Indian Polity
The Indian polity is a federal, parliamentary democracy. The legislative branch, the Parliament, consists of the Lok Sabha (lower house) and the Rajya Sabha (upper house), with the Lok Sabha being the more powerful.
India’s federal structure grants significant autonomy to its 28 states and 8 union territories, each with its own elected government and legislative assembly.
ocal governance is further decentralized through the Panchayati Raj system, empowering communities at the district, block, and village levels.
Share
Discuss India as a secular state and compare with the secular principles of the US constitution. (Answer in 250 words) [UPSC 2024]
Model Answer India as a Secular State Secularism is fundamental to modern democratic governance, guaranteeing the separation of religion from the state. In India, secularism is constitutionally enshrined, ensuring that no religion is favored by the state. The term "secular" was officially added to tRead more
Model Answer
India as a Secular State
Secularism is fundamental to modern democratic governance, guaranteeing the separation of religion from the state. In India, secularism is constitutionally enshrined, ensuring that no religion is favored by the state. The term “secular” was officially added to the Constitution by the 42nd Amendment in 1976.
Constitutional Guarantee
The Indian Constitution emphasizes secularism by ensuring religious freedom, equality, and state neutrality towards all religions. Articles 25-28 guarantee the right to freedom of religion and the management of religious affairs, fostering inclusivity.
Pluralistic Society
India’s secular state embodies pluralism, promoting equality among diverse religious communities. The separation of personal laws respects religious autonomy, guiding civil matters like marriage and inheritance. For instance, the Hindu Marriage Act (1955) and the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act (1937) reflect this approach.
Judicial Protection
India’s judiciary plays a crucial role in balancing secularism with personal faith. Landmark cases such as the Shah Bano case (1985) and the Sabarimala Judgment (2018) illustrate the tensions between religious practices and constitutional rights.
Secular Policies
Government programs, like the Midday Meal Scheme (1995) and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (2001), ensure equitable access to services irrespective of religion, reinforcing the nation’s secular commitment.
Comparison with US Secular Principles
Constitutional Enshrinement and Political Neutrality
Both India and the US emphasize the separation of religion from the state. The First Amendment in the US and Articles 25-28 in India prohibit the establishment of a state religion.
Freedom of Religion
Both countries guarantee individual religious freedoms. Article 25 of the Indian Constitution parallels the First Amendment in protecting the right to practice religion freely.
Judiciary’s Role
Courts in both nations uphold secular values. The US Supreme Court’s Engel v. Vitale (1962) and India’s Kesavananda Bharati (1973) reaffirm the importance of secularism.
Protection Against Discrimination
Legal frameworks in both countries protect citizens from religious discrimination. The Civil Rights Act in the US and Articles 14 and 15 of the Indian Constitution ensure equal rights.
Differences with US Secular Principles
Explain the reasons for the growth of public interest litigation in India. As a result of it, has the Indian Supreme Court emerged as the world's most powerful judiciary? (Answer in 250 words) [UPSC 2024]
Model Answer Introduction Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has fundamentally reshaped the judicial system in India by empowering courts to champion the rights of marginalized communities. Rooted in Articles 32 and 226 of the Indian Constitution, PIL enables individuals or groups to file petitions inRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has fundamentally reshaped the judicial system in India by empowering courts to champion the rights of marginalized communities. Rooted in Articles 32 and 226 of the Indian Constitution, PIL enables individuals or groups to file petitions in the High Courts and Supreme Court on behalf of those whose rights are under threat, expanding judicial reach.
Reasons for the Growth of Public Interest Litigation in India
Supreme Court Emerging as the World’s Most Powerful Judiciary
The Indian Supreme Court has emerged as a powerful judiciary through its expansive interpretation of rights and intervention in governance. It has used PILs to broaden the interpretation of constitutional rights, influencing legislative domains. For example, in the MC Mehta vs. Union of India (1986) case, a PIL prompted the Supreme Court to broaden the interpretation of the right to a healthy environment under Article 21 . The court’s ability to intervene in policy-making and its broad judicial review powers have allowed it to examine the constitutionality of legislative and executive actions, giving it immense influence over national policies.
Conclusion
The innovative use of PIL has positioned the Indian Supreme Court as a powerful force for social justice and legal reform, addressing systemic issues and protecting the rights of marginalized communities. However, to maintain its efficacy, reforms to the PIL process must prioritize public interest while ensuring judicial balance.
See lessWhat changes has the Union Government recently introduced in the domain of Centre-State relations? Suggest measures to be adopted to build the trust between the Centre and the States and for strengthening federalism. (Answer in 250 words) [UPSC 2024]
Model Answer Introduction The Centre-State relations in India have seen notable changes recently, particularly in the context of cooperative federalism and fiscal management. The 15th Finance Commission's recommendations, the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), and the contentious faRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The Centre-State relations in India have seen notable changes recently, particularly in the context of cooperative federalism and fiscal management. The 15th Finance Commission’s recommendations, the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), and the contentious farm laws have all influenced this dynamic relationship.
Recent Changes Introduced by the Union Government
Measures to Build Trust and Strengthen Federalism
Conclusion
In conclusion, nurturing India’s federal structure through mutual trust and cooperation is essential for effective governance. Strengthening Centre-State relations through dialogue, financial autonomy, and clear constitutional definitions will enhance the foundation of Indian democracy.
See lessRight to privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty and is inherently protected under Article 21 of the constitution. Explain. In this reference discuss the law relating to D.N.A. testing of child in the womb to establish its paternity. (Answer in 250 words) [UPSC 2024]
Model Answer Introduction The right to privacy is a fundamental aspect of life and personal liberty, as established by the Supreme Court of India in the landmark case of Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017). This case affirmed that privacy is intrinsic to Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, whichRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The right to privacy is a fundamental aspect of life and personal liberty, as established by the Supreme Court of India in the landmark case of Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017). This case affirmed that privacy is intrinsic to Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. The Court unanimously recognized that privacy is essential for the enjoyment of various other fundamental rights, including autonomy over personal decisions and protection against arbitrary state actions.
Right to Privacy as Intrinsic to Life and Personal Liberty under Article 21
Law Relating to DNA Testing of Child in the Womb to Establish Paternity
Balancing Right to Privacy with Other Interests
The conflict between the right to privacy and the need for DNA testing in paternity cases highlights the complexities involved. Courts must carefully evaluate each case, ensuring that privacy is only compromised when legally justified. For instance, in the case of Rohit Shekhar vs. Narayan Dutt Tiwari, the need for biological truth through DNA testing was weighed against privacy concerns . Judicial oversight is crucial to maintain this balance, ensuring that the dignity of all parties involved is preserved.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the right to privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21, the legal framework surrounding DNA testing for paternity must navigate the delicate balance between individual privacy and the child’s right to know their biological parentage.
See less"The duty of the Comptroller and Auditor General is not merely to ensure the legality of expenditure but also its propriety." Comment. (Answer in 150 words) [UPSC 2024]
Model Answer Introduction The statement that "the duty of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) is not merely to ensure the legality of expenditure but also its propriety" underscores the comprehensive responsibilities of this constitutional authority in India. The CAG plays a crucial role in maRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The statement that “the duty of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) is not merely to ensure the legality of expenditure but also its propriety” underscores the comprehensive responsibilities of this constitutional authority in India. The CAG plays a crucial role in maintaining financial accountability and transparency in government spending.
Legality of Expenditure
The CAG’s primary function, as outlined in Article 149 of the Indian Constitution, is to audit government accounts to ensure that expenditures are legal. This involves verifying that public funds are utilized in accordance with the laws and regulations established by Parliament. For instance, the CAG’s report on the 2019-20 Union Government Accounts highlighted instances of misallocation of funds, emphasizing the necessity for strict adherence to legal frameworks.
Propriety of Expenditure
Beyond legality, the CAG is tasked with assessing the propriety of expenditures. This means evaluating whether the funds were used efficiently, economically, and for their intended purposes. Propriety ensures that expenditures not only comply with legal standards but also align with the principles of good governance. For example, the CAG’s Performance Audit of the National Rural Health Mission revealed significant inefficiencies and mismanagement, indicating that the intended objectives were not being achieved effectively.
Importance of Propriety
Focusing on propriety is essential for fostering accountability and public trust in government institutions. It ensures that taxpayers’ money is spent judiciously and that government programs deliver the intended benefits. If expenditures are legal but not proper, it can lead to wastage of resources and undermine public welfare.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the CAG’s duty extends beyond ensuring legal compliance to encompass the broader aspect of propriety in expenditure. By ensuring both legality and propriety, the CAG plays a vital role in safeguarding public funds and promoting good governance in India. This dual focus is critical for enhancing the effectiveness of government programs and ensuring accountability to the citizens.
See lessExplain and distinguish between Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals. Whether they entertain civil as well as criminal cases? (Answer in 150 words) [UPSC 2024]
Model Answer Lok Adalats vs. Arbitration Tribunals Both Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals serve as alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms aimed at resolving disputes outside the conventional court system. However, they differ in terms of nature, jurisdiction, and procedures. DistinctionRead more
Model Answer
Lok Adalats vs. Arbitration Tribunals
Both Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals serve as alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms aimed at resolving disputes outside the conventional court system. However, they differ in terms of nature, jurisdiction, and procedures.
Distinction between Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals
Nature of Disputes
Legal Basis
Voluntary Nature
Appointment of Judges/Arbitrators
Cost Efficiency
Appeal Process
Role of Lawyers
Speed of Resolution
Civil and Criminal Case Jurisdiction
- Lok Adalats handle civil matters and minor criminal cases (compoundable offences), such as cheque bounce cases and motor accident claims.
- Arbitration Tribunals strictly deal with civil matters, particularly commercial disputes, as seen in the Ambani family asset dispute.
See lessExamine the need for electoral reforms as suggested by various committees with particular reference to "one nation one election" principle. (Answer in 150 words) [UPSC 2024]
Model Answer Introduction Electoral reforms are essential for enhancing the integrity and efficiency of India’s democratic process. The principle of "One Nation, One Election," recently advocated by the Kovind Committee, promotes the idea of conducting simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and stRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Electoral reforms are essential for enhancing the integrity and efficiency of India’s democratic process. The principle of “One Nation, One Election,” recently advocated by the Kovind Committee, promotes the idea of conducting simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. This reform seeks to minimize election-related expenditures, simplify governance, and increase political stability by synchronizing electoral cycles.
Need for Electoral Reforms
Strengthening Electoral Participation
Encouraging higher voter turnout and simplifying the voter registration process is vital for a more inclusive democracy. The Goswami Committee suggested measures to enhance voter participation, emphasizing streamlined registration processes (Goswami Committee Report, 1990).
Addressing Political Corruption
Combating the nexus between criminals and politicians is crucial for restoring voter trust and accountability. The Vohra Committee Report highlighted these connections and called for comprehensive electoral reforms to address them (Vohra Committee Report, 1993).
Curbing Electoral Expenditure
Limiting escalating election costs is necessary to maintain a level playing field. The 2nd Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) emphasized the need to control electoral expenses to ensure fair elections (2nd ARC Report, 2007).
Improving Election Integrity
Strengthening transparency measures is vital for a credible electoral process. The Election Commission of India has advocated for reforms in electoral funding to enhance integrity, particularly concerning electoral bonds (Election Commission Reports).
Ensuring Inclusivity in Voting
It is imperative to guarantee that marginalized communities have equal access to voting. The National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC) recommended inclusive practices to accommodate diverse needs (NCRWC Report, 2002).
Significance of One Nation-One Election Principle
Economic Growth
Simultaneous elections can boost GDP by enhancing economic stability. The Kovind Committee projected a potential 5 percentage point increase in national GDP growth in the following year (Kovind Committee Report, 2020).
Increased Government Expenditure
Simultaneous elections could lead to a 67% increase in public expenditure, focusing on capital investments that promote long-term growth (Economic Survey, 2021).
Investment Climate
Frequent elections create uncertainty for investors. Simultaneous elections can foster a more stable investment environment, with the Gross Fixed Capital Formation to GDP ratio estimated to be 5 percentage points higher during such periods (Economic Studies).
Cost Efficiency
The Election Commission reportedly spends over ₹4,500 crore on conducting elections. Consolidating these elections could significantly reduce governmental expenditures (Parliamentary Panel Reports).
Enhanced Governance
Frequent enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct disrupts governance. Simultaneous elections could mitigate these interruptions, ensuring smoother government functioning (Political Analysis, 2023).
Conclusion
The “One Nation, One Election” principle has the potential to strengthen India’s democratic framework by promoting efficient governance, reducing costs, and enhancing voter engagement.
See lessMost controversial amendment
The 42nd Amendment of the Indian Constitution is possibly the most disputed. This is why: Passed during Emergency: Seen as an effort to concentrate power in the ruling party's grasp, it was legislated in 1976 throughout the Emergency period declared by Indira Gandhi. Restricted in legal powers: theRead more
The 42nd Amendment of the Indian Constitution is possibly the most disputed.
This is why:
Passed during Emergency: Seen as an effort to concentrate power in the ruling party’s grasp, it was legislated in 1976 throughout the Emergency period declared by Indira Gandhi.
Restricted in legal powers: the amendment severely limited the powers of the judiciary—particularly those of the Supreme Court—not to review and thus invalidate the laws passed by Parliament.
Having vested power in the center changed the balance of power from that of the states to the center, therefore weakening India’s federal system structure.
The amendment limited the range of the fundamental rights, especially regarding the right to property.
See lessWhat make fundamental rights different for Armed forces of India?
Although the Indian Constitution provides fundamental rights to all citizens, it allows certain restrictions on the rights of the members of the Armed Forces. This is primarily because of the nature of their service and the need to maintain discipline and national security. Article 33: This ARead more
Although the Indian Constitution provides fundamental rights to all citizens, it allows certain restrictions on the rights of the members of the Armed Forces. This is primarily because of the nature of their service and the need to maintain discipline and national security.
Article 33: This Article gives the Parliament power to restrict or abolish, as regards members of the Armed Forces, police forces and such force as may hereafter be created, any right conferred by this Part. Such provisions can provide for restrictions, for instance, right to form union or strike which is essential to maintain discipline and operational efficiency in the forces.
Discipline and National Security: The Armed Forces operate on a strict code of discipline and hierarchy. Restraints upon certain rights are considered necessary for swift and effective command, maintenance of morale, and national security. For example, the right to freedom of speech may be restricted not to allow sensitive information to be disclosed, which could have a detrimental impact on national security.
-Specialized Nature of Service: Armed forces require manning on more occasions in challenging and demanding environments involving risks and sacrifices of significant proportions. Some rights may be limited as justification toward ensuring safety and well-being of personnel and operational effectiveness.
See less‘Once a Speaker, Always a Speaker’ ! Do you think this practice should be adopted to impart objectivity to the office of the Speaker of Lok Sabha ? What could be its implications for the robust functioning of parliamentary business in India?
The "Once a Speaker, Always a Speaker" principle might have been designed to promote impartiality but may also prove a boon and a bane to efficient parliamentary business management in India. Advantages: It would highly increase the impartiality of the Speaker because there would be no chance of eveRead more
The “Once a Speaker, Always a Speaker” principle might have been designed to promote impartiality but may also prove a boon and a bane to efficient parliamentary business management in India.
Advantages:
It would highly increase the impartiality of the Speaker because there would be no chance of ever returning to active party politics and, hence, any perceived or actual biases that may result from future political ambitions.
Strengthen Democratic Norms: This convention would strengthen the non-partisan character of the office of the Speaker, hence improving the democratic process and further instilling confidence in the institution among the people.
Reduced Impact of Political Pressure: Since there is no hope of political benefits in the future, the Speaker may not be under so much pressure to make political decisions but rather make impartial ones.
It may be considered a limitation of the political career of someone holding the office of Speaker, thereby discouraging men and women of good standing from holding such an office.
-Potential Not to Join Party After Term Has Been Completed: The potential not to join their party once their term has been served would reduce the incentive for highly qualified people to seek the position of Speaker.
Detachment from Political Realities: A Speaker permanently disconnected in active politics may become disoriented from the dynamic political scenario and thus would not be able to efficiently preside over the business of parliament and understand the nuances of contemporary political oratory.
Constitutional Issues: It may even attract constitutional questions because it can breach one’s right to associate oneself or oneself with political activity.
Alternative approaches to the “Once a Speaker, Always a Speaker” principle can be utilized to neutralize the office of the Speaker as follows:
-Strengthening the existing norms and conventions: It could be in focusing on strengthening existing norms and conventions governing the office of the Speaker to be directed toward non-partisanship and impartiality.
-Public awareness of the importance of the Speaker’s neutrality as well as to the need of maintaining the office dignity.
See less-Policies on periodical and clear review of conduct of the Speaker so that judgment is perceived not to be arbitrary and concerns will be addressed.