Home/upsc: growth nationalism india (1858-1905)
- Recent Questions
- Most Answered
- Answers
- No Answers
- Most Visited
- Most Voted
- Random
- Bump Question
- New Questions
- Sticky Questions
- Polls
- Followed Questions
- Favorite Questions
- Recent Questions With Time
- Most Answered With Time
- Answers With Time
- No Answers With Time
- Most Visited With Time
- Most Voted With Time
- Random With Time
- Bump Question With Time
- New Questions With Time
- Sticky Questions With Time
- Polls With Time
- Followed Questions With Time
- Favorite Questions With Time
Discuss the lasting implications of Lord Curzon's policies on the national movement in India. (200 words)
Model Answer Introduction Lord Curzon served as Viceroy of India from 1899 to 1905, and his tenure was marked by significant and controversial policies that had enduring effects on the Indian national movement. These policies inadvertently strengthened nationalist sentiments, catalyzing the push forRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Lord Curzon served as Viceroy of India from 1899 to 1905, and his tenure was marked by significant and controversial policies that had enduring effects on the Indian national movement. These policies inadvertently strengthened nationalist sentiments, catalyzing the push for independence.
Key Policies and Their Implications
1. Partition of Bengal (1905)
The partition of Bengal along communal lines was perceived as a “divide and rule” strategy aimed at weakening nationalism.
2. Universities Act (1904)
This act placed major universities under increased government control, ostensibly to improve standards.
3. Official Secrets Act (1904)
The Act imposed severe restrictions on press freedom, targeting writings deemed seditious.
4. Ancient Monuments Protection Act (1904)
This act gave the government authority over India’s cultural heritage, seen as an appropriation of Indian identity.
5. Infrastructure and Modernization
Curzon initiated various infrastructure projects, including the formation of a railway commission.
6. Calcutta Corporation Act (1899)
This act reduced elected representatives in the Calcutta Corporation, limiting Indian self-governance.
7. Attitude Towards Princely States
Curzon aimed to maintain the autonomy of princely states, which hindered political unification efforts.
Conclusion
Lord Curzon’s policies, intended to curb nationalism, ironically became catalysts for its growth. His tenure marked a significant shift from moderate to assertive nationalism, uniting diverse groups against colonial rule and setting the stage for the Indian freedom struggle.
See lessHow did Indian nationalism develop in response to colonial policies? (200 words)
Model Answer Introduction Indian nationalism emerged as a powerful reaction against British colonial policies, deeply intertwined with the anti-colonial movement. The shared experience of oppression under colonial rule fostered a sense of unity among diverse groups in India. Emergence of Indian NatiRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Indian nationalism emerged as a powerful reaction against British colonial policies, deeply intertwined with the anti-colonial movement. The shared experience of oppression under colonial rule fostered a sense of unity among diverse groups in India.
Emergence of Indian Nationalism
1. Segregation and Discrimination
British policies of segregation sparked widespread opposition.
2. Political and Administrative Divide
The Partition of Bengal in 1905, orchestrated by Viceroy Lord Curzon, intensified nationalist sentiments.
3. Technological Unification
The British introduced railways and telegraphs primarily for military logistics.
4. Legal Unification
The establishment of a unified judiciary and codified laws created a new dimension of political unity.
5. Western Thought and Education
The introduction of modern education allowed the assimilation of Western ideas.
6. Rise of the Middle Class Intelligentsia
British economic policies led to the emergence of a new urban middle class.
Other Influential Factors
Conclusion
Indian nationalism was not solely a product of colonial policies; it arose as a complex interplay of reactions to these policies and broader socio-political movements. The emergence of a unified national identity was shaped by both the oppressive nature of colonial rule and the diverse responses it provoked across India.
See lessHow would you describe Lord Ripon as a relatively progressive Viceroy of India? (200 words)
Model Answer Lord Ripon as a Progressive Viceroy of India Lord Ripon, who served as the Viceroy of India from 1880 to 1884, is widely regarded as one of the most progressive British rulers in India due to his reforms that spanned social, economic, and political spheres. His tenure was marked by a reRead more
Model Answer
Lord Ripon as a Progressive Viceroy of India
Lord Ripon, who served as the Viceroy of India from 1880 to 1884, is widely regarded as one of the most progressive British rulers in India due to his reforms that spanned social, economic, and political spheres. His tenure was marked by a response to the challenges faced by India, such as widespread famine, regressive taxation, and growing anti-imperialist sentiment. His actions aimed to improve the lives of Indians and address the grievances of the time.
Key Reforms Initiated by Lord Ripon
Due to these efforts, Lord Ripon is remembered as a compassionate and progressive Viceroy who worked towards the welfare of Indians and the reform of India’s administrative system. His policies laid the groundwork for future self-governance and a more inclusive approach to governance.
See lessWhat changes occurred in the administration and army of the British colonial government in India after the Revolt of 1857? (200 words)
Model Answer The Revolt of 1857 led to significant changes in the British administration and army in India, reflecting the British government's response to the rebellion and its efforts to maintain control. Changes in the Administration Transfer of Power: The Government of India Act, 1858, marked thRead more
Model Answer
The Revolt of 1857 led to significant changes in the British administration and army in India, reflecting the British government’s response to the rebellion and its efforts to maintain control.
Changes in the Administration
The Government of India Act, 1858, marked the transfer of power from the East India Company to the British Crown. Queen Victoria was declared the sovereign of British India, and the administration was now to be overseen by a Secretary of State for India, supported by a Council. The Governor-General of India, now titled Viceroy, continued to administer the country (source: Government of India Act, 1858).
The Indian Councils Act of 1861 brought decentralisation to the provincial level. It established Legislative Councils in major provinces like Bombay, Madras, and Bengal, which helped distribute authority across local governments (source: Indian Councils Act, 1861).
Following the financial strains of the revolt, the British promoted local governance through Municipalities and District Boards. Additionally, the Indian Civil Service, previously an exclusive British institution, was opened to Indians, allowing them to take competitive exams for administrative posts (source: administrative reforms after 1857).
Changes in the Army
To prevent future uprisings, the British restructured the army, increasing the proportion of European soldiers. European troops were placed in key military positions, especially in artillery, tanks, and armoured corps, which were kept under European control (source: army reorganisation after 1857).
The British adopted a “divide and rule” strategy in recruiting Indian soldiers, focusing on caste, religion, and regional differences to prevent unity among the Indian troops. They introduced caste-based regiments and communal companies, ensuring the army remained divided and loyal to British interests (source: army recruitment policies post-1857).
These reforms made the British rule more autocratic, suppressing Indian aspirations for power-sharing. Ultimately, this approach contributed to the rise of modern nationalism among the educated Indian middle class.
See lessWhy did the ‘Moderates’ fail to carry conviction with the nation about their proclaimed ideology and political goals by the end of the nineteenth century? (150 words) [UPSC 2017]
Reasons for the Failure of the Moderates to Convince the Nation By the end of the nineteenth century, the 'Moderates' in Indian politics failed to gain widespread support for their ideology and goals due to several reasons: **1. Ineffectiveness of Reforms The Moderates, led by figures like DadabhaiRead more
Reasons for the Failure of the Moderates to Convince the Nation
By the end of the nineteenth century, the ‘Moderates’ in Indian politics failed to gain widespread support for their ideology and goals due to several reasons:
**1. Ineffectiveness of Reforms
The Moderates, led by figures like Dadabhai Naoroji and Gopal Krishna Gokhale, advocated for gradual reforms and constitutional methods. However, the limited reforms offered by the British, such as the Indian Councils Act of 1892, were insufficient in addressing the pressing needs of the Indian masses. For example, the 1892 Act only marginally increased Indian representation but failed to address core issues like self-governance and economic exploitation.
**2. Economic Exploitation
The economic policies of the British Raj, including heavy taxation and land revenue systems, led to widespread poverty and economic distress. The Moderate leaders’ focus on constitutional reforms was seen as inadequate in addressing the dire economic conditions, evident from the famines of the 1890s that devastated large parts of India.
**3. Political Apathy and Discontent
The general public’s growing discontent with British rule, driven by increasing political awareness and socio-economic hardships, made the Moderate approach seem overly conservative. The rise of extremist leaders, like Bal Gangadhar Tilak, who demanded more radical changes, reflected the shift in public sentiment towards more assertive forms of resistance.
**4. Lack of Mass Mobilization
The Moderates failed to connect with the broader masses and lacked a strong grassroots support base. Their emphasis on petitions and reforms did not resonate with the rising tide of nationalist sentiment that sought immediate and substantial changes.
These factors contributed to the decline in the Moderates’ influence and paved the way for more radical approaches in the early 20th century.
See lessEvaluate the policies of Lord Curzon and their long term implications on the national movement. (150 words)[UPSC 2020]
Policies of Lord Curzon and Their Long-Term Implications Lord Curzon, British Viceroy of India from 1899 to 1905, implemented several policies that significantly impacted the Indian national movement. Partition of Bengal (1905): Curzon's decision to partition Bengal on religious lines aimed to weakeRead more
Policies of Lord Curzon and Their Long-Term Implications
Lord Curzon, British Viceroy of India from 1899 to 1905, implemented several policies that significantly impacted the Indian national movement.
In summary, while Curzon’s policies were designed to consolidate British control and suppress nationalist activities, they inadvertently contributed to the growth of the national movement by fueling resistance and fostering a sense of national identity.
See lessDiscuss the role of the Indian National Congress in shaping the early nationalist movement and its evolving political agenda.
The Indian National Congress (INC) played a crucial role in shaping the early nationalist movement in India. Founded in 1885 by A.O. Hume, a British civil servant, the INC was initially an elite, liberal, and constitutionalist organization that sought to address Indian grievances within the frameworRead more
The Indian National Congress (INC) played a crucial role in shaping the early nationalist movement in India. Founded in 1885 by A.O. Hume, a British civil servant, the INC was initially an elite, liberal, and constitutionalist organization that sought to address Indian grievances within the framework of British colonial rule. Over time, the INC evolved to become a more radical and democratic force, playing a key role in shaping India’s nationalist movement and its political agenda.
Early Years (1885-1905):
Split and Radicalization (1905-1917):
Gandhi’s Leadership (1917-1947):
Evolving Political Agenda:
- From constitutionalism to revolution: The INC’s political agenda evolved from advocating for constitutional reforms to demanding independence from British rule.
- From elite to mass mobilization: The organization expanded its reach beyond the elite to mobilize the masses through non-violent resistance and civil disobedience.
- From economic grievances to full-fledged independence: The INC’s focus shifted from addressing economic grievances to demanding full independence for India.
See lessAssess the significance of the attainment of self-government in the provinces and the consequent impact on the nationalist aspirations.
The Significance of Attaining Self-Government in the Provinces The attainment of self-government in the provinces was a crucial step in the Indian nationalist movement. It marked a significant shift towards decentralization and autonomy, which had a profound impact on the nationalist aspirations ofRead more
The Significance of Attaining Self-Government in the Provinces
The attainment of self-government in the provinces was a crucial step in the Indian nationalist movement. It marked a significant shift towards decentralization and autonomy, which had a profound impact on the nationalist aspirations of the Indian people.
Key Points:
Consequent Impact on Nationalist Aspirations:
Recent Examples:
- Tamil Nadu’s Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission (TNERC): Established in 1998, TNERC is an independent regulatory body that has been instrumental in promoting transparency and accountability in the power sector.
- Kerala’s Left Democratic Front (LDF): Elected in 2016, the LDF government has been committed to implementing progressive policies, such as universal healthcare and free education.
- Uttar Pradesh’s Samajwadi Party (SP) Government: Elected in 2012, the SP government implemented several populist measures, including the distribution of free laptops and smartphones.
See lessEvaluate the British response to the growing nationalist movement, including the introduction of reformist policies and methods of repression.
British Response to the Growing Nationalist Movement: A Review Introduction: The British response to the growing nationalist movement in India was a combination of reformist policies and methods of repression. The British government aimed to pacify the nationalist movement and maintain their coloniaRead more
British Response to the Growing Nationalist Movement: A Review
Introduction:
The British response to the growing nationalist movement in India was a combination of reformist policies and methods of repression. The British government aimed to pacify the nationalist movement and maintain their colonial control over India.
Reformist Policies:
The British government introduced various reformist policies to address the grievances of the Indian people and pacify the nationalist movement. These included:
Methods of Repression:
The British government also employed various methods of repression to crush the nationalist movement. These included:
Recent Examples:
- Operation Blue Star (1984): The Indian Army’s military operation in Amritsar’s Golden Temple complex, which resulted in the deaths of hundreds of Sikhs and damaged the temple.
- Tehelka Scandal (2001): A sting operation by Tehelka magazine exposed widespread corruption among Indian politicians and bureaucrats.
- 2013 Anti-Terrorism Act: The Indian government introduced an anti-terrorism act, which allowed for indefinite detention and torture of suspects.
See lessAssess the significance of the Partition of Bengal and the subsequent Swadeshi movement in galvanizing mass participation in the nationalist struggle.
Significance of the Partition of Bengal and the Swadeshi Movement in Galvanizing Mass Participation in the Nationalist Struggle 1. The Partition of Bengal (1905): Context and Impact The Partition of Bengal was implemented by Lord Curzon in 1905 under the guise of administrative convenience but was aRead more
Significance of the Partition of Bengal and the Swadeshi Movement in Galvanizing Mass Participation in the Nationalist Struggle
1. The Partition of Bengal (1905): Context and Impact
The Partition of Bengal was implemented by Lord Curzon in 1905 under the guise of administrative convenience but was aimed at dividing the Bengali-speaking population along communal lines. This move was perceived as an attempt to weaken the nationalist movement by creating discord between Hindus and Muslims.
Impact on Nationalist Sentiment:
2. The Swadeshi Movement (1905-1911): Objectives and Achievements
In response to the partition, the Swadeshi Movement emerged as a direct challenge to British rule. Its core objective was to promote indigenous industries and encourage the boycott of British goods.
Mass Participation:
3. Recent Examples and Relevance
Historical Resonance: The Swadeshi movement’s emphasis on economic self-reliance and cultural revival has contemporary relevance. For instance, the recent push for ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ (Self-Reliant India) by the Indian government reflects similar principles of promoting local industries and reducing dependence on foreign goods.
Mobilization Techniques: Modern movements, such as farmer protests and anti-CAA protests, show how historical tactics of mass mobilization, public demonstrations, and broad-based participation continue to be relevant. These recent examples underline the enduring importance of collective action and grassroots involvement in addressing national issues.
See less