Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Introduce the shared similarities between the Communist regimes in China and the USSR: Both adopted Marxist-Leninist ideology and one-party systems. Both underwent revolutions (Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 for the USSR, Chinese Revolution and Civil War for China leading to ...
Of course, there is always a question of whether haGH democracy and hyper-capitalism go hand in hand. As a rule, democracy and capitalism are different partners, although they often mean alike; at the same time, hypercapitalism can pose a danger to democratic values. Patholoygical hyper-capitalism wRead more
Of course, there is always a question of whether haGH democracy and hyper-capitalism go hand in hand. As a rule, democracy and capitalism are different partners, although they often mean alike; at the same time, hypercapitalism can pose a danger to democratic values.
Patholoygical hyper-capitalism where there is excessive greed for wealth, increased polarization of income inequality, undue influence by business corporations, and lack of regulation erodes democracy through: This preserves inequity with regards to economic resources placing legislative control in the hands of few rich individuals, who are able to fund their political campaigns and lobby the system, thus offering skewed policy ideal for the wealthy as opposed to the public good.
In this context, hyper-capitalism can be explained because society is divided into the rich and the poor and their possibilities of life are as different as the immediate outcome of the process. That eventually results in social disorder, political crisis, and a decline in confidence in democracy.
However, this paper should demonstrate that there are conditions in which democracy and capitalism can socially coexist and not only sustainably evolve but also complement each other. One can find that higher and powerful regulations, progressive taxation, and social welfare systems can help to reduce the effects of the negative side of hyper-capitalism and make economic growth more inclusive. That is, strong and effective civil society, engaged citizens, and a vibrant and independent media are key to curbing dominance of other interests-and for sustaining democracy.
That is, hyper-capitalism is tightly connected with democracy as the interdependence between the two concepts has been balanced. Capitalism promotes or stimulates economic growth, innovation, and investment, but equally important, all this should not diminish the fundamental elements of democracy: democracy, respect for the rights of others, equality, fairness and respect for the rule or law. And thus, achieving the balance, the input and output factors, it is feasible to construct a society in which the people of that society are at one end beneficial economically as well as socially satisfied.
See less
Model Answer Reasons Why Communism Persisted in China but Not in the USSR 1. Reformist Approaches In China, under Deng Xiaoping, economic reforms were gradually implemented while maintaining the one-party system. These reforms allowed private ownership and market activity but avoided political liberRead more
Model Answer
Reasons Why Communism Persisted in China but Not in the USSR
1. Reformist Approaches
In China, under Deng Xiaoping, economic reforms were gradually implemented while maintaining the one-party system. These reforms allowed private ownership and market activity but avoided political liberalization, keeping the Communist Party’s authority intact. In contrast, the USSR under Mikhail Gorbachev introduced both economic (Perestroika) and political reforms (Glasnost) simultaneously, including multi-party elections. This openness led to democratization and eventually the disintegration of the Soviet Union, as the reforms weakened central control and allowed for the rise of independence movements in Soviet republicsourse Correction**
China’s leadership, particularly Mao Zedong, took timely corrective actions following the failures of campaigns like the Great Leap Forward. After the 100 Flowers Campaign in 1956-57, which revealed discontent, Mao adjusted policies to focus more on agricultural economy and market socialism. In contrast, Soviet Communism failed to adapt to the changing needs of its economy, which led to stagnation and a lack of popular support .
3. odels
China’s model emphasized decentralized industrialization and a focus on agriculture, which allowed for some degree of economic flexibility. On the other hand, the USSR focused heavily on centralized, state-run industries and engaged in costly Cold War conflicts, which drained resources and worsened the economic crisis .
4. Popular S National Identity
China benefited from a more homogeneous society with around 92% Han Chinese population, which allowed the CCP to forge a stronger national identity through Confucian values. Meanwhile, the USSR’s diverse ethnic composition (with Russians making up only 51% of the population) led to issues of national identity, and the Soviet model’s failure to address ethnic diversity contributed to the weakening of the union .
5. Repression
Deated a willingness to use force to suppress protests, such as during the Tiananmen Square incident in 1989. Conversely, Gorbachev was more sympathetic to the autonomy of Soviet republics, which led to a weakening of central authority and contributed to the collapse of the USSR .
In summary, China’s ability to adapt ecowhile maintaining strict political control allowed Communism to endure, whereas the USSR’s simultaneous political and economic reforms ultimately led to its downfall.
See less