Similar to Marx’s idea of class, the caste system has historically been the main means of social stratification in India. The lower castes have historically been subjugated by the upper castes, who have held political and economic authority. Marx’s concept of class conflict is reflected in the social and economic differences that have resulted from this power mismatch. According to Marx’s dialectical materialism thesis, economic forces and class conflict do shape history. Despite having its roots in European industrial capitalism, this theory can be used to comprehend Indian social dynamics.                                                                                  However, the particular complexity of Indian society makes a direct application of Marx’s theory difficult. Besides the caste system does not alone determine social and economic consequences. There are other important elements as well, such as gender, geography, and religion. Furthermore, Marx’s paradigm may not adequately describe how India’s rich cultural and historical background has affected its social and economic growth. Although Marx’s theory offers a useful framework for examining Indian society, it is crucial to take into account the unique subtleties and complexity of the Indian setting. A more comprehensive comprehension necessitates the integration of alternative theoretical stances, such as those that prioritize cultural, religious, and historical elements.