Daily Answer Writing

Model Answer

Introduction

International institutions like the UN Security Council and the World Trade Organization aim to promote fairness in global relations. However, states often prioritize national interests, disregarding moral values and the objectives set by these institutions. This leads to a gap between stated commitments and actual practices in international relations.

Reasons for States Not Adhering to Fairness (200-220 words)

1. Sense of Insecurity and Power Politics

International relations are often driven by a balance-of-power politics, where nations act out of insecurity, focusing on maximizing their power. Even nations that pledge non-violence and peaceful conduct often pursue nuclear weapons to secure their sovereignty.

Example: Despite commitments to non-violence, countries like North Korea and India have pursued nuclear weapons for security reasons.

2. Regional Supremacy and Economic Interests

Nations often prioritize regional dominance and economic self-interest over fairness, supporting other nations or taking actions that serve their objectives.

Example: China’s support for Pakistan, including arms funding and vetoing international sanctions, highlights its regional aspirations and its disregard for the wider impact on other countries, particularly India.

3. Colonial Hangover and Interference in Internal Affairs

Despite the global commitment to sovereignty and non-interference, some states continue to meddle in the internal affairs of other countries, often out of historical legacies or geopolitical considerations.

Example: The UK’s discussions in Parliament about the abrogation of Article 370 in India demonstrated how former colonial powers continue to influence domestic affairs.

4. Distributive Justice and Climate Change

Developed nations, who are primarily responsible for climate change, often fail to contribute equitably to climate mitigation, prioritizing their own economic growth over global sustainability.

Example: Developed countries often resist providing the necessary support to developing countries in addressing climate change, despite being the major contributors to it.

5. Self-interest vs. Global Standards

States often pursue policies based on their own national interests, which may conflict with global standards of fairness and justice.
Example: India’s industrial growth, fueled by fossil fuels, conflicts with international climate change agreements that prioritize carbon reduction.

Conclusion

Although international institutions aim to ensure fairness, states often prioritize self-interest, security, and economic gains over the moral standards they publicly uphold. This discrepancy challenges global cooperation and underscores the need for ethical practices in international relations, especially in addressing global crises like terrorism and climate change.