World War II
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
What were the key factors that contributed to the decolonization of Asian and African countries following the end of World War II? (200 words)
Model Answer Asian and African Countries After World War II The end of World War II marked a significant shift in global politics, leading to the independence of many countries in Asia and Africa. Several key factors contributed to this decolonization process: 1. Rise of Nationalism: Nationalist movRead more
Model Answer
Asian and African Countries After World War II
The end of World War II marked a significant shift in global politics, leading to the independence of many countries in Asia and Africa. Several key factors contributed to this decolonization process:
1. Rise of Nationalism:
Nationalist movements gained momentum in the colonies, driven by a growing sense of identity and resistance to colonial rule. Leaders like Mahatma Gandhi in India and Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana rallied mass support for independence. These movements pushed colonial powers to reconsider their hold on territories, accelerating the decolonization process.
2. Weakening of Imperialism:
World War II had severely weakened the economies of imperialist powers, making it more difficult for them to maintain control over their colonies. Additionally, the rise of anti-colonial sentiment within these countries further weakened their grip on their colonies. For instance, Britain’s weakened state after the war played a role in India gaining independence.
3. Spread of Democratic Ideals:
The Allied powers, who had fought the war to uphold democracy and freedom against fascist regimes, faced difficulty in denying these same principles to their colonies. The global push for freedom and democracy encouraged anti-colonial movements, particularly in Asia and Africa.
4. Support from Rival Blocs:
The United States and the Soviet Union, as part of the Cold War rivalry, supported anti-colonial movements to expand their influence. The US and USSR’s backing played a crucial role in the independence of countries like Korea and Vietnam, where both superpowers provided support to resist colonial domination.
5. International Opinion:
The rise of global opinion in favor of decolonization was significant. The United Nations, through its Charter, affirmed the right of self-determination for all peoples. It also set up the Trusteeship Council to oversee decolonization, further encouraging colonial powers to grant independence.
6. Unity Among Colonies:
Colonies often united in their struggle for independence. Independent India, for example, supported the freedom movements in African nations as part of its foreign policy, fostering a collective spirit of resistance against colonialism.
These factors collectively created a global environment conducive to decolonization, ultimately leading to the independence of numerous countries across Asia and Africa after World War II
See lessHow did the Treaty of Versailles contribute to the rise of Nazi Germany and the onset of World War II?
This paper looks at the Treaty of Versailles that was signed in 1919, as one of the critical factors that paved way for the emergence of Nazi Germany and as a precursor to the next World War which was the second. The treaty imposed harsh penalties on Germany, including: -Territorial Losses: GermanyRead more
This paper looks at the Treaty of Versailles that was signed in 1919, as one of the critical factors that paved way for the emergence of Nazi Germany and as a precursor to the next World War which was the second.
The treaty imposed harsh penalties on Germany, including:
-Territorial Losses: Germany lost much area : Alsace-Lorraine to France, and parts of Poland.
Demilitarization : German military was far from being even a medium power and hardly possessed any long ranged weapons.
Reparations : It compelled them to pay off the reparation to Germany, in billions to the allied countries which weaken their economies.
War Guilt Clause : The German were completely blamed for having done this war and this led to tendency of avenging.
-Economic and Political Instability: These treaty terms were very unfriendly and caused so much economic mayhem in Germany. Present here were features of extreme adversity consisting of severe inflation, unemployment, and political instability that provided ideal environment for such ideology as the Nazism to capture the German soil.
There rose Nationalism and Revisionism: This treaty created strong nationalism in Germany because of the Germans’ perception of the treaty together with considering that Terms of the treaty as unjust instead of just. This was leveraged by political leaders like Adolf Hitler he preach for scrapping of the treaty arguing that Germany was once again going to dominate.
-Weakening of International Cooperation: The terms of the treaty and then political turmoil in Europe resulted to international relations decline and approaches to isolationism.
It is important to note that while the Treaty of Versailles could have been associated with the outbreak of World War II solely because of its punitive provisions and the resentment that it evoked in Germans who wanted to revenge for their humiliating defeat and the Treaty, the effects of Nazism had already been sown in Germany long before the second global conflict took place.
See lessWhat were the social, economic, and cultural legacies of World War II for different countries and regions around the world?
Here's a glance at its social, economic, and cultural legacies: Social: -Demographic Shifts: This includes loss of lives, people being forced to flee their homes and a shifted family make up. -Social and Political Changes: Labour market integration of women, mobility, and new social movements. -TrauRead more
Here’s a glance at its social, economic, and cultural legacies:
Social:
-Demographic Shifts: This includes loss of lives, people being forced to flee their homes and a shifted family make up.
-Social and Political Changes: Labour market integration of women, mobility, and new social movements.
-Trauma and Psychological Impact: Remorse, self-blame, and guilt, fear, nervousness, sleep and eating disorders, nightmares, vulnerability to illness, gambling, alcoholism, and drug dependency.
Economic:
-Waste and Rebuilding: It incurred infrastructure and economy loses in Europe and Asia. This, in turn, called for enormous reconstruction processes that consequently led to the development of economic activities.
-America Emerges Stronger: It made the US as the epitome of being an economic and a military world’s super power befitting all other powers for victory.
-Economic Power Shift: The war set a great deal to European colonial powers while the new economic giants including the United States emerged from the injury.
Cultural :
-Anti-War Sentiment: The horrors that the war brought forward stimulated an oppose to war sentiment and the desire for world unity.
-Human Rights Movement: Crimes against humanity such as holocaust led to the diversification and the general promotion of human rights and crusade against discrimination.
-Technological Advancements: It speeded up the development of various technologies like aviation, nuclear physics and computing which were long term in their implications.
Regional Variations:
-Europe: Knew a lot about devastation but also saw how people and countries came back to life – literally and economically – and how they can merge through organizations like the EU.
-Asia: Thus, with the exception of Japan most of the Asian countries emerged to independence, but rebuilding and coping from the trauma of the war.
-Africa: The war played a part in effectively the dissolution of colonialism, however after winning most African nations which had gained their independence had numerous challenges in the construction of the positive and successful societies.
Still, World War II influences today people’s impact on international relations and their organization, forms of social and political activity, and world conscience.
See lessWorld War II
This is a very big change in what is currently associated with the memory and commemoration of World War II as compared with after the war. Yet there was a distinct bias toward the meditation on victory as allied and mourning of sacrifice. But over the years, there has been a shift in focus to everyRead more
This is a very big change in what is currently associated with the memory and commemoration of World War II as compared with after the war. Yet there was a distinct bias toward the meditation on victory as allied and mourning of sacrifice. But over the years, there has been a shift in focus to everyone who gets a disease, war participants and non-combatants as well.
-From Victory to Commemoration: The value has shifted from the victory celebration to recalling the great losses of human lives during the wars. It is has now extended to the celebration of genocide victims, slave and other atrocities.
Recognition of Different Experiences: There is now an understanding of how various groups whether civilians or soldiers , or resistance movements experienced the war differently.
This symbolizes the triumph of peace, reunion and understanding in striking out armed conflicts and future futile conflicts that ravage this world.
Lessons to Learn from International Relations Today:
-The Dangers of Nationalism and Extremism: War was brought about by the increased nationalist and extreme political parties during that period. Such is a realistic depiction of what may happen in extreme conditions when nationalism is allowed to run rampant and how that equilibrium may be regained through fostering cross national and cross cultural collaboration.
-Importance of Multilateralism: That was evidenced by the war where the global cooperation for the most part of the twentieth century remained a cornerstone of a relative world peace and security. Other organizations like United Nations were created to assist in dealing with such issues and to ensure that there weren’t more wars.
-The Value of Human Rights: What happened during the war proved that human rights should not be violated and that it is important to protect endangered people- a possibility that would not have come to life if it was not for the Brave Nelson Mandela.
The Findings of World War II to today remain an essential part of the historical memory of the twentieth century, which also should serve as significant lessons for the modern international relations. Going back to history can help us design the best life for every individual who plans to exist in the future.
See lessWorld war II
The second world war was one of the major key factors that changed the structures in politics across the world and contributed to decline of colonialism. Here's how: -Weakening of European Powers: There whose economies and military were greatly stretched and crippled by the war were the major EuropeRead more
The second world war was one of the major key factors that changed the structures in politics across the world and contributed to decline of colonialism. Here’s how:
-Weakening of European Powers: There whose economies and military were greatly stretched and crippled by the war were the major European colonial powers namely Britain, France and Netherlands. They failed in the way they could not exercise authority and had not the power and political will to continue to hold and control huge overseas territories due to internal pressured and emergence of nationalist movements.
-Rise of New Powers: Second, an unprecedented global war was observed wherein two super powers, the United States and the Soviet Union emerged during the war. These new powers demanded national self- determination, decolonization; all of which contributed to the further breaking of European empires’ hold.
-Growth of Nationalist Movements: The war, therefore, offered a boost to anti-colonialism in Asia and or Africa. The colonial subjects, who played a crucial role with the colonial masters during the same fights for liberation and wanted to govern themselves.
-Ideological Change: The war led to shift of ideology to self determination and human rights. Another cause was the Atlantic Charter that announced people had the right to choose the type of the governmental system themselves; therefore, colonialism was not legitimate.
Thus, the war offered the latter an environment for decolonization . While sometimes a long process and sometimes even involving conflicts, this led to the disintegration of most colonial empires and transition to the age of nation states.
In summary: The Second World War, in fact, demoralized the European colonial masters, provided momentum to the anti-colonial attitudes worldwide and brought dramatic change of the ideological base from colonialism to freedom-freedom of nation and the freedom from colonialism.
See lessHow successful do you think was the League of Nations in the resolution of disputes between nations?
You are right though, as in the sense that while in most of its profiles, the League of Nations is associated with its failures, these tend to overshadow its successes and the dynamics, as well as the variations, of both its success and failure profiles. In general, historians and historians of theRead more
You are right though, as in the sense that while in most of its profiles, the League of Nations is associated with its failures, these tend to overshadow its successes and the dynamics, as well as the variations, of both its success and failure profiles. In general, historians and historians of the international relations point to its losses as the failure of the League at stopping global war, however it is important to mention that the League was not a failure in every respect –at services of international disputes mediation, cooperative processes, humanitarian issues.
Some Case or Success stories on Dispute Resolution
This paper will also argue that the League of Nations was able to solve some of the conflicts that arose after the First World War. Here are some:
1. Aaland Islands (1921):
With reference to this, the League of Nations was able to resolve a problem that arose between Sweden and Finland over the Aaland Islands. They relinquished the islands to Finland, but the Finnish government agreed to provide cultural rights for the Swedes who constituted the minority in these islands.
2. Upper Silesia (1921):
After conducting a plebiscite, the League was able to mediate on a contentious issue on the border between Germany and Poland. A party of the League compelled territorial division of Upper Silesia. The violence thus did not get any worse than that .
3. Mosul (1924-1926):
The League of Nations compelled the use of arbitration in regards to the issue of the territory between Iraq-Iraq was under the British mandate back then-and Turkey over the Mosul area. It decided in favour of giving Mosul to Iraq. This was largely the case because of the pressure they received from the British.
4. Greek-Bulgarian Border Incident (1925):
The League did not waste a lot of time as soon as a border incident between Greece and Bulgaria arose by demanding an immediate ceasefire and launched an inquiry immediately. According to the League’s instructions, both parties reacted in the same manner as if they are engaged with a mediator of some minor regional disputes.
5. Saar Territory Administration:
The League managed and later submitted the case to a plebiscite the territory of Saar, which was peacefully reincorporated into Germany in 1935.
Limitations in Dispute Resolution:
Although the League of Nations did experience some successes, its failures in more complex, large-scale disputes did reveal its structural weaknesses:
1. Manchurian Crisis (1931-1933):
The aggression by Japan in Manchuria and the creation of the puppet state of Manchukuo revealed the weaknesses of the league of Nations in its provision of sanctions. Japan just resigned from the League after they were scolded.
2. Abyssinian Crisis (1935-1936):
This had been revealed by the failure of the League to prevent Italy from invading Abyssinia (Ethiopia). Because of the weak sanctions and Britain and France’s desire to please Mussolini on this issue all credibility of the league was erased.
3. Spanish Civil War, 1936-1939:
The League did virtually nothing in this period, which proved that it had no roles of any importance in any significant conflict involving the great powers.
4. German Rearmament and Expansion:
This organization was incapable of stopping German’s transgression of the Treaty of Versailles; for instance rearmament and territorial agriculture under Hitler since Britain and France did not want any confrontations.
As the league was successful in some parts, why was it also limited in others?
The League’s haphazard record of dispute settlement was due in part to its design and the international politics of the interwar years:
Structural Flaws:
– Every important decision in the work of the organization was made by voting, so any member could cancel any action.
This ion had no proper army that would implement the decisions; they were given based on members’ voluntary adherence to them.
No Key Powers:
– The United States never signed on which left it alone among the mightiest economies of the world and without a potential peace enforcer.
– Germany and the Soviet Union were the only important powers missing, and this absence of Germany and the Soviet Union undermined the claim to universal legitimacy of the League.
Geopolitical Constraints
International cooperation became weak with the advent of a global economic crisis in the 1930s (Great Depression).
The national interests superceded the collective action, particularly among major powers like Britain and France.
Conclusion
See lessIt was not entirely without any success; it did not attain its primary goal of saving humankind from another world war. It was able to show that some of the small disputes could be settled through international cooperation and, thereby, paved the way for establishing much greater post-second world war international institutions such as the United Nations. Some of the successes, however, were blighted by enormous failures, thus illuminating the fact that it was more than just a cursory player in the interwar world. The tale of inevitable failure oversimplifies a history of real successes and systemic failures.
World War 2
As the Führer of the Third Reich, Adolf Hitler was the most influential individual that instigated the Second World War. His militaristic policies and ambition for conquest instigated a worldwide conflict which was bound to have cataclysmic effects. The reason described above explains clearly why HiRead more
As the Führer of the Third Reich, Adolf Hitler was the most influential individual that instigated the Second World War. His militaristic policies and ambition for conquest instigated a worldwide conflict which was bound to have cataclysmic effects.
The reason described above explains clearly why Hitler was obsessed with conquering Europe. Ems “violated” the Versailles treaty and undertook a policy of rearmament. Early in his strategy was the ideologically motivated Anschluss of Germany with Austria and the resumption of the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia.
But the key part of his plans was conquest of Poland. As the negotiations with Britain and France did not resolve this issue troubling him much, Germany attacked Poland on the first of September in 1939. This was the action that brought the war against Germany declared by Britain and France, meaning that World War II had begun.
Hitler’s aggressive policies, refusal to obey international treaties, and military strategies further deteriorated the situation in Europe and eventually escalated into a full-scale war. His rule and ideology, together with the interwar years geopolitical tensions, prepared the ground for the beginning of the most terrible war the mankind has ever experienced.
See lessDetails about Wilfred Owen's life during World War and why he thinks that "it's not an honor to die for one's country"?
Wilfred Owen is indeed one of the best-known war poets of the first world war. [He was born in 1893 in England, volunteered for the British army in 1915 in what he believed was an act of patriotism only to realize that he was wrong via a bitter experience of the trenches. The bloodiest and traumaticRead more
Wilfred Owen is indeed one of the best-known war poets of the first world war.
[He was born in 1893 in England, volunteered for the British army in 1915 in what he believed was an act of patriotism only to realize that he was wrong via a bitter experience of the trenches. The bloodiest and traumatic actions for him occurred on the Western Front especially focusing the Somme.
Suffering from the trauma of such impressions, Owen was a severe shell-shock victim admitted to a military hospital in 1917 and met there Siegfried Sassoon. Sassoon did the same to Owen who provoked him to bring out the truth behind the actual wars. The author of the works nearly highlighted in this paper, including the widely celebrated poem *Dulce et Decorum Est*, critiques war and its glorification, especially death for country.
Owen’s line “Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori’ from Horace ‘It is sweet and honourable to die for your country’ However, he referred to this as “the old lie which is all in favour of the patriotic propaganda, which misguides innocent young soldiers to enlist.” This testimony bears out his exposure to death, pain and the irrelevance of warfare as given thorough consideration his belief on the use of lethal force on people during war.
Unfortunately Owen himself died in combat on November 4, 1918, one week before the signing of the Armistice. His poetry is still among the most striking examples of how much human cost a war can claim.
See lessWorld War II
Great suffering in the conditions of political and economical crises was a result of the Treaty of Versailles, signed after the First World War between the Allied Powers and Germany. This was evidenced by Germany’s humiliating conditions that included Babylonian, reparations payment, severe territorRead more
Great suffering in the conditions of political and economical crises was a result of the Treaty of Versailles, signed after the First World War between the Allied Powers and Germany.
This was evidenced by Germany’s humiliating conditions that included Babylonian, reparations payment, severe territorial losses and limitation on her military)을과 by the severity of the treaty, which forced severe economic penalty on Germany through extensive reparations payments, most of which it could not afford due to loss of many of its territories. This paved way for extremists such as the Nazis with their assertion to restore a previously glorious Germany and their /our economy.
The treaty also has effect on the political structure of Europe. It contributed to over throwing of the German monarchy and the Weimar Republic came into power, a weak and vulnerable government it could not cope with the internal issues of Germany. This led to deficit of political culture or political vacuum within the region which was suddenly filled by right wing people like the Nazis.
Moreover, the treaty failed to contain the root of conflict and disagreement among the varied European state powers on expansion of aggressiveness of nationalism and militarism. These arguments originate at the roots of territorial disputes with the additional factor of a desire for vengance which was motivation for Hitler and Mussolini.
Hence, all in all, concluding that the chief aim of the treaty was to prevent subsequent war-making but the treaty of Versailles led to the second world war. Shortening of terms of war, economic crisis, and political upturn facilitated the blossoming of the totalitarian regimes and ultimately a world war.
See lessTo what extent can Germany be held responsible for causing the two World Wars? Discuss critically. (200 words) [UPSC 2015]
Germany’s Responsibility for the Two World Wars Germany's role in instigating the two World Wars is a subject of significant historical debate. Here’s a critical analysis of its responsibility: **1. World War I (1914-1918) Germany's responsibility in World War I is evident but not absolute. The JulyRead more
Germany’s Responsibility for the Two World Wars
Germany’s role in instigating the two World Wars is a subject of significant historical debate. Here’s a critical analysis of its responsibility:
**1. World War I (1914-1918)
Germany’s responsibility in World War I is evident but not absolute. The July Crisis of 1914 escalated tensions across Europe, but Germany’s blank check assurance to Austria-Hungary, following the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, significantly contributed to the war’s outbreak. Germany’s aggressive stance, exemplified by the Schlieffen Plan which sought to quickly defeat France before turning to Russia, further exacerbated the conflict. However, the war involved multiple alliances and nationalistic fervor across Europe.
**2. World War II (1939-1945)
Germany’s role in World War II is more direct. Under Adolf Hitler’s leadership, Germany pursued an aggressive expansionist policy, including the invasion of Poland in 1939, which directly triggered the war. The Nazi ideology and totalitarian regime led to widespread atrocities, including the Holocaust. Germany’s actions, such as the reoccupation of the Rhineland and the Munich Agreement, demonstrated a clear intent to challenge and destabilize the existing international order.
**3. Recent Analysis and Context
Modern analyses, including historical reassessments and diplomatic studies, suggest that while Germany played a crucial role in both conflicts, the causes were multi-faceted involving other major powers’ actions, alliances, and failures in diplomacy. For example, the Versailles Treaty’s harsh terms on Germany contributed to the rise of extremism and militarism, indirectly fostering the conditions for World War II.
In conclusion, while Germany bears significant responsibility, the causes of both World Wars were complex and involved various international factors.
See less