Home/upsc: amendments in indian constitution provisions/Page 3
- Recent Questions
- Most Answered
- Answers
- No Answers
- Most Visited
- Most Voted
- Random
- Bump Question
- New Questions
- Sticky Questions
- Polls
- Followed Questions
- Favorite Questions
- Recent Questions With Time
- Most Answered With Time
- Answers With Time
- No Answers With Time
- Most Visited With Time
- Most Voted With Time
- Random With Time
- Bump Question With Time
- New Questions With Time
- Sticky Questions With Time
- Polls With Time
- Followed Questions With Time
- Favorite Questions With Time
Discuss the role of the Parliament and the state legislatures in the amendment process. What is the required majority threshold for passing a constitutional amendment, and why was this threshold chosen?
In constitutional democracies like India, the amendment process involves both the Parliament (at the central level) and the state legislatures (at the state level). Let's discuss their roles and the majority thresholds required for passing constitutional amendments: Role of Parliament and State LegiRead more
In constitutional democracies like India, the amendment process involves both the Parliament (at the central level) and the state legislatures (at the state level). Let’s discuss their roles and the majority thresholds required for passing constitutional amendments:
Role of Parliament and State Legislatures
Parliament (Central Level):
Initiation of Amendments: Amendments to the Indian Constitution can be initiated in either house of Parliament (Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha).
Passage in Parliament: The amendment bill must be passed by a majority of the total membership of each house (i.e., a simple majority of members present and voting, assuming quorum is met).
Special Majority Requirement: Some amendments require a special majority, which means it must be supported by:
A majority of the total membership of each house (simple majority), and
At least two-thirds of the members present and voting.
State Legislatures:
Ratification: After passing in Parliament, certain types of amendments (like those affecting federalism or states’ powers) require ratification by at least half of the state legislatures. Each state legislature considers the amendment and votes on it.
Required Majority Thresholds
Simple Majority: A simple majority means more than 50% of members present and voting. This is the standard requirement for most constitutional amendments initiated in Parliament. It ensures that amendments are supported by a majority of the legislators present to vote on the bill.
Special Majority: A special majority is a higher threshold intended to ensure broader support for amendments that are considered more significant or affect fundamental aspects of the constitution. It requires:
A majority of the total membership of each house (simple majority).
At least two-thirds of the members present and voting.
Rationale for Choosing the Thresholds
Balancing Flexibility and Stability: The simple majority threshold allows for flexibility in amending the constitution to adapt to changing circumstances or societal needs. It ensures that amendments can be passed with strong support from the legislators present at the time of voting.
Protecting Core Principles: The special majority requirement (two-thirds majority of members present and voting) for certain amendments ensures that changes to fundamental aspects of the constitution are supported by a significant consensus across political parties and ideologies. This protects core principles and values enshrined in the constitution.
Federal Considerations: Requiring ratification by state legislatures for certain amendments involving federalism ensures that states have a say in changes that affect their powers and autonomy. This mechanism promotes cooperative federalism and ensures that amendments do not undermine the federal structure.
Historical Context: The thresholds were chosen based on the experiences of other democracies and India’s own historical context. They aim to strike a balance between democratic responsiveness and stability, avoiding frequent and arbitrary changes while allowing for necessary adaptations over time.
In conclusion, the amendment process in India involves careful consideration of majority thresholds in Parliament and ratification by state legislatures. These thresholds reflect a deliberate effort to ensure that constitutional amendments are supported by sufficient consensus and consideration of both national and state-level perspectives. They are designed to uphold the integrity of the constitution while allowing for necessary updates and reforms in response to evolving challenges and aspirations.
See lessDiscuss the role of public discourse and civil society engagement in the amendment process. To what extent can citizens and interest groups influence the debate and outcome of a proposed constitutional amendment?
Public discourse and civil society engagement play a crucial role in the amendment process of a constitution. They provide avenues for citizens and interest groups to voice their opinions, participate in debates, and influence the outcome of proposed constitutional amendments. However, the extent ofRead more
Public discourse and civil society engagement play a crucial role in the amendment process of a constitution. They provide avenues for citizens and interest groups to voice their opinions, participate in debates, and influence the outcome of proposed constitutional amendments. However, the extent of influence can vary depending on various factors. Let’s discuss the role of public discourse and civil society engagement and the ways citizens and interest groups can impact the debate and outcome of constitutional amendments.
Creating Awareness and Shaping Public Opinion:
Public discourse and civil society engagement help create awareness about proposed constitutional amendments among the general public. Through various platforms such as media, public meetings, social media, and advocacy campaigns, citizens and interest groups can disseminate information, explain the implications of amendments, and shape public opinion. This awareness-raising process is crucial for generating interest, mobilizing support, and fostering informed debates.
Advocacy and Lobbying:
Interest groups and civil society organizations often engage in advocacy and lobbying to influence the debate and outcome of constitutional amendments. They present their perspectives, research, and recommendations to lawmakers, participate in parliamentary committee hearings, and provide expert opinions. By presenting evidence-based arguments and mobilizing support, these groups can influence the decision-making process and shape the content and scope of amendments.
Petitions, Memoranda, and Public Consultations:
Citizens and interest groups can actively participate in the amendment process by submitting petitions, memoranda, and representations to lawmakers, parliamentary committees, and constitutional review bodies. These documents highlight concerns, propose amendments, and provide suggestions for improving the proposed changes. Public consultations and hearings enable citizens and interest groups to directly engage with decision-makers, express their views, and influence the debate and drafting process.
Litigation and Judicial Review:
In some cases, citizens and interest groups may resort to litigation and seek judicial intervention to challenge the constitutionality of proposed amendments. By approaching the courts, they can bring their concerns to the attention of the judiciary and argue against amendments that they perceive as infringing upon fundamental rights or the basic structure of the constitution. Judicial review provides an avenue for independent scrutiny and can significantly impact the outcome of constitutional amendments.
Grassroots Movements and Protests:
Citizens and interest groups can organize grassroots movements, protests, and demonstrations to express their dissent or support for proposed constitutional amendments. These movements serve as a means to mobilize public opinion, raise awareness, and put pressure on lawmakers and the government to consider alternative perspectives or modifications to the proposed amendments. Such grassroots movements can influence the political environment and create a momentum for change.
It’s important to note that the influence of citizens and interest groups in the amendment process depends on the openness of the political system, institutional mechanisms for public participation, and the responsiveness of policymakers. The impact can vary from case to case, and the final outcome is ultimately determined by the deliberations and decisions of elected representatives and the constitutional processes in place.
In conclusion, public discourse and civil society engagement play a vital role in the amendment process by shaping public opinion, advocating for interests, providing expert opinions, and participating in deliberations. While citizens and interest groups can influence the debate and outcome of proposed constitutional amendments through various means, the degree of influence depends on multiple factors and the dynamics of the particular political and institutional context.
See lessHow have the provisions for amending the Constitution been utilized in practice since 1950? Provide an overview of the major constitutional amendments that have been passed, and discuss their socio-political contexts and impacts.
Since the adoption of the Indian Constitution in 1950, several amendments have been made to address various socio-political contexts and challenges. These amendments have played a crucial role in shaping and evolving the constitutional framework of India. Let's provide an overview of some major consRead more
Since the adoption of the Indian Constitution in 1950, several amendments have been made to address various socio-political contexts and challenges. These amendments have played a crucial role in shaping and evolving the constitutional framework of India. Let’s provide an overview of some major constitutional amendments, along with their socio-political contexts and impacts.
First Amendment Act, 1951:
See lessContext: This amendment was primarily introduced to address legal challenges to land reforms and to curtail freedom of speech and expression.
Impact: It inserted reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech and expression to protect public order, decency, and morality. It also validated land reform laws, ensuring their constitutionality.
Twenty-Fourth Amendment Act, 1971:
Context: This amendment was introduced to counter the Supreme Court’s judgment in the Golaknath case, which held that Parliament could not amend the fundamental rights.
Impact: It amended Article 13 and reaffirmed Parliament’s power to amend any part of the Constitution, including fundamental rights. It restored Parliament’s authority to amend fundamental rights.
Forty-Second Amendment Act, 1976:
Context: This amendment was passed during the period of the Emergency (1975-1977) and aimed to consolidate power in the hands of the government.
Impact: It made significant changes to the Constitution, including asserting the supremacy of Parliament, limiting judicial review, and diluting fundamental rights. It was widely criticized for its authoritarian nature.
Forty-Fourth Amendment Act, 1978:
Context: This amendment was introduced to reverse some of the changes made by the Forty-Second Amendment Act and restore certain fundamental rights.
Impact: It restored the power of judicial review and limited the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution. It reinforced fundamental rights and curtailed the powers of the government.
Forty-Sixth Amendment Act, 1982:
Context: This amendment was introduced to extend reservations for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Parliament and state legislatures.
Impact: It extended the reservations for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lok Sabha (lower house of Parliament) and state legislatures for another ten years, ensuring representation and social justice.
Seventy-Third Amendment Act, 1992:
Context: This amendment was passed to strengthen local self-government institutions and promote decentralization.
Impact: It added the provisions for Panchayats (village councils) and conferred them with constitutional status. It aimed to empower local communities, enhance grassroots democracy, and promote rural development.
Ninety-Ninth Amendment Act, 2014:
Context: This amendment was introduced to facilitate the Land Boundary Agreement between India and Bangladesh.
Impact: It enabled the exchange of territories and resolved border disputes between India and Bangladesh. It demonstrated the flexibility of the amendment process in addressing geopolitical challenges.
These are just a few examples of significant constitutional amendments in India. Each amendment reflects the socio-political context of its time and has had varying impacts on governance, fundamental rights, social justice, and decentralization. The amendment process has allowed the Indian Constitution to adapt and respond to the evolving needs of the nation, ensuring its relevance and vitality.
Evaluate the argument that the Constitution should be subjected to periodic comprehensive reviews and revisions, rather than piecemeal amendments. What are the potential advantages and challenges of this approach?
Here is my evaluation of the argument for periodically reviewing and revising the Constitution rather than relying solely on piecemeal amendments: Potential Advantages: Comprehensive Updates: Regularly reviewing and revising the Constitution could allow for comprehensive updates to address changingRead more
Analyze the impact of constitutional amendments on the federal structure of India. How have certain amendments altered the Centre-State power dynamics, and what has been the response from the states?
The Shifting Sands: Constitutional Amendments and India's Federal Balance India's federal structure, a delicate dance between central and state authority, has been subtly reshaped by amendments to its constitution. Let's delve into how these changes have impacted the Centre-State power dynamics andRead more
The Shifting Sands: Constitutional Amendments and India’s Federal Balance
India’s federal structure, a delicate dance between central and state authority, has been subtly reshaped by amendments to its constitution. Let’s delve into how these changes have impacted the Centre-State power dynamics and the reactions they’ve evoked.
Certain amendments, like the 42nd (1976), have tilted the scales towards the Centre. By expanding the Union List (central government’s domain) and allowing Parliament to override state laws in the Concurrent List (shared domain), the Centre’s reach has increased. This has been viewed by some states as an encroachment on their autonomy.
Further, amendments bypassing the usual legislative process, like the one affecting Jammu and Kashmir’s special status (2019), have caused friction. States see such actions as bypassing federal principles and raising concerns about democratic consultation.
However, the story isn’t one-sided. Amendments like the 73rd and 74th (1992) aimed to empower states by strengthening Panchayati Raj institutions (local self-governance) and urban local bodies. This decentralization, while a work in progress, acknowledges the importance of local participation.
The response from states has been mixed. Some actively engage with the Centre to negotiate amendments, while others challenge them in court. This highlights the ongoing debate on the ideal balance between a strong Centre for national unity and empowered states for regional development.
In conclusion, constitutional amendments in India have been a double-edged sword. While some have centralized power, others have nudged towards decentralization. The tug-of-war between the Centre and states continues, shaping the ever-evolving character of India’s federalism. (Word count: 198)
Analyze the impact of the 42nd Amendment, often referred to as the "Constitution's funeral," on the balance of power between the judiciary, executive, and legislature. How did this amendment reshape the constitutional landscape, and what were the subsequent efforts to undo its effects?
The 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 made significant changes to the Indian Constitution, aiming to strengthen parliamentary sovereignty and reduce judicial review. There are some factors illustrating its impact on the balance of power:- 1. Parliamentary sovereignty - The amendment sought to assert the suRead more
The 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 made significant changes to the Indian Constitution, aiming to strengthen parliamentary sovereignty and reduce judicial review. There are some factors illustrating its impact on the balance of power:-
1. Parliamentary sovereignty – The amendment sought to assert the supremacy of Parliament over other institutions by limiting judicial review, making certain fundamental rights non-justiciable, and expanding Parliament’s amendment powers.
2. Reducing Judicial Review – It restricted the scope of judicial review over constitutional amendments and other legislative actions, thereby curtailing the judiciary’s ability to strike down laws or amendments deemed unconstitutional.
3. Centralisation of Power – The 42nd Amendment centralised power in the hands of the executive and the Parliament, giving them broader authority to enact laws and amend the Constitution without significant checks from the judiciary.
4. Impact on Fundamental Rights – Some fundamental rights were altered or reinterpreted, with a focus on promoting socialist principles and limiting challenges to government actions.
Subsequent Efforts to Undo Its Effects-
1. 43rd and 44th Amendments
These subsequent amendments were passed in response to the overreach perceived in the 42nd Amendment. The 43rd Amendment (1977) and the 44th Amendment (1978) aimed to restore certain checks and balances,for example:-
The 43rd Amendment reinstated some fundamental rights that were curtailed.
The 44th Amendment reversed many of the changes made by the 42nd Amendment, restoring judicial review powers and reducing the supremacy of Parliament in amending the Constitution.
2.Judicial Activism – The judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court of India, played a crucial role in interpreting and restoring the balance of powers post the 42nd Amendment. It asserted its authority to review legislative and executive actions, ensuring they conform to constitutional principles.
3. Public and Political Backlash – The amendments faced significant public and political backlash, with critics arguing that they undermined democracy and fundamental rights. This pressure contributed to subsequent amendments that aimed to correct perceived imbalances.
Therefore, the 42nd Amendment had a profound impact on the balance of power in India’s constitutional framework, tilting it towards parliamentary sovereignty and centralising power in the executive and legislative branches. Subsequent efforts, including constitutional amendments and judicial actions, sought to restore the constant checks and balances intended by the framers of the Indian Constitution.
See lessDiscuss the role of judicial review in the context of constitutional amendments. To what extent can the courts scrutinize the constitutional validity of an amendment passed by the Parliament?
Judicial reviews are a challenge to a decision made.It promotes review of lawfulness of a decision or action taken by a public authority. It is the power of courts to examine the actions of legislature, executive and administrative bodies of government to upheld the constitution of the country . WheRead more
Judicial reviews are a challenge to a decision made.It promotes review of lawfulness of a decision or action taken by a public authority.
It is the power of courts to examine the actions of legislature, executive and administrative bodies of government to upheld the constitution of the country .
When it comes to amendments,it is the duty of courts to uphold the rule of law .A major example is of Kesavananda Bharti case vs State of Kerala (1970) where the constitutional validity of 24th,25th and 29th amendment was challenged.
In Golak Nath Vs State of Punjab is another example.
The Parliament under Article 368 can amend any part of the Constitution including Fundamental rights but without affecting the Basic Structure of the constitution.
See lessExplain the process of amending the Constitution of India as outlined in Article 368. What are the different procedures for amending different parts of the Constitution, and what is the rationale behind these varying amendment procedures?
Article 368 of the Indian Constitution outlines the process for amending the Constitution. Here are the key steps involved: Introduction of the Bill: An amendment bill can be introduced in either House of Parliament (Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha). It must be introduced as a private member’s bill or by aRead more
Article 368 of the Indian Constitution outlines the process for amending the Constitution. Here are the key steps involved:
Introduction of the Bill: An amendment bill can be introduced in either House of Parliament (Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha). It must be introduced as a private member’s bill or by a minister.
Passage in Each House: The bill must be passed in each House by a majority of the total membership and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting.
President’s Assent: Once the bill is passed by both Houses, it is presented to the President for his assent. The President must give his assent to the bill, after which it becomes an amendment to the Constitution.
Special Provisions: If the amendment seeks to make changes in specific provisions, such as federal structure aspects, it must be ratified by at least half of the State Legislatures before it is presented to the President for his assent. This includes amendments related to:
The election of the President
See lessThe extent of the executive power of the Union and the States
The Supreme Court and High Courts
Distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States
Representation of States in Parliament
Article 368 itself
This process ensures that any change to the Constitution is made with broad consensus and reflects the federal nature of the Indian polity.
Highlight the devolution of powers under the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts. Do you think the process of devolution has been less than satisfactory so far?
The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts were landmark reforms aimed at strengthening local self-governance in India through the devolution of powers to Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs). Key features of the devolution of powers under these amendments include thRead more
The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts were landmark reforms aimed at strengthening local self-governance in India through the devolution of powers to Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs).
Key features of the devolution of powers under these amendments include the establishment of a three-tier system of Panchayats, the mandatory holding of regular elections, the devolution of 29 subjects from the state list to Panchayats, and the recognition of municipalities as the third tier of governance with the devolution of 18 subjects.
However, the process of devolution has been less than satisfactory in many parts of the country. Challenges include the lack of functional devolution, inadequate financial resources, capacity constraints of local bodies, and political interference by state governments.
To address these challenges and strengthen local self-governance, a more concerted effort is needed by both the central and state governments to empower PRIs and ULBs through adequate devolution of powers, resources, and capacity-building support. This would enable local bodies to fulfill their responsibilities effectively and contribute to the overall development and democratic governance of the country.
See less