Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The Indian Constitution isn’t classified as “quasi-judicial” itself. A quasi-judicial system refers to bodies outside the formal court system that have powers resembling courts, like tribunals that handle disputes.
The Constitution likely establishes a framework for a government with a strong, independent judiciary. This means a separate branch (judiciary) interprets laws and the Constitution, ensuring fairness and upholding citizens’ rights. This is crucial for a democracy.
The Constitution might empower certain commissions or agencies to settle disputes or make rulings, but these wouldn’t define the entire system as quasi-judicial.
The framers of the Indian Constitution crafted a unique blend of federal and unitary features, resulting in what is often called a quasi-federal system. Let’s explore why:
In summary, India’s Constitution is quasi-federal, combining elements from both federal and unitary systems to address its unique context.