“Corruption is protected by the need for government approval before dishonest officials may be prosecuted.” Analyze the assertion. (125 Words) [UPPSC 2020]
Corruption in India severely impedes economic development by distorting resource allocation, deterring foreign and domestic investments, and undermining public trust in government institutions. It leads to inefficiencies in public services and infrastructure projects, hindering overall economic growRead more
Corruption in India severely impedes economic development by distorting resource allocation, deterring foreign and domestic investments, and undermining public trust in government institutions. It leads to inefficiencies in public services and infrastructure projects, hindering overall economic growth and exacerbating income inequality.
To combat corruption effectively in India, several strategies can be implemented:
Strengthening Anti-Corruption Laws: Enforce existing laws rigorously and introduce stricter penalties for corrupt practices.
Enhancing Transparency: Implement measures like digital platforms for government services, e-procurement, and transparent allocation of resources to minimize discretion and opportunities for corruption.
Promoting Accountability: Establish independent oversight bodies, enhance auditing processes, and enforce accountability measures for public officials.
Educating and Empowering Citizens: Promote civic education and awareness campaigns about the detrimental effects of corruption, encouraging citizens to report corrupt activities.
Political and Electoral Reforms: Introduce reforms to reduce the influence of money in politics and enhance political accountability.
Encouraging Whistleblower Protection: Strengthen laws to protect whistleblowers who expose corruption.
International Cooperation: Collaborate with international organizations to combat cross-border corruption and illicit financial flows.
See less
Requirement of Government Sanction and Corruption 1. Protective Shield: The need for government sanction to prosecute dishonest officials often acts as a barrier to addressing corruption. This requirement can be exploited to delay or block investigations. For example, in the case of Vijay Mallya, deRead more
Requirement of Government Sanction and Corruption
1. Protective Shield: The need for government sanction to prosecute dishonest officials often acts as a barrier to addressing corruption. This requirement can be exploited to delay or block investigations. For example, in the case of Vijay Mallya, delays in sanctioning prosecution have been criticized for allowing financial misconduct to persist.
2. Bureaucratic Hurdles: Obtaining sanction involves bureaucratic procedures that can be manipulated. Recent instances, such as allegations against former Delhi Chief Secretary Anshu Prakash, highlight how such processes can obstruct timely justice.
3. Accountability Issues: The requirement can undermine accountability, allowing corrupt officials to escape consequences. In the Securities Scam of 1992, delays in sanctioning prosecution affected the speed of legal proceedings.
Conclusion: While the sanction process aims to prevent misuse of authority, it often becomes a protective shield for corruption, delaying justice and undermining accountability.
See less