Throughout Sense and Sensibility, Austen uses free indirect discourse to delve into the thoughts and emotions of both Elinor and Marianne Dashwood. However, some argue that the narrative voice itself occasionally displays a subtle bias. Can you identify specific instances where the narrative voice seems to favor Elinor’s “sense” over Marianne’s “sensibility,” and how might this influence the reader’s interpretation of the characters and the novel’s themes?
In Sense and Sensibility, Austen’s free indirect discourse allows access to both Elinor and Marianne’s minds. However, the narrative voice itself can sometimes favor Elinor’s “sense.” Here’s how:
Word Choice: Austen might describe Marianne’s emotional outbursts with words like “indulged” or “despair,” implying a lack of control. Conversely, Elinor’s actions might be narrated with words like “composed” or “considered,” highlighting her rationality.
Irony: Austen might employ subtle irony when depicting Marianne’s pronouncements on love. For example, a grand declaration of eternal devotion might be followed by a dry observation about the weather, casting a hint of doubt on Marianne’s sincerity.
These techniques influence the reader’s interpretation. We’re subtly nudged towards seeing Elinor’s approach as more mature and realistic, while Marianne’s emotions seem excessive and potentially misguided. This reinforces the novel’s theme of balancing reason and emotion. By highlighting the potential pitfalls of unchecked “sensibility,” Austen encourages readers to admire Elinor’s ability to navigate the world with both heart and head. However, it’s important to note that this doesn’t diminish Marianne’s emotional depth. The novel’s ending suggests a potential future where Marianne can find happiness by integrating her “sensibility” with a dose of Elinor’s “sense.”