Roadmap for Answer Writing Step 1: Introduction Briefly define delimitation and its purpose. Mention the constitutional and procedural context of delimitation (such as the freeze on delimitation after the 1971 Census, the 84th Constitutional Amendment of 2002, and the planned delimitation after the ...
Model Answer Introduction to the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) was established by the Government of India in 1964 and granted statutory status through the CVC Act, 2003. Its primary objective is to oversee and supervise vigilance matters in organizations cRead more
Model Answer
Introduction to the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC)
The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) was established by the Government of India in 1964 and granted statutory status through the CVC Act, 2003. Its primary objective is to oversee and supervise vigilance matters in organizations controlled by the Union Government and to combat corruption. While the CVC has played an essential role in tackling corruption, its effectiveness has been subject to both praise and criticism.
Achievements of the CVC in Tackling Corruption
The CVC has been instrumental in addressing corruption through various mechanisms. In 2019, it handled 35,649 cases, of which 34,813 were resolved. This includes recommending criminal proceedings in 72 cases. The CVC has also played a pivotal role in overseeing the CBI, especially in high-profile cases such as the 2G spectrum and Coalgate scams. Furthermore, the launch of the Integrity Index has helped government organizations assess their ethical standards and identify areas for improvement.
The CVC also organizes an annual “Vigilance Week” to raise public awareness about the dangers of corruption, fostering a culture of integrity in society. Additionally, since the enactment of the Whistleblowers Protection Act, 2014, the CVC has been entrusted with handling complaints about corruption and misconduct in the public sector.
Criticisms and Challenges
Despite its successes, the CVC’s effectiveness has been questioned. One significant issue is the lack of transparency and clarity in the appointment process of the Chief Vigilance Officer (CVO). For instance, the appointment of PJ Thomas as Chief Vigilance Commissioner in 2010 was quashed by the Supreme Court due to irregularities. Another concern is the CVC’s low conviction rate, which undermines its impact. It is often referred to as a “toothless tiger” because it lacks adjudicatory powers and depends on other agencies for investigations and sanctioning prosecutions.
Furthermore, the CVC has limited resources and investigative authority, often waiting for approvals from other agencies to proceed with inquiries.
Conclusion
While the CVC plays a crucial role in combating corruption in India, its lack of investigative powers, transparency issues in appointments, and low conviction rates diminish its overall effectiveness. Strengthening the CVC with more investigative authority, financial autonomy, and a transparent appointment process could enhance its ability to fight corruption more effectively.
See less
Model Answer Issues Associated with Census-Based Delimitation of Lok Sabha Constituencies Census-based delimitation aims to redraw the boundaries of Lok Sabha constituencies to ensure nearly equal voter representation. However, this approach raises several concerns: 1. Disincentivizing Population CoRead more
Model Answer
Issues Associated with Census-Based Delimitation of Lok Sabha Constituencies
Census-based delimitation aims to redraw the boundaries of Lok Sabha constituencies to ensure nearly equal voter representation. However, this approach raises several concerns:
1. Disincentivizing Population Control
Northern states like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Madhya Pradesh have higher population growth rates (12-15% every decade), while southern states like Tamil Nadu and Kerala have slower growth rates (6-10%). This disparity leads to a skewed representation, where higher-population states, primarily in the north, would gain more seats, further entrenching their political power. This dynamic reduces the incentive for southern states to control population growth, as they may lose out on seat allocations in future redistributions.
2. Imbalance in Representation
The scheduled delimitation after 2026 is expected to cause a significant redistribution of seats, with northern states likely to gain over 30 seats at the expense of southern states. For example, states like Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh may lose approximately 24 seats. This redistribution could result in a regional imbalance, weakening the political voice of the southern states in the national legislature.
3. Erosion of Regional Parties’ Influence
The seat redistribution will disproportionately affect the southern states, potentially diminishing the influence of regional parties, which are stronger in these areas. The increased dominance of northern political parties could marginalize regional interests, skewing the political landscape in favor of larger, more populous states.
4. Impact on Reserved Seats for SC/STs
The process of delimitation also influences the allocation of seats reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (SC/ST). Changes in constituency boundaries could alter the representation of marginalized communities, potentially diluting their political presence in Parliament.
Suggested Solutions
In conclusion, while census-based delimitation aims for equal voter representation, it risks amplifying regional imbalances and diminishing the power of certain states and communities. A more nuanced approach is needed to ensure fair and inclusive representation.
See less