Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question

Modern India

Share
Followers
209 Answers
1k Questions
Home/Modern India/Page 3

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Rajashree Shirke
  • 0
Rajashree ShirkeLearner
Asked: January 27, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction (Approx. 50-70 words) Start with a brief introduction about the Mughal Empire, its peak, and its eventual decline. Mention the time frame, particularly focusing on the death of Aurangzeb in 1707, which marked the beginning of ...

upsc: modern history events before 1857
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The Mughal Empire, which began with Babur’s ascension in 1526, reached its peak during the reign of Aurangzeb (1658–1707). However, the empire began to rapidly decline after his death in 1707. Despite its immense territorial expanse and power, the Mughal Empire disintegrateRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The Mughal Empire, which began with Babur’s ascension in 1526, reached its peak during the reign of Aurangzeb (1658–1707). However, the empire began to rapidly decline after his death in 1707. Despite its immense territorial expanse and power, the Mughal Empire disintegrated within a mere fifty years. Several factors contributed to this decline, including corruption, incompetence, religious intolerance, and military vulnerability.

    Corruption

    One of the key factors behind the decline of the Mughal Empire was the rampant corruption within the administration. During the later years, many officials used their positions for personal gain, misappropriating public funds and weakening the state’s financial stability. This corruption severely affected the empire’s economy, leading to reduced revenues and insufficient resources to manage the vast empire effectively. As a result, the empire’s central authority diminished, paving the way for its eventual downfall.

    Incompetence

    The successors of Aurangzeb were marked by inefficiency and incompetence. Weak rulers, unable to manage the complex political and military issues, became easy targets for factionalism and court intrigues. High taxes imposed to fund their lavish lifestyles drained the economy, and poor administrative decisions led to a lack of focus on critical areas such as military strength and infrastructure. This neglect weakened the empire’s defenses and reduced its ability to respond to both internal and external threats.

    Religious Intolerance

    Religious intolerance became more pronounced under the later Mughal rulers. Policies that discriminated against non-Muslim communities, particularly Hindus and Sikhs, sparked discontent and rebellion. The empire’s failure to maintain religious harmony destabilized the internal social fabric, fostering resistance movements that eventually weakened Mughal authority.

    Military Vulnerability

    The Mughal military, once a powerful force, began to deteriorate due to internal corruption, poor leadership, and lack of resources. The empire also faced external threats from powers like the Persians under Nadir Shah, who attacked Mughal territories in the 18th century, leading to a loss of wealth and territory. Additionally, the empire’s vast size made it difficult to defend effectively, especially as regional powers began to assert their independence.

    Conclusion

    The decline of the Mughal Empire was not caused by a single factor but by a combination of internal corruption, poor governance, religious intolerance, and military weakness. These, coupled with external pressures and succession wars, led to the disintegration of the empire by the early 19th century, eventually paving the way for British colonial rule in India.

    See less
Rajashree Shirke
  • 0
Rajashree ShirkeLearner
Asked: January 27, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Context: Briefly introduce the Vaikom Satyagraha, its origins, and significance. Mention that the movement, while primarily a social reform struggle, also contributed to India’s larger independence movement. Thesis Statement: State that the Vaikom Satyagraha played a crucial ...

upsc: beginning of mass nationalism (1919-1939)
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The Vaikom Satyagraha, initiated in 1924 in Kerala, marked a significant turning point in the social and political landscape of India. Aimed at securing the rights of lower-caste communities to use the public roads leading to the Sri Mahadevar Temple, the movement sought toRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The Vaikom Satyagraha, initiated in 1924 in Kerala, marked a significant turning point in the social and political landscape of India. Aimed at securing the rights of lower-caste communities to use the public roads leading to the Sri Mahadevar Temple, the movement sought to challenge caste-based discrimination. Led by social reformer T.K. Madhavan, and supported by Mahatma Gandhi, the Satyagraha became a symbol of both social reform and a precursor to India’s larger freedom struggle.

    Vaikom Satyagraha and Social Reform

    The Vaikom Satyagraha was instrumental in raising awareness about caste-based discrimination and the plight of Dalits in India. By challenging the denial of access to public roads for certain caste groups, the movement highlighted the deep-rooted social inequalities. This spurred public opinion against untouchability and inspired other social reform movements across India, including those advocating for Dalit and women’s rights.

    The movement also marked a turning point in the Indian social reform landscape, instilling a sense of rationality and social justice among the masses. Gandhian principles of non-violence were actively embraced, and the Congress leadership, along with Gandhi, recognized the importance of eradicating untouchability. Thus, the Vaikom Satyagraha contributed to the broader social reform agenda of the time.

    Vaikom Satyagraha and India’s Struggle for Independence

    The Vaikom Satyagraha was also pivotal in India’s independence struggle, particularly in shaping the Gandhian model of non-violent resistance. The movement served as a testing ground for Satyagraha, where Gandhi’s ideas of peaceful protest were implemented on a large scale for the first time. This non-violent tactic later influenced major independence movements, including the Salt Satyagraha and the Quit India Movement.

    Furthermore, the Satyagraha united people from different castes, religions, and regions, embodying the idea of mass participation. It also fostered communal harmony, with both Savarnas and Avarnas, along with Christians and Muslims, participating actively in the movement. The inclusive nature of the struggle laid the groundwork for a more unified India.

    Conclusion

    While primarily focused on social reform, the Vaikom Satyagraha played a crucial role in India’s broader struggle for independence. It challenged social inequalities, promoted Gandhian principles of non-violence, and set the stage for future mass movements that ultimately contributed to India’s liberation. The movement, thus, was both a significant step toward social justice and a key moment in the larger freedom movement.

    See less
Rajashree Shirke
  • 0
Rajashree ShirkeLearner
Asked: January 27, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Contextualize the Question: Begin by briefly explaining the role of the capitalist class in India during the early stages of the nationalist movement. State the Shift: Highlight the shift in the stance of the early capitalist class ...

upsc: towards freedom & partition (1939-1947)
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The Indian national movement, which sought independence from British colonial rule, initially faced significant opposition from the early capitalist class in India. This group, largely concerned with protecting their economic privileges, did not initially see the benefits oRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The Indian national movement, which sought independence from British colonial rule, initially faced significant opposition from the early capitalist class in India. This group, largely concerned with protecting their economic privileges, did not initially see the benefits of India’s independence. However, by the 1940s, a noticeable shift occurred as some capitalists began supporting the movement. This change was driven by various economic, political, and social factors.

    The Early Opposition of Capitalists to the National Movement

    Several reasons explain why the early capitalist class opposed the Indian national movement:

    • Fear of Losing Economic Privileges: British capitalists heavily invested in India’s economy, controlling vital sectors like railways, mines, and plantations. The early capitalists feared that India’s independence would lead to nationalization and the loss of these lucrative ventures.
      Example: Jamsetji Tata, founder of the Tata Group, initially supported British rule, believing that colonial governance was essential for India’s economic development.
    • Desire for Political Stability: Capitalists saw British rule as a source of political stability that facilitated business growth. They feared that nationalist agitation could destabilize the existing order.
      Example: Purshottamdas Thakurdas, a prominent industrialist, supported the British crackdown on the non-cooperation movement in 1922.
    • Support for Western-style Modernization: Many capitalists believed that India’s modernization could only occur under British rule and Western models. They feared that nationalist movements, especially those focused on political independence, would hinder this progress.
    • Close Relationship with Colonial Authorities: Early capitalists had strong ties to the colonial government, seeing it as an ally in their business endeavors, which discouraged them from supporting the nationalist movement.

    The Changing Stance in the 1940s

    By the 1940s, however, the stance of the capitalist class began to change:

    • Realization of Economic Opportunities: With the prospects of independence, capitalists began to recognize that the end of colonial rule could open new markets and opportunities for economic growth in an independent India.
      Example: Ardeshir Dalal, a prominent industrialist and Congress supporter, participated in the Quit India Movement in 1942.
    • Necessity of Public Support: As the nationalist movement gained mass support, capitalists realized that aligning with it was essential for maintaining legitimacy among the Indian populace. Any opposition would have led to significant public backlash.
    • Rising Threat from Socialist Movements: The capitalist class also feared the growing influence of socialist and communist movements, which advocated for systemic economic changes. Supporting the national movement helped them counter these rival forces and secure their own interests.
    • Resentment Against British Policies: Indian capitalists were increasingly frustrated with British economic policies, such as the Ottawa Conference of 1932, which favored British industries over Indian enterprise. This resentment pushed many capitalists to reconsider their stance on independence.

    Conclusion

    The shift in the early capitalist class’s stance from opposition to support for the Indian national movement in the 1940s was primarily driven by economic self-interest and political necessity. While some initially supported British colonialism for its stability and economic opportunities, the evolving political landscape and growing public support for the nationalist cause led them to align with the movement. This change, motivated by both opportunism and a sense of patriotism, played a crucial role in the momentum toward India’s independence.

    See less
Rajashree Shirke
  • 0
Rajashree ShirkeLearner
Asked: January 27, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Contextualize the Question: Briefly explain the origin of British education policy in India, with reference to the Charter Act of 1813, which earmarked funds for education, but with the primary objective of advancing British colonial control. Thesis ...

upsc: british policies in india
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The British education policy in India, established under the Charter Act of 1813, aimed at introducing formal education to Indians, with provisions such as Rs. 1 lakh for educational development. However, the primary goal of these policies was not the holistic education ofRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The British education policy in India, established under the Charter Act of 1813, aimed at introducing formal education to Indians, with provisions such as Rs. 1 lakh for educational development. However, the primary goal of these policies was not the holistic education of the Indian population, but rather to serve British interests and further their colonial objectives. This critical evaluation explores how British education policies prioritized British needs over addressing the real educational demands of Indians.

    Creation of a Loyal Class of Indian Administrators

    One of the main goals of the British education policy was to create a class of educated Indians who could act as intermediaries between the colonial administration and the local population. The establishment of the Indian Civil Service (ICS) in 1858, which required Western education, helped the British recruit Indians for administrative roles. However, high-ranking positions in the ICS remained closed to Indians until the 1920s, showcasing that the policy primarily served British needs for a compliant administrative class rather than fostering genuine educational development among Indians.

    Promotion of Western Culture and Values

    The British educational system was designed to impart Western knowledge and values, often at the expense of indigenous cultures and traditions. Macaulay’s Minute on Education (1835) specifically promoted English as the medium of instruction, sidelining traditional Indian knowledge systems. This created a cultural disconnect and led to a loss of identity among Indians, with Western ideals presented as superior. This policy aimed to make Indians more compliant to British rule by reshaping their worldview.

    Limited Focus on Technical Education

    The British education system emphasized liberal arts over technical or vocational education, which restricted India’s industrial and economic potential. The curriculum did not prioritize technical skills, such as engineering or agriculture, which could have helped India develop a self-sustaining economy. This decision benefited the British colonial economy by ensuring that India remained dependent on British imports, rather than fostering local industries.

    Negative Impacts of the British Education Policy

    Limited Access to Education

    The British education policies were not inclusive and reached only a small portion of the Indian population. By the time India gained independence in 1947, the literacy rate was a mere 12%, with education mostly confined to urban areas and the elite. This limited educational access hindered social mobility and perpetuated inequality.

    Gender Inequality and Limited Women’s Education

    The British policy also neglected the education of women. By the time of independence, only 1 in 11 girls was literate, with approximately 9% of Indian women having access to education. This lack of focus on women’s education reinforced gender inequality, restricting women’s participation in social and economic development.

    Positive Outcomes of the British Education Policy

    Despite its flaws, the British education system had some unintended positive effects. It introduced modern sciences and Western medical practices, contributing to the development of modern industries and healthcare systems in India. Institutions like the Indian Institute of Science and the Indian Medical Service played crucial roles in these advancements. Additionally, the promotion of vernacular languages alongside English, particularly after Wood’s Dispatch (1854), helped preserve local languages and boosted literacy.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, the British education policy was primarily designed to serve British colonial interests, including creating a loyal administrative class, promoting Western cultural values, and limiting India’s economic self-sufficiency. While there were some positive aspects, such as the spread of modern sciences and vernacular language promotion, the overall policy was more about reinforcing British control than addressing the real educational needs of the Indian population. The British system neglected critical areas like technical education, women’s education, and universal access to learning, leaving India at a disadvantage when it gained independence.

    See less
Anita Ratnam
  • 0
Anita RatnamLearner
Asked: January 27, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing To answer the question comprehensively, the structure can be divided into three main sections: Introduction: Introduce the Santal Rebellion as a significant event in the colonial period, highlighting its causes and the broader issues it exposed. Briefly mention the role ...

upsc: tribal movements
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The Santal Rebellion (1855-56), led by the Santhal tribal community under Kanho and Sidhu, was a significant uprising against the British colonial system. This rebellion highlighted critical issues such as land dispossession, economic inequality, and the erosion of indigenoRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The Santal Rebellion (1855-56), led by the Santhal tribal community under Kanho and Sidhu, was a significant uprising against the British colonial system. This rebellion highlighted critical issues such as land dispossession, economic inequality, and the erosion of indigenous structures caused by British policies.

    Land Dispossession and Inequality

    • Zamindari System: The introduction of the Permanent Settlement System (1793) led to the creation of a class of zamindars (landlords) with hereditary rights over land, while peasants, including the Santhals, were forced to pay fixed taxes. This system enabled landlords to exploit the Santhals, further increasing economic inequality.
    • Loss of Land Ownership: The British policies favored landlords and moneylenders, facilitating the alienation of Santhal land. With the support of the British police, the Santhals were dispossessed of their ancestral lands and were forced into debt.
    • Moneylender Exploitation: The Santhals became heavily indebted to moneylenders, who charged exorbitant interest rates. Unable to repay their debts, many Santhals lost their land and were forced into bonded labor.
    • Exploitation through Revenue Policies: New British revenue policies placed heavy burdens on the Santhals, leading to increased exploitation and economic instability within their communities.

    Erosion of Indigenous Structures

    • Disruption of Traditional Systems: The loss of land ownership disrupted the Santhals’ traditional way of life and their political systems, including the Manjhi and Parha Panchayat systems, which had long governed their communities.
    • Erosion of Barter System: The introduction of money-based transactions undermined the Santhals’ traditional barter economy, making it difficult for them to adapt to the new system imposed by colonial rule.

    Demands of Marginalized Communities

    In response to imperial dominance, marginalized communities, including the Santhals, sought:

    • Recognition of Land Rights: They demanded legal recognition of their land rights, similar to the Kol Rebellion of 1832-33.
    • Cultural Preservation: Resistance movements like the Koya Rebellion (1940-42) focused on preserving indigenous cultural identities.
    • Autonomy and Self-governance: Movements such as the Birsa Munda-led Ulgulan aimed to protect indigenous autonomy and land rights.
    • Economic and Social Justice: Several rebellions called for fair labor practices, an end to exploitation, and better living conditions for marginalized communities.

    Conclusion

    The Santal Rebellion, alongside other indigenous uprisings, reflected the deep desire for autonomy, cultural preservation, and social justice. These movements highlighted the resilience of marginalized communities in resisting colonial rule and defending their rights and identity.

    See less
Anita Ratnam
  • 0
Anita RatnamLearner
Asked: January 27, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Briefly mention the central role of land revenue systems in British colonial rule as a major source of income. State that various land revenue systems were implemented to maximize revenue, stabilize British control, and address regional challenges. Main Body: 1. ...

upsc: economic impact of british rule
  1. Team
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The implementation of diverse land revenue systems during British colonial rule was primarily driven by the need to maximize revenue, which was one of the key sources of income for the British. Different systems were introduced based on regional needs and political considerRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The implementation of diverse land revenue systems during British colonial rule was primarily driven by the need to maximize revenue, which was one of the key sources of income for the British. Different systems were introduced based on regional needs and political considerations, which had lasting impacts on Indian society and the economy.

    Reasons for Diverse Land Revenue Systems

    1. Permanent Settlement (1793)
      Under this system, introduced by Lord Cornwallis, the zamindars were recognized as the landowners, with hereditary rights to the land.

      • Economic Motive: The British saw the Permanent Settlement as a stable and predictable income source, as it fixed the revenue amount.
      • Loyalty: By making zamindars responsible for revenue collection, the British hoped to ensure their loyalty in maintaining control over rural areas.
      • Impact:
        • No incentive to improve land: The zamindars exploited peasants through high rents and made no efforts to improve the land, resulting in poverty.
        • Pauperization: The system led to the exploitation of peasants, contributing to famines and an overall deterioration of the rural economy.
    2. Ryotwari Settlement (1820s)
      Introduced in Madras and Bombay, this system vested land ownership in individual peasants (ryots) rather than zamindars.

      • Philosophical Reasoning: This was based on English utilitarianism, aiming to eliminate the zamindari middlemen and directly collect revenue from peasants.
      • Impact:
        • Exploitation: High assessments left peasants burdened with debts, forcing many to abandon farming.
        • Increased Absentee Landlordism: Local elites and moneylenders took over the land, exacerbating the suffering of peasants.
        • Coercion: The system was harsh, with peasants being coerced into cultivating land and paying inflated taxes.
    3. Mahalwari Settlement (1822)
      This system, implemented in North-Western India, involved revenue collection by village headmen on behalf of the entire village rather than individual zamindars.

      • Revenue Maximization: The goal was to increase revenue while protecting the rights of peasant proprietors.
      • Impact:
        • Shift to Cash Crops: To meet high revenue demands, farmers were forced to grow cash crops like indigo and cotton, reducing food crop production.
        • Concentration of Land: Wealthy moneylenders and absentee landlords acquired large amounts of land, marginalizing small farmers.

    Conclusion

    The varied land revenue systems implemented by the British had significant and detrimental effects on Indian agriculture. These systems led to widespread poverty, exploitation, and stagnation in the rural economy, contributing to peasant revolts and famines, and played a key role in the agrarian distress that fueled the 1857 revolt.

    See less
Anita Ratnam
  • 0
Anita RatnamLearner
Asked: January 27, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Begin by acknowledging that India’s struggle for independence was not an isolated phenomenon but influenced by global events, particularly in North America. Mention how ideas of liberty, equality, and self-determination from the American Revolution and global shifts after ...

upsc: freedom movement
  1. Team
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The Indian struggle for independence was deeply influenced by global events and ideas, particularly those emanating from North America. The principles of liberty, equality, and self-determination, which were championed during key global events such as the American RevolutioRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The Indian struggle for independence was deeply influenced by global events and ideas, particularly those emanating from North America. The principles of liberty, equality, and self-determination, which were championed during key global events such as the American Revolution and World Wars, significantly shaped India’s quest for independence.

    1. World Wars and Geopolitical Shifts:

    • World War I (1914-1918): India’s support to Britain during the war led to some political concessions by the British. This culminated in the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms and the Government of India Act, 1919, which introduced the concept of a responsible government in India. Although this did not meet Indian aspirations, it created a momentum for political activism.
    • World War II (1939-1945): The war weakened the British Empire. The emergence of the US and the Soviet Union as superpowers pushed for decolonization. This global shift created a favorable environment for India’s push for self-rule.

    2. American Revolution:

    • US Declaration of Independence (1776): The American Revolution, with its ideals of liberty and democracy, greatly influenced the Indian freedom struggle. The Indian National Congress (INC) adopted similar ideals to challenge British colonial rule.
    • Non-Violent Resistance: Gandhi and other leaders drew inspiration from the American Revolution to adopt non-violent resistance, aiming to achieve independence through peaceful means, much like the American colonists’ revolt.

    3. Parallel Symbolic Acts:

    • Salt March (1930): Gandhi’s Salt March mirrored the symbolic Boston Tea Party of the American Revolution, both acts serving as a form of civil disobedience against colonial monopolies.
    • Swadeshi Movement: Similar to the Non-Importation Movement in the USA, the Swadeshi Movement called for the boycott of British goods and the promotion of indigenous products.

    4. Literary Influence:

    • Thoreau’s ‘Civil Disobedience’ (1849): Gandhi was deeply influenced by Thoreau’s essay, which emphasized non-violent protest as a form of resistance against unjust laws. This inspired Gandhi’s philosophy of peaceful civil disobedience.

    Conclusion

    Global events, particularly in North America, played a pivotal role in shaping the Indian independence movement. The exchange of ideas across borders, especially those of liberty, democracy, and self-rule, not only inspired Indian leaders but also accelerated the drive towards independence, ultimately leading to India’s freedom in 1947.

    See less
Anita Ratnam
  • 0
Anita RatnamLearner
Asked: January 27, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Context Setting: Briefly introduce the Quit India Movement (QIM), highlighting its launch by Mahatma Gandhi and the Indian National Congress (INC) on August 8, 1942. Objective: State that the movement’s significance lies in its intensity, widespread participation, and ...

upsc: towards freedom & partition (1939-1947)
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The Quit India Movement, launched by Mahatma Gandhi and the Indian National Congress on August 8, 1942, marked a pivotal moment in India's struggle for independence. It was a bold call for the immediate withdrawal of British colonial rule, and its significance lies in its iRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The Quit India Movement, launched by Mahatma Gandhi and the Indian National Congress on August 8, 1942, marked a pivotal moment in India’s struggle for independence. It was a bold call for the immediate withdrawal of British colonial rule, and its significance lies in its intensity, widespread participation, and its impact on British policies during and after World War II.

    Intensity and Popular Mobilization

    The Quit India Movement was characterized by widespread protests and civil disobedience across India. It saw a surge in mass mobilization, with millions of students, peasants, workers, and various other groups participating in protests, strikes, and processions. The movement united people across religious, caste, and class divides, highlighting a collective national consciousness. The British response was harsh, arresting over 100,000 people and using force to suppress the unrest, which, in turn, garnered more public sympathy for the movement.

    Broad Societal Involvement

    The movement witnessed significant participation from various sections of society. Women played a prominent role, organizing protests and protecting underground activists, with leaders like Aruna Asaf Ali and Usha Mehta emerging as key figures. This broad-based involvement showcased the movement’s national appeal and the growing impatience with British rule. Moreover, despite the arrests of Congress leaders, underground networks and parallel governance structures continued the movement, illustrating the resilience and organizational strength of the Indian populace.

    Impact on British Policies

    The Quit India Movement significantly altered British perspectives on India. The widespread unrest showed that British rule was no longer sustainable, especially as India was crucial to Britain’s war efforts. Revolts in the armed forces, such as the Royal Indian Navy mutiny, further strained British control. This unrest, combined with post-war economic challenges, led to the British decision to accelerate India’s independence process, ultimately contributing to the 1947 Partition and independence.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, the Quit India Movement was a watershed moment in India’s independence struggle. Despite the brutal suppression, it galvanized the nation, laying the groundwork for the eventual end of British rule. Its mass participation, intensity, and the shift it brought in British policy underscored the power of popular movements in shaping political change.

    See less
Anita Ratnam
  • 0
Anita RatnamLearner
Asked: January 27, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction: Purpose: Set the context for the evolution of peasant movements post-1857. Historical Background: Mention the British policies leading to peasant unrest and highlight the shift after the 1857 Revolt. Key Facts: Pre-1857: British policies like high land revenue and ...

upsc: peasant movements
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The peasant movements in India underwent significant changes after the 1857 Revolt, both in terms of their nature and character. While early peasant movements primarily focused on local grievances, the aftermath of the revolt saw a shift towards more organized and politicalRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The peasant movements in India underwent significant changes after the 1857 Revolt, both in terms of their nature and character. While early peasant movements primarily focused on local grievances, the aftermath of the revolt saw a shift towards more organized and politically charged struggles against British colonial rule.

    Peasant Movements Before 1857

    • Immediate Focus: Prior to 1857, peasant movements were largely driven by economic issues such as high rents, taxes, and oppression by local landlords. These movements were not aimed at overthrowing the larger colonial system but focused on immediate concerns.
    • Limited Understanding of Colonialism: Peasants were more concerned with the local exploiters like zamindars and foreign planters than with the broader colonial structure. The movements had a narrow focus and were not explicitly anti-colonial.
    • Leadership and Scope: These movements were typically led by local leaders, often from the peasantry, and had a regional scope. They were not formalized and lacked long-term strategies or clear ideologies.

    Peasant Movements After 1857

    • Broader Grievances: Post-1857, the nature of grievances expanded beyond local issues to include broader anti-colonial sentiments, especially resentment against British rule and the economic policies that adversely affected the peasants.
    • Nationalist Leadership: The leadership of peasant movements became more nationalist in nature. For example, the Telangana Movement and the Tehbhaga Movement were both linked to nationalist ideologies, with a strong focus on resisting British colonialism.
    • Increased Mobilization and Violence: Movements after 1857 saw a greater scale of mobilization, both regionally and nationally. Violence became a more common tool of resistance as peasants began to organize sustained uprisings against the colonial administration.
    • Integration with Nationalism: Unlike pre-1857 movements, post-1857 peasant struggles became more closely integrated with the larger Indian nationalist movement, contributing to the anti-colonial sentiment that fueled the fight for independence.

    Conclusion

    The peasant movements in India after the 1857 Revolt transformed from localized protests to organized, politically driven movements with a broader anti-colonial agenda. These movements, eventually integrated into the larger national struggle, played a crucial role in shaping India’s post-independence agrarian reforms and the vision of a free India.

    See less
Anita Ratnam
  • 0
Anita RatnamLearner
Asked: January 27, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction: Briefly introduce the indentured labor system and its connection to British colonialism. Mention how the migration of Indian laborers to foreign countries played a significant role in supporting British economic interests in their colonies. Body: Why Were Indian Indentured ...

upsc: british policies in india
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction Indian indentured laborers were sent to various British colonies to address labor shortages and contribute to economic growth through harsh working conditions, primarily in plantations and infrastructure development. The legacy of this migration continues to shape India’s rRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    Indian indentured laborers were sent to various British colonies to address labor shortages and contribute to economic growth through harsh working conditions, primarily in plantations and infrastructure development. The legacy of this migration continues to shape India’s relations with countries that received these laborers.

    Reasons for Sending Indian Indentured Laborers Abroad

    1. Labour Shortages: Following the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade, British colonies faced severe labor shortages, especially in plantation economies.
    2. Economic Exploitation: The British saw Indian labor as a cheap and reliable workforce, enabling them to maximize profits in their colonies.
    3. Recruitment Agents: Agents used deceptive tactics and coercion to persuade or force Indian workers to sign indenture contracts, often under false promises of good wages and living conditions.
    4. Profit for Plantation Owners: The indenture system ensured a steady, controllable labor force for plantation owners, making it economically viable to run plantations in distant colonies like Trinidad, Guyana, and Fiji.

    Circumstances Surrounding Indian Indentured Labor Migration

    • Plantation Agriculture: Most Indian indentured laborers worked on sugarcane, tea, and rubber plantations in places like Fiji, Guyana, Trinidad, and Mauritius.
    • Mining and Infrastructure: Indian laborers were also employed in mining and infrastructure development, including railway construction in South Africa.
    • Harsh Conditions: Workers faced long hours, poor housing, and low wages, leading to immense physical and emotional hardships.
    • End of Indenture: After the term of their indenture ended, laborers could choose to return to India, settle in the host country, or continue working.

    Impact on Modern Relations

    • Cultural Exchange and Diaspora Communities: The descendants of indentured laborers have built vibrant communities abroad, preserving Indian culture through festivals like Diwali and Holi.
    • Economic Ties: India’s trade and investment relations with countries like Mauritius are influenced by the historical presence of Indian laborers.
    • Political Cooperation: India maintains strong diplomatic ties with countries like South Africa, recognizing the significant role of the Indian diaspora in these nations.
    • Cultural Diplomacy: India engages in cultural exchanges with countries like Fiji, celebrating Indo-Fijian heritage through festivals and educational programs.
    • Challenges and Reconciliation: Efforts have been made by countries like Guyana to address historical injustices and recognize the contributions of indentured laborers.

    Conclusion

    The history of Indian indentured labor continues to influence India’s relations with the countries that hosted these workers. It has fostered cultural, economic, and political connections, while also creating opportunities for reconciliation and mutual understanding.

    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: March 8, 2025

Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (8 March 2025)

Examine the key issues that obstruct the development of port infrastructure in India and outline the recent measures taken by the government to address these challenges. (Answer in 200 words) भारत में बंदरगाह अवसंरचना के विकास में आने वाली विभिन्न ...

On: March 7, 2025 Comments: 0

मानव-वन्यजीव संघर्ष का प्रबंधन

प्रधानमंत्री की घोषणा: मानव-वन्यजीव संघर्ष प्रबंधन के लिए एक समर्पित केंद्र की स्थापना। चुनौतियाँ: जनसंख्या वृद्धि और संसाधनों की प्रतिस्पर्धा। वन्यजीव संरक्षण का महत्व पारिस्थितिक संतुलन और जलवायु अनुकूलन: वन्यजीव पारिस्थितिकी तंत्र को बनाए रखने और जलवायु पैटर्न को विनियमित ...

On: March 7, 2025 Comments: 0

Safeguarding Wildlife, Securing Harmony”

Context: Based on the editorial “Living with animals – the challenges and the solution” published in The Indian Express. Announcement: PM announced a center for managing human-wildlife conflict. (Press Information Bureau (PIB) release or official government announcement.) Importance of Wildlife ...

Explore Our Blog