Home/Indian Polity/Page 4
Indian Polity
The Indian polity is a federal, parliamentary democracy. The legislative branch, the Parliament, consists of the Lok Sabha (lower house) and the Rajya Sabha (upper house), with the Lok Sabha being the more powerful.
India’s federal structure grants significant autonomy to its 28 states and 8 union territories, each with its own elected government and legislative assembly.
ocal governance is further decentralized through the Panchayati Raj system, empowering communities at the district, block, and village levels.
Share
Explain the roles and functions of the National Commission for Women (NCW). How does possessing civil court powers enhance the Commission's ability to address women's issues effectively? (200 Words)
Model Answer The National Commission for Women (NCW), established in 1992 under the NCW Act 1990, serves as a pivotal body to safeguard and promote the interests of women in India. Its core functions include: Investigation and Examination: The NCW investigates violations of women's rights, ensuringRead more
Model Answer
The National Commission for Women (NCW), established in 1992 under the NCW Act 1990, serves as a pivotal body to safeguard and promote the interests of women in India. Its core functions include:
Impact of Civil Court Powers on the NCW’s Effectiveness
Possessing civil court powers significantly enhances the NCW’s ability to address women’s issues in the following ways:
In conclusion, the civil court powers of the NCW significantly bolster its capability to enforce women’s rights and hold authorities accountable, ultimately contributing to a more robust mechanism for women’s protection in India.
See lessExamine the role of the Election Commission of India (ECI) in maintaining free and fair elections in the country. What impact will the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023 have on the ECI's independence? (200 Words)
Model Answer Introduction The Election Commission of India (ECI), under Article 324 of the Constitution, plays a pivotal role in maintaining the integrity of India's democratic process. Its duties include overseeing the preparation of voter lists, deploying security during elections, and raising eleRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The Election Commission of India (ECI), under Article 324 of the Constitution, plays a pivotal role in maintaining the integrity of India’s democratic process. Its duties include overseeing the preparation of voter lists, deploying security during elections, and raising electoral awareness. The ECI also ensures that the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) is adhered to during elections, taking strict action against any violations by political parties or candidates. Additionally, it monitors electoral malpractices, such as rigging or vote-buying, and takes appropriate actions to preserve fairness in elections.
The Impact of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023
The Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023 was introduced to strengthen the ECI’s independence. The Act addresses critical aspects like ensuring no re-appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners (ECs), thereby insulating them from potential executive influence. Furthermore, the Act outlines a new selection committee for the appointment of the CEC and ECs, consisting of the Prime Minister, a Cabinet Minister, and the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha.
However, concerns have emerged about the potential impact of the new Act on the ECI’s autonomy. One of the primary concerns is the composition of the selection committee, which has an executive majority. This could lead to politically motivated appointments, undermining the impartiality of the ECI. Moreover, the Act allows the selection committee to bypass the recommendations of the Search Committee, which could further compromise the ECI’s independence. Additionally, the Act limits the eligibility for CEC and EC positions to individuals who have previously held high-ranking government positions, potentially excluding candidates with diverse backgrounds and expertise.
The Act also equates the salaries of the CEC and ECs to that of the Cabinet Secretary, raising concerns that the government may exert indirect control over the ECI.
In conclusion, while the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023 aims to protect the ECI’s independence, it introduces elements that may undermine the Commission’s autonomy, potentially influencing its ability to conduct free and fair elections.
See lessWhat are the challenges hindering Online Dispute Resolution's (ODR) potential to provide just, speedy, and effective resolution of disputes? (200 Words)
Model Answer While Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) has the potential to transform dispute resolution by making it more accessible, quick, and cost-effective, there are several challenges that limit its effectiveness. 1. Lack of Adequate Digital Infrastructure A key barrier to ODR is the lack of digiRead more
Model Answer
While Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) has the potential to transform dispute resolution by making it more accessible, quick, and cost-effective, there are several challenges that limit its effectiveness.
1. Lack of Adequate Digital Infrastructure
A key barrier to ODR is the lack of digital infrastructure. Effective ODR requires access to devices like smartphones and computers, along with reliable internet connectivity. In many parts of the world, particularly in rural and underserved areas, this infrastructure is either inadequate or unavailable. In India, for example, internet penetration is significantly lower in rural areas, with only 17% of rural households having internet access compared to 44% in urban areas (2023 report). This digital divide limits the reach of ODR and prevents equitable access to justice for all citizens.
2. Privacy and Confidentiality Concerns
ODR systems also face significant privacy and confidentiality challenges. The digital environment increases the risk of online impersonation, data breaches, and unauthorized access to sensitive documents. Given the nature of many disputes that require confidentiality, such as personal or business matters, the security of the digital platforms used for ODR is a critical concern. The potential for data misuse or leaks can undermine trust in these systems.
3. Issues with Determining the ‘Place of Proceedings’
In traditional dispute resolution, the concept of a ‘place of arbitration’ is clear, but ODR complicates this due to its virtual nature. When parties are located in different jurisdictions, it becomes challenging to determine which laws apply, and where the legal authority resides. This ambiguity can cause delays and confusion, detracting from ODR’s potential to provide a speedy resolution.
In conclusion, while ODR offers promising benefits, these challenges must be addressed to fully unlock its potential for delivering just, speedy, and effective dispute resolution.
See lessWhat were the primary objectives behind the introduction of the Ninth Schedule in the Indian Constitution? Is the Supreme Court permitted to review legislation included in the Ninth Schedule? Discuss with reference to relevant case laws. (200 Words)
Model Answer The Ninth Schedule was introduced by the First Amendment of the Indian Constitution in 1951, primarily to protect certain laws from judicial scrutiny. It was designed to safeguard land reform laws and other legislations aimed at achieving social and economic justice, aligning with the gRead more
Model Answer
The Ninth Schedule was introduced by the First Amendment of the Indian Constitution in 1951, primarily to protect certain laws from judicial scrutiny. It was designed to safeguard land reform laws and other legislations aimed at achieving social and economic justice, aligning with the government’s welfare objectives. The inclusion of the Ninth Schedule allowed for laws dealing with land reforms, abolition of zamindari, and redistribution of land to be insulated from challenges based on the violation of fundamental rights (FR). This was particularly important in the post-independence period, when various state and central governments were enacting legislation to promote social and economic welfare in the face of entrenched landholding structures.
Judicial Review of Laws in the Ninth Schedule
Initially, the Supreme Court upheld Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution, including placing laws in the Ninth Schedule, as seen in the case of Shankari Prasad vs. Union of India (1951). The Court held that such amendments could not be challenged on the grounds of violating fundamental rights. The Sajjan Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (1964) case further reaffirmed this stance, upholding the 17th Amendment that placed land acquisition laws in the Ninth Schedule.
However, this position shifted in I.C. Golaknath & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab (1967), where the Court ruled that any constitutional amendment abridging fundamental rights was void. The landmark decision in Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala (1973) established the “basic structure” doctrine, asserting that no amendment could alter the Constitution’s basic structure, though it did not specifically address the Ninth Schedule.
The case of Waman Rao vs. Union of India (1981) provided a crucial distinction: laws placed in the Ninth Schedule before April 24, 1973, were immune to judicial review, but those added after that date were subject to it. This was further reinforced by the I.R. Coelho vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2007), where the Court ruled that any law added to the Ninth Schedule after April 24, 1973, could be reviewed for its constitutionality.
Conclusion
The Ninth Schedule was introduced with the objective of protecting land reform laws and advancing social justice, but over time, the judiciary has developed a more nuanced approach to its review, balancing legislative intent with the protection of fundamental rights.
See lessExamine the role of Section 8A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 in safeguarding the integrity of India's electoral process. (200 Words)
Model Answer Introduction Section 8A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, introduced through the Election Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975, plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of India's electoral process. Its primary aim is to ensure that elections remain fair, transparent, and frRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Section 8A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, introduced through the Election Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975, plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of India’s electoral process. Its primary aim is to ensure that elections remain fair, transparent, and free from corruption, thereby reinforcing the democratic values of the country.
Combating Corruption and Electoral Malpractices
The key objective of Section 8A is to disqualify candidates who have been convicted for corrupt practices such as bribery, undue influence, or other electoral malpractices. By preventing such individuals from contesting elections, the provision seeks to uphold the purity of the electoral process and deter potential offenders from exploiting the system. This helps maintain the trust of the public in the electoral system.
Long Duration of Disqualification
Section 8A imposes a disqualification period of six years from the date of conviction. This extended duration prevents convicted individuals from immediately re-entering the electoral process, thus reducing the risk of recidivism and encouraging long-term accountability. By ensuring that offenders are kept out of the political arena for a substantial period, it acts as a deterrent against corrupt practices. Strengthening Democracy and Public Trust
By eliminating candidates involved in corrupt practices, Section 8A helps maintain fair representation, equal opportunity, and the active participation of citizens in the democratic process. This strengthens public confidence in elections, ensuring that only candidates with a clean track record can contest. In this way, it promotes the core democratic principles of fairness and equality.
Challenges and Limitations
Despite its importance, Section 8A faces certain challenges. The complexity of investigating and prosecuting corruption cases, coupled with delays in judicial processes, can undermine its effectiveness. Moreover, the provision’s broad language may be misused for political motives, with false accusations being leveled against opponents. These issues can weaken public faith in the system, making timely implementation critical.
In conclusion, while Section 8A is vital in safeguarding India’s electoral integrity, addressing its challenges is necessary to ensure it operates effectively and equitably.
See lessHow have the courts' evolving interpretations expanded the scope of the Right to Life and Personal Liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution? Discuss with reference to relevant case laws. (200 Words)
Model Answer Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. Over time, the Supreme Court of India has expanded the scope of this fundamental right, interpreting it beyond mere physical existence to encompass a wide range of human needs and dignity. Right toRead more
Model Answer
Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. Over time, the Supreme Court of India has expanded the scope of this fundamental right, interpreting it beyond mere physical existence to encompass a wide range of human needs and dignity.
Right to Livelihood: Olga Tellis (1986)
In Olga Tellis & Ors. vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1986), the Supreme Court interpreted the right to life to include the right to livelihood. The Court held that no one can live without the means of subsistence, thereby extending the scope of Article 21 to encompass the right to earn a living as a fundamental component of life.
Right to Medical Assistance: Pt. Parmanand Katara (1989)
In Pt. Parmanand Katara vs. Union of India (1989), the Court ruled that medical professionals are obligated to provide urgent medical care to all individuals, regardless of their background or financial status. This decision expanded Article 21 to include the right to immediate medical treatment, reflecting the right to life as encompassing health care.
Right to a Healthy Environment: Subhash Kumar (1991)
The Subhash Kumar vs. State of Bihar (1991) judgment further extended Article 21, declaring that the right to life includes the right to live in a pollution-free environment. This ruling emphasized the State’s responsibility to ensure access to clean air and water, which are essential for survival and well-being.
Right to Privacy: Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (2017)
The Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs. Union of India (2017) case marked a landmark judgment in which the Supreme Court affirmed that the right to privacy is intrinsic to the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21. The Court held that privacy is an essential aspect of human dignity, thus expanding the interpretation of personal liberty.
Right to Die with Dignity: Common Cause (2018)
In Common Cause vs. Union of India (2018), the Court recognized the right to die with dignity, allowing passive euthanasia. This ruling acknowledged that the right to life also includes the right to choose the manner and timing of one’s death, further broadening the scope of personal liberty.
Right to Protection from Climate Change: MK Ranjitsinh (2024)
The Supreme Court, in M K Ranjitsinh & Ors. vs. Union of India (2024), recognized the right to be free from the harmful effects of climate change as part of the fundamental right to life under Article 21. This ruling reflects the Court’s recognition of environmental factors as critical to the protection of human life and dignity.
Through these evolving interpretations, the scope of Article 21 has significantly expanded, ensuring a broader, more inclusive protection of fundamental rights in India.
See lessGiven the concerns of prejudice and partisanship surrounding Speakers of State Legislative Assemblies, should the authority under the anti-defection law be removed from their control?
Model Answer Introduction: Bias and Partisanship Among Speakers The Speakers of State Legislative Assemblies in India have often been accused of acting in a biased manner. For example, the Maharashtra Assembly Speaker was criticized for delaying disqualification decisions, while the Rajasthan AssembRead more
Model Answer
Introduction: Bias and Partisanship Among Speakers
The Speakers of State Legislative Assemblies in India have often been accused of acting in a biased manner. For example, the Maharashtra Assembly Speaker was criticized for delaying disqualification decisions, while the Rajasthan Assembly Speaker faced backlash for issuing disqualification notices to certain MLAs. These concerns highlight the need to review the current role of Speakers in matters related to the Anti-Defection Law.
Provisions Under the Anti-Defection Law
The Anti-Defection Law under the Tenth Schedule grants significant powers to the Speaker. Their decision on disqualification is final, with no time limit for making a ruling. Moreover, the courts cannot intervene until the Speaker has made a decision. This setup has raised concerns about potential bias and delay in decisions, especially when the Speaker is from the ruling party.
Arguments for Curtailing the Powers of the Speaker
Conflict of Interest: The Speaker, often from the ruling party, may have an inherent conflict of interest. During the 2019 Karnataka Assembly crisis, the Speaker was accused of favoring the ruling party in disqualification matters.
Delay in Decisions: Speakers have been criticized for delaying decisions on disqualification, allowing defected legislators to continue as members. For example, a disqualification petition in Manipur remained pending for almost three years before the Supreme Court intervened.
Dinesh Goswami Committee Recommendation: The committee recommended that the power to disqualify members under the Tenth Schedule be vested in the Governor, who would act on the advice of the Election Commission.
Arguments Against Transferring Power to Other Bodies
Independent Panel: Suggestions for an independent panel of retired judges could lead to judicial interference in political matters, disrupting the separation of powers.
Politicization of the Election Commission: Giving the Election Commission greater role in disqualification could politicize the body, as the executive plays a significant role in its appointments.
Suitability of the Speaker: The Speaker, being an integral part of the legislature, is best suited to decide on disqualification matters, as shown by unbiased decisions like those taken by the Andhra Pradesh Speaker, who disqualified eight MLAs in 2023 for shifting their loyalties.
Conclusion: Promoting Neutrality
To address the concerns of bias and partisanship, the best approach would be to promote neutrality within the Speaker’s role. Drawing from practices in developed democracies like the UK and Ireland, reforms should aim at ensuring the Speaker acts impartially and in the best interests of the legislative process.
See lessWhat are the reasons behind the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) being unable to effectively perform its role as a human rights watchdog in India? What factors have hindered its accreditation by the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI)?
Model Answer Limited Powers: While NHRC can make recommendations, it lacks enforcement authority. It relies on the government to act on its suggestions, which often leads to non-compliance. This limitation has led to criticism, with the former Chief Justice of India calling NHRC a "toothless tiger".Read more
Model Answer
Factors Hindering NHRC’s GANHRI Accreditation
NHRC has also faced difficulties in obtaining accreditation from the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) due to its non-compliance with the Paris Principles:
Conclusion
To enhance its effectiveness and secure GANHRI accreditation, NHRC must address these issues by strengthening its independence, enhancing enforcement powers, and ensuring greater transparency and resource allocation.
See lessHow do the shortcomings in the Indian criminal justice system affect the human rights of undertrial prisoners? What reforms are needed to rectify these issues?( 200 Words)
Model Answer Introduction Undertrial prisoners form a significant portion of India's prison population, accounting for 77.1% of the total inmates in 2022, as per the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). The systemic deficiencies in the Indian criminal justice system lead to severe human rights violRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Undertrial prisoners form a significant portion of India’s prison population, accounting for 77.1% of the total inmates in 2022, as per the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). The systemic deficiencies in the Indian criminal justice system lead to severe human rights violations for these prisoners.
Overcrowding and Poor Conditions
Overcrowding is a major issue in Indian prisons, with the occupancy rate reaching 118.5% in 2019 (NCRB). This results in substandard living conditions for undertrials, including inadequate accommodation, poor healthcare, and insufficient food. These conditions directly violate the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
Delay in Trials and Denial of Right to a Speedy Trial
The slow judicial process is another significant challenge. As of December 2021, 70.9% of undertrial prisoners had been confined for up to one year, often without a verdict. This delay violates their right to a speedy trial, as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
Custodial Abuse and Deaths
Custodial abuse remains prevalent, with incidents of torture and deaths in custody. According to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), 17,146 people died in judicial or police custody between 2010 and 2020—an alarming statistic that highlights the abuse faced by undertrials.
Discrimination and Marginalization
Most undertrials come from marginalized communities, particularly Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs). In Tamil Nadu, for example, two-thirds of undertrials belong to these groups, highlighting systemic inequality.
Necessary Reforms
Speedy Trials and Affordable Bail
To address these deficiencies, expediting the judicial process and providing affordable bail options are crucial. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has already set aside Rs. 20 crores annually for financial assistance to poor prisoners to secure bail.
Judicial Accountability and Prison Reforms
Courts must adhere to procedural mandates to prevent arbitrary arrests, as emphasized in the Supreme Court’s ruling in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2014). Further, comprehensive legal aid, vocational training programs, and the passing of the Prevention of Torture Bill (2010) would significantly improve conditions for undertrials.
Conclusion
By implementing these reforms, India can mitigate the systemic issues in its criminal justice system, ensuring justice, dignity, and human rights for all undertrial prisoners.
See lessDiscuss how the Indian Constitution has evolved over time to meet the changing needs and aspirations of society, and explain why it is considered a living document. ( 200 Words)
Model Answer Introduction The Indian Constitution is often referred to as a "living document" because of its ability to adapt to the evolving needs of society. Through a combination of amendments and judicial interpretations, it has consistently reflected the changing aspirations of the people and tRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The Indian Constitution is often referred to as a “living document” because of its ability to adapt to the evolving needs of society. Through a combination of amendments and judicial interpretations, it has consistently reflected the changing aspirations of the people and the state. This flexibility is ensured by provisions in both the Legislature (Article 368) and the Judiciary (Articles 13 and 32).
Key Amendments and Evolution
Equitable Distribution
Post-independence, the Constitution was amended to address economic disparities. For instance, the First Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951 inserted Article 31A, allowing the state to acquire estates for public welfare, addressing inequalities between landowners and tillers.
Decentralization
In 1992, the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments empowered local self-government by establishing Panchayati Raj Institutions and urban local bodies, promoting grassroots democracy and decentralization of power.
Digitisation and Data Privacy
With technological advancements, the Puttaswamy vs. Union of India case (2017) expanded the scope of Article 21 by recognizing the right to privacy as a fundamental right, reflecting the need for digital rights protection in governance.
Affirmative Action
The 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019 introduced a 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS), showing the Constitution’s adaptability in addressing new forms of inequality.
Political Stability
The 52nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1985 added the Tenth Schedule, aimed at preventing political defections, thus ensuring political stability in the country.
Conclusion
The Basic Structure Doctrine, established in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), ensures that while the Constitution can evolve through amendments, its core values remain intact. The Indian Constitution, through its flexible framework, continues to meet contemporary challenges, making it a dynamic and living document that resonates with the changing socio-political landscape.
See less