In India’s Constitutional system, discuss the structural and operational aspects of conflicts for supremacy between the Parliament and the Supreme Court. (Answer limit: 100 words, Marks 10) [RPSC 2023]
Sarath NayarEnthusiast
Resources & Suggestions
Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles
On: April 18, 2025
Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (18 April 2025)
Do you agree with the claim that indecision and risk aversion are prevalent issues in Indian bureaucracy? Support your answer with logical reasoning. (150 words) ऐसा कहा जाता है कि भारतीय नौकरशाही में अनिर्णय और जोखिम से बचने की प्रवृत्ति ...
On: April 18, 2025
Comments:
0
Strengthening India’s Cyber Defence
Rising Threats Digital Era Challenges: 2024 marks a significant rise in digital threats, particularly from AI and cyberattacks. Key Issues: Disinformation campaigns. Cyber fraud affecting daily life. Current Major Cyber Threats Ransomware Rampage: Over 48,000 instances of WannaCry ransomware detected ...
On: April 18, 2025
Comments:
0
भारत की साइबर सुरक्षा
बढ़ते खतरे कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता (AI) और साइबर हमले: 2024 में AI और साइबर हमलों के खतरे में वृद्धि। महत्वपूर्ण अवसंरचना पर हमले: डिजिटल हमलों और दुष्प्रचार अभियानों की संभावना बढ़ी है। प्रमुख साइबर खतरें रैनसमवेयर का प्रकोप: 48,000 से अधिक ...
In India’s Constitutional system, the conflict for supremacy between Parliament and the Supreme Court arises from their respective powers. Parliament holds legislative authority, while the Supreme Court exercises judicial review. Structurally, Parliament can amend the Constitution, but the Supreme Court ensures that amendments do not violate the “basic structure” doctrine, maintaining judicial supremacy in constitutional interpretation. Operationally, conflicts occur when laws passed by Parliament are challenged in court. This balance of power prevents authoritarianism, as judicial review checks parliamentary overreach, while legislative amendments challenge judicial interpretation, creating a dynamic balance between the two institutions.
In India’s Constitutional system, the conflict for supremacy between Parliament and the Supreme Court arises from their respective powers. Parliament holds legislative authority, while the Supreme Court exercises judicial review. Structurally, Parliament can amend the Constitution, but the Supreme Court ensures that amendments do not violate the “basic structure” doctrine, maintaining judicial supremacy in constitutional interpretation. Operationally, conflicts occur when laws passed by Parliament are challenged in court. This balance of power prevents authoritarianism, as judicial review checks parliamentary overreach, while legislative amendments challenge judicial interpretation, creating a dynamic balance between the two institutions.
In India’s constitutional system, conflicts between Parliament and the Supreme Court arise from structural and operational aspects.
Structural Aspects
Operational Aspects
These conflicts underscore the delicate balance of power in India’s democracy, aiming to uphold constitutional supremacy while respecting parliamentary authority.