Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question
Home/upsc: federal structure

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Prateek
  • 0
PrateekLearner
Asked: June 5, 2024In:
  • 0

Using examples, highlight the distinctions between “holding together federations” and “coming together federations.” (A response of 200 words) (Answer in 200 words)

upsc: federal structure
  1. Debdatta Das
    Debdatta Das Begginer

    FEDARALISM IS DIVIDED INTO TWO FORMS i.e. the coming together fedaration and the holding together fedaration . Holding together fedartaion means that when a larger country decides to divide its power and authority in to the  member states and the  central government . Coming together fedaration on tRead more

    FEDARALISM IS DIVIDED INTO TWO FORMS i.e. the coming together fedaration and the holding together fedaration . Holding together fedartaion means that when a larger country decides to divide its power and authority in to the  member states and the  central government . Coming together fedaration on the other hand means that the wherein the sovereign states they join their hands with other sovereign states in order to form a larger unit . In holding together fedaration the central government has its dominance in the other state constituences and that of the coming together fedaration both the state and the central  government has the equal power distribution .

    Examples of Holding together fedaration : India and Spain .

    Examples of Coming together fedaration : USA and Australia.

    See less
Prateek
  • 0
PrateekLearner
Asked: June 5, 2024In:
  • 0

Describe the different obstacles that India faces in maintaining cooperative federalism. Provide strategies for promoting cooperative federalism as well. (Answer in 200 words)

upsc: federal structure
  1. Animesh Singh
    Animesh Singh Learner

    Ensuring cooperative federalism in India faces several challenges: 1. Power imbalance: The central government's dominance over financial resources and policy decisions creates an uneven power dynamic between the Union and the states, hampering genuine cooperation. 2. Political differences: IdeologicRead more

    Ensuring cooperative federalism in India faces several challenges:

    1. Power imbalance: The central government’s dominance over financial resources and policy decisions creates an uneven power dynamic between the Union and the states, hampering genuine cooperation.

    2. Political differences: Ideological and political differences between the ruling parties at the center and in the states can lead to conflicting agendas and a lack of consensus on national issues.

    3. Fiscal constraints: Many states face financial constraints and are heavily dependent on the center for grants and transfers, limiting their autonomy in decision-making.

    4. Coordination issues: Lack of effective coordination mechanisms and communication channels between the Union and the states can hinder the implementation of joint programs and policies.

    5. Functional overlap: Unclear delineation of responsibilities between the Union and the states often leads to overlapping jurisdictions and conflicts over policy implementation.

    To foster cooperative federalism, the following measures can be taken:

    1. Strengthening inter-governmental forums: Institutions like the Inter-State Council and the Goods and Services Tax Council should be empowered to facilitate greater dialogue and consensus-building.

    2. Enhancing fiscal federalism: Revising the formula for the devolution of financial resources to the states, increasing the untied grants, and expanding the states’ revenue-raising powers can promote fiscal autonomy.

    3. Institutionalizing cooperative mechanisms: Establishing permanent secretariats, joint task forces, and regular consultations between the Union and the states can improve coordination and collaboration.

    4. Promoting cooperative mindset: Fostering a culture of mutual trust, respect, and accommodative approach among political parties and government officials can contribute to the success of cooperative federalism.

    See less
Gitanjali Reena
  • 0
Gitanjali ReenaBegginer
Asked: June 28, 2024In:
  • 0

The Indian federalist model has drawn criticism for being overly centralized, yet it also gives the states enough room and autonomy. Examine. (Answer in 250 words)

upsc: federal structure
  1. Sagar soni
    Sagar soni Begginer

    Federalism is a system of government in which powers have been divided between the Centre and its constituent parts such as states within a country. Though the word federation is not mentioned in the Indian Constitution, the country has a federal system having a rigid Constitution, bicameralism, indRead more

    Federalism is a system of government in which powers have been divided between the Centre and its constituent parts such as states within a country. Though the word federation is not mentioned in the Indian Constitution, the country has a federal system having a rigid Constitution, bicameralism, independent Judiciary, division of powers between various levels of government, etc. However, it has been often argued that the Indian model of federalism has centralization tendencies. Centralized nature of the Indian federalism:

    • Legislation by the Centre in ‘state subjects’: Under the Seventh Schedule, the legislative powers of the Centre and States are delineated in the Union List, State List, and Concurrent List.
      • In case of a deadlock between the Union and states over subjects in the Concurrent list, the Union law prevails.
      • The Union List contains more subjects than the State List.
      • Under Article 249 of the Indian Constitution, the Parliament has power to legislate with respect to a matter in the State List in the national interest.
    • President’s Rule: Under Article 356 of the Constitution, the President can dismiss state governments and dissolve Legislative Assemblies, leading to central control of the states.
    • Central agencies and institutions: The existence of central agencies like the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the National Investigation Agency (NIA) signifies the control of the Central government in matters of investigation and law enforcement.
    • Other features:
      • The Union Parliament has been given unilateral discretion to reconstruct the boundaries of the states.
      • The Union government has the power of appointing Governors in the states and dissolving state governments by proclaiming President’s Rule if the Centre deems fit.

    However, in the Indian model of federalism, states have been given adequate space and autonomy, as can be discerned through the following examples:

    • State List: Under the Seventh Schedule, states have exclusive legislative rights on matters in the State List. Even when the Parliament makes a law under Article 249 of the Constitution, the state law can prevail if there is the consent of the President.
    • Executive and financial powers: The state governments have the power to administer programmes and policies in their respective states, and they are responsible for rolling out the budget, and collecting and spending revenue.
    • The Indian Constitution also provides for a system of fiscal federalism, which ensures that the states receive a share of revenue from the Central government.
    • Special status and autonomy: The Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution provides for special provisions for tribal areas in the North-Eastern states allowing them a degree of autonomy in governance.
    • Cooperative federalism: Different forums are established for promotion of cooperative federalism, such as the Niti Aayog, GST Council, Inter-State Council, etc. to promote the participation of state governments in the policy-making process.
    • Others: One of most important moments for federalism in recent times is the revelation of the vital role of state governments in managing the COVID-19 crisis. After initial challenges, the Union government ceded adequate space and autonomy to the states for strengthening their healthcare facilities and managing localised lockdowns.

    Indian federalism is a dynamic model that has witnessed a unique interplay of centralization and decentralization. While the Central government maintains significant control over the states, there are instances where autonomy has been granted to accommodate regional aspirations and promote cooperative federalism. The ongoing evolution of Indian federalism should ensure that the needs of a diverse country are effectively addressed.

    See less
Bhavesh singh
  • 0
Bhavesh singhBegginer
Asked: June 17, 2024In:
  • 0

The cooperative federalism of India is in jeopardy because several state governments have withdrawn their general consent to the CBI.

upsc: federal structure
  1. Rohini Singh
    Rohini Singh Begginer

    Answer: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is the premier investigating police agency in India. It is not only a premier anti-corruption investigative agency but also has experience of handling high profile conventional crimes, economic offences, banking frauds and frauds with international lRead more

    Answer: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is the premier investigating police agency in India. It is not only a premier anti-corruption investigative agency but also has experience of handling high profile conventional crimes, economic offences, banking frauds and frauds with international linkages. The CBI is governed by The Delhi Special Police Establishment Act (DSPE) Act, 1946, and it must mandatorily obtain the consent of the state government concerned before beginning to investigate a crime in a state. The consent of the state government can be case-specific or general. General consent is usually given by states to help the CBI in seamless investigation of cases of corruption against central government employees in their states. This is consent by default, in the absence of which, the CBI would have to apply to the state government, in every case, and before taking even small actions. Traditionally, almost all states have given the CBI general consent. However, currently nine states have withdrawn consent to the CBI on the grounds that the CBI is used for political interests and vendetta. This tussle between the CBI and States has created an impasse as around 150 requests for sanction to investigate by the CBI are pending with such state governments since 2018. The Supreme Court has referred to the situation as ‘undesirable’. It has been argued that this also threatens the spirit of cooperative federalism in India in the following manner:

    • Under the Seventh Schedule, ‘Police’ and ‘Public Order’ are State subjects under the Constitution, conferring exclusive domain to the state to make laws regarding the same. However, the CBI continues to carry out its functions as a Central Government investigative agency. This overlap of functioning and jurisdiction with local police forces cause recurrent federal issues.
    • A fallout of it is that the CBI has not been able to start a probe in over Rs. 21,000 Crores worth of bank fraud cases in want of consent by five states in the last three years.
    • It has led to widening of trust deficit between the Center and states and weakening an important central agency, making it incapable of coordinating on vital common matters.

    In 2013, the CBI came under harsh criticism by one of the Supreme Court judges, who referred to it as a “caged parrot” and “its master’s voice” due to political interference in the CBI inquiry on the allocation of coalfield licences. It has been argued that when different political parties form governments at the Center and states, often their interests don’t align and the CBI is used as a political tool in such instances. Therefore, the concerns of states governments also need to be looked into along with ensuring that the CBI conducts all its investigations in a free, fair and impartial manner as per the law. Following steps can be taken in this regard:

    • As observed by the Madras High Court, the CBI Director should be given similar powers as that of the Secretary to the Government of India. Also, he should directly report to the Minister/Prime Minister without going through the Department of Personnel and Training.
    • The central investigation agency “should be made more independent” like the Election Commission of India and the Comptroller and Auditor General of India. The Madras High Court also directed the government to “consider and take a decision for enactment of a separate Act giving statutory status with more powers and jurisdiction to CBI at the earliest”.

    This federal impasse is a worrying development. Strong federal agencies are in national interest because big crimes often straddle state and national borders and state agencies may not have resources or jurisdiction to thwart such offenses. Therefore, it would be in India’s interest to protect CBI from political influence and interference.

    See less
Mansi Gautam
  • 0
Mansi GautamLearner
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Analyze the Union government’s role in managing national infrastructure, including roads, trains, and telecommunications, and in regulating interstate commerce.

upsc: federal structure
  1. Mohit Sharma
    Mohit Sharma Begginer

    The Union government plays a significant role in regulating interstate commerce and managing national infrastructure in India. Here are some of the key areas where the Union government is involved: Regulation of Interstate Commerce: Trade and Commerce: The Union government regulates trade and commerRead more

    The Union government plays a significant role in regulating interstate commerce and managing national infrastructure in India. Here are some of the key areas where the Union government is involved:

    Regulation of Interstate Commerce:

    Trade and Commerce: The Union government regulates trade and commerce through various laws and institutions, such as the Customs Act, 1962, the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Income-tax Act, 1961.
    Interstate Trade Agreements: The Union government negotiates and signs interstate trade agreements with neighboring countries to facilitate trade and commerce.
    National Trade Policy: The Union government formulates and implements national trade policies to promote exports, imports, and domestic trade.
    Management of National Infrastructure:

    Railways: The Indian Railways is a nationalized sector, and the Union government has the responsibility to manage and regulate rail infrastructure, including track maintenance, signaling systems, and train operations.
    Highways: The Union government is responsible for constructing, maintaining, and regulating national highways, which connect major cities and towns across the country.
    Telecommunications: The Union government regulates telecommunications through the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), which sets standards for network infrastructure, services, and tariffs.
    Airports: The Airports Authority of India (AAI) is responsible for managing and developing civil aviation infrastructure, including airports, air traffic control systems, and air navigation services.
    Seaports: The Indian Ports Act, 1907, gives the Union government control over seaports, which are responsible for handling international trade cargo.
    Key Challenges:

    Corruption: Corruption is a significant challenge in the regulation of interstate commerce and management of national infrastructure.
    Inadequate Funding: Insufficient funding can hinder the development and maintenance of national infrastructure.
    Regulatory Overreach: Excessive regulation can lead to bureaucratic delays and inefficiencies.
    Coordination Challenges: Coordination between different ministries and agencies can be challenging, leading to delays and inefficiencies.
    To overcome these challenges, the Union government can:

    Strengthen institutional mechanisms for regulation and management of national infrastructure.
    Increase transparency and accountability in decision-making processes.
    Enhance public-private partnerships to attract investment in infrastructure development.
    Simplify regulations to reduce bureaucratic hurdles and increase efficiency.
    In conclusion, the Union government plays a crucial role in regulating interstate commerce and managing national infrastructure in India. While there are challenges, the government can address them by strengthening institutional mechanisms, increasing transparency and accountability, promoting public-private partnerships, and simplifying regulations.

    See less
Ajay Sundar
  • 0
Ajay SundarLearner
Asked: February 18, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Define Centre-State relations and their significance in Indian federalism. Briefly mention the recent changes and the context of these changes. Recent Changes Introduced by the Union Government 15th Finance Commission’s Recommendations: Discuss the reduction of states’ share in central taxes ...

upsc: federal structure
  1. Team
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The Centre-State relations in India have seen notable changes recently, particularly in the context of cooperative federalism and fiscal management. The 15th Finance Commission's recommendations, the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), and the contentious faRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The Centre-State relations in India have seen notable changes recently, particularly in the context of cooperative federalism and fiscal management. The 15th Finance Commission’s recommendations, the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), and the contentious farm laws have all influenced this dynamic relationship.

    Recent Changes Introduced by the Union Government

    1. 15th Finance Commission’s Recommendations: The Centre has implemented the recommendation to reduce the states’ share in central taxes from 42% to 41%. This adjustment acknowledges the fiscal challenges while considering the needs of newly formed Union Territories like Jammu & Kashmir .
    2. Introduction of GST: While GST aimed to unify the Indian market, it has led to financial stress for states, particularly due to delays in compensation payments. Several states have expressed concerns over these delays, which strain their budgets .
    3. Farm Laws: The controversial farm laws enacted by the Centre aimed at agricultural reform but faced significant backlash from states like Punjab and Haryana, which argued that agriculture is a state subject and that these laws infringed upon their legislative powers .
    4. Establishment of NITI Aayog: The transition from the Planning Commission to NITI Aayog was intended to promote cooperative federalism. However, some states feel that decision-making remains overly centralized .
    5. Increase in Centrally Sponsored Schemes: The rise in centrally sponsored schemes has reduced the financial autonomy of states, as they are often required to contribute funds, limiting their flexibility in local development priorities .
    6. Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) Scheme: The DBT has centralized welfare disbursement, reducing state control over social welfare programs, which may not always align with local needs .

    Measures to Build Trust and Strengthen Federalism

    1. Strengthening the Inter-State Council: Revitalizing this council can foster dialogue on policy decisions and disputes, ensuring inclusiveness in governance .
    2. Timely GST Compensation: Ensuring timely compensation will help maintain fiscal stability and trust between the Centre and states.
    3. More Autonomy in Centrally Sponsored Schemes: Empowering states to tailor schemes according to local needs will enhance efficiency .
    4. Cooperative Federalism through NITI Aayog: Involving states in key decisions will promote shared ownership of national development goals .
    5. Resolving Disputes through Consensus: A collaborative approach to resolving issues like river water-sharing disputes can reduce friction .
    6. Constitutional Clarity on State Subjects: Clearly defining powers and responsibilities will minimize conflicts and enhance cooperative federalism .
    7. Fiscal Empowerment of States: Revisiting the 15th Finance Commission’s recommendations to provide greater fiscal autonomy will ensure balanced development.
    8. Collaborative Policy Formulation: Engaging states in the early stages of policy formulation will foster a sense of ownership and cooperation.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, nurturing India’s federal structure through mutual trust and cooperation is essential for effective governance. Strengthening Centre-State relations through dialogue, financial autonomy, and clear constitutional definitions will enhance the foundation of Indian democracy.

    See less
Ananya Patel
  • 0
Ananya Patel
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Talk about the federal framework’s provisions for the autonomy of local self-government organizations like municipalities and panchayats. Examine the difficulties and arguments surrounding the transfer of authority to these organizations at the local level.

upsc: federal structure
  1. Ishaan Chopra
    Ishaan Chopra Begginer

    The autonomy of local self-government institutions, such as Panchayats and Municipalities, within India's federal framework is enshrined in the Constitution through the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments. These amendments aimed to decentralize governance and empower local bodies to promote demoRead more

    The autonomy of local self-government institutions, such as Panchayats and Municipalities, within India’s federal framework is enshrined in the Constitution through the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments. These amendments aimed to decentralize governance and empower local bodies to promote democratic participation and socio-economic development at the grassroots level. However, the devolution of powers to these institutions has faced several challenges and debates.

    Provisions for Local Self-Government Autonomy
    Panchayats (73rd Amendment Act, 1992)
    Three-Tier System:
    Village Level (Gram Panchayat), Intermediate Level (Panchayat Samiti), and District Level (Zila Parishad).
    Elections:
    Direct elections to all seats in Panchayats at all levels (Article 243C).
    Reservation of Seats:
    Reservation for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in proportion to their population.
    Reservation of one-third of seats for women (Article 243D).
    Powers and Responsibilities:
    State legislatures to endow Panchayats with the powers and authority necessary to function as institutions of self-government (Article 243G).
    Preparation of plans for economic development and social justice.
    Implementation of schemes for economic development and social justice.
    Finance:
    Constitution of State Finance Commissions to review the financial position of Panchayats and recommend measures to improve their finances (Article 243-I).
    Municipalities (74th Amendment Act, 1992)
    Three Types of Municipalities:
    Nagar Panchayat for a transitional area (rural to urban).
    Municipal Council for a smaller urban area.
    Municipal Corporation for a larger urban area (Article 243Q).
    Elections:
    Direct elections to all seats in Municipalities (Article 243R).
    Reservation of Seats:
    Reservation for SCs and STs in proportion to their population.
    Reservation of one-third of seats for women (Article 243T).
    Powers and Responsibilities:
    State legislatures to endow Municipalities with the powers and authority necessary to function as institutions of self-government (Article 243W).
    Preparation of plans for economic development and social justice.
    Implementation of schemes for economic development and social justice.
    Finance:
    Constitution of State Finance Commissions to review the financial position of Municipalities and recommend measures to improve their finances (Article 243Y).
    Challenges and Debates Surrounding Devolution of Powers
    Inadequate Devolution of Powers:

    State Control: Many states have been reluctant to devolve significant powers, functions, and resources to Panchayats and Municipalities, maintaining substantial control over these bodies.
    Unfunded Mandates: Local bodies are often assigned responsibilities without adequate financial resources, leading to ineffective functioning.
    Capacity and Training:

    Administrative Capacity: Local bodies frequently lack the administrative capacity and skilled personnel needed to effectively discharge their responsibilities.
    Training: There is a need for comprehensive training programs for elected representatives and functionaries to enhance their capabilities.
    Financial Autonomy:

    Revenue Generation: Local bodies have limited sources of revenue and rely heavily on grants from state and central governments.
    State Finance Commissions: Recommendations of State Finance Commissions are often not implemented effectively, undermining the financial autonomy of local bodies.
    Political Interference:

    Interference by State Governments: Excessive interference by state governments in the functioning of local bodies undermines their autonomy and effectiveness.
    Partisan Politics: Local governance is sometimes influenced by partisan politics, affecting the neutrality and efficiency of local institutions.
    Implementation of Plans:

    Coordination: Lack of coordination between various levels of government (central, state, and local) hampers the effective implementation of development plans and schemes.
    Monitoring and Accountability: Weak mechanisms for monitoring and accountability lead to inefficiencies and corruption.
    Inclusivity and Representation:

    Social Inclusion: Ensuring effective participation and representation of marginalized communities, including women, SCs, STs, and OBCs, remains a challenge.
    Awareness: Low levels of awareness and participation among citizens about the roles and functions of local bodies reduce their effectiveness.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 13, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Definition of Article 356: Explain what Article 356 entails and its purpose in the Indian Constitution. Thesis Statement: State that the frequency of its invocation has decreased since the mid-1990s due to various legal and political factors. 2. ...

upsc: federal structure
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction Article 356 of the Indian Constitution allows the President to impose direct central rule in a state when constitutional machinery fails. While frequently invoked in earlier decades, its usage has significantly declined since the mid-1990s. This reduction can be attributedRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    Article 356 of the Indian Constitution allows the President to impose direct central rule in a state when constitutional machinery fails. While frequently invoked in earlier decades, its usage has significantly declined since the mid-1990s. This reduction can be attributed to various legal and political factors.

    Legal Factors

    Judicial Pronouncements

    The S.R. Bommai case (1994) was pivotal in shaping the application of Article 356. The Supreme Court ruled that the use of Article 356 is subject to judicial review, reinforcing that the President’s power to dissolve a state assembly must be exercised judiciously.

    Doctrine of Constitutional Mandate

    The judiciary has emphasized the importance of federalism, advocating for state autonomy and restricting the arbitrary use of Article 356. This judicial perspective encourages a more thoughtful application of the provision.

    Guideline Establishment

    The Bommai case established guidelines outlining the appropriate circumstances for invoking Article 356, promoting a more restrained and deliberate approach to its application.

    Recommendations of Commissions

    The Sarkaria Commission and Punchhi Commission recommended a cautious application of Article 356 to foster cooperative federalism and enhance center-state relations. Their recommendations emphasized the need for restraint in imposing President’s Rule.

    Judicial Role of the President

    Post-Bommai, the President’s role in assessing state conditions has become more judicial, necessitating careful consideration before recommending Article 356. This shift has led to a more cautious approach.

    Political Factors

    Coalition Politics

    The rise of coalition governments has fostered collaborative governance, reducing the impulsive use of Article 356 and promoting political stability.

    Public Perception and Media Scrutiny

    Increasing media scrutiny and informed public opinion act as deterrents against arbitrary use of Article 356, holding the government accountable and upholding democratic principles.

    Strength of Regional Parties

    The growing influence of regional parties has created a balanced power dynamic, discouraging the central government from unnecessarily invoking Article 356.

    Political Maturity

    India’s evolving political landscape has prioritized stability and governance over power struggles, fostering adherence to constitutional norms.

    International Image

    The desire to maintain a positive international image as a democratic nation has led Union governments to avoid unnecessary applications of Article 356.

    Conclusion

    In summary, the combination of prudent legal interventions and an evolved political environment has significantly reduced the frequency of invoking Article 356. This trend reflects a mature democracy striving to uphold the ideals enshrined in its Constitution while fostering balanced governance.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 13, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Contextual Background: Briefly explain the concept of decentralization and its significance in the Indian governance framework. Key Amendments: Mention the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments (1992) that established the Panchayati Raj system and urban local bodies. 2. Body A. ...

upsc: federal structure
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The decentralization of power in India, particularly through the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments in 1992, has fundamentally transformed the governance landscape at the grassroots level. This significant legal framework established the Panchayati Raj system and urbanRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The decentralization of power in India, particularly through the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments in 1992, has fundamentally transformed the governance landscape at the grassroots level. This significant legal framework established the Panchayati Raj system and urban local bodies, empowering local governance.

    Enhanced Participation

    Decentralization has markedly increased public participation in governance. Local communities now engage actively in planning, implementing, and monitoring development programs. According to the Ministry of Panchayati Raj, this has led to greater alignment of policies with local needs, fostering a sense of ownership among citizens.

    Empowerment of Marginalized Groups

    One of the most significant outcomes of decentralization is the empowerment of marginalized groups, particularly women. The 1992 amendments mandated that at least one-third of Panchayat seats be reserved for women, promoting social equity. Studies by the National Institute of Rural Development show a notable increase in women’s representation in local governance as a result.

    Responsive Governance and Accountability

    Local governments have become more responsive to community needs, enhancing service delivery. Research from the Indian Institute of Management indicates that decentralized governance has improved accountability, as local elected officials are more directly answerable to their constituents.

    Capacity Building

    Decentralization has facilitated capacity building for local representatives, equipping them with essential skills to manage resources effectively. Initiatives in states like Kerala have demonstrated successful training programs that enhance the effectiveness of local governance.

    Challenges

    Despite these advancements, challenges persist. Many local bodies suffer from inadequate financial resources, limiting their autonomy. Additionally, a lack of training and instances of corruption undermine the potential benefits of decentralization.

    Conclusion

    In summary, while decentralization in India has led to enhanced participation, empowerment, and accountability at the grassroots level, addressing financial constraints and capacity issues is crucial for realizing its full potential. Continued efforts to strengthen local governance will pave the way for a more inclusive and responsive governance framework.

    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: February 24, 2025

Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (24 February 2025)

The rise of the work-from-home culture has brought about several ethical issues in private organizations. In this context, do you believe it is ethical for an employee to engage in moonlighting? Discuss. (Answer in 150 words) घर से काम करने ...

On: February 22, 2025 Comments: 0

Indo-US Relation: Areas of Cooperation & Conflicts

Key Areas: Defense, technology, trade, energy, and regional cooperation. Key Areas of Cooperation 1. Defense and Security Transition from buyer-seller to co-production and technology sharing. India as a Major Defense Partner (MDP) and inclusion in STA-1. Access to advanced technologies, ...

On: February 22, 2025 Comments: 0

भारत-अमेरिका संबंध: सहयोग और संघर्ष के क्षेत्र

मुख्य विषय: भारत-अमेरिका संबंधों की मजबूती, विशेषकर रक्षा, प्रौद्योगिकी और क्षेत्रीय सहयोग में प्रगति। सहयोग के प्रमुख क्षेत्र 1. रक्षा एवं सुरक्षा सहयोग भारत और अमेरिका के बीच रक्षा संबंधों का विस्तार। प्रमुख रक्षा साझेदार (MDP) का दर्जा और STA-1 ...

Explore Our Blog