Yes. I agree with the notion that caste and religion has become the major key to influence elections in India. A country with such a wide and rich cultural heritage has successfully accommodated people from different cultures and religions. But since the last few years, it has become evident that thRead more
Yes. I agree with the notion that caste and religion has become the major key to influence elections in India. A country with such a wide and rich cultural heritage has successfully accommodated people from different cultures and religions. But since the last few years, it has become evident that the people in the center along with the parties contesting elections have been using religion indirectly to contest in the election campaigns. However, it is a rule that one cannot use the name of any religion for the promotion of any ideology during the election campaign. But it’s been clear that the people in the country have been paying no attention to the rules and regulations. Political parties have been using strategies like candidate selection and campaign promises that pertain to people belonging to specific religious groups to appeal to them and to secure their votes. Many issues which often go parallel with caste and religion can influence voter behaviour and choices as well. One major thing that a person can do while casting their vote is that they should think clearly about the developments any specific party has done in their locality or village or town and then accordingly cast their votes. The biased practice of political leaders to secure votes in the name of religion and caste has often been criticised for leading to divisions and further developmental issues in the country. Thus, painting a dented image of the Indian democracy on the international platforms. Hence, it is correct to say that caste and religion has become the major key to influence elections in India.
See less
The rise of populist leaders will hurt the established democratic practices of a country. The populist list leaders either left wing or right wing try to implement their core agendas effectively such as reducing income inequality or restricting certain rights. Populist leaders can undermine democratRead more
The rise of populist leaders will hurt the established democratic practices of a country. The populist list leaders either left wing or right wing try to implement their core agendas effectively such as reducing income inequality or restricting certain rights.
See lessPopulist leaders can undermine democratic stability by eroding civil liberties and institutional constraints, potentially leading to authoritarianism. Institutional changes promoting bureaucratic parties are crucial for safeguarding democracy. Populist leaders often erode democratic institutions rapidly and severely, posing a significant threat to the stability of democracy while implementing their economic and social agendas. Populist leaders in post-authoritarian democracies like Indonesia and the Philippines can increase support for strong leadership, potentially bolstering institutional trust despite authoritarian tendencies
Populist leaders challenge democratic stability by clashing with longer time horizons, cross-institutional constraints, intermediary organizations, transparent governance, and governance norms, eroding democratic checks and balances.