Talk about the drawbacks of utilizing GDP to gauge a nation’s level of prosperity.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is widely used to gauge a country’s economic performance, but it has notable limitations as a measure of well-being:
These limitations highlight the need for complementary measures, such as the Human Development Index (HDI), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), and measures of social and environmental health, to provide a more comprehensive assessment of a country’s well-being.
Gros Domestic Product (GDP) is the sum total of value of goods and services created within the geographical boundary of a country in a particular year. It is usually taken as an indicator of the well-being in the context of per capita income suggesting the prosperity of the people. It may indicate more income and capacity to buy more goods and services among the people. However, there are some limitations of using GDP as an indicator of economic welfare of a country:
In addition to this, GDP also does not take into account economic inequality, loss of jobs and opportunities and level of health and education and quality of choices in an economy. Therefore, new concepts like Gross National Happiness (GNH), Human Development Index (HDI) and the Social Progress Index (SPI) are often discussed as the better alternative to assess the well-being of society.