Why was there a sudden spurt in famines in colonial India since the mid-eighteenth century? Give reasons.
The Santhal Hul, also known as the Sonthal Rebellion or Santhal Rebellion, was a significant uprising that took place in 1855-1856 in the eastern Indian state of Bihar and parts of present-day Jharkhand, Odisha, and West Bengal. While it is often referred to as an anti-British revolt, it was actuallRead more
The Santhal Hul, also known as the Sonthal Rebellion or Santhal Rebellion, was a significant uprising that took place in 1855-1856 in the eastern Indian state of Bihar and parts of present-day Jharkhand, Odisha, and West Bengal. While it is often referred to as an anti-British revolt, it was actually a rebellion against the exploitative policies and practices of both the British colonial government and the local zamindars (feudal lords) who were collaborating with the British.
- The Santhals, a tribal community, had traditionally lived in the region for centuries, practicing shifting cultivation and subsistence farming. However, with the arrival of the British, their lands were forcibly taken away and given to the zamindars, who then collected taxes from the Santhals. The British East India Company also imposed taxes on the Santhals, further exacerbating their economic hardships.
- The Santhals, who were already struggling to survive, felt that they were being exploited by both the British and the zamindars. They resented the forced labor, land grabs, and exorbitant taxes imposed on them. The British, on the other hand, saw the Santhals as ” primitives” and “uncivilized,” and believed that they needed to be “civilized” and brought under their control.
- The spark that ignited the rebellion was the death of a Santhal leader named Tilka Manjhi’s daughter-in-law at the hands of a British officer. This incident led to widespread outrage among the Santhals, who saw it as an example of British brutality. They decided to take up arms against both the British and the zamindars.
- The rebellion was led by Tilka Manjhi’s son, Birsa Munda, who was only 22 years old at the time. He rallied thousands of Santhals and launched a series of attacks on British army posts, police stations, and estates belonging to the zamindars. The rebels also destroyed crops and infrastructure built by the British.
- The British responded with force, and the rebellion was brutally suppressed. Many Santhals were killed or injured, and thousands were imprisoned or forced to flee into hiding. Birsa Munda was captured and executed in 1895.
- However, the Santhal Hul was not just an anti-British revolt; it was also a resistance against local exploitation by the zamindars. The rebellion highlighted the deep-seated grievances of the Santhals against both colonialism and feudalism. It also marked a turning point in their struggle for self-determination and their fight against economic exploitation.
- In many ways, the Santhal Hul can be seen as a precursor to later movements for tribal rights and self-rule in India. It showed that even marginalized communities could organize themselves and resist oppression when pushed to the limits. The rebellion also inspired other tribal communities in India to challenge colonialism and demand their rights.
[caption id="attachment_68808" align="aligncenter" width="300"] Famine during colonial era[/caption] There was a sudden surge in famines during colonial rule, mainly in the mid-eighteenth century. That was not the first time India saw famines, but colonial rule and its exploitative policies made conRead more
Famine during colonial era
There was a sudden surge in famines during colonial rule, mainly in the mid-eighteenth century. That was not the first time India saw famines, but colonial rule and its exploitative policies made conditions worse for the people of India, resulting in an uncountable number of deaths.
There were several reasons why famines saw a sudden spurt during colonial rule.
1. Colonial policies that were exploitive in nature, like the heavy taxes, and policies like the permanent settlement, which hurt farmers.
2. The farming methods of the people were not modern, and farmers had to depend on one cash crop that could fulfil the British tax requirement.
3. British trade policies like heavy taxes on Indian goods and exporting all raw materials outside resulted in the destruction of local markets and the handicrafts industry, leaving people with no money to survive during famine-like situations. And when they started exporting food grains outside the country, there was no food left for people to have during famines.
4. Under colonial rule, no arrangements were made to prepare for famines, which made the condition worse when famine hit.
5. Natural calamities like drought and flood made the situation of farmers worse as they didn’t have any modern irrigation techniques and, in this situation, had to pay taxes to Britishers, which made the farmers starve to death.
See less