Examine Gandhi’s non-cooperation movement from a philosophical perspective. (125 Words) [UPPSC 2019]
Kant's Doctrine of 'Duty for Duty's Sake' and Its Role in Civil Services 1. Understanding Kant's Doctrine: Kant's doctrine of 'duty for duty's sake' is a central concept in Immanuel Kant's moral philosophy. It asserts that individuals should perform their duties based on a sense of moral obligationRead more
Kant’s Doctrine of ‘Duty for Duty’s Sake’ and Its Role in Civil Services
1. Understanding Kant’s Doctrine: Kant’s doctrine of ‘duty for duty’s sake’ is a central concept in Immanuel Kant’s moral philosophy. It asserts that individuals should perform their duties based on a sense of moral obligation rather than personal desires or consequences. According to Kant, actions are morally right if they are performed out of respect for the moral law and the principle of duty itself, irrespective of the outcomes.
2. Role of This Principle in Civil Services:
- Upholding Ethical Standards: In civil services, adhering to duty for duty’s sake ensures that officials act with integrity and honesty, prioritizing ethical standards over personal gains or external pressures. For example, the Satyam Scam revealed the failure of ethical standards in corporate governance, underscoring the need for civil servants to act according to moral principles, not influenced by corruption.
- Commitment to Public Welfare: This doctrine reinforces a commitment to public service and the well-being of citizens. During the COVID-19 pandemic, health officials and administrators worked tirelessly, driven by a sense of duty to safeguard public health, demonstrating commitment irrespective of personal risk or recognition.
- Fairness and Impartiality: It promotes fairness and impartiality in decision-making. For instance, the implementation of the Right to Information (RTI) Act requires officials to ensure transparency and accountability, guided by the principle of duty rather than convenience or pressure from external entities.
3. Conclusion: Kant’s principle of ‘duty for duty’s sake’ serves as a guiding framework for civil servants to act ethically and impartially, ensuring that their actions are driven by a commitment to moral duty and public service rather than personal interests or external rewards.
See less
Philosophical Perspective of Gandhi's Non-Cooperation Movement Principle of Satyagraha: Gandhi's Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-22) was rooted in the philosophy of Satyagraha, which emphasizes non-violent resistance as a means to achieve political and social goals. Gandhi believed that true strengthRead more
Philosophical Perspective of Gandhi’s Non-Cooperation Movement
Principle of Satyagraha: Gandhi’s Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-22) was rooted in the philosophy of Satyagraha, which emphasizes non-violent resistance as a means to achieve political and social goals. Gandhi believed that true strength lay in adhering to truth and non-violence, rejecting violent or coercive methods.
Ethical and Moral Framework: The movement was a manifestation of moral and ethical commitment to justice. Gandhi argued that passive resistance against British colonial rule was a moral duty, aligning with the principle of non-violence and the pursuit of truth.
Empowerment and Self-Reliance: Philosophically, the movement sought to empower the common people and foster self-reliance. By promoting boycotts of British goods and institutions, Gandhi aimed to cultivate national self-respect and economic independence, encouraging Indians to rely on their own resources.
Recent Example: Gandhi’s principles continue to influence modern movements. For example, the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) reflects his ethos of self-reliance and empowerment by providing guaranteed employment to rural workers.
Conclusion: Gandhi’s Non-Cooperation Movement, viewed philosophically, was a profound application of non-violence and moral resistance, aimed at empowering the masses and promoting self-reliance.
See less