You are right though, as in the sense that while in most of its profiles, the League of Nations is associated with its failures, these tend to overshadow its successes and the dynamics, as well as the variations, of both its success and failure profiles. In general, historians and historians of the international relations point to its losses as the failure of the League at stopping global war, however it is important to mention that the League was not a failure in every respect –at services of international disputes mediation, cooperative processes, humanitarian issues.

Some Case or Success stories on Dispute Resolution
This paper will also argue that the League of Nations was able to solve some of the conflicts that arose after the First World War. Here are some:
1. Aaland Islands (1921):
With reference to this, the League of Nations was able to resolve a problem that arose between Sweden and Finland over the Aaland Islands. They relinquished the islands to Finland, but the Finnish government agreed to provide cultural rights for the Swedes who constituted the minority in these islands.
2. Upper Silesia (1921):
After conducting a plebiscite, the League was able to mediate on a contentious issue on the border between Germany and Poland. A party of the League compelled territorial division of Upper Silesia. The violence thus did not get any worse than that .

3. Mosul (1924-1926):
The League of Nations compelled the use of arbitration in regards to the issue of the territory between Iraq-Iraq was under the British mandate back then-and Turkey over the Mosul area. It decided in favour of giving Mosul to Iraq. This was largely the case because of the pressure they received from the British.

4. Greek-Bulgarian Border Incident (1925):
The League did not waste a lot of time as soon as a border incident between Greece and Bulgaria arose by demanding an immediate ceasefire and launched an inquiry immediately. According to the League’s instructions, both parties reacted in the same manner as if they are engaged with a mediator of some minor regional disputes.

5. Saar Territory Administration:
The League managed and later submitted the case to a plebiscite the territory of Saar, which was peacefully reincorporated into Germany in 1935.

Limitations in Dispute Resolution:
Although the League of Nations did experience some successes, its failures in more complex, large-scale disputes did reveal its structural weaknesses:

1. Manchurian Crisis (1931-1933):
The aggression by Japan in Manchuria and the creation of the puppet state of Manchukuo revealed the weaknesses of the league of Nations in its provision of sanctions. Japan just resigned from the League after they were scolded.

2. Abyssinian Crisis (1935-1936):
This had been revealed by the failure of the League to prevent Italy from invading Abyssinia (Ethiopia). Because of the weak sanctions and Britain and France’s desire to please Mussolini on this issue all credibility of the league was erased.

3. Spanish Civil War, 1936-1939:
The League did virtually nothing in this period, which proved that it had no roles of any importance in any significant conflict involving the great powers.

4. German Rearmament and Expansion:
This organization was incapable of stopping German’s transgression of the Treaty of Versailles; for instance rearmament and territorial agriculture under Hitler since Britain and France did not want any confrontations.

As the league was successful in some parts, why was it also limited in others?
The League’s haphazard record of dispute settlement was due in part to its design and the international politics of the interwar years:

Structural Flaws:
– Every important decision in the work of the organization was made by voting, so any member could cancel any action.
This ion had no proper army that would implement the decisions; they were given based on members’ voluntary adherence to them.

No Key Powers:
– The United States never signed on which left it alone among the mightiest economies of the world and without a potential peace enforcer.
– Germany and the Soviet Union were the only important powers missing, and this absence of Germany and the Soviet Union undermined the claim to universal legitimacy of the League.

Geopolitical Constraints
International cooperation became weak with the advent of a global economic crisis in the 1930s (Great Depression).
The national interests superceded the collective action, particularly among major powers like Britain and France.

Conclusion
It was not entirely without any success; it did not attain its primary goal of saving humankind from another world war. It was able to show that some of the small disputes could be settled through international cooperation and, thereby, paved the way for establishing much greater post-second world war international institutions such as the United Nations. Some of the successes, however, were blighted by enormous failures, thus illuminating the fact that it was more than just a cursory player in the interwar world. The tale of inevitable failure oversimplifies a history of real successes and systemic failures.