Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question

Ethical Concerns & Dilemmas

Share
Followers
147 Answers
87 Questions
Home/Ethics in Public Administration/Ethical Concerns & Dilemmas/Page 6

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Mayur Katgaonkar
  • 0
Poll
Mayur KatgaonkarBegginer
Asked: July 17, 2024In: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
  • 0

This initiative will give Indians so much learning that they will be more disciplined. basic civic sense, learn basic survival skills, improve fitness and mentality and above all increase the feeling of Nationalism and cooperation

Sandra
  • 1
SandraBegginer
Asked: July 17, 2024In: , , , , , , , , , ,
  • 1

According to you, is euthanasia a personal autonomy issue or does it create a slippery slope leading to the devaluation of human life?

question
  1. Hetal Bansal
    Hetal Bansal Begginer

    Euthanasia is a complex and deeply contested issue, often framed as either a matter of personal autonomy or a potential slippery slope leading to the devaluation of human life. Personal Autonomy Proponents of euthanasia argue that it is fundamentally about personal autonomy and the right to self-detRead more

    Euthanasia is a complex and deeply contested issue, often framed as either a matter of personal autonomy or a potential slippery slope leading to the devaluation of human life.

    Personal Autonomy

    Proponents of euthanasia argue that it is fundamentally about personal autonomy and the right to self-determination. They believe that individuals should have the freedom to choose how and when they die, especially in cases of terminal illness and unbearable suffering. From this perspective:

    • Dignity: Allowing euthanasia can provide a dignified end to life, aligning with the individual’s wishes.
    • Compassion: It can be an act of compassion, relieving someone from prolonged pain and suffering.
    • Control: It gives individuals control over their own lives and deaths, respecting their autonomy and personal choices.

    Slippery Slope

    Opponents, however, caution that legalizing euthanasia could lead to a slippery slope where the value of human life is undermined. They worry about:

    • Abuse and Coercion: Vulnerable populations, such as the elderly, disabled, or economically disadvantaged, might be pressured into choosing euthanasia.
    • Moral and Ethical Implications: It could lead to a broader acceptance of ending lives in cases beyond terminal illness, such as severe depression or non-terminal conditions.
    • Erosion of Medical Ethics: It could conflict with the medical profession’s duty to preserve life and do no harm, potentially eroding trust in healthcare providers.

    Balancing the Two Perspectives

    The debate involves balancing individual rights with broader societal implications. Legal frameworks in various jurisdictions attempt to address these concerns through stringent regulations and safeguards. These include requiring multiple medical opinions, psychological evaluations, and strict eligibility criteria to ensure that euthanasia is a well-considered, voluntary decision made without external pressure.

    In conclusion, whether euthanasia is viewed primarily as a matter of personal autonomy or a slippery slope leading to the devaluation of human life depends on one’s ethical framework and societal values. Both perspectives have valid concerns that need to be carefully weighed in the discussion and legislation of euthanasia.

    See less
Hitha S Chowta
  • 0
Hitha S ChowtaBegginer
Asked: July 16, 2024In: , , , , , , , , ,
  • 0

if you have to choose one what would it be?
  1. Reachel Tanya Albuquerque
    Reachel Tanya Albuquerque Begginer

    Talent and Attitude should always go hand in hand. A person with good attitude will always flourish in whatever in does. TALENT : It may give individuals an advantage and allows them to excel in their chosen field with relative ease, but it a positive attitude - characterized by resilience, willingnRead more

    Talent and Attitude should always go hand in hand. A person with good attitude will always flourish in whatever in does.

    TALENT : It may give individuals an advantage and allows them to excel in their chosen field with relative ease, but it a positive attitude – characterized by resilience, willingness to learn, and strong work ethic that often determines sustained success. Talent alone may not be enough. Today in this competitive world dedication, skills and right attitude matters. If not talent can stagnate and go unrecognized.

    ATTITUDE : Individuals with good attitude often are likely to embrace challenges, seek continuous improvement, and work effectively with others, which can help them overcome obstacles and adapt to changing circumstances. This will also help them to initiate a growth in their career. Good attitude will help to indulge in many activities with your peers , and this might showcase in your talent. one of the cons which I can mention is that a positive attitude alone may not compensate for a lack of fundamental skills or knowledge in certain technical and specialized arears.

    See less
Rishita
  • 0
RishitaBegginer
Asked: July 15, 2024In: ,
  • 0

What ethical considerations should be prioritized in the development and deployment of genetic engineering technologies?

question
  1. anweshade
    anweshade Begginer

    In the development and deployment of genetic engineering technologies, several ethical considerations must be prioritized to ensure responsible and beneficial outcomes. Firstly, informed consent is crucial, ensuring that individuals or groups affected by genetic interventions fully understand the poRead more

    In the development and deployment of genetic engineering technologies, several ethical considerations must be prioritized to ensure responsible and beneficial outcomes. Firstly, informed consent is crucial, ensuring that individuals or groups affected by genetic interventions fully understand the potential risks, benefits, and implications of genetic modifications. Respect for autonomy ensures that individuals have the right to make informed decisions about their genetic information and treatments.

    Equity and justice are essential to prevent genetic technologies from exacerbating existing social inequalities. Policies and practices should aim to provide equitable access to genetic therapies and ensure that disadvantaged populations are not unfairly burdened or excluded.

    Transparency in research and development processes promotes trust and accountability. It involves openly sharing information about methods, outcomes, and potential impacts with the scientific community and the public.

    Safety and efficacy are paramount to minimize risks to individuals and populations undergoing genetic interventions. Rigorous testing and monitoring are necessary to ensure that genetic modifications are safe, effective, and reliable.

    Lastly, long-term consequences must be considered to anticipate potential environmental, social, and ethical impacts of genetic modifications over time. Responsible oversight and continuous evaluation are essential to mitigate risks and maximize the benefits of genetic engineering technologies while upholding ethical standards and societal values.

    See less
Aishwarya garg
  • 0
Aishwarya gargBegginer
Asked: July 18, 2024In: ,
  • 0

In governance Sometimes personal moral values conflicts with duties of an administrator what will be it’s impact on decision making and outcome??

question
  1. Shefali
    Shefali Begginer

    When personal moral values conflict with the duties of an administrator, it can significantly impact decision-making and outcomes. Administrators are often faced with decisions that require balancing ethical considerations with professional responsibilities. A conflict between personal morals and adRead more

    When personal moral values conflict with the duties of an administrator, it can significantly impact decision-making and outcomes. Administrators are often faced with decisions that require balancing ethical considerations with professional responsibilities. A conflict between personal morals and administrative duties can lead to internal dilemmas, causing stress and potentially delaying decision-making. Administrators might struggle to reconcile their personal beliefs with the need to follow laws, regulations, or policies that they find ethically questionable.

    Such conflicts can result in compromised decisions that attempt to satisfy both personal and professional standards, which may not always be feasible. For instance, an administrator with strong personal values against a specific policy might implement it reluctantly, leading to half-hearted execution and suboptimal results. Alternatively, they might resist or obstruct the policy, causing friction within the organization and possibly leading to disciplinary actions or loss of credibility.

    On the other hand, if an administrator prioritizes their duties over personal morals, they might experience guilt or moral distress, which can affect their mental well-being and job performance. This conflict can also erode trust among colleagues and subordinates if they perceive the administrator as insincere or conflicted.

    Ultimately, the impact of such conflicts underscores the importance of ethical frameworks and support systems within organizations to help administrators navigate these challenging situations and make balanced, principled decisions.

    See less
Anonymous
  • 0
Anonymous
Asked: July 13, 2024In: ,
  • 0

How do deontology and utilitarianism vary in their approaches to ethical decision-making, especially in complicated circumstances when following precisely a moral norm could result in harmful or negative consequences? In your comparison, analyze how each theory emphasizes concepts such as ...

ethical principles
  1. Srikumar sahoo
    Srikumar sahoo Begginer

    Deontology and utilitarianism differ in their approaches to ethical decision-making. Deontology, associated with Immanuel Kant, emphasizes adherence to moral duties and rights, regardless of consequences. It provides clear ethical guidelines but can lead to negative outcomes if rules are followed riRead more

    Deontology and utilitarianism differ in their approaches to ethical decision-making. Deontology, associated with Immanuel Kant, emphasizes adherence to moral duties and rights, regardless of consequences. It provides clear ethical guidelines but can lead to negative outcomes if rules are followed rigidly. For example, a deontologist would tell the truth to a dangerous person searching for a friend, prioritizing honesty over potential harm.

    Utilitarianism, linked to Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, focuses on the consequences of actions, aiming to maximize overall happiness. It is flexible and practical but can justify actions that violate individual rights. In the same scenario, a utilitarian would lie to protect their friend, prioritizing the prevention of harm over strict honesty.

    In medical ethics, a deontologist might refuse euthanasia to preserve life, while a utilitarian might support it to alleviate suffering. In environmental policy, a deontologist might enforce strict pollution controls based on duty, while a utilitarian might balance economic benefits with environmental impact.

    Each theory has merits and limitations, highlighting the importance of context in ethical decision-making.

    See less
sourav barnwal
  • 0
sourav barnwalBegginer
Asked: July 12, 2024In: , , , , , , ,
  • 0

aibenifits of aibenifits of nepnew education policy
  1. amnatooba
    amnatooba Begginer

    The New Education Policy (NEP) in India, introduced in 2020, aims to overhaul the education system and address various issues. It can potentially offer several benefits that may help graduates navigate the challenges posed by AI integration and resulting layoffs:   1. Holistic and MultidiscipliRead more

    The New Education Policy (NEP) in India, introduced in 2020, aims to overhaul the education system and address various issues. It can potentially offer several benefits that may help graduates navigate the challenges posed by AI integration and resulting layoffs:

     

    1. Holistic and Multidisciplinary Education: NEP promotes a more holistic and multidisciplinary approach to education. This can help graduates develop a broader skill set, making them more adaptable to different job roles and industries.

     

    2. Emphasis on Skill Development: The policy places a strong emphasis on vocational training and skill development from an early age. Graduates with practical skills are likely to be more employable and better prepared to meet the changing demands of the job market.

     

    3. Flexibility in Education: NEP introduces flexibility in choosing subjects, allowing students to tailor their education according to their interests and career aspirations. This flexibility can help graduates specialize in fields less susceptible to automation.

     

    4. Focus on Technology and Digital Literacy: The policy advocates for the integration of technology and digital literacy in the curriculum. Graduates with strong tech skills and digital literacy are better positioned to work alongside AI and in tech-driven environments.

     

    5. Encouragement of Critical Thinking and Innovation: NEP encourages critical thinking, problem-solving, and innovation. These skills are crucial in an AI-driven world where routine tasks may be automated, and human ingenuity is needed to create and manage new technologies.

     

    6. Enhanced Higher Education: The policy aims to improve the quality of higher education institutions by introducing more autonomy, fostering research, and encouraging international collaborations. High-quality education can boost the confidence of graduates in their capabilities.

     

    7. Lifelong Learning and Continuous Education: NEP promotes the concept of lifelong learning, encouraging individuals to continuously update their skills. This mindset can help graduates stay relevant and competitive in the job market despite technological advancements.

     

    8. Entrepreneurship and Self-Employment: The policy supports entrepreneurial education and training. Graduates who are equipped to start their own ventures can create job opportunities for themselves and others, reducing reliance on traditional employment.

     

    By focusing on these aspects, the NEP can help graduates build confidence and resilience in a rapidly changing job market. The policy’s emphasis on adaptability, continuous learning, and innovation can empower graduates to navigate and thrive despite the challenges posed by AI integration and automation.

    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: April 18, 2025

Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (18 April 2025)

Do you agree with the claim that indecision and risk aversion are prevalent issues in Indian bureaucracy? Support your answer with logical reasoning. (150 words) ऐसा कहा जाता है कि भारतीय नौकरशाही में अनिर्णय और जोखिम से बचने की प्रवृत्ति ...

On: April 18, 2025 Comments: 0

Strengthening India’s Cyber Defence

Rising Threats Digital Era Challenges: 2024 marks a significant rise in digital threats, particularly from AI and cyberattacks. Key Issues: Disinformation campaigns. Cyber fraud affecting daily life. Current Major Cyber Threats Ransomware Rampage: Over 48,000 instances of WannaCry ransomware detected ...

On: April 18, 2025 Comments: 0

भारत की साइबर सुरक्षा

बढ़ते खतरे कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता (AI) और साइबर हमले: 2024 में AI और साइबर हमलों के खतरे में वृद्धि। महत्वपूर्ण अवसंरचना पर हमले: डिजिटल हमलों और दुष्प्रचार अभियानों की संभावना बढ़ी है। प्रमुख साइबर खतरें रैनसमवेयर का प्रकोप: 48,000 से अधिक ...

Explore Our Blog