Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question
Home/upsc: ethics in public administration

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 23, 2024In:
  • 0

Describe what is meant by “social capital.” How does it improve the governance of good (150 words)[UPSC 2023]

upsc: ethics in public administration
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction Social capital refers to the collective value of trust, cooperation, and mutual support within a community, facilitating collaboration and resource sharing. For instance, neighbors helping each other during crises exemplifies how social bonds foster resilience and cooperatiRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    Social capital refers to the collective value of trust, cooperation, and mutual support within a community, facilitating collaboration and resource sharing. For instance, neighbors helping each other during crises exemplifies how social bonds foster resilience and cooperation.

    Understanding Social Capital

    Components of Social Capital

    Social capital comprises three integral components:

    1. Networks: Interconnected relationships among individuals that foster a sense of belonging and community.
    2. Norms: The rules, values, and expectations governing social interactions that guide behavior.
    3. Sanctions: Rewards and punishments that reinforce adherence to norms, such as praise or social disapproval.

    These components are interlinked; for example, volunteer networks can establish norms like environmental responsibility, with non-participants facing social sanctions, thereby enhancing both practices and community unity.

    Reinforcing Relationships

    The dynamics between social capital’s components are crucial for its sustainability. In closely-knit neighborhoods, regular gatherings and mutual assistance develop strong networks, promoting norms of community support and unity.

    Role of Social Capital in Enhancing Good Governance

    Trust and Accountability

    Social capital fosters trust among citizens and between citizens and their government. In India’s Panchayati Raj system, community trust helps hold elected representatives accountable, enhancing governance.

    Civic Engagement

    High social capital encourages civic engagement, as individuals actively participate in political processes. The Gram Sabha exemplifies this, facilitating informed decision-making through community participation.

    Social Cohesion

    Social capital promotes collective efforts to address challenges and foster inclusive policies. Sports teams, for instance, demonstrate how social networks can achieve common objectives, reinforcing community bonds.

    Conflict Resolution

    Communities with high social capital promote peaceful conflict resolution through negotiation and mediation. This stability is vital for good governance, as seen in property dispute resolutions that avoid lengthy legal processes.

    Reducing Corruption

    Strong social networks act as a deterrent to corruption. Self-help groups, for instance, enhance transparency and accountability in financial transactions, thereby reducing corruption at the grassroots level.

    Inclusivity

    Social capital ensures marginalized groups have a voice in governance. Cooperative societies empower farmers to collectively influence policies, improving access to resources.

    Conclusion

    Social capital is essential for effective governance. Successful policies in India, such as self-help groups and community-driven initiatives, underscore the importance of cultivating social capital. Investing in social capital-building is vital for achieving equitable and effective governance in society.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 28, 2024In: ,
  • 0

Public workers have a great deal of ethical responsibility since they manage large sums of public money, hold positions of authority, and make decisions that have a significant impact on the environment and society. What actions have you taken to ...

upsc: ethics in public administrationupsc: utilization of public funds
  1. Team
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction Public servants carry a significant ethical responsibility due to their roles in managing public resources and impacting society. To effectively handle this responsibility, enhancing ethical competence is essential. Steps to Improve Ethical Competence 1. Education and TrainRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    Public servants carry a significant ethical responsibility due to their roles in managing public resources and impacting society. To effectively handle this responsibility, enhancing ethical competence is essential.

    Steps to Improve Ethical Competence

    1. Education and Training

    Attending workshops, seminars, and training sessions helps public servants understand ethical principles and their applications in governance. Courses in ethics and law can deepen their knowledge base and enhance decision-making skills.

    Fact: Research shows that ethics training improves public officials’ decision-making and accountability (source: International City/County Management Association).

    2. Adherence to a Code of Ethics

    Public servants should commit to a code of ethics that outlines expected standards of conduct. Regular reviews and updates ensure the code reflects current best practices and societal expectations.

    Fact: A strong ethical framework within organizations leads to higher trust and better overall performance (source: Ethics & Compliance Initiative).

    3. Personal Reflection

    Engaging in regular self-reflection allows public servants to assess their values and behaviors. This practice fosters ethical awareness and helps identify areas for improvement.

    4. Consultation

    Seeking advice from colleagues, mentors, or ethical experts can provide valuable insights and reinforce sound decision-making grounded in ethical principles.

    5. Accountability and Transparency

    Public servants must be accountable for their actions and transparent in dealings with the public. A commitment to admitting mistakes and taking corrective measures enhances public trust.

    Personal Commitment to Ethical Conduct

    To improve my ethical competence, I have taken the following steps:

    • Integrity: I maintain integrity in all my actions.
    • Accountability: I am prepared to be held accountable for my decisions.
    • Honesty: I strive for honesty in both my public and private life.
    • Empathy: I remain conscious of and empathetic towards the challenges faced by others.
    • Conflict of Interest: I actively avoid conflicts of interest.
    • Public Resources: I do not misuse public resources for personal gain.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, public servants must uphold ethical standards to positively impact society and the environment. By actively improving ethical competence, public servants can navigate their responsibilities with integrity and accountability.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: September 3, 2024In:
  • 0

Answer the question in maximum 10 words. This question carries 02 marks. [MPPSC 2023] Which Administrative Reforms Commission made ethics in government a priority?

upsc: ethics in public administration
  1. Avantika Ali
    Avantika Ali Learner

    Administrative Reforms Commission and Ethics in Governance The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC), established by the Government of India in 2005, stressed the importance of ethics in governance. This commission was headed by M. Veerappa Moily and played a crucial role in recommending vaRead more

    Administrative Reforms Commission and Ethics in Governance

    The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC), established by the Government of India in 2005, stressed the importance of ethics in governance. This commission was headed by M. Veerappa Moily and played a crucial role in recommending various reforms aimed at improving the efficiency and ethical standards of governance in India.

    1. Overview of the Second Administrative Reforms Commission

    • Establishment: The Second Administrative Reforms Commission was constituted in 2005.
    • Chairperson: The commission was chaired by M. Veerappa Moily, a prominent Indian politician and former Chief Minister of Karnataka.
    • Objective: The primary aim was to suggest measures for enhancing the effectiveness of the administrative system and improving governance.

    2. Focus on Ethics in Governance

    The Second Administrative Reforms Commission placed significant emphasis on ethics in governance. The key aspects highlighted were:

    • Integrity and Transparency: The commission emphasized the need for high ethical standards among public officials to ensure transparency and integrity in public administration.
    • Anti-Corruption Measures: It recommended various strategies to curb corruption and ensure accountability in the functioning of government institutions.
    • Strengthening Institutions: Suggested reforms included strengthening institutions like the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) and the Lokpal to enhance oversight and address corruption.
    • Recent Example: The recommendations of the Second ARC influenced the enactment of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, which established the Lokpal as an anti-corruption watchdog to oversee and address corruption in high public offices.

    3. Key Recommendations by the Second ARC on Ethics

    The Second ARC’s report, titled “Promoting Ethics in Governance”, included several critical recommendations:

    • Ethics Code for Public Servants: Recommended the formulation of a comprehensive code of ethics for public servants to guide their conduct and decision-making.
    • Training and Education: Emphasized the need for regular training programs to promote ethical behavior and integrity among government officials.
    • Public Accountability: Advocated for mechanisms to ensure greater public accountability and transparency in government operations.
    • Recent Example: The establishment of ethics committees and training programs in various government departments and public sector enterprises reflects the ARC’s emphasis on ethical conduct. For instance, the Ethics Committee of the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) plays a role in promoting and enforcing ethical standards among its members.

    4. Impact and Implementation

    The recommendations of the Second ARC have had a significant impact on:

    • Policy Reforms: Many of the commission’s recommendations have been integrated into government policies and procedures to enhance ethical governance.
    • Institutional Changes: Reforms have led to the strengthening of institutions responsible for overseeing ethical practices and combating corruption.
    • Recent Example: The Digital India initiative and the introduction of various e-Governance platforms are aimed at increasing transparency and reducing opportunities for corruption, reflecting the ARC’s emphasis on ethical governance.

    Conclusion

    The Second Administrative Reforms Commission was instrumental in stressing the importance of ethics in governance. Its recommendations focused on enhancing integrity, transparency, and accountability within the public administration system. The influence of the Second ARC is evident in recent legislative and institutional reforms aimed at promoting ethical practices and combating corruption. The emphasis on ethics continues to shape governance policies and practices, ensuring a more accountable and transparent administrative system.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 27, 2024In:
  • 0

omplete resistance to compromise is one way to assess someone’s integrity. Give an example from actual life to illustrate. (150 words) [UPSC 2017]

upsc: ethics in public administration
  1. Anita Dhruw
    Anita Dhruw Legend

    Integrity is the strong observance of moral and ethical standards, even under adverse circumstances. Edward Snowden is the most poignant real-life example of that. A contractor of America by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), while at the job, Snowden discovered that the agency had mass surveiRead more

    Integrity is the strong observance of moral and ethical standards, even under adverse circumstances. Edward Snowden is the most poignant real-life example of that. A contractor of America by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), while at the job, Snowden discovered that the agency had mass surveillance programs against the citizen’s privacy and constitutional rights. However, he bore the evil consequences of this breach-the exile and imprisonment that will result from this revelation.

    It reflects how much value Edward Snowden places on principles of transparency and accountability, as weighty as the cost may be, when it refuses to be complicit in unethical practices even under pressure.The act sparked worldwide debate over privacy, government encroachment, and how security should be played off against civil liberties. Hard as it may seem, drawing a fine line between the two certainly winds up in controversy. His case, however, illustrates an adamant refusal to trade integrity for personal purposes. Thus, it is quite imperative to abide by one’s values, no matter how inconvenient life can be when acting in passion against principle.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 27, 2024In:
  • 0

Young individuals who behave morally are reluctant to enter the political sphere. Provide strategies to encourage them to come forward.

upsc: ethics in public administration
  1. Team
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The reluctance of young people in India to participate in active politics is a pressing issue. Many perceive politics as corrupt and unethical, which discourages those with strong ethical values from stepping forward. Addressing this concern requires strategic measures to iRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The reluctance of young people in India to participate in active politics is a pressing issue. Many perceive politics as corrupt and unethical, which discourages those with strong ethical values from stepping forward. Addressing this concern requires strategic measures to inspire and empower the youth.

    Steps to Motivate Young People

    1. Create a Supportive Environment

    Political parties and civil society organizations must foster a welcoming atmosphere for youth engagement. Platforms for debate and policy contributions can encourage young voices. For example, initiatives like the Aam Aadmi Party’s youth wing provide avenues for young individuals to express their opinions in politics.

    2. Increase Transparency and Accountability

    Young people are more likely to engage if they see a transparent political system. Political parties should adopt clear decision-making processes and hold representatives accountable for their actions. Research indicates that transparency enhances trust, a crucial factor for youth involvement (Bleich & Norrander, 2020).

    3. Enhance Representation

    To ensure young people’s perspectives are heard, political parties should reserve seats for youth in legislative bodies. The Bharatiya Janata Party’s youth wing, ABVP, exemplifies efforts to integrate young leaders into political discourse.

    4. Empower Youth-Led Initiatives

    Encouraging youth-led organizations can galvanize young people to participate in politics. The Yuva Bharat program launched by the Indian government empowers youth initiatives, allowing them to contribute to national development.

    5. Provide Civic Education

    Civic education is vital for equipping young people with knowledge about their rights and responsibilities. Programs like the National Service Scheme (NSS) teach civic responsibility and encourage community service, fostering a sense of political engagement.

    6. Address Barriers to Entry

    Financial constraints and lack of networks can hinder youth participation. Initiatives like the Young Women’s Leadership Program by the All India Democratic Women’s Association aim to support marginalized youth in overcoming these challenges.

    7. Increase Participation in Local Governance

    Encouraging youth to engage in local governance can build interest in broader political participation. The Chief Minister’s Youth Advisory Council in Rajasthan serves as a model for involving young people in local decision-making.

    Conclusion

    Motivating young people with ethical conduct to join active politics necessitates a comprehensive approach that includes creating supportive environments, enhancing transparency, and addressing barriers. By implementing these strategies, we can inspire the youth to take an active role in shaping the political landscape of India.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 28, 2024In:
  • 0

In general, discipline means deference to authority and order. It might, however, work against the organization. Talk about it. (150 words) [UPSC 2017]

upsc: ethics in public administration
  1. Team
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction Discipline in organizations typically signifies adherence to orders and subordination to authority. While some level of discipline is crucial for maintaining order, excessive discipline can be counter-productive, leading to inefficiencies and stifling creativity. Body 1. ExRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    Discipline in organizations typically signifies adherence to orders and subordination to authority. While some level of discipline is crucial for maintaining order, excessive discipline can be counter-productive, leading to inefficiencies and stifling creativity.

    Body

    1. Excessive Discipline in Indian Schools

    In many Indian schools, strict rules regarding dress codes, attendance, and punishments for minor infractions aim to maintain order. However, this rigidity can suppress students’ creativity and individuality. According to a study by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT), such environments can hinder critical thinking and innovation among students, as they may feel discouraged from expressing unique ideas (NCERT, 2015).

    2. The Indian Bureaucracy

    The Indian bureaucracy is characterized by a rigid hierarchy and a stringent adherence to rules. This often results in bureaucratic delays and inefficiencies, as officials prioritize compliance over finding innovative solutions. A report by the Administrative Reforms Commission notes that this inflexible approach can lead to significant delays in decision-making and service delivery (Government of India, 2008).

    3. Discipline in the Indian Military

    While discipline is paramount in the military, excessive rigidity can hinder flexibility and adaptability. Soldiers are trained to follow orders without question, which can be detrimental in dynamic situations requiring quick thinking. Research indicates that organizations with a high degree of flexibility are better equipped to respond to rapidly changing environments (Hamel & Prahalad, 1994).

    4. Manufacturing Sector Challenges

    In the Indian manufacturing sector, strict adherence to regulations can stifle innovation. Companies that prioritize compliance over creativity may struggle to compete globally, particularly as technological advancements accelerate. A report by McKinsey & Company highlights that fostering a culture of innovation is essential for maintaining competitiveness in the global market (McKinsey & Company, 2020).

    Conclusion

    While discipline is vital for organizational order and productivity, excessive discipline can be counter-productive. In the Indian context, rigid adherence to rules often stifles creativity and leads to inefficiencies. Organizations must strike a balance between discipline and flexibility to maximize productivity and achieve their goals.

    See less
Darshan Suresh
  • 0
Darshan SureshBegginer
Asked: January 11, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing I. Introduction Define objectivity and impartiality. Objectivity: Evaluating situations based on facts, evidence, and established rules, without external influence or bias. Impartiality: Acting without favoring any side, making decisions based on fairness and merit. II. Importance of Objectivity in Civil Services Fact: ...

upsc: ethics in public administration
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer 1. Objectivity in Civil Services Definition: Objectivity refers to evaluating situations and making decisions based solely on facts, evidence, and established procedures, without personal bias or external influence. Fact: Objectivity helps civil servants make decisions based on facts, nRead more

    Model Answer

    1. Objectivity in Civil Services

    Definition: Objectivity refers to evaluating situations and making decisions based solely on facts, evidence, and established procedures, without personal bias or external influence.

    • Fact: Objectivity helps civil servants make decisions based on facts, not personal opinions or preferences.
      Example: When making public appointments or awarding contracts, objectivity ensures that decisions are based on merit and not on personal relationships or biases.
    • Fact: Objectivity enhances transparency and accountability.
      Example: By following clear, evidence-based procedures, civil servants can demonstrate that their actions are justified, building trust among the public and avoiding allegations of corruption or favoritism.
    • Fact: Objectivity contributes to public trust.
      Example: When civil servants act impartially, their actions are more likely to be perceived as fair and just, which strengthens the public’s confidence in government institutions.

    2. Impartiality in Civil Services

    Definition: Impartiality means acting without bias, favoring neither side, and ensuring decisions are based solely on the merits of the case, in line with fairness and justice.

    • Fact: Impartiality allows civil servants to work effectively across different political environments.
      Example: Civil servants can serve under various political regimes while maintaining their professionalism, ensuring policies are implemented fairly regardless of political affiliation.
    • Fact: Impartiality ensures that civil servants make merit-based decisions.
      Example: When handling recruitment, procurement, or service delivery, civil servants’ impartiality ensures that decisions are made according to merit, without favoring any particular group.
    • Fact: Impartiality upholds constitutional principles such as equality, justice, and democracy.
      Example: Civil servants uphold the rule of law and ensure fairness in governance, contributing to the democratic fabric of the country.

      Conclusion

      Objectivity and impartiality are core values that enable civil services to function effectively and uphold the rule of law. These principles promote fairness, transparency, and trust, ensuring that government decisions are made in the public’s best interest and in accordance with constitutional values. Both concepts are integral in fostering a fair, just, and accountable administration.

    See less
Darshan Suresh
  • 0
Darshan SureshBegginer
Asked: January 11, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Brief Introduction to Ethical Challenges in Public Service Mention the role of public servants in ensuring effective governance and the challenges they face due to ethical considerations. Define ethical dilemmas in the context of public administration. 2. Identification of ...

upsc: ethics in public administration
  1. Team
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Ethical Challenges Faced by Public Servants in India Public servants in India often encounter several ethical dilemmas while executing their duties, where they must balance conflicting principles. Some common ethical challenges include: Economic Development vs. Environmental and Human CRead more

    Model Answer

    Ethical Challenges Faced by Public Servants in India

    Public servants in India often encounter several ethical dilemmas while executing their duties, where they must balance conflicting principles. Some common ethical challenges include:

    Economic Development vs. Environmental and Human Costs

    Public servants are often tasked with development projects that may harm the environment or lead to human displacement. For instance, the construction of dams or industrial projects may improve economic growth but may also cause pollution or displace local communities. Balancing the need for economic progress with the protection of the environment and human rights poses a significant ethical dilemma.

    Oath of Secrecy vs. Transparency

    Public servants are required to protect sensitive information for security reasons, but they must also uphold transparency to maintain public accountability. Striking a balance between confidentiality and the need for openness to the public can lead to ethical conflicts, especially when there is pressure to disclose sensitive information.

    Conflicts Between Personal Beliefs and Official Duties

    At times, public servants may receive orders or be expected to implement policies that go against their personal beliefs. For example, enforcing policies that involve demolishing religious or community structures may conflict with their personal values, creating a moral dilemma.

    Politicization of Bureaucracy

    Public servants may face external pressure from political parties to favor certain individuals or groups, compromising their professional duty to serve impartially. This politicization undermines the principles of fairness and equal treatment.

    Allocation of Limited Resources

    With limited resources, public servants must make difficult decisions on how to allocate funds for various sectors, such as healthcare, education, or infrastructure. These decisions often involve ethical dilemmas as each sector has significant social impact.

    Addressing Ethical Dilemmas

    Public servants can resolve these dilemmas by adhering to the ALIR Model (Accountability, Legality, Integrity, and Responsiveness), which ensures that decisions are based on democratic accountability, the rule of law, and professional integrity. They can also engage in dialogue with superiors and follow established codes of conduct. Furthermore, personal moral values, fortitude, and the ability to take responsibility for one’s actions are essential in resolving ethical conflicts. Following Gandhiji’s Talisman, which prioritizes the interests of the marginalized and the poor, can also guide ethical decision-making.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 24, 2024In:
  • 0

List the five moral characteristics that can be used to chart a government servant’s performance. Justify their matrix inclusion. (150 words) [UPSC 2021]

upsc: ethics in public administration
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The performance of civil servants is critical for the effective functioning of government institutions and the delivery of public services. A comprehensive evaluation of their performance should include ethical traits, which provide insights into their conduct and integrityRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The performance of civil servants is critical for the effective functioning of government institutions and the delivery of public services. A comprehensive evaluation of their performance should include ethical traits, which provide insights into their conduct and integrity.

    Five Ethical Traits

    1. Integrity

    Definition: Integrity involves acting honestly, fairly, and transparently, even under pressure.
    Justification: Civil servants with integrity are trustworthy, enabling them to make decisions that are in the best interest of the public.
    Example: T. N. Seshan, former Chief Election Commissioner of India, implemented reforms to ensure free and fair elections, demonstrating integrity in his role.

    2. Accountability

    Definition: Accountability refers to the willingness to take responsibility for one’s actions and decisions.
    Justification: Civil servants who are accountable foster trust and integrity, as they are willing to explain their decisions and face consequences.
    Example: IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri Dasari took a firm stand against illegal mining in Karnataka in 2018, despite political pressure, showcasing her accountability.

    3. Objectivity

    Definition: Objectivity involves making decisions based on facts and evidence rather than personal biases.
    Justification: Objective civil servants ensure that policies are fair and based on data, leading to better governance.
    Example: Raghuram Rajan, former Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, is renowned for his data-driven approach to policy-making.

    4. Respect for Diversity

    Definition: This trait entails recognizing and appreciating differences among individuals and groups.
    Justification: Respect for diversity promotes inclusivity and ensures that all stakeholders are treated with dignity.
    Example: R. Subrahmanyam, former Chief Secretary of Andhra Pradesh, worked to promote diversity and inclusion in governance.

    5. Professionalism

    Definition: Professionalism encompasses maintaining high standards of conduct and communication.
    Justification: Professional civil servants uphold the values of the civil service, which is essential for public trust and effective service delivery.
    Example: K. Vijay Raghavan, Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India, has been pivotal in shaping science and technology policies through his professionalism.

    Conclusion

    Civil servants exhibiting these ethical traits are more likely to earn public respect and effectively serve the public interest. Evaluating their performance based on these traits can identify areas for improvement and guide targeted training and support.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 28, 2024In:
  • 0

How do the qualities of resilience and dependability show themselves in public service? Give examples to illustrate. (150 words) [UPSC 2015]

upsc: ethics in public administration
  1. Team
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction Public servants play a vital role in delivering essential services to the community, ranging from law enforcement to education. To effectively fulfill their responsibilities, they must embody key virtues, particularly trustworthiness and fortitude. Body Trustworthiness in PRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    Public servants play a vital role in delivering essential services to the community, ranging from law enforcement to education. To effectively fulfill their responsibilities, they must embody key virtues, particularly trustworthiness and fortitude.

    Body

    Trustworthiness in Public Service

    Trustworthiness is foundational for public servants, as it fosters confidence in government institutions. Trustworthy public servants are characterized by their honesty, reliability, and transparency. For instance, when a government official discloses potential conflicts of interest and refrains from personal gains, they exemplify trustworthiness. This transparency not only reinforces public confidence but also ensures the integrity of the democratic process (Pew Research Center, 2020).

    A notable example is a police officer who reports misconduct within their department. By prioritizing their duty to uphold the law over loyalty to colleagues, they demonstrate commitment to ethical standards, which is crucial for maintaining public trust in law enforcement.

    Fortitude in Public Service

    Fortitude, or the courage to act rightly in challenging situations, is equally essential for public servants. Those who possess fortitude are willing to make difficult decisions in the interest of the public good, often in the face of pressure or adversity. For instance, a mayor who vetoes a harmful bill despite intense lobbying from powerful interest groups exemplifies fortitude. This action reflects a commitment to prioritize community welfare over political convenience (Kotter, 1996).

    Another example includes civil servants who whistleblow against corruption within their organizations. By exposing unethical practices, they stand firm against potential backlash, thus fulfilling their duty to serve the public interest and uphold accountability.

    Conclusion

    The virtues of trustworthiness and fortitude are critical for public servants to effectively serve their communities. By embodying these qualities, public servants can maintain public trust and uphold their commitment to the greater good.

    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: February 22, 2025 Comments: 0

Indo-US Relation: Areas of Cooperation & Conflicts

Key Areas: Defense, technology, trade, energy, and regional cooperation. Key Areas of Cooperation 1. Defense and Security Transition from buyer-seller to co-production and technology sharing. India as a Major Defense Partner (MDP) and inclusion in STA-1. Access to advanced technologies, ...

On: February 22, 2025 Comments: 0

भारत-अमेरिका संबंध: सहयोग और संघर्ष के क्षेत्र

मुख्य विषय: भारत-अमेरिका संबंधों की मजबूती, विशेषकर रक्षा, प्रौद्योगिकी और क्षेत्रीय सहयोग में प्रगति। सहयोग के प्रमुख क्षेत्र 1. रक्षा एवं सुरक्षा सहयोग भारत और अमेरिका के बीच रक्षा संबंधों का विस्तार। प्रमुख रक्षा साझेदार (MDP) का दर्जा और STA-1 ...

On: February 22, 2025 Comments: 0

India’s Disaster Management

The article discusses the growing tensions between the Centre and states regarding disaster relief funding in India. It emphasizes the need for a transparent and equitable disaster management framework. Key Disaster Threats India Faces Increasing Frequency of Extreme Weather Events ...

Explore Our Blog