Home/Probity in Governance/Challenges of Corruption
Challenges of Corruption
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Although bribery is illegal and detrimental, public officials still demand bribes, and private sector executives are often tempted to pay them. In this context, discuss how corporations can establish a framework to eliminate the practice of offering kickbacks. (150 words)
Model Answer 1. Anticipate Bribery Risk Management should conduct thorough assessments to understand the motivations behind public officials' demands for bribes. By identifying these motivations, companies can propose lawful alternatives that align with their operational mandates, thereby reducing tRead more
Model Answer
1. Anticipate Bribery Risk
Management should conduct thorough assessments to understand the motivations behind public officials’ demands for bribes. By identifying these motivations, companies can propose lawful alternatives that align with their operational mandates, thereby reducing the temptation to engage in corrupt practices.
2. Account for Costs
Corporations must factor in the potential costs of avoiding bribery in their financial projections. This includes recognizing that refusing to pay bribes may lead to delays or loss of contracts. By transparently communicating these costs to investors, companies can foster a culture of ethical decision-making that prioritizes long-term integrity over short-term gains.
3. Identify New Markets
Certain markets, often referred to as “moon markets,” are notorious for corruption. Companies should assess whether these markets align with their ethical standards and consider withdrawing from them if necessary. While this may result in short-term profit losses, it ultimately contributes to building a more resilient and principled organization.
4. Gather Intelligence
Investing in intelligence gathering is crucial for identifying high-risk areas for bribery. For example, Coca-Cola utilizes data from Transparency International to map out bribery risks and strategically focus its anti-corruption efforts.
5. Recalibrate Performance Targets
To discourage employees from accepting kickbacks, companies should revise performance-based targets. For instance, GlaxoSmithKline eliminated sales targets after facing significant fines for bribery, while Novartis shifted its compensation structure to prioritize values and behavior over sales quotas.
6. Reporting Mechanisms
Establishing transparent reporting channels for bribery incidents is essential. Corporations should commit to openly addressing and reporting any instances of bribery, reinforcing their zero-tolerance policy against corruption.
By implementing these strategies, corporations can create a robust framework that not only deters bribery but also fosters a culture of accountability and ethical business practices.
See lessDo you agree with the view that corruption thrives in Indian society due to its social acceptance and its perception as aspirational? Discuss with examples. (200 Words)
Model Answer Introduction Corruption continues to be a major issue in India, deeply rooted in various sectors like politics, business, and governance. I agree with the view that corruption thrives in Indian society due to its social acceptance and the perception that it is aspirational, although recRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Corruption continues to be a major issue in India, deeply rooted in various sectors like politics, business, and governance. I agree with the view that corruption thrives in Indian society due to its social acceptance and the perception that it is aspirational, although recent shifts in public attitudes indicate growing resistance.
Social Acceptance and Aspirational View of Corruption
Corruption often creates an image of success, with individuals who accumulate wealth and power through corrupt means being admired. In many cases, achieving success “by any means necessary” is seen as a shortcut to wealth, normalizing unethical practices. This normalization is further reflected in the widespread acceptance of “speed money,” where bribes are seen as a practical way to expedite services or get things done. For example, in sectors like bureaucracy and police, corruption is seen as the only effective way to bypass systemic inefficiencies, creating a cycle that is hard to break.
Shifting Attitudes and Anti-Corruption Movements
However, over time, there has been a growing intolerance towards corruption in India. The India Against Corruption Movement in 2011 became a significant turning point, mobilizing public opinion and pressuring the government for greater accountability. As a result, legislative measures like the Right to Information Act (2005) and the Lokpal Act (2013) were enacted to combat corruption more effectively.
Corruption in Elections and Public Sentiment
Corruption has also become a key issue in Indian elections, influencing the political landscape. Public outrage over high-profile scandals, such as the 2G spectrum case, coal allocation scam, and allegations of “40% commission” governments, has led to electoral shifts, showing that the public is increasingly intolerant of corrupt practices.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while corruption thrives due to its social acceptance and perceived aspirational nature, there has been a marked shift in public sentiment toward greater accountability and the need for institutional reforms. Strengthening anti-corruption laws, promoting ethical leadership, and integrating ethics into education are essential for a long-term solution.
See lessDo you think democracy as a mode of government is efficient hand-in-hand with hyper-capitalism?
Of course, there is always a question of whether haGH democracy and hyper-capitalism go hand in hand. As a rule, democracy and capitalism are different partners, although they often mean alike; at the same time, hypercapitalism can pose a danger to democratic values. Patholoygical hyper-capitalism wRead more
Of course, there is always a question of whether haGH democracy and hyper-capitalism go hand in hand. As a rule, democracy and capitalism are different partners, although they often mean alike; at the same time, hypercapitalism can pose a danger to democratic values.
Patholoygical hyper-capitalism where there is excessive greed for wealth, increased polarization of income inequality, undue influence by business corporations, and lack of regulation erodes democracy through: This preserves inequity with regards to economic resources placing legislative control in the hands of few rich individuals, who are able to fund their political campaigns and lobby the system, thus offering skewed policy ideal for the wealthy as opposed to the public good.
In this context, hyper-capitalism can be explained because society is divided into the rich and the poor and their possibilities of life are as different as the immediate outcome of the process. That eventually results in social disorder, political crisis, and a decline in confidence in democracy.
However, this paper should demonstrate that there are conditions in which democracy and capitalism can socially coexist and not only sustainably evolve but also complement each other. One can find that higher and powerful regulations, progressive taxation, and social welfare systems can help to reduce the effects of the negative side of hyper-capitalism and make economic growth more inclusive. That is, strong and effective civil society, engaged citizens, and a vibrant and independent media are key to curbing dominance of other interests-and for sustaining democracy.
That is, hyper-capitalism is tightly connected with democracy as the interdependence between the two concepts has been balanced. Capitalism promotes or stimulates economic growth, innovation, and investment, but equally important, all this should not diminish the fundamental elements of democracy: democracy, respect for the rights of others, equality, fairness and respect for the rule or law. And thus, achieving the balance, the input and output factors, it is feasible to construct a society in which the people of that society are at one end beneficial economically as well as socially satisfied.
See lessEvaluate the effectiveness of these measures with justifications.
To evaluate the effectiveness of measures, it's crucial to understand which specific measures are being referred to. However, I'll provide a general framework that can be adapted to various contexts, with recent examples to illustrate the points. 1. Introduction: Evaluating the effectiveness of measRead more
To evaluate the effectiveness of measures, it’s crucial to understand which specific measures are being referred to. However, I’ll provide a general framework that can be adapted to various contexts, with recent examples to illustrate the points.
1. Introduction: Evaluating the effectiveness of measures involves assessing their impact, efficiency, and outcomes relative to their objectives. This framework can be applied to different types of measures, such as economic policies, environmental regulations, or public health interventions.
2. Economic Measures:
a. Economic Stimulus Packages: Recent Example: The Indian government’s Atmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyan (2020) aimed to boost economic growth post-COVID-19. Effectiveness: This measure provided liquidity support, enhanced credit facilities, and stimulus to MSMEs. Justification: The initiative helped stabilize the economy and supported small businesses, though the pace of recovery was uneven.
b. GST Implementation: Recent Example: Goods and Services Tax (GST) was implemented to streamline tax collection and reduce tax evasion. Effectiveness: GST has simplified tax structure and broadened the tax base. Justification: The introduction of GST led to increased compliance and revenue, though issues like compliance burden and IT glitches initially posed challenges.
3. Environmental Measures:
a. Plastic Waste Management Rules: Recent Example: Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2021, aimed to reduce single-use plastics. Effectiveness: The rules have led to improved waste segregation and recycling. Justification: Implementation has faced hurdles, such as lack of infrastructure and enforcement challenges, but public awareness and local initiatives have shown positive trends.
b. Carbon Pricing Mechanisms: Recent Example: India’s carbon market initiatives, like the National Clean Energy Fund, are designed to mitigate carbon emissions. Effectiveness: These mechanisms have incentivized renewable energy projects. Justification: While progress has been made, there is a need for more comprehensive and aggressive policies to meet long-term emission reduction targets.
4. Public Health Measures:
a. COVID-19 Vaccination Drive: Recent Example: India’s COVID-19 vaccination campaign aimed to achieve mass immunization. Effectiveness: Rapid vaccination rollout has significantly reduced COVID-19 cases and deaths. Justification: The drive’s success was marked by the administration of over 2 billion doses, though vaccine hesitancy and logistical challenges affected initial phases.
b. National Health Mission: Recent Example: National Health Mission (NHM) focuses on improving healthcare infrastructure and access. Effectiveness: NHM has expanded healthcare facilities and services in rural areas. Justification: Despite improvements, challenges remain in terms of quality and accessibility, especially in remote regions.
5. Conclusion: The effectiveness of measures should be continuously monitored and adjusted based on their outcomes and changing circumstances. Recent examples demonstrate both successes and areas needing improvement, highlighting the need for adaptive and evidence-based policy-making.
See lessSuggest more effective strategies to tackle this menace. (150 words) [UPSC 2015]
Effective Strategies to Tackle Modern Menaces Cybersecurity Threats: To address the growing threat of cyber-attacks, advanced encryption technologies and artificial intelligence-based threat detection systems are crucial. For instance, India's National Cyber Security Policy 2020 outlines measures toRead more
Effective Strategies to Tackle Modern Menaces
Cybersecurity Threats: To address the growing threat of cyber-attacks, advanced encryption technologies and artificial intelligence-based threat detection systems are crucial. For instance, India’s National Cyber Security Policy 2020 outlines measures to protect critical infrastructure and data. Strengthening public-private partnerships can also enhance cybersecurity resilience.
Climate Change: Combating climate change requires a multi-faceted approach, including a shift towards renewable energy sources and sustainable practices. The Paris Agreement emphasizes global cooperation to limit global warming. Countries should invest in climate adaptation technologies and enforce stricter emission regulations. For example, Denmark’s wind energy initiatives and India’s Solar Power Mission exemplify successful strategies in renewable energy adoption.
Global Health Crises: To manage global health threats, robust vaccination programs and international collaboration are essential. The response to the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for rapid vaccine development and equitable distribution. Strengthening healthcare infrastructure and improving global health surveillance systems are vital for early detection and response. GAVI’s COVAX initiative demonstrates effective international cooperation for equitable vaccine access.
By implementing these strategies, we can more effectively address these contemporary challenges and enhance global resilience.
See lessWhat are the ethics and regulations surrounding Animal testing in the cosmetics industry in India ?
In India, the ethics and regulations surrounding animal testing in the cosmetics industry have evolved significantly in recent years, reflecting a growing concern for animal welfare. The turning point came in 2013 when the Indian government banned animal testing for cosmetics. This decision was inflRead more
In India, the ethics and regulations surrounding animal testing in the cosmetics industry have evolved significantly in recent years, reflecting a growing concern for animal welfare. The turning point came in 2013 when the Indian government banned animal testing for cosmetics. This decision was influenced by ethical concerns, public outcry, and global trends towards cruelty-free practices.
The regulatory framework is governed by the Drugs and Cosmetics Act of 1940 and its rules. In 2014, India became the first South Asian country to prohibit the import of cosmetics tested on animals, further strengthening its stance against animal cruelty. The ban applies to both finished products and ingredients, aligning with international standards set by regions like the European Union.
Ethically, this move is supported by the principle of ahimsa (non-violence), which is deeply rooted in Indian culture. The use of alternative methods, such as in vitro testing and computer modeling, is encouraged to ensure safety without causing harm to animals.
However, challenges remain. Enforcement of the ban can be inconsistent, and some companies may still rely on animal testing for products sold outside India. The lack of comprehensive alternatives for all types of testing also poses difficulties.
Overall, India’s regulations reflect a strong ethical stance against animal testing in cosmetics, promoting cruelty-free practices while encouraging the development of innovative alternatives. The country’s leadership in this area sets a significant example for the global industry.
See lessAnalyse the definitional complexity of corruption.
Definitional Complexity of Corruption: An Analysis Introduction Corruption is a multifaceted issue that poses significant challenges to governance and societal integrity. Its definitional complexity arises from its diverse manifestations and the varying contexts in which it occurs. Understanding thiRead more
Definitional Complexity of Corruption: An Analysis
Introduction
Corruption is a multifaceted issue that poses significant challenges to governance and societal integrity. Its definitional complexity arises from its diverse manifestations and the varying contexts in which it occurs. Understanding this complexity is crucial for effectively addressing and combating corruption.
1. Variability in Definitions
2. Multiple Forms of Corruption
3. Legal and Ethical Dimensions
4. Impact of Globalization
5. Evolution Over Time
Conclusion
The definitional complexity of corruption arises from its variability across cultures and jurisdictions, its multiple forms, the interplay between legal and ethical dimensions, the impact of globalization, and its evolving nature. Recent examples illustrate how these factors contribute to the challenges in defining and combating corruption effectively. Understanding this complexity is essential for developing comprehensive anti-corruption strategies and policies.
See lessExplain any five forms of corruption identified by Central Vigilance Commission.
Forms of Corruption Identified by Central Vigilance Commission Introduction The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) plays a pivotal role in combating corruption within the Indian government. It identifies and addresses various forms of corruption that undermine public trust and efficiency. UnderstandRead more
Forms of Corruption Identified by Central Vigilance Commission
Introduction
The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) plays a pivotal role in combating corruption within the Indian government. It identifies and addresses various forms of corruption that undermine public trust and efficiency. Understanding these forms is crucial for developing effective strategies to combat corruption.
1. Bribery
2. Embezzlement
3. Nepotism and Favoritism
4. Extortion
5. Fraud
Conclusion
Understanding these five forms of corruption—bribery, embezzlement, nepotism and favoritism, extortion, and fraud—is essential for the Central Vigilance Commission’s efforts to promote transparency and accountability. Recent examples illustrate the persistent challenges posed by these forms of corruption and underscore the importance of effective anti-corruption measures.
See lessOn 23rd March, 2019, who was appointed as the first Lokpal of India?
Appointment of the First Lokpal of India Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose On 23rd March 2019, Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose was appointed as the first Lokpal of India. His appointment marked a significant milestone in the establishment of the Lokpal institution, which is designed to address corruption atRead more
Appointment of the First Lokpal of India
Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose
On 23rd March 2019, Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose was appointed as the first Lokpal of India. His appointment marked a significant milestone in the establishment of the Lokpal institution, which is designed to address corruption at the highest levels of government.
Background and Significance
Recent Examples and Developments
Conclusion
The appointment of Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose as the first Lokpal on 23rd March 2019 represented a significant step towards enhancing accountability and tackling corruption in India. His role and subsequent developments in the Lokpal institution highlight the ongoing commitment to uphold integrity and transparency in public administration.
See lessOn whose recommendation does the President appoint the Central Vigilance Commissioner?
Appointment of the Central Vigilance Commissioner Recommendation of the Prime Minister The President of India appoints the Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) on the recommendation of the Prime Minister. This process ensures that the appointment is made based on the advice and selection of the headRead more
Appointment of the Central Vigilance Commissioner
Recommendation of the Prime Minister
The President of India appoints the Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) on the recommendation of the Prime Minister. This process ensures that the appointment is made based on the advice and selection of the head of the executive government.
Procedure for Appointment
Recent Examples
Conclusion
The appointment of the Central Vigilance Commissioner is a significant process that underscores the Prime Minister’s role in ensuring the integrity and efficiency of the country’s vigilance system. The President acts on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, ensuring a process that is both streamlined and reflective of the executive’s judgment in selecting a capable individual for this crucial position.
See less