Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
**Substantive laws** define rights, duties, and legal relationships, specifying what is legally permissible. For example, the **Indian Penal Code (IPC)** defines offenses like theft, specifying that stealing someone’s property is a crime and stipulating the penalties for it. Similarly, the **Indian Contract Act, 1872** outlines the requirements for forming a contract, such as mutual consent and lawful consideration, and defines the rights and obligations of the parties involved.
**Procedural laws**, in contrast, govern the methods by which substantive laws are enforced. They detail the processes for legal proceedings. For example, the **Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)** provides the steps for filing a civil suit, conducting a trial, and appealing decisions. If a person wants to sue for breach of contract, the CPC outlines how to initiate the case, present evidence, and conduct hearings. The **Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)** specifies procedures for criminal cases, such as how police investigations are conducted and how trials are carried out.
In summary, while substantive laws focus on defining legal rights and obligations, procedural laws ensure these rights are enforced through established legal processes.
Procedural law encompasses the rules and processes for enforcing legal rights and obligations through the court system. It includes the steps for filing a lawsuit, pre-trial procedures, trial conduct, and rules for appeals and post-trial activities. Some examples of Procedural law are CrPC ( now BNSS), CPC, IEA ( now BSA). The primary aim of procedural law is to ensure that legal proceedings are fair and just.
Substantive law, in contrast, defines the actual rights, duties, and obligations of individuals and entities. Substantive law specifies what actions are considered crimes, how to establish liability for breaches of contracts, and the consequences of violating property rights. Some examples of Substantive laws are IPC (now BNS), TPA, Contract Act, SRA, SOGA.
In essence, procedural law governs the methods and processes of legal enforcement, while substantive law delineates the specific rights and responsibilities under the law.
Procedural law cannot create rights or obligations that are not already established by substantive law, nor can it diminish the rights or obligations provided by substantive law. Therefore, procedural law is subservient to substantive law. Its primary role is to facilitate and advance the cause of justice, which is why it is often said that “procedure is the handmaid of justice, not its mistress.” However, when the strict application of a procedural rule would defeat the purpose of justice, courts may interpret the rule more liberally to align with its intent, ensuring that the ultimate goal of serving justice is achieved.