Effectively safeguarding a constitution against amendments that could undermine fundamental rights requires a combination of legal, institutional, and societal measures: Strong Fundamental Principles: Ensure that fundamental rights are enshrined as core principles that cannot be amended easily or wiRead more
Effectively safeguarding a constitution against amendments that could undermine fundamental rights requires a combination of legal, institutional, and societal measures:
- Strong Fundamental Principles: Ensure that fundamental rights are enshrined as core principles that cannot be amended easily or without stringent procedures. This might include requiring a supermajority vote, a referendum, or judicial review to amend certain rights.
- Separation of Powers: Establish a robust system of checks and balances where the judiciary has the authority to review and strike down amendments that violate fundamental rights. This requires an independent judiciary that is capable of interpreting the constitution impartially.
- Public Awareness and Education: Foster a culture of constitutionalism where citizens understand and value their fundamental rights. Educated and engaged citizens are more likely to resist attempts to undermine constitutional rights through amendments.
- International Standards and Commitments: Align constitutional provisions with international human rights standards and treaties, which can provide additional protection and norms against retrogressive amendments.
- Political Consensus Building: Encourage broad political consensus on the importance of protecting fundamental rights. Political parties and leaders should prioritize the constitution’s integrity over short-term gains.
- Amendment Safeguards: Implement procedural safeguards such as requiring amendments to undergo rigorous scrutiny, public consultation, and possibly time delays to prevent hasty changes that could harm fundamental rights.
By implementing these measures, a constitution can be fortified against amendments aimed at undermining fundamental rights, ensuring its enduring protection and relevance in safeguarding democratic principles and individual liberties.
See less
The constitution replies on a model of structural, procedural and societal safeguarding so as to prevent comprehensible constitutional tampering that may render fundamental rights insecure and thus constitutional amendments do meet the requirements of the justice, equality, and human dignity. 1. EntRead more
The constitution replies on a model of structural, procedural and societal safeguarding so as to prevent comprehensible constitutional tampering that may render fundamental rights insecure and thus constitutional amendments do meet the requirements of the justice, equality, and human dignity.
1. Entrenchment Clauses: Some enlightenment to the above is that the constitution may contain provisions known as ‘eternity clauses’ that protect constitutions from alteration or repeal. For example, the basic law in Germany allows mostly justified prohibitions against changes to certain rights, tasks, and powers of the Federation and the Länder; against alterations in the principles of the division of powers between the Federation and the Länder; and against violation of human dignity.
2. Supermajority Requirements: Supermajority in the legislature means the decision enjoys the support of more than two thirds before changes are made. This rules out the possibility of a small majority to change basic rights at will.
3. Referendums: Assuming that some of the changes alter the basic rights of the citizens then those amendments must go to a referendum should pass through a test to enhance public acceptance.
4. Judicial Oversight: To be a guardian, the constitution court or supreme court may have the duty to look at the amendments proposed to the people in order to prevent the violation of the basic principles of the constitution.
5. Civic Engagement and Education: An educated and active populace is a good defense. Promoting constitutionalism helps citizens to develop the capacity to distinguish the violation of rights in order to prevent them.
6. Independent Institutions: Parliamentary and administrative ombudsmen, human rights commissions and independent free media can observe and prevent efforts that seek to erode those rights and hence enhance the constitution.
All these put together provide a strong basis for the defense of human rights from detractors on one aspect of liberal democracy.
See less