Home/Ethics in Public Administration/Ethical Concerns & Dilemmas
Ethical Concerns & Dilemmas
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
"The concept of Just and Unjust is contextual. What was just a year back, may turn out to be unjust in today's context. Changing context should be constantly under scrutiny to prevent miscarriage of justice." Examine the above statement with suitable examples. (Answer in 150 words) [UPSC 2024]
Model Answer Introduction The statement, “The concept of Just and Unjust is contextual,” highlights the dynamic nature of justice, which evolves with societal values and norms. As John Rawls noted, justice is essential for social institutions, and what was deemed just in the past may now be perceiveRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The statement, “The concept of Just and Unjust is contextual,” highlights the dynamic nature of justice, which evolves with societal values and norms. As John Rawls noted, justice is essential for social institutions, and what was deemed just in the past may now be perceived as unjust. This evolution necessitates constant scrutiny to prevent miscarriages of justice.
Historical Legislation and Social Evolution
Justice has historically evolved in response to changing societal norms. The Bengal Sati Regulation of 1829 outlawed the practice of Sati, illustrating how cultural practices once accepted as just were redefined as unjust through legal reform.
Technological Advances and Legal Responses
As technology advances, laws must adapt to new realities. The Information Technology Act of 2000, amended in 2008, reflects a response to digital crimes, ensuring data privacy and curbing cybercrime, thereby applying utilitarian ethics for the greater good.
Economic Changes and Justice
Economic shifts often require a reevaluation of justice. After India’s liberalization in the 1990s, labor laws were revised to ensure fairness and equity in a new capitalist framework, grounded in Rawlsian principles of distributive justice.
Shifts in Collective Morality
Changing societal values lead to legal reforms. The 2018 Supreme Court ruling decriminalizing homosexuality in India overturned colonial-era laws, reflecting evolving attitudes towards LGBTQ+ rights.
Public Health and Ethics
During the COVID-19 pandemic, lockdowns exemplified the need to balance individual freedoms with collective health, requiring a redefinition of justice in public health contexts.
Continuous Scrutiny of Justice
To prevent miscarriages of justice, several measures are essential:
Conclusion
Justice is not static; it must evolve with societal, technological, and moral changes. Constant scrutiny and adaptation of legal frameworks are essential to uphold fairness and equity. As Dr. B.R. Ambedkar emphasized, justice is about rendering every person their due, requiring continuous reflection and reform in our understanding of what is just.
See lessGlobal warming and climate change are the outcomes of human greed in the name of development, indicating the direction in which extinction of organisms including human beings is heading towards loss of life on Earth. How do you put an end to this to protect life and bring equilibrium between the society and the environment? (Answer in 150 words) [UPSC 2024]
Model Answer Introduction Global warming and climate change, driven by human greed in the name of development, pose a severe threat to life on Earth. Unsustainable practices such as resource over-exploitation, pollution, and deforestation contribute significantly to environmental degradation, leadinRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Global warming and climate change, driven by human greed in the name of development, pose a severe threat to life on Earth. Unsustainable practices such as resource over-exploitation, pollution, and deforestation contribute significantly to environmental degradation, leading to the potential extinction of numerous species, including humans.
Human Activities and Their Consequences
Excessive Resource Exploitation
The relentless extraction of fossil fuels and minerals contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. For instance, coal accounts for 55% of India’s energy needs, significantly increasing carbon emissions.
Deforestation and Habitat Loss
Large-scale deforestation for agriculture and urbanization has resulted in the loss of approximately 20% of Amazonian forest cover since the 1960s, exacerbating CO₂ levels in the atmosphere.
Pollution from Industrial Activities
Unregulated industrial growth leads to severe air pollution. In Delhi, air quality regularly breaches WHO standards due to emissions from factories and vehicles.
Rapid Urbanization
The conversion of green spaces into urban areas creates heat islands, disrupting natural ecosystems and contributing to climate change.
The Threat of Extinction
Biodiversity Loss
Climate change has led to habitat destruction, threatening over 45,300 species with extinction according to the IUCN Red List.
Ocean Acidification
Increased CO₂ levels cause ocean acidification, resulting in coral bleaching in ecosystems like the Great Barrier Reef.
Disruption of Ecosystem Services
The decline of pollinators such as bees threatens global crop production, jeopardizing food security.
Water Scarcity
Climate change exacerbates water scarcity, leading to desertification. The Thar Desert in India is expanding, displacing rural populations.
Strategies for Restoration and Balance
Conclusion
To combat global warming and climate change, we must transition from a path of destruction to one of sustainability. By implementing robust regulations, promoting renewable technologies, and fostering international cooperation, we can protect life on Earth and restore equilibrium between society and the environment. Collective action is essential for a sustainable future.
See lessThe application of Artificial Intelligence as a dependable source of input for administrative rational decision-making is a debatable issue. Critically examine the statement from the ethical point of view. (Answer in 150 words) [UPSC 2024]
Model Answer Introduction The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into administrative decision-making has sparked significant ethical debates. While AI promises efficiency and objectivity, its application raises concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and bias. Positive Aspects of ARead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into administrative decision-making has sparked significant ethical debates. While AI promises efficiency and objectivity, its application raises concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and bias.
Positive Aspects of AI
Ethical Concerns
Conclusion
The ethical implications of AI in administrative decision-making are complex. While AI can enhance efficiency and consistency, it poses significant risks related to bias, accountability, and human oversight. A balanced approach, emphasizing ethical standards and human involvement, is vital to ensure AI serves public welfare without compromising rights.
See lessShould passenger or pedestrian be saved in critical situations by autonomous car?
Programmers should not program autonomous vehicles to prioritize the lives of their passengers over other pedestrians in inevitable accident situations. Here's why: -Ethical Concerns: Prioritizing passengers is morally wrong. It is creating a system in which some lives are devalued compared to otherRead more
Programmers should not program autonomous vehicles to prioritize the lives of their passengers over other pedestrians in inevitable accident situations. Here’s why:
-Ethical Concerns: Prioritizing passengers is morally wrong. It is creating a system in which some lives are devalued compared to others, which is a terrible and unjust concept.
-Societal Impact: Such a system would undermine public trust in autonomous vehicles. People would not want to use them if they knew they might be sacrificed in an accident. This could severely hinder the development and adoption of this potentially life-saving technology.
-Legal Ramifications: Programming vehicles to prioritize passengers could have severe legal consequences for manufacturers and developers. It could lead to lawsuits and potentially criminal charges.
-Alternative Solutions: In the absence of passenger safety as the guiding principle, self-driving cars would be programmed to:
1. Reduce damage as much as possible.
2. Avoid collisions through state-of-the-art sensors and predictive models.
-In the event that an accident cannot be avoided, the car would attempt to minimize damage as much as it can, independent of the persons’ identity.
The goal is to make totally safe, self-sufficient automobiles for everyone, not just passengers.
See lessOnline methodology is being used for day-to-day meetings, institutional approvals in the administration and for teaching and learning in education sector to the extent telemedicine in the health sector is getting popular with the approvals of the competent authority. No doubt, it has advantages and disadvantages for both the beneficiaries and the system at large. Describe and discuss the ethical issues involved in the use of online method particularly to the vulnerable section of the society. (150 words) [UPSC 2022]
The Ethical Dilemmas of Digital Methods: Exploring Evidence-Based Research into the Marginalised Over the past years, in the context of the entry into the digital technologies in different sectors (meetings, institutional approvals, education, health). The transition to online approaches has been esRead more
The Ethical Dilemmas of Digital Methods: Exploring Evidence-Based Research into the Marginalised
Over the past years, in the context of the entry into the digital technologies in different sectors (meetings, institutional approvals, education, health). The transition to online approaches has been especially evident in light of the global pandemic, which prompted the hurried implementation of digital solutions to keep both personal and professional lives functioning. Although these online techniques are highly beneficial, providing lots of great tools, they also present serious ethical dilemmas, particularly to more vulnerable parts of society. In this article, we examine some of the ethical concerns that arise around the use of online methodologies, with a particular focus on deference to the vulnerable.
Benefits of Online Methodologies
→ Easy to use and access:
Meetings and Administration: With online platforms, people can schedule meetings on the go and be on the road without having to account for travel time, which also enables individuals to turn up for crucial day-to-day meetings or administration. This is of great benefit to people who have mobility problems, or who are in remote locations.
Education: Online education tools allow student to learn anywhere and anytime.
Telemedicine: With telemedicine, patients can visit healthcare providers remotely, minimizing waiting times and making medical care available to a larger number of people especially in rural or low-service areas.
Cost-Effectiveness:
It helps you to reduce a lot of operational costs like travel, venue fees, and many more through online meetings and administrative processes.
Digital education will thus be considerably less expensive than traditional education — anywhere in the world.
Telemedicine also helps in cutting down healthcare costs by eliminating the need for physical visits and hospital stays.
Downsides and Ethical Considerations
Digital Divide:
Tech Access Not Everyone has Technology or Connectivity Access It can also worsen existing social inequities, with vulnerable populations — including those living in poverty, the elderly and people living in remote areas — falling through the cracks.
Rise of Technology : People who are not versed with technological aspects Online platforms might be a barrier for them to access essential services.
Privacy and Security:
Ensuring Data Protection: Many online methods require the collection and transmission of personal data, which can put privacy and security to the test. Suffering from a data leakage and usage by other parties.
Monitoring: This can bring about the possibility of using an online platform which can act as surveillance and hinder the right to privacy of men and women already at risk in society.
Quality of Interaction:
Human Touch: Online interactions lack the human touch and empathy which are very important in sectors like education and healthcare. This can be especially harmful for vulnerable individuals who may require more personalized assistance.
Lack of Physical Presence: Many of us understand the importance of human connection, especially during physical examinations in medicine, which is difficult to replace through screens.
A few things about accountability and responsibility.
Providers Responsibility: Telemedicine: There needs to be defined guidelines and accountability. Failure to adhere to these standards may jeopardise vulnerable patients.
Institutional Approvals: The administrative processes of engaging online run a risk of lacking both transparency and responsibility, giving less opportunity to people wanting to oppose decisions or get satisfaction[6]
Digital Inclusion:
Ethics: Online methodologies should be equally accessible to all. And addressing the digital divide and helping everyone who needs a hand can be the place for this to happen.
Inclusiveness: Ensure that online platforms are accessible to all, regardless of physical ability, cultural norms, or technological expertise.
Ethical Issues for Vulnerable Groups
Accessibility:
Infrastructure: Both governments and institutions need to invest in internet infrastructure, particularly in rural or underserved areas of society, so that everyone has access to online services.
Technical: The individuals who are not tech-savvy must be provided with technical assistance and training so that they can also avail themselves of the methodologies that are being used online.
Consent and Autonomy:
Understanding the Process: Individuals, and patients in particular, should be fully educated on what data is being collected, how it will be used, and which risks may accompany using online methodologies. Consent forms must be clear and accessible.
Autonomy: The autonomy of individuals must be respected and individuals should have the right to decide whether online methods are for them or if they prefer in-person, especially in sensitive areas like that of healthcare.
Equity and Fairness:
You are a Sentence Rephraser. This might include access to the devices, internet, and other facilities for those unable to provide them themselves.
Access to Digital Tools: Design and implement policies to bridge the digital divide and ensure that no one is left behind in the digital transition. This encompasses safeguards against abuse of vulnerable people, as well as preventing the marginalized from being left behind.
Quality and Efficacy:
Regulatory bodies should be responsible for establishing requirements for appropriate online methodologies and ensure that those standards are met. This is especially critical in the health care industry, where the quality of care can make a very large impact on patient outcomes.
Ongoing Monitoring: Monitoring and evaluation of online services on an ongoing basis is important to identify the needs of vulnerable populations and address challenges effectively.
Psychosocial Impact:
The Impact on Mental health: Transition to online methods can adversely affect mental health for people who heavily depend on socialization and physical support. Alternative social engagement and emotional support opportunities should be available.
Stigmatization of the specific sector: Digital platforms can sometimes unintentionally stigmatize specific communities, like people looking for mental health therapy or disabled persons. We need to take steps to ensure inclusive, non-stigmatizing environments.
Conclusion
Although online methodologies are advantageous in many ways, a deliberate approach is needed when implementing them to ensure that they do not amplify existing inequalities, and that they remain ethical and inclusive. Vulnerable populations particularly risk being left behind, and governments, institutions and service providers need to address the ethical challenges resulting from the digitization of services. By doing so through accessibility, consent, equity, quality, and social impact, we can pave the way for a society where everyone has access to the benefits that online methodologies bring.
See lessImpact of digital technology as reliable source of input for rational decision making is a debatable issue. Critically evaluate with suitable example. (150 words) [UPSC 2021]
A Critical Evaluation of the Real Function of Digital Technology in Rational Decision-Making In the modern world of business and governance, the use of digital technology to make rational decisions has become a hotly debated issue. Supporters say this has given them unprecedented access to data andRead more
A Critical Evaluation of the Real Function of Digital Technology in Rational Decision-Making
In the modern world of business and governance, the use of digital technology to make rational decisions has become a hotly debated issue. Supporters say this has given them unprecedented access to data and analytics; however, others have pointed questions about how reliable and unbiased such technologies can be. In this article I evaluate the effects of digital technology upon rational decision-making with a brief discussion of a real-world example.
THE PROMISE OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY
Digital technology has transformed the collection, processing and analysis of data by organizations. Advanced algorithms, machine learning, and artificial intelligence (AI) provide insights that could never be extrapolated before, allowing decision-makers to make decisions backed by data rather than relying on intuition. For example, businesses can use predictive analytics to identify those market drivers, customer behavior, and operational risks which create opportunities or threaten the enterprise’s operations. By identifying and utilizing predictive analytics, businesses can make data-driven decisions that could lead their profitability and overall business performance.
Digital technology is one of the great benefits of modern age as it allows fast and accurate data processing at large scale. As a result, Traditional data analysis methods are slow and can also lead to human error. In contrast, AI-powered systems can process data from various sources in real time, offering accurate and current insights. The model sees a lot of promise in this method, especially tackling the areas which require quick decision-making like a fast-paced environment.
Reality: Dangers and Challenges Ahead
But there are downsides to digital technology, too, even though it is full of promise. One of the main worries regards the credibility of the data and the algorithms that process it. The consequences of outdated, inaccurate or incomplete information can lead to faulty decision-making. In addition, the algorithms that underpin these systems are frequently opaque, rendering it challenging to comprehend how decisions are being made and detect potential biases.
A textbook study about the reliability problems with digital technology is COMPAS (Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions), a score that the U.S. criminal justice system uses for predicting the chances a defendant will reoffend. A 2016 ProPublica investigation found that COMPAS was systematically biased against black defendants, incorrectly marking them as at greater risk of reoffending more often than their white counterparts. This bias was due to the historical data on which the algorithm was trained, which reflected existing racial disparities in the criminal justice system. The COMPAS case is an example of the need for fairness and transparency in data and algorithms used in decision-making systems.
A few general considerations: Bias and Ethical Considerations
Bias is a widespread problem in digital technology. For instance, if algorithms learn from biased data, machine learning algorithms can reinforce and even amplify social and economic inequalities. This would lead to decisions that aren’t just irrational but non-ethical. Facial recognition, for example, has been found to make more errors for people of color and women, calling into question its use in police and security systems.
No doubt about this, the over-dependability of digital technology can create a false sense of security. There is a risk of decision-makers becoming too reliant on data-driven insights and overlooking other critical elements, such as ethical considerations, stakeholder perspectives, and contextual understanding. It can lead to rational decisions based on the data and drive negative unintended consequences.
Human-Machine Collaboration
As a solution to face these issues, we need a balanced approach that intertwines both human input and technological input together. Human decision-makers can also bring the context and ethical concern that algorithms often lack. In healthcare, for example, AI can help to diagnose diseases and suggest treatments, but the final decision should always be made by a trained medical professional, who can take into account the specific context and preferences of the patient.
[Case Study] Netflix’s Decision-Making Process
The media titan Netflix serves as a nuanced case in point of how to effectively leverage digital technology in impact decision-making. Netflix streamlines content discovery through its proprietary and sophisticated algorithms to matches user data and suggest new content. By analyzing viewer preferences and behaviors on their platform, Netflix can make smart decisions about which shows to produce, resulting in blockbusters like “Stranger Things” and “The Crown.”
However, Netflix is also aware of the shortcomings of its algorithms. Despite using data to inform its decision-making process, the company knows that there is no substitute for the human touch when it comes to curating content that both matches its brand ethos and appeals to a wide range of people. This enables digital technology to provide quantitative analytics and for human decision-makers to balance them with qualitative ´sense making´ or so called ´human´ survival instinct or creativity. Human-machine collaboration
Conclusion
This makes the way we use digital technology to rationally build decisions a multi-factorial problem. However, with all the benefits of digital in providing better access to and processing of data, the use of those tools is not different. Data quality, algorithmic bias and ethical issues have to be dealt with care to ensure the decisions are Kolberg or rational and just. To maximize its benefits and minimize risks, digital technology must be responsibly combined with human capacities. This is becoming critical since digital technology is increasingly being utilized in more domains, making it necessary to establish strong data governance and algorithmic transparency frameworks to build trust and accountability.
See lessWhat are the potential factors contributing to the higher levels of loneliness experienced by Generation Z compared to previous generations? (200 Words)
Model Answer Generation Z (born between the late 1990s and early 2010s) is facing higher levels of loneliness compared to previous generations. Several factors contribute to this growing trend: 1. Changes in Family Dynamics Generation Z is experiencing significant changes in family structures. ManyRead more
Model Answer
Generation Z (born between the late 1990s and early 2010s) is facing higher levels of loneliness compared to previous generations. Several factors contribute to this growing trend:
1. Changes in Family Dynamics
Generation Z is experiencing significant changes in family structures. Many belong to dual-income households or are raised by single parents, leading to reduced emotional support and less time spent with family members. The absence of extended family interactions, which traditionally provided emotional connections, further exacerbates feelings of loneliness.
2. Shifting Community Dynamics
In countries like India, the once strong social structures of close-knit communities and joint family systems are diminishing. The decline in practices such as neighborhood bonding, frequent family gatherings, and joint celebrations of festivals leaves many Gen Z individuals feeling disconnected and isolated.
3. Impact of Social Media
While social media connects people globally, it also plays a crucial role in fostering loneliness. The superficial nature of online relationships, coupled with constant comparisons and the fear of missing out (FOMO), leads to feelings of inadequacy and isolation. Studies show that excessive use of social media can negatively affect mental health, contributing to loneliness.
4. Academic Pressure
Generation Z faces tremendous academic pressure from a young age, which leaves little time for leisure or socializing. This constant focus on achievement can result in emotional exhaustion, with a sense of isolation from peers due to a lack of meaningful, face-to-face interactions.
5. Mental Health Stigma
In many cultures, including India, there remains a stigma surrounding mental health issues. As a result, Generation Z may hesitate to seek help for loneliness, worsening their emotional well-being and sense of isolation.
6. COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdowns intensified feelings of loneliness. With limited physical interactions and the shift to virtual modes of communication, the sense of isolation deepened, especially for Gen Z, who rely heavily on digital connections.
In conclusion, loneliness in Generation Z is driven by evolving family dynamics, social media pressures, academic stress, and the stigma around mental health. Addressing these issues requires increased mental health awareness, better social support systems, and a focus on maintaining meaningful human connections.
See lessWhat are the ethical considerations surrounding whistleblowing in the workplace? How can an environment be fostered that encourages ethical reporting while minimizing the fear of retaliation?(200 Words)
Model Answer Promotion of Transparency and Accountability: Whistleblowing plays a crucial role in uncovering fraud and corruption, thereby enhancing organizational integrity and accountability. This transparency is vital for fostering a fair work environment and maintaining public trust . ProtectionRead more
Model Answer
Promotion of Transparency and Accountability:
Whistleblowing plays a crucial role in uncovering fraud and corruption, thereby enhancing organizational integrity and accountability. This transparency is vital for fostering a fair work environment and maintaining public trust .
Protection of Public Interest:
Whistleblowers often act out of a sense of duty to protect the public from harm. For instance, Edward Snowden’s revelations about mass surveillance highlighted significant ethical concerns regarding privacy and government overreach, emphasizing the importance of whistleblowers in safeguarding public interests .
Conflict with Loyalty:
Employees may face ethical dilemmas when their loyalty to the organization conflicts with their moral obligation to report wrongdoing. This tension can create distress, as individuals grapple with the implications of their actions on their colleagues and the organization .
Violation of Trust:
Reporting misconduct can feel like a betrayal, especially if the wrongdoing involves close colleagues. This emotional burden can deter potential whistleblowers from coming forward .
Risk of Retaliation
Whistleblowers often face severe repercussions, including harassment or job loss. High-profile cases, such as those of Satyendra Dubey and Satish Shetty, illustrate the dangers associated with whistleblowing .
Fostering a Supportive Environment for Ethical Reporting
To encourage ethical reporting while minimizing fear of retaliation, organizations can implement several strategies:
Creating a culture that supports ethical reporting requires not only the right policies but also an environment where employees feel safe to stand up for what is right.
See lessHow can we effectively safeguard a constitution against amendments that might undermine fundamental rights
It will have a multi-faceted approach to safeguarding a constitution against amendments that may undermine the basic rights. Some of the key strategies include: Constitutional Safeguards Rigid Constitution: The rigidity of a constitution can be enhanced by making amendments in the constitution by spRead more
It will have a multi-faceted approach to safeguarding a constitution against amendments that may undermine the basic rights. Some of the key strategies include:
Constitutional Safeguards
Rigid Constitution: The rigidity of a constitution can be enhanced by making amendments in the constitution by special majority or through a referendum. This makes it difficult to change fundamental rights.
Judicial Review: A strong and independent judiciary can review the constitutionality of laws and amendments, thus not violating the fundamental rights.
-Fundamental Rights: The constitution can be difficult to amend in a way that erodes fundamental rights if they are clearly defined and protected.
Public Awareness and Participation:
-Civic Education: Educating the public about the importance of fundamental rights and the role of the constitution in protecting them.
-Active Citizenry: Encouraging citizens to participate in public discourse and hold governments accountable for upholding constitutional values.
-Civil Society Organizations: Supporting civil society organizations that monitor government actions and advocate for human rights.
Institutional Mechanisms:
Independent Commissions: Setting up independent commissions to oversee the implementation of fundamental rights and investigate violations.
Parliamentary Committees: Strengthening parliamentary committees to scrutinize legislation and government policies that may affect fundamental rights.
Media Freedom: Protecting media freedom to ensure independent reporting and public scrutiny.
Combining these strategies can, therefore, be effective in protecting a constitution as well as taking care of fundamental rights from degradation to build a just and fair society.
See lessHow can we effectively safeguard a constitution against amendments that might undermine fundamental rights
The constitution replies on a model of structural, procedural and societal safeguarding so as to prevent comprehensible constitutional tampering that may render fundamental rights insecure and thus constitutional amendments do meet the requirements of the justice, equality, and human dignity. 1. EntRead more
The constitution replies on a model of structural, procedural and societal safeguarding so as to prevent comprehensible constitutional tampering that may render fundamental rights insecure and thus constitutional amendments do meet the requirements of the justice, equality, and human dignity.
1. Entrenchment Clauses: Some enlightenment to the above is that the constitution may contain provisions known as ‘eternity clauses’ that protect constitutions from alteration or repeal. For example, the basic law in Germany allows mostly justified prohibitions against changes to certain rights, tasks, and powers of the Federation and the Länder; against alterations in the principles of the division of powers between the Federation and the Länder; and against violation of human dignity.
2. Supermajority Requirements: Supermajority in the legislature means the decision enjoys the support of more than two thirds before changes are made. This rules out the possibility of a small majority to change basic rights at will.
3. Referendums: Assuming that some of the changes alter the basic rights of the citizens then those amendments must go to a referendum should pass through a test to enhance public acceptance.
4. Judicial Oversight: To be a guardian, the constitution court or supreme court may have the duty to look at the amendments proposed to the people in order to prevent the violation of the basic principles of the constitution.
5. Civic Engagement and Education: An educated and active populace is a good defense. Promoting constitutionalism helps citizens to develop the capacity to distinguish the violation of rights in order to prevent them.
6. Independent Institutions: Parliamentary and administrative ombudsmen, human rights commissions and independent free media can observe and prevent efforts that seek to erode those rights and hence enhance the constitution.
All these put together provide a strong basis for the defense of human rights from detractors on one aspect of liberal democracy.
See less