Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question

World History

Share
Followers
142 Answers
691 Questions
Home/World History/Page 24

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Lakshmi Priya
  • 0
Lakshmi PriyaBegginer
Asked: July 20, 2024In:
  • 0

What were the significant domestic impacts of the Vietnam War on American society and politics during the 1960s and 1970s?

question
  1. Neha Jha
    Neha Jha Begginer

    After the French departure from Vietnam it was divided into 2 main provinces one in the north and other in the south. Both the provinces were influenced by the two different ideologies prevalent at that time that is of Communism supported by the Soviet Union and Capitalism backend by the US. To estaRead more

    After the French departure from Vietnam it was divided into 2 main provinces one in the north and other in the south. Both the provinces were influenced by the two different ideologies prevalent at that time that is of Communism supported by the Soviet Union and Capitalism backend by the US.

    To establish greater control US took matters to a greater extent to restrict the preach of Communism. For this, in the 1960s it deployed it’s resources in this area which led to a civil war situation. Soon the USA realised the advantages of guerrilla warfare tactics used by the Vietnamese which inflicted heavy casualties on the USA.

    Back home when this news reached the citizens it led to outrage against the government. Students participated and organised agitations against the inflation and war expenses which was paid with their taxes. The government was highly criticized in the media which also affected the Presidential elections of that time. After this backlash it was concluded to negotiate. The peace treaty was then signed in Paris.

    See less
Uttam Jangir
  • 0
Uttam JangirBegginer
Asked: July 15, 2024In: ,
  • 0

question
  1. Vaibhav Dhanorkar
    Vaibhav Dhanorkar Begginer

    1) Trade policies are rules set by a country about how it trades with other countries. These rules include: a. Tariffs: Taxes on goods coming into the country. b. Quotas: Limits on the number of goods that can be imported. c.Trade Agreements: Deals between countries to make trading easier.   2)Read more

    1) Trade policies are rules set by a country about how it trades with other countries. These rules include:

    a. Tariffs: Taxes on goods coming into the country.

    b. Quotas: Limits on the number of goods that can be imported.

    c.Trade Agreements: Deals between countries to make trading easier.

     

    2) How Trade Policies Help Economic Growth

    a. Selling More Products (Exports)

    Example: If India sells more clothes to the USA, Indian companies make more money, which helps the Indian economy grow.

    b. Buying Needed Goods (Imports)

    Example: If Brazil can buy advanced farming machines from Germany, Brazilian farms can produce more food, boosting the economy.

    c. Attracting Foreign Companies

    Example: If Nigeria has friendly trade policies, a big tech company like Apple might build a factory there, creating jobs and bringing in money.

    d. Getting Better at Making Things (Specialization)

    Example: Vietnam focuses on making electronics because it’s good at it. By specializing, Vietnam can produce electronics efficiently and sell them worldwide.

    e. Learning New Things (Technology Transfer)

    Example: When South Korea trades with the USA, it learns new technologies and business practices, which helps South Korean companies improve.

     

    3. Problems with Trade Policies

    a. Dependency on a Few Products

    Example: If Angola relies heavily on selling oil, a drop in oil prices can hurt its economy badly.

    b. Importing Too Much

    Example: If Mexico buys more goods than it sells, it might end up owing a lot of money to other countries.

    c. Hurting Local Businesses

    Example: If Kenya suddenly allows a lot of cheap shoes from China, local shoe makers might not be able to compete and could go out of business.

     

    4. Balancing Trade Policies

    a. Protecting Local Businesses

    Example: India might put a tax on imported cars to help local car manufacturers grow. But too much protection can make local companies lazy and inefficient.

    b. Opening Up Trade (Trade Liberalization)

    Example: South Korea gradually removed trade barriers, which helped its companies compete globally, but did it slowly to give local businesses time to adjust.

     

    5. Real-Life Examples

    a. China’s Success

    Example: China opened up its economy in the 1980s, allowing foreign businesses to invest. This led to rapid growth, making China a global manufacturing powerhouse.

    b. Challenges in Africa

    Example: Some African countries focus too much on exporting raw materials like minerals. If prices drop, their economies suffer. They need to diversify to become more stable.

     

    6. Summary

    Trade policies can help developing countries grow by selling more goods, buying necessary products, attracting foreign companies, specializing in what they do best, and learning new technologies. However, they need to balance these benefits with potential risks like dependency, trade deficits, and harm to local businesses. By managing trade policies wisely, countries can achieve sustainable economic growth.

    See less
Chandra Shekhar
  • 0
Chandra ShekharBegginer
Asked: July 30, 2024In:
  • 0

Examine the political and social ramifications of Bismarck’s Kulturkampf, which targeted the Catholic Church.

upsc: unification of germany
  1. Parth Nayak
    Parth Nayak Begginer

    Political and Social Consequences of the Kulturkampf Introduction The Kulturkampf, or "Culture Struggle," was a political campaign initiated by Otto von Bismarck in the 1870s aimed at reducing the influence of the Catholic Church in Germany. This conflict had significant political and social repercuRead more

    Political and Social Consequences of the Kulturkampf

    Introduction

    The Kulturkampf, or “Culture Struggle,” was a political campaign initiated by Otto von Bismarck in the 1870s aimed at reducing the influence of the Catholic Church in Germany. This conflict had significant political and social repercussions that shaped the course of German history and offers lessons for understanding contemporary church-state relations.

    Political Consequences

    1. Reduction in Church Power:
      • Bismarck’s campaign sought to curb the political power of the Catholic Church and assert state control over religious matters. The implementation of laws, such as the May Laws (1873), aimed to restrict the Church’s authority and assert governmental control over clerical appointments and educational institutions.
    2. Political Alliances and Shifts:
      • The Kulturkampf led to the formation of new political alliances. Bismarck’s aggressive policies against the Catholic Church alienated the Zentrum Party (Center Party), which represented Catholic interests. In response, the Zentrum Party emerged as a significant political force opposing Bismarck’s policies, reflecting a shift in the political landscape.
    3. Impact on Bismarck’s Position:
      • Initially, the Kulturkampf bolstered Bismarck’s position as it consolidated his authority over the Catholic Church. However, the resistance from the Catholic community and the political costs of alienating significant portions of the population eventually led Bismarck to seek a reconciliation with the Church, culminating in the Concordat of 1887. This agreement marked the end of the Kulturkampf and restored some degree of autonomy to the Church.

    Social Consequences

    1. Religious Tensions:
      • The Kulturkampf exacerbated religious tensions in Germany. The campaign fostered an environment of conflict between Catholics and Protestants, deepening divisions within German society. The Church’s opposition to state policies led to social unrest and polarized communities along religious lines.
    2. Catholic Identity and Resistance:
      • The campaign strengthened Catholic identity and solidarity. The Catholic community, through the Zentrum Party and other organizations, mobilized against Bismarck’s policies, leading to a heightened sense of religious and cultural identity. This resistance not only reinforced Catholicism as a political force but also contributed to a broader sense of communal identity among German Catholics.
    3. Educational and Social Institutions:
      • The Kulturkampf led to changes in educational and social institutions. The state assumed control over educational institutions previously managed by the Church, leading to a shift in curriculum and pedagogy. Additionally, religious orders and charitable organizations faced restrictions, affecting their role in social welfare activities.

    Recent Examples and Comparisons

    1. Contemporary Church-State Relations:
      • The Kulturkampf’s legacy can be seen in modern debates over church-state relations in various countries. For instance, in Poland, there have been ongoing discussions about the role of the Catholic Church in public life and politics, reflecting historical tensions similar to those experienced during the Kulturkampf.
    2. Secularism vs. Religious Influence:
      • The tension between secularism and religious influence in public affairs continues to be relevant. In France, the principle of laïcité (secularism) has led to debates over the role of religion in public institutions and education, echoing the struggles experienced during the Kulturkampf.

    Conclusion

    The Kulturkampf had profound political and social consequences in 19th-century Germany. Politically, it led to significant shifts in party dynamics and a reevaluation of Bismarck’s strategies, while socially, it deepened religious divisions and strengthened Catholic identity. Contemporary examples of church-state relations continue to reflect the complexities and challenges associated with balancing religious and political authority, providing a lasting context for understanding the impact of the Kulturkampf.

    See less
Meghana Asadi
  • 0
Meghana AsadiBegginer
Asked: July 13, 2024In: ,
  • 0

question
  1. BAVA
    BAVA Begginer

    World War I started due to several key factors: 1. **Assassination:** The killing of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist in 1914. 2. **Nationalism:** Intense national pride and rivalries among countries. 3. **Imperialism:** Competition for colonies and resources. 4.Read more

    World War I started due to several key factors:

    1. **Assassination:** The killing of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist in 1914.
    2. **Nationalism:** Intense national pride and rivalries among countries.
    3. **Imperialism:** Competition for colonies and resources.
    4. **Militarism:** The arms race and glorification of military power.
    5. **Alliances:** Treaties that obligated countries to defend each other, like the Triple Entente and Triple Alliance.

    These elements created a tense situation where the assassination triggered a chain reaction, leading to war in July 1914.

    See less
Akshat Aggarwal
  • 0
Akshat AggarwalBegginer
Asked: July 19, 2024In:
  • 0

cold warquestion
  1. Sanskriti Srivastava
    Sanskriti Srivastava Begginer

    World War II set the stage for the Cold War through a series of geopolitical, ideological, and military developments that created a climate of mutual suspicion and competition between the United States and the Soviet Union. Here are some key factors: Allied Cooperation and Post-War Tensions: DuringRead more

    World War II set the stage for the Cold War through a series of geopolitical, ideological, and military developments that created a climate of mutual suspicion and competition between the United States and the Soviet Union. Here are some key factors:

    1. Allied Cooperation and Post-War Tensions:
      • During World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union were allies against the Axis powers, but their cooperation was based on a common enemy rather than shared values or goals.
      • As the war ended, tensions quickly emerged over the post-war reconstruction of Europe and the fate of countries liberated from Nazi occupation.
    2. Ideological Differences:
      • The United States and the Soviet Union represented two fundamentally different ideologies: capitalism and democracy versus communism and authoritarianism.
      • These differences led to a deep mistrust, as each side viewed the other’s ideology as a threat to its own way of life and global influence.
    3. Division of Europe:
      • Europe was divided into spheres of influence, with the Eastern Bloc under Soviet control and the Western Bloc under American influence.
      • The Iron Curtain symbolized this division, with countries in Eastern Europe becoming satellite states of the Soviet Union.
    4. Nuclear Arms Race:
      • The development and use of atomic bombs by the United States at the end of World War II demonstrated a new level of military power.
      • The Soviet Union quickly sought to develop its own nuclear arsenal, leading to an arms race that became a central aspect of the Cold War.
    5. Formation of Military Alliances:
      • In response to perceived threats, the United States and its allies formed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in 1949.
      • The Soviet Union responded by establishing the Warsaw Pact in 1955, formalizing the military divide in Europe.
    6. Economic and Political Reconstruction:
      • The United States implemented the Marshall Plan to aid Western Europe’s economic recovery, aiming to prevent the spread of communism by stabilizing these countries.
      • The Soviet Union, in turn, exerted control over the economies of Eastern Europe, integrating them into its own economic system.
    7. Emergence of Proxy Wars:
      • Conflicts in various parts of the world, such as Korea and later Vietnam, became arenas for the United States and the Soviet Union to exert influence without direct confrontation.
      • These proxy wars were indicative of the global struggle for power and ideological dominance.
    8. Berlin Crisis:
      • The Berlin Blockade (1948-1949) and the subsequent Berlin Airlift highlighted the city’s symbolic and strategic importance, solidifying the division of Germany and Berlin.
      • The construction of the Berlin Wall in 1961 further entrenched the Cold War divide.

    These factors combined to create a tense and competitive global environment in which the United States and the Soviet Union vied for dominance, shaping international relations for the next several decades.

    See less
Atharva Gadhave
  • 0
Atharva GadhaveBegginer
Asked: July 31, 2024In:
  • 0

historyquestion
  1. Abraham
    Abraham Begginer

    The Cold War cast a long, chilling shadow over the latter half of the 20th century, creating a global atmosphere of tension and competition. In the USA, the pervasive fear of Soviet communism spurred significant political and social changes. Domestically, McCarthyism fueled paranoia and led to widesRead more

    The Cold War cast a long, chilling shadow over the latter half of the 20th century, creating a global atmosphere of tension and competition. In the USA, the pervasive fear of Soviet communism spurred significant political and social changes. Domestically, McCarthyism fueled paranoia and led to widespread investigations of suspected communists, impacting the lives and careers of many. Economically, the US engaged in an arms race, heavily investing in military technology and defense, which significantly shaped its industrial and technological advancements.

    In the USSR, the Cold War prompted intense efforts to rival Western technological and military achievements. This resulted in a robust military-industrial complex and significant investments in space exploration, culminating in milestones like the launch of Sputnik. However, the relentless pursuit of military dominance strained the Soviet economy and exacerbated internal inefficiencies, contributing to eventual economic stagnation.

    Globally, the Cold War’s influence extended to proxy wars, where countries became battlegrounds for ideological conflicts between superpowers. Nations aligned themselves with either the capitalist West or the communist East, often at the cost of their own political stability and economic development.

    The era ended in a somber realization: despite grand displays of power and technological prowess, the world remained starkly divided, and the ideological conflict left an indelible mark on international relations.

    See less
Rajesh Subramaniam
  • 0
Rajesh SubramaniamBegginer
Asked: August 1, 2024In:
  • 0

Talk about the aftermath of the Cuban Missile Crisis and how it affected the creation of crisis management plans during the Cold War.

upsc: cuban crisis
  1. Aditi Malhotra
    Aditi Malhotra Begginer

    Legacy of the Cuban Missile Crisis and Its Influence on Crisis Management Strategies During the Cold War Era 1. Overview of the Cuban Missile Crisis The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 was a pivotal moment in the Cold War, bringing the United States and the Soviet Union to the brink of nuclearRead more

    Legacy of the Cuban Missile Crisis and Its Influence on Crisis Management Strategies During the Cold War Era

    1. Overview of the Cuban Missile Crisis

    The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 was a pivotal moment in the Cold War, bringing the United States and the Soviet Union to the brink of nuclear conflict over Soviet missile installations in Cuba. The resolution of the crisis had a profound and lasting impact on crisis management strategies and Cold War diplomacy.

    2. Key Legacies of the Cuban Missile Crisis

    The Cuban Missile Crisis left several important legacies that influenced Cold War-era crisis management strategies:

    • Establishment of the Washington-Moscow Hotline: One of the most significant legacies of the Cuban Missile Crisis was the establishment of the Hotline Agreement between the U.S. and the Soviet Union in June 1963. This direct communication link, known as the “Red Phone,” was designed to allow immediate dialogue between the two superpowers to prevent misunderstandings and accidental nuclear war. This hotline became a symbol of the commitment to avoiding nuclear conflict and improved crisis communication.
    • Development of Crisis Management Protocols: The crisis underscored the need for effective crisis management protocols and contingency planning. Both superpowers developed more structured and formalized crisis management procedures, including regular war games and simulations to prepare for potential conflicts. The National Security Council (NSC) in the U.S. and similar bodies in the Soviet Union enhanced their roles in coordinating responses to international crises.
    • Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: The Cuban Missile Crisis highlighted the dangers of nuclear proliferation and prompted efforts to control nuclear testing. This led to the signing of the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty in 1963, which prohibited atmospheric, underwater, and outer space nuclear tests. The treaty was a crucial step towards arms control and demonstrated a commitment to reducing the risk of nuclear escalation.

    3. Influence on Cold War Crisis Management Strategies

    The legacy of the Cuban Missile Crisis influenced several aspects of Cold War crisis management:

    • Increased Emphasis on Diplomacy: The crisis demonstrated the importance of diplomacy and negotiation in managing superpower conflicts. The U.S. and the Soviet Union recognized the need for direct and open communication channels to resolve disputes peacefully. This approach was reflected in subsequent diplomatic efforts, such as the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) and the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), which aimed to limit and reduce nuclear arsenals.
    • Focus on Intelligence and Surveillance: The crisis highlighted the importance of accurate intelligence and surveillance in crisis management. The U.S. developed advanced reconnaissance capabilities, including the U-2 spy planes, to monitor potential threats. The emphasis on intelligence gathering and analysis became a cornerstone of Cold War-era security strategies.
    • Crisis Management Teams and Simulations: Both the U.S. and Soviet Union established specialized crisis management teams and engaged in regular simulations to prepare for potential scenarios. For example, the U.S. conducted Operation Quick Kick and other exercises to test response strategies. These efforts were aimed at improving coordination and decision-making during crises.

    4. Recent Examples Reflecting the Legacy of the Cuban Missile Crisis

    The principles and lessons from the Cuban Missile Crisis continue to influence contemporary crisis management and international diplomacy:

    • North Korea’s Nuclear Program: The U.S. and its allies have applied lessons from the Cuban Missile Crisis in dealing with North Korea’s nuclear program. Efforts to engage North Korea in diplomatic talks, such as the U.S.-North Korea summits and negotiations led by the Six-Party Talks, reflect an approach informed by the need for direct dialogue and crisis management.
    • Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA): The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with Iran demonstrates the application of Cold War-era crisis management strategies in addressing nuclear proliferation. The deal, which aimed to limit Iran’s nuclear capabilities in exchange for sanctions relief, involved extensive negotiations and international oversight, drawing on principles of diplomacy and arms control established during the Cold War.
    • Ukraine Crisis: The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, including the annexation of Crimea in 2014, reflects the enduring relevance of Cold War-era crisis management lessons. The international community’s response, including sanctions and diplomatic efforts, echoes the strategies developed during the Cold War to manage superpower tensions and regional conflicts.

    Conclusion

    The Cuban Missile Crisis had a profound and lasting impact on crisis management strategies during the Cold War. Its legacy includes the establishment of communication channels, development of formal crisis management protocols, and efforts towards arms control. These lessons continue to influence contemporary international diplomacy and crisis management, highlighting the importance of direct communication, accurate intelligence, and diplomatic engagement in preventing and resolving conflicts.

    See less
Rishab Chopra
  • 0
Rishab ChopraBegginer
Asked: July 31, 2024In:
  • 0

Consider how well President John F. Kennedy and his team handled the Cuban Missile Crisis and prevented a nuclear exchange.

upsc: cuban crisis
  1. Akshay Desai
    Akshay Desai Begginer

    Role of President John F. Kennedy and His Administration in Managing the Cuban Missile Crisis and Avoiding Nuclear War The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 was a pivotal moment in Cold War history, and President John F. Kennedy's leadership during this period was instrumental in managing the criRead more

    Role of President John F. Kennedy and His Administration in Managing the Cuban Missile Crisis and Avoiding Nuclear War

    The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 was a pivotal moment in Cold War history, and President John F. Kennedy’s leadership during this period was instrumental in managing the crisis and avoiding a nuclear confrontation. This analysis evaluates the key aspects of Kennedy’s role and the administration’s strategies that contributed to resolving the crisis.

    1. Initial Response and Strategic Decision-Making

    a. Discovery of Soviet Missiles

    The crisis began with the discovery of Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba by U.S. reconnaissance aircraft, which posed a direct threat to the U.S. mainland.

    • Example: On October 14, 1962, a U-2 spy plane captured images of Soviet missile installations in Cuba. The revelation led to immediate and intense scrutiny by Kennedy and his advisers.

    b. Establishment of the Executive Committee of the National Security Council (ExComm)

    Kennedy convened the ExComm, a group of top advisers and experts, to assess the situation and formulate a response.

    • Example: ExComm meetings were crucial for discussing potential courses of action, ranging from diplomatic negotiations to military strikes. This collective decision-making process helped Kennedy weigh the pros and cons of various strategies.

    2. Public and Diplomatic Actions

    a. Imposition of a Naval Blockade

    Kennedy decided on a naval blockade, or “quarantine,” of Cuba to prevent further Soviet shipments of military equipment.

    • Example: On October 22, 1962, Kennedy announced the blockade in a televised address, informing the American public and the world of the U.S. response. The blockade was intended to pressure the Soviet Union without immediately escalating to military conflict.

    b. Diplomatic Negotiations and Communication

    Kennedy engaged in direct and indirect communications with Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev to de-escalate the situation.

    • Example: A series of back-channel communications and public exchanges between Kennedy and Khrushchev played a critical role. The exchange of letters between the two leaders, including a key message from Khrushchev offering to remove the missiles in exchange for a U.S. non-invasion pledge, was pivotal in reaching a resolution.

    3. Management of Domestic and International Reactions

    a. Domestic Leadership and Public Assurance

    Kennedy managed domestic reactions by balancing the need for national security with maintaining public calm and confidence.

    • Example: Kennedy’s addresses and public statements aimed to reassure the American public and maintain support for the administration’s strategy. The decision to avoid immediate military action helped prevent panic and ensured that diplomatic options remained viable.

    b. International Relations and Allies’ Coordination

    Kennedy coordinated with NATO allies and ensured that the U.S. actions were consistent with the broader Western alliance’s interests.

    • Example: The administration kept allies informed and involved in discussions, ensuring a unified Western stance. This coordination helped maintain international support and pressure on the Soviet Union.

    4. Resolution and Aftermath

    a. The Agreement and Resolution

    The crisis was resolved through a negotiated agreement between Kennedy and Khrushchev, leading to the withdrawal of Soviet missiles from Cuba in exchange for a U.S. pledge not to invade Cuba and the secret removal of U.S. missiles from Turkey.

    • Example: On October 28, 1962, Khrushchev announced the decision to withdraw the missiles from Cuba. The resolution was seen as a diplomatic victory for both leaders and avoided a potential nuclear conflict.

    b. Long-Term Impact on U.S.-Soviet Relations

    The resolution of the Cuban Missile Crisis led to a period of improved communication and the establishment of direct communication channels, such as the Washington-Moscow Hotline, to prevent future crises.

    • Example: The establishment of the hotline and subsequent arms control agreements, including the Partial Test Ban Treaty (1963), were direct outcomes of the crisis and marked a step towards reducing Cold War tensions.

    5. Recent Examples and Continued Relevance

    a. Lessons for Modern Diplomacy

    The Cuban Missile Crisis serves as a model for crisis management and diplomatic negotiations in contemporary geopolitical conflicts.

    • Example: Recent negotiations with North Korea over its nuclear program have drawn comparisons to the Cuban Missile Crisis, highlighting the importance of direct communication and negotiation in managing nuclear risks.

    b. Legacy in U.S. Foreign Policy

    Kennedy’s handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis has influenced U.S. foreign policy approaches, emphasizing the value of diplomacy and strategic patience in resolving high-stakes conflicts.

    • Example: The emphasis on diplomatic solutions and crisis management in U.S. foreign policy continues to be evident in modern contexts, such as the diplomatic efforts surrounding the Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA).

    In summary, President John F. Kennedy and his administration played a crucial role in managing the Cuban Missile Crisis through strategic decision-making, effective use of diplomacy, and public leadership. Their actions prevented a potential nuclear war and led to significant changes in U.S.-Soviet relations and international crisis management. The lessons from the crisis continue to inform contemporary diplomatic practices and international relations.

    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: April 18, 2025

Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (18 April 2025)

Do you agree with the claim that indecision and risk aversion are prevalent issues in Indian bureaucracy? Support your answer with logical reasoning. (150 words) ऐसा कहा जाता है कि भारतीय नौकरशाही में अनिर्णय और जोखिम से बचने की प्रवृत्ति ...

On: April 18, 2025 Comments: 0

Strengthening India’s Cyber Defence

Rising Threats Digital Era Challenges: 2024 marks a significant rise in digital threats, particularly from AI and cyberattacks. Key Issues: Disinformation campaigns. Cyber fraud affecting daily life. Current Major Cyber Threats Ransomware Rampage: Over 48,000 instances of WannaCry ransomware detected ...

On: April 18, 2025 Comments: 0

भारत की साइबर सुरक्षा

बढ़ते खतरे कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता (AI) और साइबर हमले: 2024 में AI और साइबर हमलों के खतरे में वृद्धि। महत्वपूर्ण अवसंरचना पर हमले: डिजिटल हमलों और दुष्प्रचार अभियानों की संभावना बढ़ी है। प्रमुख साइबर खतरें रैनसमवेयर का प्रकोप: 48,000 से अधिक ...

Explore Our Blog