Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Introduce the ‘Moderates’ as a faction within the Indian nationalist movement during the late nineteenth century. Briefly state their ideology centered on political reforms within British rule. Mention the failure to gain widespread conviction by the end of the ...
The Emergence of Radical and Militant Strands: A Turning Point in the Nationalist Movement Background: The Indian nationalist movement, which began as a moderate and peaceful movement, underwent a significant transformation in the early 20th century. The emergence of radical and militant strands witRead more
The Emergence of Radical and Militant Strands: A Turning Point in the Nationalist Movement
Background:
The Indian nationalist movement, which began as a moderate and peaceful movement, underwent a significant transformation in the early 20th century. The emergence of radical and militant strands within the movement marked a significant shift in its trajectory.
Radical and Militant Strands:
The radical and militant strands within the nationalist movement were characterized by:
- Extremism: A willingness to adopt extreme measures to achieve independence, including violence and terrorism.
- Nationalism: A strong emphasis on nationalism, often accompanied by a sense of urgency and desperation.
- Secularism: A rejection of religious orthodoxy and a focus on secular ideologies.
Key Players:
Some notable leaders who exemplified these radical and militant strands include:
- Subhas Chandra Bose: A charismatic leader who believed in the use of force to achieve independence. He founded the Indian National Army (INA) and led it in the fight against British colonial rule.
- Sukhdev Thapar: A revolutionary who believed in the use of violence to achieve independence. He was hanged for his involvement in the Lahore Conspiracy Case.
Impact on the Trajectory:
The emergence of radical and militant strands within the nationalist movement had significant consequences:
- Division: The movement became increasingly divided, with moderates and radicals having differing views on the use of force and violence.
- Terrorism: The use of violence and terrorism by some radical groups led to a cycle of violence and repression, which further polarized the movement.
- International Condemnation: The movement’s increasing reliance on violence and terrorism led to international condemnation, which undermined its legitimacy.
Model Answer Introduction The 'Moderates' were a significant faction within the Indian nationalist movement during the late nineteenth century, advocating for political reforms within the British colonial framework. However, by the end of the century, they struggled to garner widespread support forRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The ‘Moderates’ were a significant faction within the Indian nationalist movement during the late nineteenth century, advocating for political reforms within the British colonial framework. However, by the end of the century, they struggled to garner widespread support for their ideology and political goals.
Limited Objectives
One of the primary reasons for the Moderates’ failure was their limited objectives. They aimed for reforms rather than complete independence, which made their goals less appealing to many Indians seeking total freedom from British rule. This cautious approach failed to resonate with a population increasingly frustrated with colonial oppression.
Constitutional Methods
The Moderates embraced constitutional methods and peaceful agitation, employing petitions, memorandums, and speeches to achieve their goals. However, this approach was perceived as weak and ineffective by many Indians who desired more direct and assertive actions against British rule. The belief that reform could be achieved through dialogue was seen as naïve, especially in the face of mounting repression.
Lack of Mass Support
The Moderate leadership primarily consisted of educated urban elites, lacking deep connections with the rural majority of India. This disconnect hindered their ability to mobilize support across diverse social strata, limiting their appeal and effectiveness.
Economic Issues
The Moderates also failed to adequately address the dire economic hardships faced by the Indian populace, such as widespread poverty and exploitative economic policies. Their focus on political reforms overlooked the immediate socio-economic concerns of many Indians, further alienating potential supporters.
Rise of Extremism
The emergence of leaders like Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Lala Lajpat Rai, who advocated for more aggressive measures to achieve independence, resonated with a disillusioned populace. This shift towards extremism indicated a growing impatience with the Moderates’ approach.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the Moderates’ inability to connect with the aspirations of the majority of Indians—who sought more radical and assertive means to achieve independence—led to their failure to carry conviction. Their approach was perceived as ineffective and out of touch, paving the way for more militant factions within the nationalist movement.
See less