Frequent amendments to the Indian Constitution carry significant implications for the stability of the nation's legal framework. On one hand, they demonstrate the Constitution's flexibility and its ability to adapt to the evolving socio-political landscape. This adaptability is crucial in a diverseRead more
Frequent amendments to the Indian Constitution carry significant implications for the stability of the nation’s legal framework. On one hand, they demonstrate the Constitution’s flexibility and its ability to adapt to the evolving socio-political landscape. This adaptability is crucial in a diverse and dynamic country like India, where societal norms, political needs, and economic conditions are constantly changing. Amendments enable the legal system to address contemporary issues, incorporate progressive ideals, and rectify ambiguities or outdated provisions.
However, frequent amendments can also undermine the perceived stability and predictability of the legal framework. If changes are made too often or for short-term political gains, it can erode public confidence in the sanctity of the Constitution and lead to a sense of legal uncertainty. This could potentially disrupt governance and the enforcement of laws, as citizens and institutions might struggle to keep up with the constant changes.
The nature and context of the amendments reflect India’s evolving socio-political landscape. For instance, amendments addressing social justice, such as those related to reservations and affirmative action, highlight the ongoing efforts to create a more equitable society. Similarly, changes in economic policies and governance structures underscore the nation’s response to global economic trends and internal demands for better administration.
While frequent constitutional amendments allow India to remain responsive to changing needs, they must be balanced carefully to maintain the stability and integrity of the legal framework.
See less
Answer:- The President, the Upper House (Rajya Sabha), and the Lower House (Lok Sabha) make up India's parliament. According to Article 108 of the Constitution, the following circumstances may result in the calling of a joint session of parliament: To break the impasse when a bill is passed by one hRead more
Answer:-
The President, the Upper House (Rajya Sabha), and the Lower House (Lok Sabha) make up India’s parliament.
According to Article 108 of the Constitution, the following circumstances may result in the calling of a joint session of parliament:
The following bills have been approved during combined sittings:
The 1960 Dowry Prohibition Bill.
Bill, 1977: Banking Service Commission (Repeal).
The 2002 Prevention of Terrorism Bill.
Certain Joint Session Exemptions:
Money Bill: Only the Lok Sabha must approve money bills in accordance with the Indian Constitution. The Lok Sabha is open to recommendations from the Rajya Sabha, which it need not take.
Bill for Constitutional Amendment: In accordance with Article 368, both chambers of parliament may change the Indian Constitution with a two-thirds majority. In the event of a dispute between the two houses, a joint session of parliament is not called for.