Home/Freedom Movement/Beginning of Mass Nationalism (1919-1939)
Beginning of Mass Nationalism (1919-1939)
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
What were the main factors that motivated Mahatma Gandhi to launch the Non-cooperation Movement (NCM)? How important was the NCM in India's struggle for independence? (200 words)
Model Answer Introduction The Non-Cooperation Movement (NCM), initiated by Mahatma Gandhi in 1920, marked a critical phase in India's quest for independence from British colonial rule. The movement aimed at uniting Indians in peaceful protest and demanding self-governance. It was a transformative stRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The Non-Cooperation Movement (NCM), initiated by Mahatma Gandhi in 1920, marked a critical phase in India’s quest for independence from British colonial rule. The movement aimed at uniting Indians in peaceful protest and demanding self-governance. It was a transformative step in the Indian freedom struggle.
Key Factors that Motivated Gandhi to Launch the Non-Cooperation Movement
Significance of the Non-Cooperation Movement
Conclusion
While the Non-Cooperation Movement did not immediately achieve its goals, it played a crucial role in reshaping India’s freedom struggle. Gandhi’s leadership and the movement’s mass appeal significantly advanced the cause of Indian independence, laying the groundwork for future protests and resistance against British colonialism.
See lessEvaluate the impact of globalization on Indian classical music and dance. How have these art forms been adapted to the global stage, and what legal mechanisms are in place to preserve their originality and cultural significance amid extensive cultural exchanges?
Globalization delivers both opportunities for global dissemination and originality challenges to distant and adjacent forms of Indian classical music and dance. Digital media together with international festivals along with collaborations allow these traditional art forms to spread widely while receRead more
Globalization delivers both opportunities for global dissemination and originality challenges to distant and adjacent forms of Indian classical music and dance. Digital media together with international festivals along with collaborations allow these traditional art forms to spread widely while receiving growing global recognition. Traditional Indian classical art forms have expanded their international concert venues through performers who combine traditional methods with modern trends for global audiences. Cultural dilution has emerged as a consequence of the creation of new artistic forms through genre blending across cultural traditions.
Intangible Cultural Heritage recognition by UNESCO provides legal protection that safeguards authentic Indian classical traditions alongside their promotion. The Copyright Act of 1957 together with the Geographical Indications (GI) Act shields original works by providing proper authorization. The Sangeet Natak Akademi alongside different government initiatives push for documentation and training yet some essential creative talent disappears during this development since India continues to need the imaginative power that globalisation frequently replaces with modern globalized cultural influences.
See lessThe Paradox of Tolerance in a Digital Age
The "Paradox of Tolerance" allows for the idea that absolute tolerance may become a threat to tolerance itself. The paradox has a new twist in the digital age. With online interfaces, freedom of speech and transfer of diverse viewpoints can be provided, but it also increases negative content, such aRead more
The “Paradox of Tolerance” allows for the idea that absolute tolerance may become a threat to tolerance itself. The paradox has a new twist in the digital age. With online interfaces, freedom of speech and transfer of diverse viewpoints can be provided, but it also increases negative content, such as:
Hate speech: The Internet may facilitate hate speech, incitement to violence, and other types of discrimination against minority groups.
-Disinformation and misinformation: False or misleading information can quickly gather enough momentum to challenge the validity of institutions and lead to social unrest.
-Extremism and radicalization:Online environments can nurture extremist ideologies and convert people to become violent extremists.
Balancing Tolerance and Protection:
1. Content Moderation:
-Have Clear Terms of Service: The companies must have clear and unmistakable terms of service that ban hate speech, harassment, and the creation of false information to be spread to others.
-Human Moderation- Use human moderators in conjunction with AI algorithm to moderate and delete harmful content.
-Transparency &Accountability. Speak out what the policies on the moderation of content are for each platform and be able to appeal for the deletion of users’ contents.
2. Media Literacy
Training the users in critical thinking, media literacy, and information searching and analysis skills on the Internet.
Development of Critical Thinking Skills: Embed media literacy into the school curricula so that the students understand the digital sphere and think critically before accepting and acting upon information.
3. Civil Discourse Support
-Facilitating Fact-Checking: Provide resources and funding to independent fact-checking services to limit the spread of disinformation
-Encourage Diverse Views: Assist companies in their efforts toward the promotion of diverse views and engagements of respectful nature between users whose views may differ with them.
4. Legal and Regulatory Structure:
Legislative: Legislation related to the proliferation of hate speech, misinformation, and manipulations with online platforms.
-Regulatory: Think about ways the regulations call the platforms into account for content they allow on the internet and what that has in store for society as a whole.
5. International Cooperation
-International Cooperation: Carry out international cooperation to address international issues on global matters of online extremism, disinformation, and information manipulation.
See lessMany voices had strengthened and enriched the nationalist movement during the Gandhian phase. Elaborate. (250 words) [UPSC 2019
From 1919 to 1947, the Gandhian stage of the Indian nationalist movement saw numerous voices from many sources energizing and fortifying the fight for independence. Gandhi's inclusive leadership attracted people from different parts of society, hence turning the cause into a mass-based effort. 1. FaRead more
From 1919 to 1947, the Gandhian stage of the Indian nationalist movement saw numerous voices from many sources energizing and fortifying the fight for independence. Gandhi’s inclusive leadership attracted people from different parts of society, hence turning the cause into a mass-based effort.
1. Farmers and peasants
Agrarian movements including the Champaran Satyagraha in 1917 and the Bardoli Satyagraha in 1928 tackled agrarian impoverishment and drew farmers into the national fight. Leaders including Vallabhbhai Patel and Rajendra Prasad multiplied the voices of rural India, linking bottom-up conflicts to the more general national movement.
2. corporate workers
Under leaders such Subhas Chandra Bose and Lala Lajpat Rai, who ran strikes and boycotts during movements like Non-Cooperation (1920-22) and Quit India (1942), the working class entered the movement. The AITUC sort of groups fused the independence movement with labor rights.
3. Females
Leading characters included Sarojini Naidu, Kasturba Gandhi, and Aruna Asaf Ali. Women’s empowerment was evident in their actions in picketing, demonstrations, and civil disobedience, hence increasing the movement’s foundation.
young people and students.
Especially during the Quit India Movement, which showed the youngsters’ energy behind this cause, the students came out in support and rioted at many levels mostly along with Jayaprakash Narayan as a role model.
5. Other Backward Classifications
Leaders such as G.R. discussed questions of social justice. Periyar and Ambedkar acted to see that the nationalist movement embraced an end to casteism, Dalit and minority rights.
6. Cultural and Literary Offerings
Poets, writers, and intellectuals like Rabindranath Tagore, Subramania Bharati, and Premchand permeated nationalism into art and literature through their works, thus inspiring the masses.
Conclusion
See lessThe different engagement during the Gandhian period not only empowered the nationalist movement but also guaranteed that it answered the many issues of Indian society, hence transforming independence into a common goal.
How did the 1919 Jallianwala Bagh Massacre serve as a pivotal moment in India’s independence movement, and what were its broader implications both within India and globally? (200 words)
Model Answer Introduction The Jallianwala Bagh massacre of April 13, 1919, marked a critical juncture in India's fight for independence. British troops, under General Reginald Dyer, killed hundreds of unarmed Indian civilians protesting British oppression. This brutal act not only heightened tensionRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The Jallianwala Bagh massacre of April 13, 1919, marked a critical juncture in India’s fight for independence. British troops, under General Reginald Dyer, killed hundreds of unarmed Indian civilians protesting British oppression. This brutal act not only heightened tensions within India but also attracted global attention, significantly influencing both domestic and international politics.
Domestic Impact of the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre
The massacre galvanized India’s political landscape. It became a powerful rallying cry for Indian leaders, leading to the emergence of Mahatma Gandhi as a key figure in the independence movement. The massacre intensified the push for Indian self-rule, sparking the Non-Cooperation Movement in 1920, which united Hindus and Muslims in their opposition to British colonialism.
Relations between the British and Indians soured dramatically after the massacre. The Indian public lost trust in British authorities, and anti-British sentiments surged across the nation. The massacre also deepened religious and communal divides, particularly among the Sikh community, many of whom were victims, leading to feelings of betrayal, as they had previously been loyal to the British.
Additionally, many soldiers who had previously served in the British Indian Army protested the massacre by resigning or refusing to reenlist, demonstrating the growing disillusionment with British rule.
International Impact of the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre
Globally, the massacre attracted widespread condemnation. International media outlets denounced the British for their actions, portraying them as an example of colonial brutality. This criticism not only tarnished Britain’s image but also fueled anti-colonial sentiment worldwide.
The incident also led to diplomatic tensions, particularly with the United States and Canada, who criticized Britain’s treatment of Indians. Moreover, it inspired nationalist movements in other colonized countries and contributed to the larger decolonization process.
Conclusion
The Jallianwala Bagh massacre was a transformative event in India’s struggle for independence. It galvanized domestic resistance, united diverse groups against British rule, and attracted global attention to the injustices of colonialism. It remains a significant moment in both Indian and global history, symbolizing the brutality of imperialism and the unyielding desire for self-determination.
See lessHow did the Vaikom Satyagraha contribute to social reform and India's struggle for independence? (200 words)
Model Answer Introduction The Vaikom Satyagraha, initiated in 1924 in Kerala, marked a significant turning point in the social and political landscape of India. Aimed at securing the rights of lower-caste communities to use the public roads leading to the Sri Mahadevar Temple, the movement sought toRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The Vaikom Satyagraha, initiated in 1924 in Kerala, marked a significant turning point in the social and political landscape of India. Aimed at securing the rights of lower-caste communities to use the public roads leading to the Sri Mahadevar Temple, the movement sought to challenge caste-based discrimination. Led by social reformer T.K. Madhavan, and supported by Mahatma Gandhi, the Satyagraha became a symbol of both social reform and a precursor to India’s larger freedom struggle.
Vaikom Satyagraha and Social Reform
The Vaikom Satyagraha was instrumental in raising awareness about caste-based discrimination and the plight of Dalits in India. By challenging the denial of access to public roads for certain caste groups, the movement highlighted the deep-rooted social inequalities. This spurred public opinion against untouchability and inspired other social reform movements across India, including those advocating for Dalit and women’s rights.
The movement also marked a turning point in the Indian social reform landscape, instilling a sense of rationality and social justice among the masses. Gandhian principles of non-violence were actively embraced, and the Congress leadership, along with Gandhi, recognized the importance of eradicating untouchability. Thus, the Vaikom Satyagraha contributed to the broader social reform agenda of the time.
Vaikom Satyagraha and India’s Struggle for Independence
The Vaikom Satyagraha was also pivotal in India’s independence struggle, particularly in shaping the Gandhian model of non-violent resistance. The movement served as a testing ground for Satyagraha, where Gandhi’s ideas of peaceful protest were implemented on a large scale for the first time. This non-violent tactic later influenced major independence movements, including the Salt Satyagraha and the Quit India Movement.
Furthermore, the Satyagraha united people from different castes, religions, and regions, embodying the idea of mass participation. It also fostered communal harmony, with both Savarnas and Avarnas, along with Christians and Muslims, participating actively in the movement. The inclusive nature of the struggle laid the groundwork for a more unified India.
Conclusion
While primarily focused on social reform, the Vaikom Satyagraha played a crucial role in India’s broader struggle for independence. It challenged social inequalities, promoted Gandhian principles of non-violence, and set the stage for future mass movements that ultimately contributed to India’s liberation. The movement, thus, was both a significant step toward social justice and a key moment in the larger freedom movement.
See lessIn what ways did the Swarajists and the No Changers differ in their approach to the freedom struggle? Were they more adept at handling disagreements than the Moderates and Extremists? Evaluate. (200 words)
Introduction Post 1922's Non-Cooperation Movement end the Indian National Congress developed internal disagreements. Under the leadership of C.R. Das and Motilal Nehru both activists formed Swarajism which advocated entering British legislative councils. Gandhi directed the No Changers who maintaineRead more
Introduction
Post 1922’s Non-Cooperation Movement end the Indian National Congress developed internal disagreements. Under the leadership of C.R. Das and Motilal Nehru both activists formed Swarajism which advocated entering British legislative councils. Gandhi directed the No Changers who maintained only non-cooperation with constructive work as ways to support change. Unlike the 1907 Moderates vs Extremists split Swarajists alongside No Changers carefully established this separation through cooperative means.
Differences in Approach to the Freedom Struggle –
1. Swarajists’ Approach –
– Constitutional Methods: The Swarajists joined legislative councils to advocate cases for reforms and expanded authority because of their political goals. –
– Setting up of Swaraj Party (1923): Through voting and political contests they fought to overtake British domination from the inside out.
– Pragmatism: According to the Swarajists the Montagu-Chelmsford reforms included provisions for the advancement of India’s self-rule status.
2. No Changers’ Approach
– Non-Cooperation: They promoted institution boycotting combined with civil disobedience activities alongside mass popular engagements.
– Constructive Work: Khadi numbers rose along with rural infrastructure development and educational initiatives to boost localized nationalist consciousness.
– Rejection of Legislative Councils: During colonial times people saw their participation as granting validity to the British administrative system.
Leadership approaches to discord stemming from difference in ideology became the focus of observation regarding choice tactics between extremists and moderates.
Swarajists and No Changers
– Unity Despite Differences: Under Gandhi’s leadership the moderation and revolutionary camps operated within Congress boundaries and merged their divergent positions at the 1924 Belgaum congress meeting.
– Complementary Strategies: During the time the Swarajists directed legislative politics while No Changers maintained their focus on mass adoption. 2. Moderates and Extremists
– Violent Split (Surat, 1907): The temporary decline of the Congress movement came after deep ideological disagreements led to complete fragmentation.
– Reconciliation (Lucknow Pact, 1916): After a decade-long separation Congress members finally saw fit to unite their forces as one entity.
Conclusion
See lessSwarajists and No Changers, despite the different tactics used, stayed together in Congress. This managed to blend mass action with legislation in the Congress. Moderates and Extremists’ schism was the reason for the biggest loss before reunification. Maturity as seen by Swarajists and No Changers exemplified a more cohesive and effective way of handling disagreement in the freedom movement.
In what ways did the First World War cause social and economic disruptions across various sections of Indian society and contribute to the mass mobilisation for the independence movement? (200 words)
Model Answer The First World War (1914-1918) caused significant socio-economic disruptions in India, which contributed to the rise of mass mobilization for the independence movement. Some of the key disruptions included: 1. Economic Hardships Rise in National Debt: To fund the war, the British goverRead more
Model Answer
The First World War (1914-1918) caused significant socio-economic disruptions in India, which contributed to the rise of mass mobilization for the independence movement. Some of the key disruptions included:
1. Economic Hardships
2. Distress Among Peasants and Workers
3. Spread of Pandemic
Contribution to Mass Mobilization for Independence
The socio-economic impact of WW-I fueled the Indian independence struggle in several ways:
1. Political Awareness
Indian soldiers who fought in the war returned with heightened political awareness and a sense of injustice about colonial rule. This sense of empowerment contributed to the spread of nationalist ideas.
2. The Home Rule Movement
In response to the hardships caused by WW-I, the Home Rule Movement, led by leaders like Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Annie Besant, gained momentum. It called for self-governance and rallied public opinion against British policies.
3. Repressive British Policies
The British response to growing discontent included the imposition of martial law and the Rowlatt Act (1919), which restricted civil liberties. These oppressive measures further united Indian society, leading to Gandhiji’s Rowlatt Satyagraha.
4. The Khilafat-Non-Cooperation Movement
The harsh post-war Treaty of Sevres and the treatment of the Turkish Sultan (Khalifa) sparked the Khilafat Movement. Gandhiji’s Non-Cooperation Movement, which combined the Khilafat cause with the broader nationalist struggle, mobilized peasants, workers, and women.
Thus, the socio-economic disruptions caused by the war, alongside oppressive British policies, led to mass mobilization across various sections of Indian society for the independence movement.
See lessDiscuss the strategy of the Indian capitalist class during the national movement, highlighting their support for both constitutional methods and alternative forms of struggle, with relevant examples. (200 words)
Model Answer Strategy of the Indian Capitalist Class During the National Movement The Indian capitalist class played a significant role in the national movement, adopting a strategy that balanced constitutional participation with alternative forms of struggle. This dual approach helped them navigateRead more
Model Answer
Strategy of the Indian Capitalist Class During the National Movement
The Indian capitalist class played a significant role in the national movement, adopting a strategy that balanced constitutional participation with alternative forms of struggle. This dual approach helped them navigate between aligning with the Indian National Congress (INC) and protecting their own economic interests.
1. Support for Constitutional Methods
a. Constitutional Participation:
b. Alignment with Congress’s National Goals:
2. Support for Alternative Forms of Struggle
a. Non-Violent Mass Struggles:
b. Mediation and Pressure on the British Government:
3. Long-Term Vision and Nationalist Support
Conclusion
The Indian capitalist class adopted a balanced strategy during the national movement, supporting constitutional reforms while also using mass struggles to apply pressure on the British. Their ability to mediate between Congress and the British, combined with their long-term vision, played a crucial role in the Indian freedom struggle.
See lessWhat motivated Gandhiji to select salt as a symbol of protest for the Dandi Satyagraha? Additionally, explain how the Dandi March influenced the national movement. (200 words)
Model Answer Reasons Behind Gandhiji's Choice of Salt as a Protest Symbol Mahatma Gandhi selected salt as a symbol of protest during the Dandi Satyagraha for its universal significance in India and to strategically mobilize the masses. Salt was an essential item in every Indian household, regardlessRead more
Model Answer
Reasons Behind Gandhiji’s Choice of Salt as a Protest Symbol
Mahatma Gandhi selected salt as a symbol of protest during the Dandi Satyagraha for its universal significance in India and to strategically mobilize the masses. Salt was an essential item in every Indian household, regardless of caste, religion, or region, making it an ideal unifying factor. Yet, the British Salt Act of 1882 imposed a heavy tax on salt and restricted Indians from freely producing it from seawater. By targeting this oppressive policy, Gandhi was able to expose the unfair practices of British rule that affected the daily lives of all Indians (source: Dandi Satyagraha history). Additionally, salt was an essential commodity with which he could channel the people’s discontent against the British, whose monopoly on salt production generated 8.2% of their tax revenue. Gandhi’s approach aimed to disrupt this key economic stream, creating an unavoidable statement of dissent (source: Analysis on Salt Tax).
Impact of the Dandi March on the Indian National Movement
The Dandi March, beginning on March 12, 1930, marked a transformative period in India’s independence movement. Its impact extended to multiple fronts:
The Dandi Satyagraha inspired similar regional marches. Leaders like C. Rajagopalachari in Tamil Nadu, K. Kelappan in Malabar, and Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan in the North-West Frontier Province organized marches to protest the salt tax. These protests were not limited to one region but spread to Assam and Andhra Pradesh, making salt production a powerful act of civil disobedience nationwide (source: Freedom Movement documentation).
Unlike previous protests, the Salt March witnessed mass involvement from peasants, workers, students, merchants, and shopkeepers, establishing Congress as a truly national movement. Women participated significantly, with leaders like Sarojini Naidu amplifying the movement’s reach (source: Congress archives).
International attention grew, with global publications like “Time” magazine covering the Dandi March and highlighting the plight of Indians. This exposure pressured the British into organizing Round Table Conferences, eventually leading to partial Indian representation in administration under the Government of India Act, of 1935, which paved the way toward complete independence (source: Time Magazine archives).
In essence, the Dandi Satyagraha symbolized the irreversibility of India’s push for independence, mobilizing both national and international support for Indian self-governance.
See less