Please explain in points the changes in the new BNSS as compared to CrPC.
..
..
See lessMains Answer Writing Latest Questions
Renuka SrivastavaBegginer
-
This answer was edited.
Why do people oppose capitalism?
-
Critics of capitalism point out the following reasons: Capitalism is criticized from a lot of perspectives, and the key reasons people criticize it are: -Inequality: Critics say that capitalism naturally breeds huge inequalities of wealth. All the power and resources concentrate in the hands of a feRead more
Critics of capitalism point out the following reasons:
Capitalism is criticized from a lot of perspectives, and the key reasons people criticize it are:
-Inequality: Critics say that capitalism naturally breeds huge inequalities of wealth. All the power and resources concentrate in the hands of a few while leaving most of the others in poverty. Such inequality may occur in income inequality, wealth inequality, or other resources like health care and education.
This concept is identified by some as exploitative because it exploits workers at a lesser wage than value added. Low wages, poor working conditions, and fear of losing a job are some aspects.
Environmental Damage: Some oppose capitalism on grounds that its profit maximization motive propels environmental degradation, leading to pollution, resource depletion, and climate change, creating an irrevocable conflict with sustainable environment.
Instability and Crises: Boom-and-bust cycles have always plagued the capitalist economies, creating economic instability, recessions, and financial crises that have disastrous effects on people and societies.
Alienation: Other arguments tell that capitalism alienates the individual from his work, from his community, and from himself. The focus on material goods and consumerism leads people to feel empty and unsatisfied.
Political Influence Critics argue that capitalism allows corporations and the elite to have undue influence on political processes and consequently promotes policies that favor the elite at the expense of the masses.
See less
TeamSupreme
Rajesh Kumar is a senior public servant, with a reputation of honesty and forthrightness, currently posted in the Finance Ministry as Head of the Budget Division. His department is presently busy in organising the budgetary support to the states, four ...
-
Model Answer Introduction Rajesh Kumar, a senior public servant in the Finance Ministry, faces a significant ethical dilemma regarding the re-appropriation of ₹6000 crores from the National Housing Scheme (NHS) to fund other developmental projects. This situation raises critical questions about theRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Rajesh Kumar, a senior public servant in the Finance Ministry, faces a significant ethical dilemma regarding the re-appropriation of ₹6000 crores from the National Housing Scheme (NHS) to fund other developmental projects. This situation raises critical questions about the ethical implications of diverting funds from a welfare initiative designed to support weaker sections of society.
(a) Ethical Issues Involved in Re-appropriation of Funds
Misallocation of Funds
Re-appropriating funds from the NHS undermines its purpose, which is to provide housing for the underprivileged. Diverting resources raises ethical concerns about prioritizing welfare over developmental projects.
Prioritization of Projects
The decision to prioritize certain projects over welfare initiatives presents an ethical dilemma. It requires a careful assessment of societal needs and equitable resource allocation.
Transparency and Accountability
Public trust hinges on transparency in fund allocation. Any diversion must be justifiable to maintain confidence in government actions.
Political Influence
The potential for political pressure to influence the decision raises ethical questions about integrity in public finance management. Such influences can compromise fair decision-making.
Impact on Beneficiaries
Diverting funds from the NHS could delay housing projects, negatively affecting the vulnerable populations the scheme is intended to serve, thus undermining their welfare.
Long-term Consequences
The long-term impact of diverting funds can hinder social development and erode public trust in government commitments to social issues.
(b) Options Available to Rajesh Kumar
Raise Concerns Internally
Kumar can express his apprehensions to superiors, emphasizing the adverse effects of re-appropriation on the NHS.
Propose Alternative Solutions
He could suggest exploring additional funding sources or reallocating funds from less critical projects, preserving the integrity of the NHS.
Advocate for Transparency
Kumar should stress the importance of transparency, urging for a thorough examination of the implications of re-appropriation.
Seek Expert Advice
Consulting legal or financial experts can provide insights into the implications and guide ethical decision-making.
Consider Resignation
If his concerns remain unaddressed, resignation may be a last resort for Kumar, reflecting his commitment to ethical principles. However, this decision requires careful consideration of its potential impact.
Whistleblowing
If unethical practices are identified, Kumar could consider whistleblowing to appropriate authorities, ensuring accountability in fund management.
Conclusion
Rajesh Kumar faces a complex ethical challenge regarding fund re-appropriation. By exploring alternative solutions and emphasizing ethical principles, he can navigate this dilemma while upholding the integrity of public service.
See less
Ratio of ages of A and B, 4 years later is 8:9 respectively. If average of present ages of A & B is 47 years, then find difference in present ages of A & B.
-
Step 1: Define Variables Based on Ratio Let the present ages of A and B be AA and BB. Four years later, the ages of A and B will be A+4 and B + 4B+4, respectively. The given ratio 4 years later is 8:9. Let A + 4 = 8xA+4=8x and B+4=9x for some value xx. Step 2: Express Present Ages in Terms of xx ARead more
Step 1: Define Variables Based on Ratio
- Let the present ages of A and B be A and B.
- Four years later, the ages of A and B will be A+4 and B+4, respectively.
- The given ratio 4 years later is 8:9.
- Let A+4=8x and B+4=9x for some value x.
Step 2: Express Present Ages in Terms of x
- A=8x−4
- B=9x−4
Step 3: Use Average Age Information
- The average of the present ages of A and B is 47 years:
Step 4: Substitute Present Ages into the Average Age Equation
- Substitute A=8x−4 and B=9x−4 into A+B=94:
- (8x−4)+(9x−4)=94
⇒ 17x−8=94
⇒ 17x=102
⇒ x=6
- (8x−4)+(9x−4)=94
Step 5: Calculate Present Ages and Difference
- Substitute x back to find present ages:
- A=8x−4=8(6)−4=48−4=44
B=9x−4=9(6)−4=54−4=50 - The difference in present ages of A and B is: B−A=50−44=6
- A=8x−4=8(6)−4=48−4=44
The difference in present ages of A and B is 6 years.
.
See less
Srishti RoyBegginer
-
Democratization of Science and Technology: A Precondition for Sustainable Human Development It is therefore true that phrase ‘democratization of science and technology’ is a necessary for democratization of growth and development. It means to share SC knowledge and technological technologies with grRead more
Democratization of Science and Technology: A Precondition for Sustainable Human Development
It is therefore true that phrase ‘democratization of science and technology’ is a necessary for democratization of growth and development. It means to share SC knowledge and technological technologies with greater number of people, to promote innovations and make sure that the outcome of innovation will be rather helpful for majority of people.
Here’s how it contributes to inclusive growth:
1. It empowers the person by extending from him/her various information and tools, thus empowering the knowledge-based economy and the problem-solving capabilities of the given individual to make proper decisions.
2. This approach puts forward challenges and ideas from a more diverse population and works collaboratively to solve these issues for the improvement of more innovative solutions to social issues.
3. It has reduced the digital disparity in that it has provided equal technology chances equality for the disadvantaged.
4. Social Issues: Through science and technological advancement it is very possible to solve the biggest social problems like poverty, hunger and diseases, in the third world countries.
Democratizing Sustainable Development: Freeing clean energy technologies and sustainable approaches brings huge environmental and climate change solutions.Democratizing Strategies:
Open Access: Read access to scientific articles and other types of publications containing research material.
-Education and Skill Development: Educational commitment in STEM to prepare workforce most efficiently.
-Digital Literacy: Raising awareness on the use of technology to improve on the efficiency of a person’s usage of technology.
-Community Engagement: Engaging people in the matter of its decision-making concerning science and technology.
-Ethical Considerations: Guaranteeing use of technology for appropriate purposes and right purposes.Democratisation of science and technology empowers nation to drive the poor out of poverty and improve the quality of population.
See less
Shivam KumarBegginer
Can you discuss a time when you had to balance your emotions with practical considerations?
-
Balancing emotions with practical considerations often comes into play during challenging situations. For instance, imagine a scenario where a person is facing a job loss. Emotionally, they might feel anxious, frustrated, or even angry. However, they also need to consider practical steps to secure tRead more
Balancing emotions with practical considerations often comes into play during challenging situations. For instance, imagine a scenario where a person is facing a job loss. Emotionally, they might feel anxious, frustrated, or even angry. However, they also need to consider practical steps to secure their financial stability and future careers.
In this case, the individual could take a moment to acknowledge their feelings but then shift focus to creating a plan. They might update their resume, network with contacts, and explore job openings. By recognizing their emotions but prioritizing actionable steps, they can navigate the situation more effectively.
This balance is crucial in many areas of life, from personal relationships to professional challenges, ensuring that emotions inform decisions without overwhelming practical needs. Have you experienced a similar situation?
See less
Which IT security threat concerns you the most?
-
Phishing attacks can be mostly avoided because most of the phishing websites looks very different from the original websites (there are exceptions to). So it's much easier to avoid such attacks easier. Data breaches are a little more scarier according to the amount of important data you have withinRead more
Phishing attacks can be mostly avoided because most of the phishing websites looks very different from the original websites (there are exceptions to). So it’s much easier to avoid such attacks easier.
Data breaches are a little more scarier according to the amount of important data you have within you. It’s highly effective for larger companies who depends on digital data, and breaching them would bring a lot of damage to their company.
But ransomwares are the deadliest among these. It not only holds on to our data, but also asks ransom for freeing the data, and even can take control on the target system. The most scarier part is that everything happens under the hood, so we can’t even see or block what’s happening.
So for me, Ransomware‘s are the most deadliest among the options that you have given.
See less
A tank has three pipes: A, B, and C. Pipe A can fill the tank in 10 hours, Pipe B can fill the tank in 15 hours, and Pipe C can empty the tank in 20 hours. If all three ...
TeamSupreme
Give a brief explanation of the fundamental principles that civil workers must uphold. (200 Words) [UPPSC 2020]
-
Examining the Statement on Bribery in Government Services 1. Analysis of the Statement: The statement suggests that if people stop offering bribes, the issue of bribery in government services will be resolved. While this perspective highlights the role of external influences in perpetuating corruptiRead more
Examining the Statement on Bribery in Government Services
1. Analysis of the Statement: The statement suggests that if people stop offering bribes, the issue of bribery in government services will be resolved. While this perspective highlights the role of external influences in perpetuating corruption, it oversimplifies the problem by not addressing the root causes and systemic factors contributing to bribery.
2. Critical Examination:
- Systemic and Institutional Factors: Bribery often stems from systemic weaknesses within institutions, such as lack of transparency, inadequate enforcement of anti-corruption laws, and bureaucratic inefficiencies. For instance, the CVC (Central Vigilance Commission) in India has identified institutional flaws as key contributors to corruption, indicating that simply stopping bribes without addressing these systemic issues may not be effective.
- Demand and Supply Dynamics: While reducing the supply of bribes is important, the demand side also needs to be addressed. Government officials who accept bribes may be motivated by low salaries, job insecurity, or personal greed. For example, the Tihar Jail corruption case highlighted how both demand (officials accepting bribes) and supply (people offering bribes) perpetuate corruption.
- Public Awareness and Ethical Culture: Combating bribery requires a cultural shift towards ethical behavior and public awareness. Initiatives like the India Against Corruption movement emphasize the importance of creating a culture of integrity and accountability among both public servants and citizens.
- Legal and Structural Reforms: Effective solutions include strengthening legal frameworks, enhancing transparency, and implementing robust monitoring systems. The implementation of the RTI Act (Right to Information) has been a step towards increasing transparency and reducing opportunities for corruption.
3. Conclusion: The statement overlooks the complexity of bribery, which involves both supply and demand factors. Addressing the problem requires a comprehensive approach involving systemic reforms, public education, and strengthening institutional integrity. Simply stopping the offer of bribes is not sufficient without tackling the underlying causes and creating a robust anti-corruption framework.
See less
The major differences between BNSS (Bureau of National Security Services) and CrPC (Code of Criminal Procedure) are as follows: Nature: BNSS: It is a secretive service operated exclusively by the Indian government. BNSS deals with matters such as border security, national security, and covert operatRead more