Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question

Ethical Concerns & Dilemmas

Share
Followers
147 Answers
87 Questions
Home/Ethics in Public Administration/Ethical Concerns & Dilemmas

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Divdv
  • 2
DivdvBegginer
Asked: July 9, 2024In: , , , ,
  • 2

  1. Gulshan Kumar
    Gulshan Kumar Begginer

    In the 2023, Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) released by Transparency International, India is placed 93rd out of 180 nations. The World Bank defines corruption as the abuse of governmental authority for personal gain. It may occur in a variety of ways, including extortion, fraud, bribery, nepotisRead more

    In the 2023, Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) released by Transparency International, India is placed 93rd out of 180 nations. The World Bank defines corruption as the abuse of governmental authority for personal gain. It may occur in a variety of ways, including extortion, fraud, bribery, nepotism, and embezzlement.

    The following are the causes of corruption in India:

    Party in Power for Multiple Terms: In a democracy, the party ought to be afraid of losing power, which deters them from acting unfairly or corruptly. However, in India, parties hold power for multiple terms by devious means. This gives them the ability to create the network and carry out illicit activities like corruption.

    Governmental influence on the judiciary body: In any other body, the judiciary should operate freely and without external pressure, but in this case, the judiciary follows government directives and ignores the fraudulent actions that are carried out by them.

    Lack of openness and Accountability: One of the main causes of corruption in India’s governance system is the absence of openness and accountability. Because of this, the corrupt are able to abuse their position of authority and power without worrying about facing consequences.

    Plans of Action to Fight Corruption in India

    India needs to ensure judicial independence from political influence, strengthen transparency through the Right to Information Act, and enact electoral reforms including term limits and stringent campaign funding laws. It is crucial to give anti-corruption organisations like the CVC and CBI the authority and resources they need. Opportunities for corruption can be decreased by raising public awareness and promoting e-governance solutions. Ensuring a transparent and accountable governance system necessitates the implementation of updated anti-corruption laws with strict enforcement, swift judicial procedures, and strong whistleblower protection.

     

     

    See less
Tisha Singh
  • 1
Tisha SinghBegginer
Asked: July 18, 2024In: , , ,
  • 1

  1. SAUMYA MISHRA
    SAUMYA MISHRA Begginer
    This answer was edited.

    "Andha Yug", written by Dharamvir Bharati, is a seminal work in Indian literature that delves deep into the moral and ethical decline during the final days of the Mahabharata war. Set in the aftermath of the battle of Kurukshetra, the play portrays the disintegration of values and the rise of chaosRead more

    “Andha Yug“, written by Dharamvir Bharati, is a seminal work in Indian literature that delves deep into the moral and ethical decline during the final days of the Mahabharata war. Set in the aftermath of the battle of Kurukshetra, the play portrays the disintegration of values and the rise of chaos and despair. Here are some key aspects of the destruction of ethical values in “Andha Yug”:

    Moral Decay in Leadership – 

    • Dhritarashtra and Gandhari: The blind king Dhritarashtra and his wife Gandhari symbolize the moral blindness that pervades the leadership. Dhritarashtra’s inability to take a stand against his son Duryodhana’s unethical actions leads to the war’s catastrophic consequences. Gandhari, though virtuous, curses Krishna, showcasing the pervasive sense of despair and loss of faith.
    • Ashwatthama: His decision to unleash the Narayanastra and later the Brahmastra, despite knowing the devastating consequences, highlights the erosion of ethical values even among respected warriors and scholars.
    • Krishna: Krishna, often seen as the embodiment of dharma (righteousness), engages in acts of deception to ensure the Pandavas’ victory. His actions, such as advising Yudhishthira to lie about Ashwatthama’s death and facilitating Bhima’s killing of Duryodhana through an unethical blow, reflect the complex interplay between dharma and adharma (unrighteousness) in times of war.

    The pervasive sense of hopelessness and despair among the characters signifies the ultimate destruction of ethical values. The survivors are left to grapple with the meaninglessness of their actions and the irreversible consequences of their moral failures.

    Symbolism of Darkness and Blindness – 

    The title “Andha Yug” itself is a metaphor for the blindness to moral and ethical values. The play’s characters, driven by anger, revenge, and despair, fail to see the path of righteousness, leading to their downfall.

    Critique of War – 

    Bharati critiques the war’s dehumanizing effects, showing how it corrupts even the most virtuous individuals. The ethical and moral degradation is evident in the ruthless killings, the use of deceit, and the abandonment of dharma.

     

    See less
Vamika Kohli
  • 1
Vamika KohliBegginer
Asked: July 26, 2024In: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
  • 1

Should developing countries such as India prioritize economic growth over stringent environmental regulations, given their need to improve living standards and reduce poverty? Why or why not?

climate changedeveloping nationseconomic developmentgreen economypolicy dilemmaspovertyquestionresource managementsustainabilitysustainable growthurbanisation
  1. Shehla Iram
    Shehla Iram Begginer

    The debate between economic growth and environmental protection in developing countries is  complex and essential . On one hand, economic growth is essential for improving living standards, reducing poverty, and providing better infrastructure, education, and healthcare. Many developing nations relyRead more

    The debate between economic growth and environmental protection in developing countries is  complex and essential . On one hand, economic growth is essential for improving living standards, reducing poverty, and providing better infrastructure, education, and healthcare. Many developing nations rely on industrialization, urbanization, and exploitation of natural resources to fuel this growth.  This often comes at the cost of environmental degradation, including deforestation, air and water pollution, and loss of biodiversity. On the other hand, environmental protection is crucial for ensuring long-term sustainability and the health of populations. Developing countries face the challenge of balancing these competing priorities. A focus only on economic growth can lead to severe environmental damage, which in turn can undermine future economic prospects by depleting natural resources and causing health problems. Likewise , stringent environmental regulations can hinder economic development by increasing costs and limiting industrial activities. So, the solution lies in adopting a sustainable development model that integrates economic growth with environmental stewardship. This includes investing in green technologies, enforcing environmental regulations, and promoting practices that minimize ecological footprints. International support, through financial aid and technology transfer, is also important to help developing countries achieve this balance.

    See less
Anchal Soni
  • 1
Anchal SoniBegginer
Asked: July 20, 2024In: , , , , , , , , ,
  • 1

constitutiondemocracyopposition
  1. Shivam Anand
    Shivam Anand Begginer

    A well-functioning democracy requires an amplified opposition voice, not just noise. In the past decade, disruptions have overshadowed genuine concerns, leading to: Reduced Scrutiny: Constant boycotts hinder proper debate on crucial policies. Polarization: Point-scoring deepens divides, hindering coRead more

    A well-functioning democracy requires an amplified opposition voice, not just noise. In the past decade, disruptions have overshadowed genuine concerns, leading to:

    • Reduced Scrutiny: Constant boycotts hinder proper debate on crucial policies.
    • Polarization: Point-scoring deepens divides, hindering constructive dialogue.

    To improve Parliament’s efficiency, consider:

    • Enforcing Norms: Respectful discourse promotes serious debate.
    • Dedicated Time: Allocate specific time for the opposition to propose amendments and offer constructive criticism.
    • Committee Focus: Empower committees for detailed bill scrutiny.

    By amplifying the opposition’s voice through these measures, Parliament can become a platform for informed debate, leading to stronger policymaking.

    See less
Yashvita Singh Chauhan
  • 1
Yashvita Singh ChauhanBegginer
Asked: July 9, 2024In: , , , , , ,
  • 1

  1. Sonanya Shrivastava
    Sonanya Shrivastava Begginer

    A profound and complex topic! Albert Camus, a philosopher and absurdist, posed this question in his book "The Myth of Sisyphus." He argued that, in the face of an indifferent and often cruel universe, individuals must confront the reality of their own mortality and the seeming meaninglessness of lifRead more

    A profound and complex topic! Albert Camus, a philosopher and absurdist, posed this question in his book “The Myth of Sisyphus.” He argued that, in the face of an indifferent and often cruel universe, individuals must confront the reality of their own mortality and the seeming meaninglessness of life.

     

    Camus believed that people often shield themselves from this harsh truth through various forms of deception, such as religious beliefs, societal expectations, or personal illusions. However, when one strips away these defenses and confronts the reality of their existence, they may be tempted to ask, “Is there any reason not to commit suicide?”

     

    In this sense, Camus is not advocating for suicide but rather highlighting the absurdity of human existence. He proposes that, in the absence of inherent meaning, individuals must create their own purpose and find ways to live with dignity and authenticity, despite the bleakness of life.

     

    Camus’ philosophy emphasizes the importance of acknowledging and accepting the absurd, rather than fleeing from it. By doing so, individuals can find a sense of liberation and empowerment, allowing them to create their own meaning and find reasons to continue living, even in the face of adversity.

     

    In summary, Camus’ question is a thought-provoking challenge to confront the reality of existence, encouraging individuals to find their own purpose and meaning in life, rather than relying on external sources or illusions.

    See less
Ishika Manchanda
  • 1
Ishika ManchandaBegginer
Asked: July 10, 2024In: ,
  • 1

question
  1. Vinay Rajan
    Vinay Rajan Begginer

    Polygamy, or the practice of having multiple spouses, has been a topic of debate among moral thinkers throughout history. Different philosophers, religious leaders, and ethicists have held diverse perspectives on the issue. Here are some examples: Plato: In his work "The Republic," Plato argued thatRead more

    Polygamy, or the practice of having multiple spouses, has been a topic of debate among moral thinkers throughout history. Different philosophers, religious leaders, and ethicists have held diverse perspectives on the issue. Here are some examples:

    1. Plato: In his work “The Republic,” Plato argued that polygamy is acceptable if it is based on a rational and just arrangement, where the partners are equal and there is no exploitation.
    2. Aristotle: Aristotle believed that polygamy is natural and beneficial, as it allows for the propagation of the species and the formation of strong family bonds.
    3. St. Augustine: The Christian theologian St. Augustine (354-430 CE) condemned polygamy as a sin, citing the biblical prohibition on marrying multiple spouses (Exodus 20:17). He argued that monogamy is the only acceptable form of marriage.
    4. John Calvin: The Protestant reformer John Calvin (1509-1564) believed that polygamy was permissible under certain circumstances, such as when a man’s first wife is barren or dies without children.
    5. Thomas More: The Catholic philosopher and politician Thomas More (1478-1535) argued that polygamy is not inherently immoral, but it should be subject to just and equitable arrangements.
    6. John Stuart Mill: The English philosopher John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) believed that polygamy should be legalized, arguing that individuals should have the freedom to choose their own lifestyle and relationships.
    7. Friedrich Nietzsche: The German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) saw polygamy as a means to overcome traditional societal norms and to create a new, more liberated morality.
    See less
Sandra
  • 1
SandraBegginer
Asked: July 17, 2024In: , , , , , , , , , ,
  • 1

According to you, is euthanasia a personal autonomy issue or does it create a slippery slope leading to the devaluation of human life?

question
  1. Hetal Bansal
    Hetal Bansal Begginer

    Euthanasia is a complex and deeply contested issue, often framed as either a matter of personal autonomy or a potential slippery slope leading to the devaluation of human life. Personal Autonomy Proponents of euthanasia argue that it is fundamentally about personal autonomy and the right to self-detRead more

    Euthanasia is a complex and deeply contested issue, often framed as either a matter of personal autonomy or a potential slippery slope leading to the devaluation of human life.

    Personal Autonomy

    Proponents of euthanasia argue that it is fundamentally about personal autonomy and the right to self-determination. They believe that individuals should have the freedom to choose how and when they die, especially in cases of terminal illness and unbearable suffering. From this perspective:

    • Dignity: Allowing euthanasia can provide a dignified end to life, aligning with the individual’s wishes.
    • Compassion: It can be an act of compassion, relieving someone from prolonged pain and suffering.
    • Control: It gives individuals control over their own lives and deaths, respecting their autonomy and personal choices.

    Slippery Slope

    Opponents, however, caution that legalizing euthanasia could lead to a slippery slope where the value of human life is undermined. They worry about:

    • Abuse and Coercion: Vulnerable populations, such as the elderly, disabled, or economically disadvantaged, might be pressured into choosing euthanasia.
    • Moral and Ethical Implications: It could lead to a broader acceptance of ending lives in cases beyond terminal illness, such as severe depression or non-terminal conditions.
    • Erosion of Medical Ethics: It could conflict with the medical profession’s duty to preserve life and do no harm, potentially eroding trust in healthcare providers.

    Balancing the Two Perspectives

    The debate involves balancing individual rights with broader societal implications. Legal frameworks in various jurisdictions attempt to address these concerns through stringent regulations and safeguards. These include requiring multiple medical opinions, psychological evaluations, and strict eligibility criteria to ensure that euthanasia is a well-considered, voluntary decision made without external pressure.

    In conclusion, whether euthanasia is viewed primarily as a matter of personal autonomy or a slippery slope leading to the devaluation of human life depends on one’s ethical framework and societal values. Both perspectives have valid concerns that need to be carefully weighed in the discussion and legislation of euthanasia.

    See less
Santosh Singh
  • 1
Santosh SinghLearner
Asked: July 25, 2024In:
  • 1

What kinds of moral conundrums might an Indian civil servant encounter? Emphasize the essential components of the approaches taken to overcome these problems.

upsc: ethical concerns & dilemmas
  1. Anil Bhargav
    Anil Bhargav Begginer

    An ethical dilemma is a complex situation that often involves an apparent conflict between moral imperatives, in which to obey one would result in transgressing the other. Ethical dilemma arises because ethical standards are not codified, and disagreements about proper behaviour often occur. For civRead more

    An ethical dilemma is a complex situation that often involves an apparent conflict between moral imperatives, in which to obey one would result in transgressing the other. Ethical dilemma arises because ethical standards are not codified, and disagreements about proper behaviour often occur. For civil servants, ethical dilemmas tend to arise from three critical relationships Le. civil servants and political office holders; civil servants and citizens; and intra-civil service (between ministries, departments and agencies of the state). These dilemmas could broadly fall into following categories:

    • Personal Cost ethical dilemmas, arising from situations in which compliance with ethical conduct results in a significant personal cost to the civil servant, for example, jeopardising held position, injuring valued relationships etc.
    • Right vs Right ethical dilemmas, arising from situations of two or more conflicting sets of bona fide ethical values, for example, civil servant’s responsibility of being open and accountable to citizens versus that of adhering to oath of secrecy/confidentiality etc.
    • Conjoint ethical dilemmas, arising from situations in which a conscientious civil servant is exposed to a combination of the aforementioned ethical dilemmas.

    A strategy to deal with ethical dilemmas must include following key elements:

    • Democratic accountability of administration: The civil servants should subordinate themselves to political authority, to carry out all ‘orders’ from the ‘top’, as long as they are as per law. They should show a spirit of ‘neutrality’ in their official capacity and dealings; and keep at bay their own personal preferences in the performance of their duties and responsibilities.
    • Principle of legality: The civil servants should manifest a spirit of constitutionalism in their exercise of authority. All power must be exercised in the name and general interest of the people and guided by an ‘articulate’ system of rules and laws.
    • Professional integrity: It should act as a source of ‘internal self-control’ in administrative conduct, based on ethical standards and criteria shared and respected by civil servants. It should be seen as a matter of personal and professional honour and prestige, in a culture of ethics, and not simply an externally imposed obligation. Also, a ‘Code of Ethics for Public Servants’ can be brought to complement this.
    • Responsiveness to citizens: It entails consultation in governance and promotion of a kind of ‘Communicative Ethic’, in social affairs. The civil society not only furnishes the State, with needs and demands, but also valuable sources of information, feed-back criticism and evaluation of performance. Along with these elements, it is imperative that a civil servant listens to his or her conscience or Inner voice to guide him or her In resolving ethical dilemmas. The talisman given by Gandhiji can provide the guiding light in this respect.

     

    See less
Sneha Lahiri
  • 1
Sneha LahiriBegginer
Asked: July 13, 2024In: , , , ,
  • 1

How do the ethical principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence influence international interactions, especially global diplomacy and foreign policy? Discuss how these values influence the activities and choices of governments and international organizations. Furthermore, investigate scenarios in which these principles may ...

question
  1. Shreyas Rao
    Shreyas Rao Begginer

    The ethical principles of beneficence (doing good) and non-maleficence (avoiding harm) are fundamental in guiding international interactions, including global diplomacy and foreign policy. These principles influence the activities and choices of governments and international organizations in variousRead more

    The ethical principles of beneficence (doing good) and non-maleficence (avoiding harm) are fundamental in guiding international interactions, including global diplomacy and foreign policy. These principles influence the activities and choices of governments and international organizations in various ways:

    1. Humanitarian interventions: Governments and international organizations may intervene in conflicts or crises to prevent or alleviate suffering, protect human rights, and promote human dignity. However, this can sometimes lead to unintended harm or create new conflicts.
    2. Economic sanctions: Economic sanctions can be used to pressure countries to change their behavior, but they can also harm innocent civilians and exacerbate economic inequality.
    3. Military actions: Military interventions can be used to protect national interests or promote regional stability, but they can also result in civilian casualties, displacement, and long-term political instability.

    Scenarios where these principles may conflict:

    1. Humanitarian intervention vs. national sovereignty: When intervening in a conflict to protect civilians, policymakers must balance the need to do good (beneficence) with the imperative to respect national sovereignty (non-maleficence).
    2. Economic sanctions vs. economic harm: Sanctions can be an effective tool for promoting regime change or forcing policy concessions, but they can also cause unintended economic harm to civilians.
    3. Military intervention vs. civilian casualties: Military actions aimed at protecting national interests or promoting regional stability may result in civilian casualties, raising concerns about non-maleficence.

    Challenges faced by policymakers:

    1. Balancing competing values: Policymakers must weigh the benefits of intervention (beneficence) against the potential risks and costs (non-maleficence).
    2. Lack of information: Insufficient information about the consequences of intervention can make it difficult for policymakers to make informed decisions.
    3. Complexity of international issues: International problems often involve multiple actors, interests, and factors, making it challenging to identify the most effective and ethical course of action.
    4. Accountability: Policymakers may face criticism from various stakeholders, including domestic constituents, international partners, and human rights organizations, which can impact their ability to make decisions that balance beneficence and non-maleficence.

    To address these challenges, policymakers can:

    1. Engage in transparent decision-making: Share information about the decision-making process and considerations behind policy choices.
    2. Consult with diverse stakeholders: Seek input from experts, civil society organizations, and affected communities to better understand the consequences of policy decisions.
    3. Prioritize human rights and humanitarian law: Integrate human rights and humanitarian law into policy decisions to ensure that actions align with ethical principles.
    4. Develop contingency plans: Establish procedures for addressing unintended consequences or unforeseen events to minimize harm and promote beneficial outcomes.
    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: March 8, 2025

Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (8 March 2025)

Examine the key issues that obstruct the development of port infrastructure in India and outline the recent measures taken by the government to address these challenges. (Answer in 200 words) भारत में बंदरगाह अवसंरचना के विकास में आने वाली विभिन्न ...

On: March 7, 2025 Comments: 0

मानव-वन्यजीव संघर्ष का प्रबंधन

प्रधानमंत्री की घोषणा: मानव-वन्यजीव संघर्ष प्रबंधन के लिए एक समर्पित केंद्र की स्थापना। चुनौतियाँ: जनसंख्या वृद्धि और संसाधनों की प्रतिस्पर्धा। वन्यजीव संरक्षण का महत्व पारिस्थितिक संतुलन और जलवायु अनुकूलन: वन्यजीव पारिस्थितिकी तंत्र को बनाए रखने और जलवायु पैटर्न को विनियमित ...

On: March 7, 2025 Comments: 0

Safeguarding Wildlife, Securing Harmony”

Context: Based on the editorial “Living with animals – the challenges and the solution” published in The Indian Express. Announcement: PM announced a center for managing human-wildlife conflict. (Press Information Bureau (PIB) release or official government announcement.) Importance of Wildlife ...

Explore Our Blog