Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question
Home/upsc: federal structure

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Prateek
  • 0
PrateekLearner
Asked: June 5, 2024In:
  • 0

Using examples, highlight the distinctions between “holding together federations” and “coming together federations.” (A response of 200 words) (Answer in 200 words)

upsc: federal structure
  1. Debdatta Das
    Debdatta Das Begginer

    FEDARALISM IS DIVIDED INTO TWO FORMS i.e. the coming together fedaration and the holding together fedaration . Holding together fedartaion means that when a larger country decides to divide its power and authority in to the  member states and the  central government . Coming together fedaration on tRead more

    FEDARALISM IS DIVIDED INTO TWO FORMS i.e. the coming together fedaration and the holding together fedaration . Holding together fedartaion means that when a larger country decides to divide its power and authority in to the  member states and the  central government . Coming together fedaration on the other hand means that the wherein the sovereign states they join their hands with other sovereign states in order to form a larger unit . In holding together fedaration the central government has its dominance in the other state constituences and that of the coming together fedaration both the state and the central  government has the equal power distribution .

    Examples of Holding together fedaration : India and Spain .

    Examples of Coming together fedaration : USA and Australia.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: September 10, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Define Financial Emergency as per Article 360 of the Indian Constitution. Mention its historical context, noting that it has never been invoked in India. Circumstances for Proclaiming Financial Emergency Explain the conditions under which the President can declare a Financial ...

upsc: federal structure
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction Financial Emergency, outlined in Article 360 of the Indian Constitution, is one of the three emergencies the President of India can proclaim. Notably, it has never been imposed in independent India. This provision aims to safeguard the nation’s financial stability and crediRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    Financial Emergency, outlined in Article 360 of the Indian Constitution, is one of the three emergencies the President of India can proclaim. Notably, it has never been imposed in independent India. This provision aims to safeguard the nation’s financial stability and creditworthiness during critical situations.

    Circumstances for Proclaiming Financial Emergency

    According to Article 360, the President may declare a Financial Emergency if they believe that the financial stability or credit of India—or any part thereof—is under threat. This could occur due to various factors, such as:

    • Severe fiscal deficits that jeopardize government operations.
    • Economic shocks, such as a sharp decline in GDP or global financial crises.
    • Insolvency issues affecting key state or central government institutions.

    These circumstances necessitate immediate intervention to prevent further economic decline.

    Consequences of Financial Emergency

    The declaration of a Financial Emergency triggers several important consequences:

    1. Executive Authority: The central government gains extensive powers to direct states on financial propriety. This includes issuing instructions to ensure compliance with financial norms and regulations.
    2. Reduction of Salaries: The President can reduce the salaries and allowances of all Central and State government employees, including judges of the Supreme and High Courts. This measure aims to control public expenditure during financial distress.
    3. Legislative Implications: All Money Bills and financial legislation passed by State Legislatures must be reserved for the President’s consideration. Additionally, the President can direct reductions in salaries for Members of Parliament (MPs) and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MLAs).
    4. Suspension of Fundamental Rights: While not explicitly stated, the enforcement of the Directive Principles of State Policy may take precedence over Fundamental Rights during a Financial Emergency, allowing for stricter governance measures.

    Conclusion

    Understanding the provisions and implications of Financial Emergency is vital for grasping the constitutional mechanisms in place to address financial crises in India. While it has never been invoked, the potential consequences could significantly affect government functioning and the economy, emphasizing the need for careful management of public finances.

    See less
Kunal Tiwari
  • 0
Kunal TiwariLearner
Asked: July 15, 2024In:
  • 0

Analyze how the Supreme Court resolves conflicts between the Union and the States and interprets the federal legal system. Evaluate how the Court has intervened to support cooperative federalism and the federal balance

upsc: federal structure
  1. Rachna Chopra
    Rachna Chopra Begginer

    Certainly, let me provide a thorough overview of the Supreme Court's role in interpreting the federal framework and its interventions in reinforcing the principles of cooperative federalism. The Supreme Court has played a pivotal role in shaping the dynamic between the federal government and the staRead more

    Certainly, let me provide a thorough overview of the Supreme Court’s role in interpreting the federal framework and its interventions in reinforcing the principles of cooperative federalism.

    The Supreme Court has played a pivotal role in shaping the dynamic between the federal government and the states through its interpretation of the Constitution. As the final arbiter of the law, the Court has been instrumental in defining the boundaries of federal and state power, and in adjudicating disputes that arise between the Union and the individual states.

    One of the key areas where the Supreme Court has intervened is in the interpretation of the Commerce Clause, which grants the federal government the power to regulate interstate commerce. Over the years, the Court’s rulings on the scope of the Commerce Clause have had a significant impact on the balance of power between the federal and state governments. For example, in cases like Wickard v. Filburn (1942) and Gonzalez v. Raich (2005), the Court upheld the federal government’s authority to regulate economic activities that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce, even if those activities are purely intrastate in nature.

    The Court has also played a crucial role in defining the boundaries of state sovereignty and the principle of dual federalism, which recognizes the independence of the federal and state governments within their respective spheres of authority. In landmark cases like National League of Cities v. Usery (1976) and Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (1985), the Court grappled with the question of how far the federal government can go in regulating state and local government activities without infringing on state sovereignty.

    More recently, the Supreme Court has focused on the principles of cooperative federalism, which emphasize the interdependence and collaboration between the federal and state governments. In cases like Printz v. United States (1997) and New York v. United States (1992), the Court has sought to preserve the autonomy of state governments by placing limits on the federal government’s ability to commandeer state resources or force states to implement federal programs.

    Additionally, the Court has addressed issues of federal preemption, where federal law supersedes conflicting state law. In cases like Wyeth v. Levine (2009) and Pliva, Inc. v. Mensing (2011), the Court has sought to balance the federal government’s interests in uniform national standards with the states’ traditional role in regulating public health and safety.

    Overall, the Supreme Court’s interventions in interpreting the federal framework and adjudicating disputes between the Union and the States have had a significant impact on the balance of power and the principles of cooperative federalism. The Court’s rulings have shaped the contours of federal-state relations, affirming the importance of state sovereignty while also recognizing the need for federal authority in certain areas of national importance.

    See less
Prateek
  • 0
PrateekLearner
Asked: June 5, 2024In:
  • 0

Describe the different obstacles that India faces in maintaining cooperative federalism. Provide strategies for promoting cooperative federalism as well. (Answer in 200 words)

upsc: federal structure
  1. Animesh Singh
    Animesh Singh Learner

    Ensuring cooperative federalism in India faces several challenges: 1. Power imbalance: The central government's dominance over financial resources and policy decisions creates an uneven power dynamic between the Union and the states, hampering genuine cooperation. 2. Political differences: IdeologicRead more

    Ensuring cooperative federalism in India faces several challenges:

    1. Power imbalance: The central government’s dominance over financial resources and policy decisions creates an uneven power dynamic between the Union and the states, hampering genuine cooperation.

    2. Political differences: Ideological and political differences between the ruling parties at the center and in the states can lead to conflicting agendas and a lack of consensus on national issues.

    3. Fiscal constraints: Many states face financial constraints and are heavily dependent on the center for grants and transfers, limiting their autonomy in decision-making.

    4. Coordination issues: Lack of effective coordination mechanisms and communication channels between the Union and the states can hinder the implementation of joint programs and policies.

    5. Functional overlap: Unclear delineation of responsibilities between the Union and the states often leads to overlapping jurisdictions and conflicts over policy implementation.

    To foster cooperative federalism, the following measures can be taken:

    1. Strengthening inter-governmental forums: Institutions like the Inter-State Council and the Goods and Services Tax Council should be empowered to facilitate greater dialogue and consensus-building.

    2. Enhancing fiscal federalism: Revising the formula for the devolution of financial resources to the states, increasing the untied grants, and expanding the states’ revenue-raising powers can promote fiscal autonomy.

    3. Institutionalizing cooperative mechanisms: Establishing permanent secretariats, joint task forces, and regular consultations between the Union and the states can improve coordination and collaboration.

    4. Promoting cooperative mindset: Fostering a culture of mutual trust, respect, and accommodative approach among political parties and government officials can contribute to the success of cooperative federalism.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 13, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Definition of Article 356: Explain what Article 356 entails and its purpose in the Indian Constitution. Thesis Statement: State that the frequency of its invocation has decreased since the mid-1990s due to various legal and political factors. 2. ...

upsc: federal structure
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction Article 356 of the Indian Constitution allows the President to impose direct central rule in a state when constitutional machinery fails. While frequently invoked in earlier decades, its usage has significantly declined since the mid-1990s. This reduction can be attributedRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    Article 356 of the Indian Constitution allows the President to impose direct central rule in a state when constitutional machinery fails. While frequently invoked in earlier decades, its usage has significantly declined since the mid-1990s. This reduction can be attributed to various legal and political factors.

    Legal Factors

    Judicial Pronouncements

    The S.R. Bommai case (1994) was pivotal in shaping the application of Article 356. The Supreme Court ruled that the use of Article 356 is subject to judicial review, reinforcing that the President’s power to dissolve a state assembly must be exercised judiciously.

    Doctrine of Constitutional Mandate

    The judiciary has emphasized the importance of federalism, advocating for state autonomy and restricting the arbitrary use of Article 356. This judicial perspective encourages a more thoughtful application of the provision.

    Guideline Establishment

    The Bommai case established guidelines outlining the appropriate circumstances for invoking Article 356, promoting a more restrained and deliberate approach to its application.

    Recommendations of Commissions

    The Sarkaria Commission and Punchhi Commission recommended a cautious application of Article 356 to foster cooperative federalism and enhance center-state relations. Their recommendations emphasized the need for restraint in imposing President’s Rule.

    Judicial Role of the President

    Post-Bommai, the President’s role in assessing state conditions has become more judicial, necessitating careful consideration before recommending Article 356. This shift has led to a more cautious approach.

    Political Factors

    Coalition Politics

    The rise of coalition governments has fostered collaborative governance, reducing the impulsive use of Article 356 and promoting political stability.

    Public Perception and Media Scrutiny

    Increasing media scrutiny and informed public opinion act as deterrents against arbitrary use of Article 356, holding the government accountable and upholding democratic principles.

    Strength of Regional Parties

    The growing influence of regional parties has created a balanced power dynamic, discouraging the central government from unnecessarily invoking Article 356.

    Political Maturity

    India’s evolving political landscape has prioritized stability and governance over power struggles, fostering adherence to constitutional norms.

    International Image

    The desire to maintain a positive international image as a democratic nation has led Union governments to avoid unnecessary applications of Article 356.

    Conclusion

    In summary, the combination of prudent legal interventions and an evolved political environment has significantly reduced the frequency of invoking Article 356. This trend reflects a mature democracy striving to uphold the ideals enshrined in its Constitution while fostering balanced governance.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 13, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Contextual Background: Briefly explain the concept of decentralization and its significance in the Indian governance framework. Key Amendments: Mention the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments (1992) that established the Panchayati Raj system and urban local bodies. 2. Body A. ...

upsc: federal structure
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The decentralization of power in India, particularly through the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments in 1992, has fundamentally transformed the governance landscape at the grassroots level. This significant legal framework established the Panchayati Raj system and urbanRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The decentralization of power in India, particularly through the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments in 1992, has fundamentally transformed the governance landscape at the grassroots level. This significant legal framework established the Panchayati Raj system and urban local bodies, empowering local governance.

    Enhanced Participation

    Decentralization has markedly increased public participation in governance. Local communities now engage actively in planning, implementing, and monitoring development programs. According to the Ministry of Panchayati Raj, this has led to greater alignment of policies with local needs, fostering a sense of ownership among citizens.

    Empowerment of Marginalized Groups

    One of the most significant outcomes of decentralization is the empowerment of marginalized groups, particularly women. The 1992 amendments mandated that at least one-third of Panchayat seats be reserved for women, promoting social equity. Studies by the National Institute of Rural Development show a notable increase in women’s representation in local governance as a result.

    Responsive Governance and Accountability

    Local governments have become more responsive to community needs, enhancing service delivery. Research from the Indian Institute of Management indicates that decentralized governance has improved accountability, as local elected officials are more directly answerable to their constituents.

    Capacity Building

    Decentralization has facilitated capacity building for local representatives, equipping them with essential skills to manage resources effectively. Initiatives in states like Kerala have demonstrated successful training programs that enhance the effectiveness of local governance.

    Challenges

    Despite these advancements, challenges persist. Many local bodies suffer from inadequate financial resources, limiting their autonomy. Additionally, a lack of training and instances of corruption undermine the potential benefits of decentralization.

    Conclusion

    In summary, while decentralization in India has led to enhanced participation, empowerment, and accountability at the grassroots level, addressing financial constraints and capacity issues is crucial for realizing its full potential. Continued efforts to strengthen local governance will pave the way for a more inclusive and responsive governance framework.

    See less
Mukherjee
  • 0
MukherjeeBegginer
Asked: August 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Briefly introduce the CBI and its role in India. State the central issue: the jurisdiction of the CBI and the power of states to withhold consent. 2. Understanding CBI’s Jurisdiction Explain the CBI’s mandate to investigate serious crimes, including ...

upsc: federal structure
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is India’s premier investigating agency tasked with addressing high-profile cases of corruption, economic offenses, and serious crimes. Operating under the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances, and Pensions, the CBI's jurisdiction often encoRead more

    Model Answer

    The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is India’s premier investigating agency tasked with addressing high-profile cases of corruption, economic offenses, and serious crimes. Operating under the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances, and Pensions, the CBI’s jurisdiction often encounters challenges, especially regarding its powers to lodge a First Information Report (FIR) and conduct investigations within states.

    Body

    India’s federal structure, as outlined in the Constitution, establishes a clear division of powers between the central and state governments. This division is categorized into three lists: the Union List, the State List, and the Concurrent List. The State List, under Entry 2 of List II in the Seventh Schedule, places “police” and law enforcement under the purview of state governments, granting them primary responsibility for maintaining law and order.

    However, the states’ authority to withhold consent from the CBI is not absolute. Several scenarios allow the CBI to exercise its jurisdiction within a state:

    1. Consent of the State: The CBI can investigate cases if the concerned state government provides its consent, which may be general or specific. States can withdraw this consent at any time, thereby affecting the CBI’s jurisdiction.
    2. Judicial Orders: High Courts and the Supreme Court have the power to direct the CBI to investigate cases, regardless of state consent. Such judicial interventions affirm the CBI’s jurisdiction as mandated by law.
    3. Central Government Cases: The CBI can investigate offenses involving central government employees or agencies, as these cases fall under the central jurisdiction, irrespective of state consent.
    4. Inter-state or International Cases: For cases with inter-state or international implications, the central government can mandate CBI involvement, superseding state objections.

    Conclusion

    While the federal structure of India grants states significant control over law enforcement, the CBI’s jurisdiction is preserved in specific scenarios. This ensures that justice is upheld and the rule of law is maintained across the nation, reflecting a balance between state autonomy and central authority.

    See less
Kriti Agarwal
  • 1
Kriti AgarwalBegginer
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 1

Consider the extent to which the Union administration uses Article 356 (President’s Rule) and other emergency powers to control and coordinate the operations of the States. Talk about the arguments for and against using these clauses appropriately.

upsc: federal structure
  1. Sakshi Rao
    Sakshi Rao Begginer

    The role of the Union government in regulating and coordinating the functioning of the States, particularly through the use of Article 356 (President's Rule) and other emergency powers, is a complex and often debated issue in India's federal structure. Use of Article 356 (President's Rule): ArticleRead more

    The role of the Union government in regulating and coordinating the functioning of the States, particularly through the use of Article 356 (President’s Rule) and other emergency powers, is a complex and often debated issue in India’s federal structure.

    Use of Article 356 (President’s Rule):

    • Article 356 of the Indian Constitution empowers the President, on the recommendation of the Union government, to impose direct central rule (President’s Rule) over a state if the President is satisfied that the governance of the state cannot be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution.
    • The Union government has invoked Article 356 several times since independence, often on the grounds of political instability, constitutional breakdown, or failure of law and order in the state.
    • The use of Article 356 has been a contentious issue, with concerns raised about the potential for misuse by the central government to dismiss state governments led by opposition parties.
    • There have been debates and judicial rulings emphasizing the need to use Article 356 sparingly and only as a last resort, with clear justification and following the due process laid out in the Constitution.

    Other Emergency Powers:

    • Beyond Article 356, the Union government also has other emergency powers under Articles 352 (National Emergency), 360 (Financial Emergency), and 359 (Suspension of Fundamental Rights) of the Constitution.
    • These powers allow the Union to exert greater control over the states during times of crisis, war, or financial distress.
    • The use of these emergency powers has also been debated, with concerns around the potential for abuse and the need to balance national interests with state autonomy.

    Debates and Suggestions:

    • The appropriate use of these constitutional provisions remains an ongoing debate, with calls for clearer guidelines, stronger checks and balances, and greater transparency in their implementation.
    • Suggestions include:
      • Limiting the use of Article 356 to only the most extreme and demonstrable cases of constitutional breakdown
      • Enhancing the role of the judiciary in reviewing the imposition of President’s Rule
      • Strengthening the federal structure by empowering states and limiting the Union’s ability to interfere in state affairs
      • Establishing clear criteria and due process for the invocation of emergency provisions

    Overall, the Union government’s ability to regulate and coordinate the functioning of states through emergency powers is a critical aspect of India’s federal structure, but one that requires a delicate balance between national interests and state autonomy, with robust safeguards against potential misuse.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Briefly introduce the concept of federalism in India. State the significance of cooperation, competition, and confrontation in shaping the Indian federation. Cooperation Define cooperative federalism and its importance in India. Provide examples: Goods and Services Tax (GST): Highlight how GST represents a ...

upsc: federal structure
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction India’s federal system is shaped by a complex interplay of cooperation, competition, and confrontation between the central and state governments. Cooperation plays a significant role in fostering collaborative planning and policy-making. An example is the establishment of tRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    India’s federal system is shaped by a complex interplay of cooperation, competition, and confrontation between the central and state governments. Cooperation plays a significant role in fostering collaborative planning and policy-making. An example is the establishment of the NITI Aayog, which promotes cooperative federalism by facilitating dialogue and coordination between the center and the states in matters of economic planning and development.

    Cooperation

    The Indian federal system is designed to facilitate cooperation between the center and the states. The Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a prime example of cooperative federalism, where both the center and the states have pooled their powers to create a unified tax system. This collaborative approach has streamlined the tax structure and improved economic integration across states. Another example is the NITI Aayog, which replaced the Planning Commission, fostering collaborative planning and policy-making between the center and the states.

    Competition

    Competitive federalism encourages states to improve their performance and policies to attract investment, businesses, and resources. In recent years, the center has adopted a competitive approach to allocate resources, prompting states to streamline their regulations and policies. The ‘Ease of Doing Business’ rankings have created healthy competition among states to improve their business environments. The Smart Cities Mission is another example where competition is used as a driving force to encourage cities to develop innovative solutions for urban development.

    Confrontation

    Despite the cooperative and competitive aspects of the Indian federation, confrontations between the center and the states have occurred. These confrontations can arise due to political, administrative, or legal issues. Recent examples include the conflict between the central government and the West Bengal government over the CBI’s jurisdiction and the tussle between the central government and the Delhi government over administrative control. The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) also led to confrontations between some state governments and the center, with some states refusing to implement the Act.

    Conclusion

    India’s federal system has been shaped by cooperation, competition, and confrontation. Cooperation and competition foster efficient policy-making and resource allocation, while confrontation can uphold federal principles. Balancing these elements is vital for the federation’s smooth functioning and addressing India’s diverse needs.

    See less
Anirudh Singh
  • 0
Anirudh SinghLearner
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Examine the administrative authority and oversight that the Union government has over the States, including the appointment and dismissal of governors and the use of CAFPOs. Analyze the discussions about how these provisions should be used.

upsc: federal structure
  1. Sundari Panwar
    Sundari Panwar Begginer

    The Union government has significant administrative control and supervision over the States in India, which is enshrined in the Constitution. Here are some key areas where the Union government exercises control: Appointment and removal of Governors: The President of India appoints Governors on the aRead more

    The Union government has significant administrative control and supervision over the States in India, which is enshrined in the Constitution. Here are some key areas where the Union government exercises control:

    Appointment and removal of Governors: The President of India appoints Governors on the advice of the Union government. Governors are the ceremonial heads of the States, but they also have some powers, such as the power to appoint advisors and to give assent to State laws.
    Deployment of Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs): The Union government can deploy CAPFs, such as the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), Border Security Force (BSF), and Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP), in States to maintain law and order and assist State police forces.
    Financial control: The Union government has significant control over State finances through the grants-in-aid, which are provided to States for specific purposes, such as infrastructure development and social welfare programs.
    Monitoring and supervision: The Union government exercises monitoring and supervision over State governments through various mechanisms, such as:
    The Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) monitors law and order situations in States and provides guidance to State governments.
    The Planning Commission (now NITI Aayog) reviews State plans and provides guidance on development priorities.
    The Election Commission of India monitors elections in States.
    Debates surrounding the use of these provisions:

    Appointments and removal of Governors: Critics argue that Governors should be impartial and not political appointees, while supporters argue that Governors have a role in advising the State government and ensuring stability.
    Deployment of CAPFs: Critics argue that the deployment of CAPFs can undermine State police forces and create a sense of distrust between the Centre and States. Supporters argue that CAPFs are necessary to maintain law and order in sensitive areas or during crises.
    Financial control: Critics argue that excessive financial control by the Centre undermines State autonomy, while supporters argue that grants-in-aid are necessary to promote national priorities and ensure economic development.
    Monitoring and supervision: Critics argue that excessive monitoring can stifle State autonomy, while supporters argue that monitoring is necessary to ensure accountability and compliance with national policies.
    Recent developments:

    Appointment of Governors: The controversy surrounding the appointment of Governors has led to calls for reforming the system, with some arguing for a more transparent and merit-based process.
    Deployment of CAPFs: The deployment of CAPFs has been criticized for being arbitrary and partisan, leading to tensions between the Centre and States.
    Financial autonomy: There have been demands for greater financial autonomy for States, with some arguing that excessive dependence on Centre’s grants-in-aid undermines their ability to make decisions.
    E-governance: Efforts have been made to improve transparency and accountability through e-governance initiatives, such as online portals for tracking grants-in-aid and electoral funding.
    In conclusion, the Union government’s administrative control over States is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. While there are concerns about over-centralization and erosion of State autonomy, there are also valid reasons for federal intervention in matters such as law and order and national security. A balanced approach is needed to ensure that federalism is maintained while also promoting effective governance and accountability at all levels.

    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: February 24, 2025

Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (24 February 2025)

The rise of the work-from-home culture has brought about several ethical issues in private organizations. In this context, do you believe it is ethical for an employee to engage in moonlighting? Discuss. (Answer in 150 words) घर से काम करने ...

On: February 22, 2025 Comments: 0

Indo-US Relation: Areas of Cooperation & Conflicts

Key Areas: Defense, technology, trade, energy, and regional cooperation. Key Areas of Cooperation 1. Defense and Security Transition from buyer-seller to co-production and technology sharing. India as a Major Defense Partner (MDP) and inclusion in STA-1. Access to advanced technologies, ...

On: February 22, 2025 Comments: 0

भारत-अमेरिका संबंध: सहयोग और संघर्ष के क्षेत्र

मुख्य विषय: भारत-अमेरिका संबंधों की मजबूती, विशेषकर रक्षा, प्रौद्योगिकी और क्षेत्रीय सहयोग में प्रगति। सहयोग के प्रमुख क्षेत्र 1. रक्षा एवं सुरक्षा सहयोग भारत और अमेरिका के बीच रक्षा संबंधों का विस्तार। प्रमुख रक्षा साझेदार (MDP) का दर्जा और STA-1 ...

Explore Our Blog