India has continued to adopt a secular attitude based on “principled distance” rather than “equi-distance.” Say something. (Answer in 150 words)
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Secularism in India does not mean a strict separation of religion from the state. Instead, the state supports or participates in a neutral manner in the affairs of all religious groups, considering the philosophy of “Sarva Dharma Samabhava” (equal respect for all religions).
The central characteristic of Indian secularism is that the State maintains a principled distance from all religions. It means that though the State is institutionally separated from religion and often engages with religion within the constitutionally and legally prescribed parameters. India’s secular approach has remained that of a ‘principled distance’ and not of ‘equi-distance’, as is evident from the following:
A State interfering in one religion more than the others does not automatically depart from secularism. Indian secularism rejects the one-size-fits-all assumption and believes in the idea of respectful transformation of religions depending upon the maintenance of social fabric, as well as the State’s capacity to bring about progressive changes in a rightful manner.