Freedom Movement

The Cripps Mission in 1942 and the Quit India Movement later the same year are pivotal episodes in India’s struggle for independence. Arriving in the backdrop of World War II, the Cripps Mission aimed to secure India’s cooperation for the British war effort. Its subsequent failure led directly to the launching of the Quit India Movement.

British objectives during World War II

• Addressing British Weakness: The Dunkirk evacuation and losses in other fronts had weakened Britain significantly. It necessitated securing Indian cooperation urgently, shaping the Cripps Mission to offer constitutional reforms that could entice India.
• Securing American Support: The USA was advocating for self-determination globally, reflected in President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Atlantic Charter. America pressured Britain to make constitutional concessions to India as a precondition for continued American support in the war.
• Axis Advances: With Japan’s advances in Southeast Asia, including the capture of Burma, the threat was too close to ignore. The British urgently needed to secure India’s allegiance to prevent it from becoming a launching pad for Axis powers.
• Diplomatic Leverage: The British understood that offering India a post-war roadmap toward self-governance could win them diplomatic points. Neutral nations and even Axis powers would see this as a sign of British commitment to ending colonial rule.

Ways in which these objectives shaped the agenda of the Cripps Mission

• Inclusion of Indians in War Council: One of the promises was to include Indians in a War Advisory Council. This was aimed at giving India a sense of involvement in war decisions, thereby making Indian support for the British war effort more palatable to the Indian populace.
• Military Incentives: Britain offered to promote Indian officers to higher ranks in the army. This was designed to make the army—and by extension, the war effort—more ‘Indian’ in character, and thus more acceptable to the Indian populace.
• Commonwealth Ties: A proposal was floated that post-independence, India could choose to be a part of the British Commonwealth. This was aimed at ensuring that India would remain economically and strategically aligned with Britain even after gaining some form of self-rule.
• Fragmentation: There was a provision for provinces to secede from the Indian federation. This was an attempt to divide and rule, a tactic to weaken the nationalistic Congress by giving more power to provincial parties, some of which were more amenable to British interests.

Factors Leading to the Failure of the Cripps Mission

• Vague Promises: The Cripps Mission offered Dominion Status, but it failed to specify a timeline, leading to deep skepticism among Indian leaders. For stalwarts like Gandhi and Nehru, this ambiguity was a non-starter as it didn’t assure immediate or guaranteed independence.
• Disunity: One major issue was the widening rift between the Congress and the Muslim League. The Cripps Mission’s proposals didn’t adequately address minority concerns, further alienating the Muslim League and making a united front for negotiations impossible.
• Provincial Option: The option given to provinces to secede was a red flag for both the Congress and the Muslim League. It was seen as an attempt to balkanize India, undermining the vision of a united nation-state, and was unacceptable to all major political stakeholders.
• No Immediate Powers: The absence of an immediate transfer of power disillusioned Indian leaders. Figures like Gandhi termed the Mission’s offerings as a “post-dated cheque on a crashing bank,” highlighting the lack of immediate action.
• Tactical Errors: Sir Stafford Cripps himself made several tactical blunders during the mission. His misunderstandings of the complex political dynamics in India and sometimes condescending attitude contributed to the ultimate failure of the mission.
• War Council Representation: The offer of mere representation in the war council without actual decision-making power was perceived as inadequate. It was seen as an attempt to appease without making substantial concessions.

Ripple Effect on Quit India Movement

• Emotional Catalyst: The failure of the Cripps Mission intensified anti-British sentiments. This created a fertile ground for the Quit India Movement, fueling the collective consciousness to demand immediate and unconditional independence from British rule.
• Mass Mobilization: The sense of betrayal and disappointment led to mass protests, strikes, and civil disobedience across India. The failure served as a catalyst that galvanized people to take to the streets, making the Quit India Movement a truly mass-based movement.
• Increased Violence: Disillusionment with the political process led to a more confrontational and aggressive approach. Acts of sabotage against British installations and machinery became more frequent, signaling a departure from a strictly non-violent approach.
• International Attention: The widespread protests of Cripps Mission and the heavy-handed British response against Quit India Movement drew international scrutiny. This made the British colonial position increasingly untenable and forced them to reconsider their strategies in India.

Cripps Mission, influenced heavily by British objectives during WWII, failed due to its vagueness and lack of commitment to genuine power transfer. Its failure sowed the seeds for the Quit India Movement, speeding up the momentum toward Indian independence. Overall, the failure of the mission acted as a catalyst, steering the Indian freedom struggle into its decisive phase.