Home/upsc: amendments in indian constitution provisions
- Recent Questions
- Most Answered
- Answers
- No Answers
- Most Visited
- Most Voted
- Random
- Bump Question
- New Questions
- Sticky Questions
- Polls
- Followed Questions
- Favorite Questions
- Recent Questions With Time
- Most Answered With Time
- Answers With Time
- No Answers With Time
- Most Visited With Time
- Most Voted With Time
- Random With Time
- Bump Question With Time
- New Questions With Time
- Sticky Questions With Time
- Polls With Time
- Followed Questions With Time
- Favorite Questions With Time
Analyze the lasting effects of the 42nd Amendment Act on the Indian Constitution, focusing on the major reforms it introduced and their significance in shaping the constitutional framework. (200 words)
Model Answer Introduction The 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 was a landmark moment in India's constitutional development, enacted during a period of political unrest. It introduced significant reforms that reshaped the nation's legal and political framework, influencing the evolution of democratic goverRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 was a landmark moment in India’s constitutional development, enacted during a period of political unrest. It introduced significant reforms that reshaped the nation’s legal and political framework, influencing the evolution of democratic governance in India.
Positive Reforms
Negative Aspects
Significance in Shaping Constitutional Landscape
Conclusion
The 42nd Amendment left a controversial but lasting legacy on India’s constitutional framework. Its impact sparked debates and legal battles, leading to reforms that balanced executive power, judicial independence, and the protection of individual rights in the years that followed.
See lessGiven that poverty serves as a suitable indicator of lack that governmental intervention can alleviate through reservations to uphold the constitutional principles of equality and empowerment, analyze critically if the 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act has the potential to redefine welfare in India. (200 words)
Model Answer Analysis of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act on Welfare Redefinition in India Positive Impacts: Promoting Inclusive Development: The amendment widens welfare measures to include economically weaker sections, fostering inclusive growth (Source: Indian Constitution). Addressing EconRead more
Model Answer
Analysis of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act on Welfare Redefinition in India
Positive Impacts:
Concerns:
In redefining welfare, precise targeting and evolving frameworks are vital for effectively aiding the most deserving. Continuous refinement is imperative to ensure the policy’s inclusivity and relevance in combating India’s persistent challenges of deprivation and discrimination.
See lessThe 42nd Amendment Act introduced several crucial changes to the Indian Constitution. Analyze these changes. (200 words)
Model Answers Introduction The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976, also known as the "Mini Constitution," introduced several significant changes to the Indian Constitution. These changes impacted various aspects of governance, judiciary, federalism, and individual duties, marking a transformatiRead more
Model Answers
Introduction
The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976, also known as the “Mini Constitution,” introduced several significant changes to the Indian Constitution. These changes impacted various aspects of governance, judiciary, federalism, and individual duties, marking a transformative period in India’s constitutional history.
Changes in the Preamble
The Preamble was amended to include the terms “socialist” and “secular,” reflecting a broader vision of India’s values. Additionally, the phrase “unity of the nation” was changed to “unity and integrity of the nation,” emphasizing the importance of national integration. These changes highlighted India’s commitment to social and secular values (Source: Indian Constitution).
Changes in the 7th Schedule
The 42nd Amendment moved several subjects, including “Education” and “Forests,” from the State List to the Concurrent List. This change increased central authority but led to tensions between the central and state governments over legislative matters (Source: Indian Constitution).
Insertion of Fundamental Duties
Article 51A was added, listing ten Fundamental Duties for citizens, reinforcing the idea that rights come with corresponding responsibilities (Source: Indian Constitution).
Judiciary and Fundamental Rights
The Amendment curtailed the power of judicial review, limiting the role of courts in scrutinizing constitutional amendments and strengthening the central government’s authority (Source: Indian Constitution).
Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs)
Three new DPSPs were added, enhancing state responsibility towards workers, legal aid, and environmental protection. Additionally, Article 31C gave primacy to DPSPs over Fundamental Rights (Source: Indian Constitution).
Conclusion
The 42nd Amendment Act brought about extensive constitutional reforms, significantly altering India’s political and legal framework, with lasting implications on the balance of power between the central government and states.
See lessDiscuss the essentials of the 69th Constitutional Amendment Act and anomalies, if any, that have led to recent reported conflicts between the elected representatives and the institution of the Lieutenant Governor in the administration of Delhi. Do you think that this will give rise to a new trend in the functioning of the Indian federal politics? (200 words) [UPSC 2016]
The 69th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1991, was a significant legislation aimed at addressing the governance structure of Delhi. It conferred a status of a Union Territory with a Legislative Assembly and a Lieutenant Governor (LG) on Delhi, distinguishing it from other Union Territories. EssentialsRead more
The 69th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1991, was a significant legislation aimed at addressing the governance structure of Delhi. It conferred a status of a Union Territory with a Legislative Assembly and a Lieutenant Governor (LG) on Delhi, distinguishing it from other Union Territories.
Essentials of the 69th Constitutional Amendment Act:
Legislative Assembly: It established a Legislative Assembly for Delhi with powers to make laws on subjects enumerated in the State List and Concurrent List, excluding those on which the Parliament had exclusive jurisdiction.
Lieutenant Governor: The LG was designated as the administrator of Delhi, holding powers to oversee the executive functions of the government and having authority over police, public order, and land.
Division of Powers: The Act aimed at a dual governance structure with the elected government handling the day-to-day administration, while the LG retained significant powers, especially in crucial areas like law and order.
Anomalies and Conflicts:
Overlap of Powers: Conflicts have arisen due to the overlapping powers between the Delhi government and the LG, particularly concerning law and order, and land, which are under the LG’s jurisdiction.
Administrative Turf Wars: Disputes regarding the extent of the Delhi government’s authority and the LG’s intervention in routine administrative matters have led to friction, affecting governance and public policy.
Judicial Interventions: The Supreme Court has had to intervene to clarify the distribution of powers, which has sometimes resulted in ambiguity and further disputes.
Impact on Indian Federal Politics:
See lessThese conflicts highlight a trend where the balance of power between state or regional governments and central authorities is increasingly contentious. It suggests a growing need for clearer constitutional definitions and conflict resolution mechanisms to manage federal relations effectively. This may influence the structure of federal politics and governance in India, emphasizing the need for re-evaluation of federal arrangements and autonomy.
Explain the salient features of the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016. Do you think it is efficacious enough "to remove cascading effect of taxes and provide for common national market for goods and services"? (250 words) [UPSC 2017]
The Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, primarily aimed to facilitate the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India. Its salient features include: GST Framework: The Act provides the constitutional foundation for GST, which replaces multiple indirect taxes levieRead more
The Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, primarily aimed to facilitate the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India. Its salient features include:
GST Framework: The Act provides the constitutional foundation for GST, which replaces multiple indirect taxes levied by both the Central and State governments with a single unified tax.
Dual GST Structure: It authorizes the implementation of a dual GST model, comprising Central GST (CGST) and State GST (SGST), with Integrated GST (IGST) for inter-state transactions. This structure helps in maintaining tax jurisdiction between central and state governments.
Compensation for States: To address potential revenue loss for states due to GST implementation, the Act includes provisions for compensation to states for a period of five years.
National GST Council: Establishes the GST Council, which includes representatives from the Centre and States, responsible for making recommendations on GST rates, exemptions, and administrative procedures.
Enhanced Federal Cooperation: Emphasizes cooperative federalism by requiring states and the Centre to work together in the administration of GST.
Efficacy in Addressing Tax Cascading and Common Market
The Act has been effective in several ways:
The Cascading Effect Can Be Eliminated GST is designed to eliminate the cascading effect of taxes by allowing input tax credits at each stage of the supply chain. This ensures that tax is levied only on the value added, rather than the total transaction value.
Common National Market: By harmonizing tax rates and reducing inter-state barriers, GST aims to create a common national market for goods and services. The removal of state-specific taxes and simplification of compliance requirements facilitate smoother interstate trade.
Challenges and Improvements
While the Act has made significant strides, challenges remain:
Implementation Issues: Complexities in GST rates, frequent changes, and compliance burdens can impact efficacy. Simplifying the tax structure and streamlining procedures could enhance effectiveness.
Technological and Administrative Hurdles: Ensuring that the technological infrastructure and administrative systems are robust and efficient is crucial for the smooth operation of GST.
In conclusion, the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, has laid a strong foundation for removing tax cascading and creating a unified market. However, its full potential will be realized with continued reforms and effective implementation strategies.
See less"Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution is a limited power and it cannot be enlarged into absolute power." In the light of this statement explain whether Parliament under Article 368 of the Constitution can destroy the Basic Structure of the Constitution by expanding its amending power? (250 words) [UPSC 2019]
Limits of Parliament’s Power to Amend the Constitution and the Basic Structure Doctrine Introduction: Article 368 of the Indian Constitution grants Parliament the power to amend the Constitution. However, the extent and limits of this power have been a subject of significant legal and constitutionalRead more
Limits of Parliament’s Power to Amend the Constitution and the Basic Structure Doctrine
Introduction: Article 368 of the Indian Constitution grants Parliament the power to amend the Constitution. However, the extent and limits of this power have been a subject of significant legal and constitutional debate. The key question is whether Parliament, under this provision, can destroy the Basic Structure of the Constitution by expanding its amending power.
Article 368 and Parliamentary Power: Article 368 empowers Parliament to amend the Constitution by way of adding, varying, or repealing provisions. This power, however, is not absolute. While Parliament can amend the Constitution to address changing needs and circumstances, this power is circumscribed by the fundamental principles underlying the Constitution.
Basic Structure Doctrine: The Basic Structure Doctrine was established by the Supreme Court in the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case (1973). The doctrine holds that certain fundamental features of the Constitution, which form its basic structure, cannot be altered or destroyed by amendments. These features include the supremacy of the Constitution, federalism, secularism, democracy, and the rule of law.
Parliamentary Limits: According to the Basic Structure Doctrine, Parliament’s amending power under Article 368 does not extend to altering or destroying the basic structure of the Constitution. This limitation ensures that fundamental principles remain intact despite changes in the Constitution. The Supreme Court has reaffirmed this doctrine in subsequent cases, emphasizing that while Parliament can amend the Constitution, it cannot use this power to undermine its core principles.
Judicial Oversight: The judiciary plays a crucial role in overseeing and ensuring that constitutional amendments do not infringe upon the basic structure. The power of judicial review allows the courts to examine amendments and ensure they comply with the Constitution’s core principles. This oversight mechanism acts as a check on the potential misuse of amending power by Parliament.
Conclusion: While Parliament under Article 368 has substantial power to amend the Constitution, this power is not limitless. The Basic Structure Doctrine ensures that Parliament cannot destroy the Constitution’s fundamental principles through amendments. Judicial oversight further reinforces this limitation, maintaining the integrity and stability of the Constitution while allowing for necessary changes and adaptations.
See lessExplain the significance of the 101st Constitutional Amendment Act. To what extent does it reflect the accommodative spirit of federalism? (250 words) [UPSC 2023]
The 101st Constitutional Amendment Act, 2021, is a landmark legislation in India that significantly impacts the country’s federal structure and political representation. This amendment primarily addresses the issue of the delimitation of constituencies and the reservation of seats for Scheduled CastRead more
The 101st Constitutional Amendment Act, 2021, is a landmark legislation in India that significantly impacts the country’s federal structure and political representation. This amendment primarily addresses the issue of the delimitation of constituencies and the reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs).
Significance of the 101st Constitutional Amendment Act
Reflection of Federalism
The 101st Amendment Act reflects the accommodative spirit of federalism in several ways:
In summary, the 101st Constitutional Amendment Act is significant for maintaining stable political representation and ensuring the continued reservation of seats for marginalized communities. It reflects the accommodative spirit of federalism by balancing the interests of different levels of government and promoting inclusiveness and justice within the federal framework.
See lessCritically examine the relevance of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act in evolving the reservations policy as tool to meet the objectives of social justice in India.
The 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, enacted in 2019, introduced a 10% reservation for economically weaker sections (EWS) in education and public employment, marking a significant shift in India's reservation policy. Earlier, reservations were aimed at addressing historical injustices and socialRead more
The 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, enacted in 2019, introduced a 10% reservation for economically weaker sections (EWS) in education and public employment, marking a significant shift in India’s reservation policy. Earlier, reservations were aimed at addressing historical injustices and social disadvantages faced by Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC). This amendment extends benefits based on economic criteria, regardless of caste. Its relevance lies in acknowledging economic hardship as a barrier to social mobility, broadening the scope of social justice. The Supporters argue that it addresses the needs of economically disadvantaged groups who do not fall under existing reserved categories, promoting inclusive growth. Critics says that this economic-based reservation may dilute the original intention of reservations, which is to rectify systemic social discrimination. Additionally, the 10% EWS quota raises questions about the practical implementation and potential overlap with existing quotas, which already account for 50% of seats. The amendment also risks perpetuating the reliance on quotas as a solution, rather than addressing structural inequalities through comprehensive socio-economic reforms. Thus,the 103rd Amendment aims to expand the ambit of social justice, its long-term impact on achieving genuine equity and inclusion remains to be critically evaluated.
See lessCritically evaluate the arguments for and against the inclusion of a "sunset clause" in the Constitution, which would require periodic re-approval of the document. How would such a provision affect the stability and longevity of the Constitution?
The proposal to include a "sunset clause" in the U.S. Constitution, which would require periodic re-approval of the document, is a complex and controversial idea with valid arguments on both sides. Arguments in Favor of a Sunset Clause: Responsiveness to Change: A sunset clause could compel regularRead more
The proposal to include a “sunset clause” in the U.S. Constitution, which would require periodic re-approval of the document, is a complex and controversial idea with valid arguments on both sides.
Arguments in Favor of a Sunset Clause:
Responsiveness to Change: A sunset clause could compel regular reviews and updates to the Constitution, enabling it to stay more relevant and responsive to evolving social, technological, and political realities.
Increased Democratic Legitimacy: Requiring periodic re-approval by the people or their representatives could enhance the Constitution’s democratic legitimacy and ensure it continues to reflect the will of the citizenry.
Preventing Constitutional Drift: A sunset clause could help prevent the gradual “drifting” of the Constitution away from its original intent and principles, as interpreted and applied over time.
Encouraging Civic Engagement: The prospect of regular constitutional reviews and re-approval could stimulate greater public engagement and discourse around the foundational principles of government.
Arguments Against a Sunset Clause:
Threat to Stability and Continuity: Introducing a sunset clause could undermine the stability and continuity that have made the U.S. Constitution a lasting and influential document. The prospect of the Constitution expiring could create significant uncertainty and instability.
Vulnerability to Partisan Manipulation: The re-approval process could become a battleground for partisan politics, with each side seeking to alter the Constitution to align with their ideological agendas, potentially leading to constitutional crises.
Logistical and Practical Challenges: Coordinating a nationwide re-approval process for the Constitution would be an immense logistical undertaking, fraught with procedural complexities and potential roadblocks.
Undermining the Rule of Law: A sunset clause could undermine the rule of law by creating the perception that the Constitution is a temporary or conditional document, rather than the enduring foundation of the American system of government.
Impact on the Stability and Longevity of the Constitution:
The inclusion of a sunset clause in the Constitution would likely have a significant impact on its stability and longevity:
Increased Vulnerability to Change: The periodic re-approval requirement could make the Constitution more susceptible to substantial revisions or even outright replacement, undermining its status as a stable, long-term framework for governance.
See lessPotential for Constitutional Crisis: The re-approval process could become a flashpoint for political conflict, potentially leading to constitutional crises if the document fails to gain the necessary support for renewal.
Weakened Role as a Unifying Document: The constant uncertainty surrounding the Constitution’s future could diminish its ability to serve as a unifying, stabilizing force in American society.
Overall, while the arguments for a sunset clause have some merit, the potential risks to the stability and longevity of the U.S. Constitution appear to outweigh the potential benefits. The enduring strength of the Constitution has been its ability to provide a durable, adaptable framework for governance, and a sunset clause could undermine this core strength.
Discuss the potential for using the amendment process to address the issue of judicial appointments and the independence of the judiciary. What are the debates and considerations surrounding this sensitive topic?
The amendment process offers a significant but challenging avenue to address issues related to judicial appointments and the independence of the judiciary. Here are some key points and considerations surrounding this topic: Potential for Using the Amendment Process Structural Reforms: ConstitutionalRead more
The amendment process offers a significant but challenging avenue to address issues related to judicial appointments and the independence of the judiciary. Here are some key points and considerations surrounding this topic:
Potential for Using the Amendment Process
Structural Reforms: Constitutional amendments could establish new procedures for appointing judges, such as creating independent commissions to nominate candidates, thus reducing partisan influence.
Term Limits: Amendments could introduce term limits or fixed terms for Supreme Court justices, replacing the current life tenure system to ensure periodic infusion of new perspectives.
Qualifications and Vetting: An amendment could stipulate specific qualifications for judicial nominees and more rigorous vetting processes, ensuring a higher standard of judicial competence and impartiality.
Balanced Representation: Amendments could ensure a more balanced representation of various demographics or legal philosophies, promoting a judiciary that reflects the diversity of the populace.
Debates and Considerations
Partisan Politics: One of the most contentious aspects of amending judicial appointment processes is the influence of partisan politics. Any proposal would likely face significant opposition from political groups that benefit from the current system.
Judicial Independence: Critics argue that frequent changes to judicial appointment procedures or term limits could undermine judicial independence, as judges might feel pressured to rule in ways that favor potential future employers or political allies.
Practicality and Feasibility: Amending the Constitution is a difficult and lengthy process, requiring significant bipartisan support. This is particularly challenging in the current polarized political climate.
Historical Precedents: Proponents and opponents alike cite historical precedents to argue their points. For instance, lifetime appointments are seen as a way to insulate justices from political pressures, but critics argue that the framers of the Constitution did not anticipate the modern political environment and its impact on the judiciary.
Public Opinion: Public support is crucial for any constitutional amendment. There is often a wide range of opinions on how the judiciary should function, making it difficult to reach a consensus on specific reforms.
Impact on Judicial Behavior: There is debate about whether term limits or other changes might affect judicial behavior, such as making judges more prone to issue landmark decisions or avoid controversial cases near the end of their terms.
See less