The ethical principles of beneficence (doing good) and non-maleficence (avoiding harm) are fundamental in guiding international interactions, including global diplomacy and foreign policy. These principles influence the activities and choices of governments and international organizations in variousRead more
The ethical principles of beneficence (doing good) and non-maleficence (avoiding harm) are fundamental in guiding international interactions, including global diplomacy and foreign policy. These principles influence the activities and choices of governments and international organizations in various ways:
- Humanitarian interventions: Governments and international organizations may intervene in conflicts or crises to prevent or alleviate suffering, protect human rights, and promote human dignity. However, this can sometimes lead to unintended harm or create new conflicts.
- Economic sanctions: Economic sanctions can be used to pressure countries to change their behavior, but they can also harm innocent civilians and exacerbate economic inequality.
- Military actions: Military interventions can be used to protect national interests or promote regional stability, but they can also result in civilian casualties, displacement, and long-term political instability.
Scenarios where these principles may conflict:
- Humanitarian intervention vs. national sovereignty: When intervening in a conflict to protect civilians, policymakers must balance the need to do good (beneficence) with the imperative to respect national sovereignty (non-maleficence).
- Economic sanctions vs. economic harm: Sanctions can be an effective tool for promoting regime change or forcing policy concessions, but they can also cause unintended economic harm to civilians.
- Military intervention vs. civilian casualties: Military actions aimed at protecting national interests or promoting regional stability may result in civilian casualties, raising concerns about non-maleficence.
Challenges faced by policymakers:
- Balancing competing values: Policymakers must weigh the benefits of intervention (beneficence) against the potential risks and costs (non-maleficence).
- Lack of information: Insufficient information about the consequences of intervention can make it difficult for policymakers to make informed decisions.
- Complexity of international issues: International problems often involve multiple actors, interests, and factors, making it challenging to identify the most effective and ethical course of action.
- Accountability: Policymakers may face criticism from various stakeholders, including domestic constituents, international partners, and human rights organizations, which can impact their ability to make decisions that balance beneficence and non-maleficence.
To address these challenges, policymakers can:
- Engage in transparent decision-making: Share information about the decision-making process and considerations behind policy choices.
- Consult with diverse stakeholders: Seek input from experts, civil society organizations, and affected communities to better understand the consequences of policy decisions.
- Prioritize human rights and humanitarian law: Integrate human rights and humanitarian law into policy decisions to ensure that actions align with ethical principles.
- Develop contingency plans: Establish procedures for addressing unintended consequences or unforeseen events to minimize harm and promote beneficial outcomes.
In the 2023, Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) released by Transparency International, India is placed 93rd out of 180 nations. The World Bank defines corruption as the abuse of governmental authority for personal gain. It may occur in a variety of ways, including extortion, fraud, bribery, nepotisRead more
In the 2023, Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) released by Transparency International, India is placed 93rd out of 180 nations. The World Bank defines corruption as the abuse of governmental authority for personal gain. It may occur in a variety of ways, including extortion, fraud, bribery, nepotism, and embezzlement.
The following are the causes of corruption in India:
Party in Power for Multiple Terms: In a democracy, the party ought to be afraid of losing power, which deters them from acting unfairly or corruptly. However, in India, parties hold power for multiple terms by devious means. This gives them the ability to create the network and carry out illicit activities like corruption.
Governmental influence on the judiciary body: In any other body, the judiciary should operate freely and without external pressure, but in this case, the judiciary follows government directives and ignores the fraudulent actions that are carried out by them.
Lack of openness and Accountability: One of the main causes of corruption in India’s governance system is the absence of openness and accountability. Because of this, the corrupt are able to abuse their position of authority and power without worrying about facing consequences.
Plans of Action to Fight Corruption in India
India needs to ensure judicial independence from political influence, strengthen transparency through the Right to Information Act, and enact electoral reforms including term limits and stringent campaign funding laws. It is crucial to give anti-corruption organisations like the CVC and CBI the authority and resources they need. Opportunities for corruption can be decreased by raising public awareness and promoting e-governance solutions. Ensuring a transparent and accountable governance system necessitates the implementation of updated anti-corruption laws with strict enforcement, swift judicial procedures, and strong whistleblower protection.
See less