In India’s Constitutional system, discuss the structural and operational aspects of conflicts for supremacy between the Parliament and the Supreme Court. (Answer limit: 100 words, Marks 10) [RPSC 2023]
Sarath NayarEnthusiast
Resources & Suggestions
Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles
On: February 24, 2025
Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (24 February 2025)
The rise of the work-from-home culture has brought about several ethical issues in private organizations. In this context, do you believe it is ethical for an employee to engage in moonlighting? Discuss. (Answer in 150 words) घर से काम करने ...
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
Indo-US Relation: Areas of Cooperation & Conflicts
Key Areas: Defense, technology, trade, energy, and regional cooperation. Key Areas of Cooperation 1. Defense and Security Transition from buyer-seller to co-production and technology sharing. India as a Major Defense Partner (MDP) and inclusion in STA-1. Access to advanced technologies, ...
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
भारत-अमेरिका संबंध: सहयोग और संघर्ष के क्षेत्र
मुख्य विषय: भारत-अमेरिका संबंधों की मजबूती, विशेषकर रक्षा, प्रौद्योगिकी और क्षेत्रीय सहयोग में प्रगति। सहयोग के प्रमुख क्षेत्र 1. रक्षा एवं सुरक्षा सहयोग भारत और अमेरिका के बीच रक्षा संबंधों का विस्तार। प्रमुख रक्षा साझेदार (MDP) का दर्जा और STA-1 ...
In India’s Constitutional system, the conflict for supremacy between Parliament and the Supreme Court arises from their respective powers. Parliament holds legislative authority, while the Supreme Court exercises judicial review. Structurally, Parliament can amend the Constitution, but the Supreme Court ensures that amendments do not violate the “basic structure” doctrine, maintaining judicial supremacy in constitutional interpretation. Operationally, conflicts occur when laws passed by Parliament are challenged in court. This balance of power prevents authoritarianism, as judicial review checks parliamentary overreach, while legislative amendments challenge judicial interpretation, creating a dynamic balance between the two institutions.
In India’s Constitutional system, the conflict for supremacy between Parliament and the Supreme Court arises from their respective powers. Parliament holds legislative authority, while the Supreme Court exercises judicial review. Structurally, Parliament can amend the Constitution, but the Supreme Court ensures that amendments do not violate the “basic structure” doctrine, maintaining judicial supremacy in constitutional interpretation. Operationally, conflicts occur when laws passed by Parliament are challenged in court. This balance of power prevents authoritarianism, as judicial review checks parliamentary overreach, while legislative amendments challenge judicial interpretation, creating a dynamic balance between the two institutions.
In India’s constitutional system, conflicts between Parliament and the Supreme Court arise from structural and operational aspects.
Structural Aspects
Operational Aspects
These conflicts underscore the delicate balance of power in India’s democracy, aiming to uphold constitutional supremacy while respecting parliamentary authority.