Home/uppsc: moral thinkers & philosophers
- Recent Questions
- Most Answered
- Answers
- No Answers
- Most Visited
- Most Voted
- Random
- Bump Question
- New Questions
- Sticky Questions
- Polls
- Followed Questions
- Favorite Questions
- Recent Questions With Time
- Most Answered With Time
- Answers With Time
- No Answers With Time
- Most Visited With Time
- Most Voted With Time
- Random With Time
- Bump Question With Time
- New Questions With Time
- Sticky Questions With Time
- Polls With Time
- Followed Questions With Time
- Favorite Questions With Time
"Kan's ethics is formalist and rigorist." Critically examine this view and evaluate the importance of Kantain ethical principles in moral life. (200 Words) [UPPSC 2018]
Kant's Ethics: Formalist and Rigorist Examination 1. Formalist Nature: Kant’s ethics is often described as formalist because it emphasizes the form of moral laws rather than their content. According to Kant, moral actions are judged based on adherence to universal maxims rather than consequences. FoRead more
Kant’s Ethics: Formalist and Rigorist Examination
1. Formalist Nature: Kant’s ethics is often described as formalist because it emphasizes the form of moral laws rather than their content. According to Kant, moral actions are judged based on adherence to universal maxims rather than consequences. For example, Kant’s Categorical Imperative requires that actions be guided by principles that could be universally applied. This formalism ensures that moral rules are objective and not subject to personal desires or situational variables.
2. Rigorist Nature: Kant’s ethical framework is also considered rigorist due to its strict adherence to duty and moral law. Kantian ethics demands that individuals act according to duty alone, without regard to the consequences. This rigorism can be seen in Kant’s assertion that lying is always wrong, regardless of circumstances or potential benefits. For instance, the case of the murderer at the door, where Kant would argue against lying to protect someone, highlights the inflexibility in his ethical system.
Importance in Moral Life:
1. Universalizability: Kant’s principles underscore the importance of universalizability, ensuring that moral actions are applicable to everyone. This concept is crucial in modern ethical discussions, such as human rights, which are based on the idea that all individuals deserve equal respect and consideration.
2. Respect for Individuals: Kantian ethics emphasizes treating individuals as ends in themselves rather than means to an end. This principle supports contemporary ethical practices, such as ethical business conduct and respect for personal autonomy, ensuring that individuals are valued and not exploited.
3. Moral Consistency: The rigorist nature of Kantian ethics provides a foundation for moral consistency and integrity. It helps individuals navigate complex moral dilemmas by adhering to clear, universal principles rather than fluctuating with consequences.
In conclusion, while Kant’s ethics may seem rigid and formalist, its emphasis on universal moral laws and respect for individuals plays a significant role in shaping contemporary ethical standards and practices.
See lessExamine the ethical and social ideas of Gandhi. (125 Words) [UPPSC 2018]
Ethical and Social Ideas of Gandhi 1. Ethical Philosophy: Gandhi’s ethical ideas centered on non-violence (Ahimsa) and truth (Satyagraha). He believed that non-violence was the highest ethical principle and a necessary condition for moral living. For instance, during the Salt March (1930), Gandhi leRead more
Ethical and Social Ideas of Gandhi
1. Ethical Philosophy: Gandhi’s ethical ideas centered on non-violence (Ahimsa) and truth (Satyagraha). He believed that non-violence was the highest ethical principle and a necessary condition for moral living. For instance, during the Salt March (1930), Gandhi led a non-violent protest against British salt taxes, showcasing his commitment to peaceful resistance.
2. Social Reform: Gandhi advocated for social equality and caste abolition. He was a proponent of the Harijan Movement, aimed at improving the conditions of the lower castes. His efforts in Champaran (1917) highlighted his commitment to alleviating rural distress and promoting farmers’ rights.
3. Self-Reliance and Rural Development: He promoted self-reliance through Khadi and village industries to reduce dependency on British goods. His vision of village republics aimed at decentralized, sustainable development, which he emphasized in his writings and speeches.
Gandhi’s ethical and social ideas remain influential in discussions on non-violence and social justice today.
See lessExamine the role of social and political ideas of Karl Marx in the field of contemporary public services. (200 Words) [UPPSC 2019]
Role of Karl Marx's Social and Political Ideas in Contemporary Public Services 1. Marx’s Concept of Class Struggle Karl Marx’s theory of class struggle underscores the conflict between different social classes, primarily between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class).Read more
Role of Karl Marx’s Social and Political Ideas in Contemporary Public Services
1. Marx’s Concept of Class Struggle
Karl Marx’s theory of class struggle underscores the conflict between different social classes, primarily between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the proletariat (working class). This idea has influenced contemporary public services by highlighting the need for social equity and workers’ rights. For instance, in countries with strong labor unions, such as Germany, policies and public services are shaped to protect worker rights and ensure fair wages, reflecting Marx’s concern for the working class.
2. State as an Instrument of Class Interests
Marx argued that the state serves the interests of the ruling class. This concept is evident in contemporary public services where debates often arise about the extent to which public services serve the general populace versus the interests of powerful elites. For example, in the U.S., the privatization of public services such as healthcare and education has led to concerns about inequality and the prioritization of profit over public welfare, reflecting Marx’s critique of state mechanisms serving elite interests.
3. Public Services as a Tool for Social Change
Marx envisioned that public services could be instrumental in achieving a more equitable society. This perspective has influenced modern policies aimed at reducing social inequalities through public welfare programs. In India, schemes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) aim to provide economic security and reduce poverty, aligning with Marx’s idea of using state mechanisms to support the working class.
4. Redistribution of Resources
Marx’s advocacy for the redistribution of wealth to address economic disparities is mirrored in contemporary social policies that aim to reduce inequality. For instance, progressive taxation and welfare programs in Scandinavian countries are designed to redistribute resources and provide universal access to public services, reflecting Marx’s ideals of a more equitable society.
In summary, Karl Marx’s social and political ideas continue to influence contemporary public services by advocating for class equality, critiquing the role of the state, and promoting resource redistribution to address social inequalities.
See lessConsider the non-cooperation movement of Gandhi from the philosophical point of view. (125 Words) [UPPSC 2019]
Philosophical Perspective of Gandhi's Non-Cooperation Movement Principle of Satyagraha: Gandhi's Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-22) was rooted in the philosophy of Satyagraha, which emphasizes non-violent resistance as a means to achieve political and social goals. Gandhi believed that true strengthRead more
Philosophical Perspective of Gandhi’s Non-Cooperation Movement
Principle of Satyagraha: Gandhi’s Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-22) was rooted in the philosophy of Satyagraha, which emphasizes non-violent resistance as a means to achieve political and social goals. Gandhi believed that true strength lay in adhering to truth and non-violence, rejecting violent or coercive methods.
Ethical and Moral Framework: The movement was a manifestation of moral and ethical commitment to justice. Gandhi argued that passive resistance against British colonial rule was a moral duty, aligning with the principle of non-violence and the pursuit of truth.
Empowerment and Self-Reliance: Philosophically, the movement sought to empower the common people and foster self-reliance. By promoting boycotts of British goods and institutions, Gandhi aimed to cultivate national self-respect and economic independence, encouraging Indians to rely on their own resources.
Recent Example: Gandhi’s principles continue to influence modern movements. For example, the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) reflects his ethos of self-reliance and empowerment by providing guaranteed employment to rural workers.
Conclusion: Gandhi’s Non-Cooperation Movement, viewed philosophically, was a profound application of non-violence and moral resistance, aimed at empowering the masses and promoting self-reliance.
See lessWhat is Kant's doctrine of 'duty for duty's sake'? What is the role of this principle in civil services? Discuss. (200 Words) [UPPSC 2020]
Kant's Doctrine of 'Duty for Duty's Sake' and Its Role in Civil Services 1. Understanding Kant's Doctrine: Kant's doctrine of 'duty for duty's sake' is a central concept in Immanuel Kant's moral philosophy. It asserts that individuals should perform their duties based on a sense of moral obligationRead more
Kant’s Doctrine of ‘Duty for Duty’s Sake’ and Its Role in Civil Services
1. Understanding Kant’s Doctrine: Kant’s doctrine of ‘duty for duty’s sake’ is a central concept in Immanuel Kant’s moral philosophy. It asserts that individuals should perform their duties based on a sense of moral obligation rather than personal desires or consequences. According to Kant, actions are morally right if they are performed out of respect for the moral law and the principle of duty itself, irrespective of the outcomes.
2. Role of This Principle in Civil Services:
3. Conclusion: Kant’s principle of ‘duty for duty’s sake’ serves as a guiding framework for civil servants to act ethically and impartially, ensuring that their actions are driven by a commitment to moral duty and public service rather than personal interests or external rewards.
See less