Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Contextual Background: Briefly introduce the 69th Constitutional Amendment Act and its significance in the context of Delhi’s governance. Purpose of the Amendment: State the aim of the amendment to balance Delhi’s unique needs and ensure efficient administration. Body Section 1: ...
Examine the effects of the 73rd and 74th Amendments, which improved municipal governance and decentralized authority. What changes have these reforms brought about in India’s grassroots democracy?
The 73rd and the 74th amendment acts were being implemented in the democratic nation and the fedaral structure of the nation were introduced in order to have a decentralized government so that the powers of the central government and the state government and to the local bodies even this came into eRead more
The 73rd and the 74th amendment acts were being implemented in the democratic nation and the fedaral structure of the nation were introduced in order to have a decentralized government so that the powers of the central government and the state government and to the local bodies even this came into effect on the 24th April 1993 and the 1st June 1993 respectively .
73rd amendment act :
This is applicable in the rural areas the PANCHAHAYTI RAJ SYSTEM wherein the state government was under the constitutional obligation . This was adopted in the 11th schedule of the Indian constitution . The members of the panchayat are elected directly by the people and the head of the panchayat is known as the sarpanch . Seats are also reserved for the SC and ST and for the chairpersons of the panchayat at all levels of the panchayat along with one- third positions for women folk .
74th AMENDMENT ACT :
This is basically found in the urban areas adopted in the year 19192 constituted of the municipalities i.e. the Nagar panchayat , Municipal Corporation, Municipal Council herein the people are directly elected by he people in the municipal area divided into wards and ward wise the representatives are chosen. Herein as well SC and St seats are reserved and 1/3rd seats are reserved for the women
IMPLEMENTS OF AMENDMENTS :
This decentralization of power has led to the upliftment of the local communities their problems are been addressed right away from the rural to the urban level from villages, blocks, zilla, wards and so and so this also led to the development of the socities of the local community in terms of industrialization, education, health care women’s position . They get the resources to development and many more.
See less
Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Definition of Amending Power: Briefly explain Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution under Article 368. Thesis Statement: State that this power is limited and cannot be enlarged to destroy the Basic Structure of the Constitution. Body 1. Understanding Article 368 Legal ...
Model Answer Introduction The power of Parliament to amend the Constitution of India is enshrined in Article 368. However, this power is not absolute and is subject to limitations, particularly as established by the Supreme Court through the Basic Structure doctrine. Body The Basic Structure doctrinRead more
The power of Parliament to amend the Constitution of India is enshrined in Article 368. However, this power is not absolute and is subject to limitations, particularly as established by the Supreme Court through the Basic Structure doctrine.
The Basic Structure doctrine was articulated in the landmark case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973). In this case, the Supreme Court held that while Parliament has the authority to amend the Constitution under Article 368, it cannot alter or destroy the Basic Structure of the Constitution. This Basic Structure includes fundamental principles such as the rule of law, separation of powers, judicial review, democracy, and federalism.
The Court emphasized that the power to amend the Constitution does not extend to undermining these essential features. This principle was further reinforced in subsequent cases, including Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) and Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980), where the judiciary reiterated that Parliament cannot use its amending power to dilute or destroy the Basic Structure.
In light of this doctrine, it is clear that Parliament cannot expand its amending power under Article 368 to a degree that would allow it to destroy the Basic Structure of the Constitution. The Basic Structure doctrine serves as a safeguard against potential abuses of the constitutional amendment power, ensuring that the foundational principles and values of the Constitution remain intact.
The Indian Supreme Court has established the Basic Structure doctrine to protect the core principles of the Constitution and preserve the democratic fabric of the country. This doctrine ensures that while Parliament has significant powers to amend the Constitution, those powers are not limitless.
See lessRoadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Definition of the 101st Constitutional Amendment Act: Briefly explain its purpose in introducing the Goods and Services Tax (GST). Thesis Statement: State its significance in simplifying India’s tax structure and how it reflects the accommodative spirit of ...
Model Answer Introduction The 101st Constitutional Amendment Act, enacted in 2016, marked a significant transformation in India's tax structure by introducing the Goods and Services Tax (GST). This amendment aimed to replace a complex array of central and state taxes with a unified tax regime, embodRead more
The 101st Constitutional Amendment Act, enacted in 2016, marked a significant transformation in India’s tax structure by introducing the Goods and Services Tax (GST). This amendment aimed to replace a complex array of central and state taxes with a unified tax regime, embodying the spirit of cooperation inherent in Indian federalism.
The Act established a harmonized taxation system, eliminating the cascading effect of taxes that plagued the previous Value Added Tax (VAT) system. This integration of multiple taxes into a single structure streamlined tax compliance for businesses.
With the introduction of GST, taxpayers now follow a standardized process nationwide, easing the burden for multi-state service providers like telecom companies and banks, which previously navigated diverse state laws.
The World Bank reported improvements in India’s business environment following the GST’s implementation, highlighting its role in fostering economic growth.
GST facilitated a unified market by removing bottlenecks at state borders, resulting in reduced transportation costs and increased efficiency, particularly benefitting sectors like logistics and e-commerce.
The amendment advanced digital governance through the GST Network (GSTN), which digitized tax administration, enhancing transparency and efficiency, and aligning with the broader objective of a Digital India.
The GST Council, as outlined in Article 279A(1), includes representatives from all states, ensuring diverse regional interests are considered in policy-making.
The GST framework includes provisions for resolving conflicts between central and state governments, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, where compensatory adjustments were made.
Consensus-based revenue-sharing agreements under the GST law reflect federal cooperation. For example, Tamil Nadu received approximately ₹40,000 crore in GST compensation during the transition, addressing concerns about potential revenue losses.
The GST Council promotes collaborative policymaking, exemplified by its consensus on tax rate adjustments for essential COVID-19 supplies, showcasing a united approach to governance.
The GST Council represents cooperative federalism, where both central and state governments participate in key policy decisions, leading to the rationalization of tax rates based on states’ inputs.
The 101st Constitutional Amendment Act not only transformed India’s tax landscape but also reinforced the spirit of cooperative federalism. By addressing regional concerns and fostering collaborative governance, it paves the way for a more harmonious federal relationship in India.
See lessTalk about the President’s involvement in the amending process. What are the President’s authority and restrictions when it comes to endorsing or rejecting a constitutional modification that the Parliament has passed?
The role of the President in the constitutional amendment process is an interesting and important one, though it is also somewhat limited compared to the central role played by Congress and the states. As outlined in Article V of the Constitution, the amendment process can be initiated in one of twoRead more
The role of the President in the constitutional amendment process is an interesting and important one, though it is also somewhat limited compared to the central role played by Congress and the states.
As outlined in Article V of the Constitution, the amendment process can be initiated in one of two ways: either by a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a national convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures.
Once an amendment has been proposed through one of those routes, it then must be ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states before it can take effect. The President does not have a direct vote in this ratification process.
However, the President does play an indirect but significant role in several ways:
Agenda-setting power: As the head of the executive branch, the President can help set the national political agenda and priorities, which can influence which constitutional amendments are introduced and debated by Congress.
Bully pulpit: The President has a powerful platform to advocate for or against specific amendment proposals, using the media and the office’s bully pulpit to sway public opinion.
Veto power: While the President cannot veto a constitutional amendment itself, they can veto legislation passed by Congress that is intended to propose an amendment. This creates an opportunity for the President to indirectly shape or block the amendment process.
Appointment power: The President appoints federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, who may later rule on the constitutionality or interpretation of any new amendments.
So in summary, the President’s role is more indirect than direct, but it is still a meaningful one. The President can use their agenda-setting influence, public platform, and appointment power to either facilitate or impede the passage of constitutional amendments, even if they cannot unilaterally approve or reject them.
Ultimately, the high bar set for amending the Constitution means that any proposed changes would need to garner broad, bipartisan support to overcome the deliberate hurdles built into the process. The President’s role is important, but not decisive, in that overall equation.
See lessTalk about the function of judicial review about constitutional modifications. How far can the courts examine whether a Parliamentary amendment is constitutionally valid?
Judicial review in the context of constitutional amendments refers to the power of the courts to examine and potentially invalidate amendments to the constitution if they are found to be unconstitutional or in violation of the basic structure or core principles of the constitution. This concept is pRead more
Judicial review in the context of constitutional amendments refers to the power of the courts to examine and potentially invalidate amendments to the constitution if they are found to be unconstitutional or in violation of the basic structure or core principles of the constitution. This concept is particularly significant in constitutional democracies where the judiciary acts as a guardian of the constitution and ensures that the legislative and executive branches do not exceed their constitutional limits.
Role of Judicial Review in Constitutional Amendments
Guardian of the Constitution:
The judiciary plays a crucial role in upholding the supremacy of the constitution. It ensures that amendments do not undermine the basic structure or fundamental principles enshrined in the constitution.
Scope of Judicial Review:
In many constitutional systems, including India, the courts have the authority to review the constitutionality of amendments.
The scope of judicial review varies, but generally includes:
Procedural Validity: Ensuring that the amendment process followed constitutional procedures (e.g., majority requirements, ratification procedures).
Substantive Validity: Assessing whether the amendment violates fundamental rights, the basic structure of the constitution, or other core principles.
Basic Structure Doctrine:
In India, the concept of the basic structure doctrine was established by the Supreme Court in the landmark case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973). This doctrine asserts that while Parliament has the power to amend the constitution, it cannot alter its basic structure or fundamental features.
The courts have used the basic structure doctrine to strike down amendments that they deemed to be in conflict with the core principles of the constitution, such as democracy, secularism, federalism, and the rule of law.
Limitations on Judicial Review:
While courts have the authority to review the constitutionality of amendments, there are some limitations:
Political Question Doctrine: Courts may refrain from intervening in purely political matters or issues best left to the discretion of elected representatives.
Respect for Legislative Authority: There is a presumption of constitutionality, and courts are generally reluctant to interfere with amendments unless they clearly violate the constitution.
Balancing Act:
Judicial review of constitutional amendments involves a delicate balance between respecting the authority of elected representatives and ensuring the constitution’s integrity and stability.
Courts typically exercise restraint and intervene only when amendments clearly undermine the constitution’s basic structure or violate fundamental rights.
Examples and Applications
India: The Indian Supreme Court has used the basic structure doctrine to strike down amendments that sought to alter the fundamental framework of the constitution, such as attempts to curtail judicial review or dilute fundamental rights.
United States: In the US, amendments to the constitution are subject to judicial review, with the Supreme Court assessing their conformity with the Bill of Rights and other fundamental constitutional principles.
Conclusion
Judicial review of constitutional amendments serves as a vital check and balance in constitutional democracies. It ensures that amendments are consistent with the constitution’s foundational principles and do not undermine essential rights and freedoms. While courts exercise caution and respect legislative authority, they play a crucial role in safeguarding the integrity and enduring relevance of the constitution in the face of changing societal and political dynamics.
Describe the procedure for modifying the Indian Constitution according to Article 368. What are the distinct processes for changing the various sections of the Constitution, and why do these procedures differ?
The process of amending the Constitution of India is outlined in Article 368. The Indian Constitution provides for a flexible amendment procedure, with varying degrees of difficulty for amending different parts of the Constitution. This is to ensure that the fundamental structure and core principlesRead more
The process of amending the Constitution of India is outlined in Article 368. The Indian Constitution provides for a flexible amendment procedure, with varying degrees of difficulty for amending different parts of the Constitution. This is to ensure that the fundamental structure and core principles of the Constitution are protected, while also allowing for necessary changes to be made.
There are two primary procedures for amending the Constitution:
Simple Majority Amendment:
This procedure applies to the majority of the provisions in the Constitution.
An amendment can be initiated in either house of Parliament.
The amendment bill must be passed by a simple majority (more than 50%) of the total membership of each house of Parliament and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of each house present and voting.
This amendment process is relatively straightforward and allows for necessary changes to the Constitution to be made.
Special Majority Amendment:
This procedure applies to specific parts of the Constitution, such as the provisions related to the federal structure of the government, the representation of states in Parliament, and the powers of the Supreme Court and High Courts.
An amendment bill must be passed by a special majority of the Parliament, which requires a majority of the total membership of each house and a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of each house present and voting.
Additionally, such an amendment must be ratified by the legislatures of not less than one-half of the states.
This more stringent amendment procedure is in place to protect the basic structure and federal nature of the Indian Constitution.
The rationale behind these varying amendment procedures is to strike a balance between flexibility and stability. The simple majority amendment process allows for necessary changes to the Constitution, while the special majority amendment process ensures that the fundamental features and core principles of the Constitution are not easily altered.
The special majority amendment procedure is designed to make it more difficult to amend certain critical parts of the Constitution, such as those related to the federal structure and the powers of the judiciary. This is to prevent the concentration of power and to safeguard the core principles of the Constitution, which are crucial for the effective functioning of the Indian democratic system.
By having these different amendment procedures, the Constitution aims to maintain a balance between the need for change and the need for stability, ensuring that the Constitution remains responsive to the evolving needs of the country while also preserving its core values and principles.
See lessRoadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Objective: Introduce the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, and its significance. Key Points to Mention: Definition and purpose of the Goods and Services Tax (GST). Overview of the amendment’s goal to create a unified tax structure ...
Model Answer Introduction The Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, introduced the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India, fundamentally changing the indirect tax landscape and aiming to create a unified national market for goods and services. Salient Features of the GST Dual GSTRead more
The Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, introduced the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India, fundamentally changing the indirect tax landscape and aiming to create a unified national market for goods and services.
The GST has significantly reduced the cascading effect of taxes by subsuming multiple indirect taxes—like excise duty, service tax, and value-added tax—into a single entity. This simplification leads to improved transparency and compliance, as businesses are incentivized to maintain proper records through the input tax credit system .
Moreover, by harmonizing tax rates and eliminating state-level barriers, GST facilitates the creation of a common national market, enhancing economic efficiency and making it easier for businesses to operate across state lines .
However, challenges remain. The presence of multiple tax rates can confuse businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which may struggle with compliance and digital filing requirements. Additionally, some states may still experience revenue losses despite the compensation mechanism, as they lose the autonomy to levy their own taxes .
While the GST is a significant step towards a unified tax structure and a common market, addressing ongoing challenges and further simplifying the tax framework will be crucial for enhancing its overall efficacy in achieving its stated objectives.
See lessExamine the claim that rather than implementing piecemeal changes, the Constitution should undergo periodic thorough assessments and updates. What are this approach’s possible benefits and drawbacks?
The argument for subjecting the U.S. Constitution to periodic comprehensive reviews and revisions, rather than relying solely on the piecemeal amendment process, is an interesting and complex one that has merits but also significant challenges. Potential Advantages of Comprehensive Reviews and RevisRead more
The argument for subjecting the U.S. Constitution to periodic comprehensive reviews and revisions, rather than relying solely on the piecemeal amendment process, is an interesting and complex one that has merits but also significant challenges.
Potential Advantages of Comprehensive Reviews and Revisions:
Holistic Updating: A comprehensive review would allow for a more holistic examination of the Constitution’s continued relevance and fitness for the modern era. It could identify interconnected issues and opportunities for broad, systemic updates, rather than addressing challenges in isolation through individual amendments.
Increased Adaptability: Periodic, comprehensive reviews could build in greater structural adaptability to the Constitution, making it easier to keep pace with rapidly evolving societal and technological changes. This could provide a more dynamic and flexible framework for governance.
Democratic Participation: The process of comprehensive reviews could encourage broader public engagement and input, helping to ensure the Constitution remains responsive to the needs and values of the citizenry.
Clarity and Coherence: Undertaking holistic revisions could help streamline and clarify the Constitution, removing outdated provisions, resolving ambiguities, and improving internal consistency.
Potential Challenges of Comprehensive Reviews and Revisions:
Political Difficulty: Achieving the level of bipartisan consensus and political will required to convene a comprehensive constitutional convention or revision process would be extremely challenging, if not practically impossible in the current hyper-polarized political climate.
Risk of Instability: Opening up the entire Constitution to potential revision could create significant uncertainty and instability, with the possibility of core founding principles and protections being altered or dismantled.
Logistical Complexity: Coordinating a large-scale, comprehensive review process involving Congress, the states, and diverse stakeholders would be an enormously complex undertaking, fraught with procedural and practical hurdles.
Preserving the Document’s Essence: There is a valid concern that attempting to modernize the Constitution through comprehensive revisions could inadvertently undermine the core values, principles, and structures that have made it such a durable and respected framework of government.
Ultimately, while the idea of periodic comprehensive reviews has some merit, the immense political and practical challenges involved, combined with the risks of destabilizing the fundamental basis of American government, likely outweigh the potential benefits. A more cautious, incremental approach of targeted amendments may be the more prudent path forward for updating the Constitution over time.
Consider whether the amendment process may be used to address modern issues including environmental preservation, technological development, and the emergence of human rights concerns. How can the Constitution be changed to reflect modern society and keep it current?
As an informed individual from August 2023, I would offer the following perspective on using the constitutional amendment process to address contemporary challenges: The U.S. Constitution has proven to be a remarkably resilient and adaptable document, but it was written over 200 years ago and inevitRead more
As an informed individual from August 2023, I would offer the following perspective on using the constitutional amendment process to address contemporary challenges:
The U.S. Constitution has proven to be a remarkably resilient and adaptable document, but it was written over 200 years ago and inevitably faces challenges in remaining fully relevant to the modern era. The amendment process outlined in Article V provides a formal mechanism for updating the Constitution, but it is intentionally quite difficult, requiring a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of the states.
That high bar for amending the Constitution is by design – the founders wanted to protect the core framework and principles of the document from being altered too easily. However, this also means the amendment process has been used sparingly, with only 27 amendments ratified in over two centuries.
In the face of pressing 21st century challenges like environmental degradation, technological disruption, and evolving human rights norms, there is a compelling case for exploring ways to more readily update the Constitution. Some potential approaches could include:
Environmental protection: An amendment that establishes environmental stewardship as a core governmental responsibility and outlines principles for sustainable use of natural resources. This could enshrine the right to a healthy environment as a fundamental human right.
Technological advancements: An amendment addressing emerging technologies and their societal impacts, such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity. This could establish guardrails and rights for individuals in the digital age.
Human rights: An amendment that consolidates and expands on existing civil rights protections, potentially including new categories like LGBTQ+ equality, disability rights, and reproductive freedom. This could help ensure the Constitution keeps pace with evolving social norms and values.
Ultimately, any effort to amend the Constitution would face substantial political hurdles given the high bar for passage. But a carefully considered, inclusive, and well-crafted amendment process could help the document remain a vital and responsive framework for American governance in the face of rapid social, technological, and environmental change.
Thoughtful debate and compromise among diverse stakeholders would be essential to developing amendments that strike the right balance between stability and adaptability. The Constitution’s enduring strength lies in its ability to evolve, and leveraging the amendment process could help ensure it continues to serve the nation effectively in the decades to come.
See less
Model Answer Introduction The 69th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1991 was a pivotal development in Indian constitutional law, granting special status to the National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi through the introduction of Articles 239AA and 239AB. This amendment aimed to address Delhi’s uniquRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The 69th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1991 was a pivotal development in Indian constitutional law, granting special status to the National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi through the introduction of Articles 239AA and 239AB. This amendment aimed to address Delhi’s unique administrative needs while ensuring efficient governance.
Body
Essentials of the 69th Constitutional Amendment Act
Anomalies and Conflicts
Impact on Indian Federal Politics
The conflicts stemming from the 69th Amendment reveal complexities within India’s federal structure, particularly concerning Union Territories. These tensions may set new precedents in Indian federal politics, emphasizing the necessity for clearly defined roles for elected representatives and constitutional authorities.
Conclusion
The 2018 Supreme Court judgment clarified the respective roles and powers of the LG and the Delhi Government, asserting that the LG must act on the advice of the Council of Ministers. This decision promotes cooperation between the two entities and could serve as a model for governance in other Union Territories.
See less