The argument for subjecting the U.S. Constitution to periodic comprehensive reviews and revisions, rather than relying solely on the piecemeal amendment process, is an interesting and complex one that has merits but also significant challenges.

Potential Advantages of Comprehensive Reviews and Revisions:

Holistic Updating: A comprehensive review would allow for a more holistic examination of the Constitution’s continued relevance and fitness for the modern era. It could identify interconnected issues and opportunities for broad, systemic updates, rather than addressing challenges in isolation through individual amendments.
Increased Adaptability: Periodic, comprehensive reviews could build in greater structural adaptability to the Constitution, making it easier to keep pace with rapidly evolving societal and technological changes. This could provide a more dynamic and flexible framework for governance.
Democratic Participation: The process of comprehensive reviews could encourage broader public engagement and input, helping to ensure the Constitution remains responsive to the needs and values of the citizenry.
Clarity and Coherence: Undertaking holistic revisions could help streamline and clarify the Constitution, removing outdated provisions, resolving ambiguities, and improving internal consistency.
Potential Challenges of Comprehensive Reviews and Revisions:

Political Difficulty: Achieving the level of bipartisan consensus and political will required to convene a comprehensive constitutional convention or revision process would be extremely challenging, if not practically impossible in the current hyper-polarized political climate.
Risk of Instability: Opening up the entire Constitution to potential revision could create significant uncertainty and instability, with the possibility of core founding principles and protections being altered or dismantled.
Logistical Complexity: Coordinating a large-scale, comprehensive review process involving Congress, the states, and diverse stakeholders would be an enormously complex undertaking, fraught with procedural and practical hurdles.
Preserving the Document’s Essence: There is a valid concern that attempting to modernize the Constitution through comprehensive revisions could inadvertently undermine the core values, principles, and structures that have made it such a durable and respected framework of government.
Ultimately, while the idea of periodic comprehensive reviews has some merit, the immense political and practical challenges involved, combined with the risks of destabilizing the fundamental basis of American government, likely outweigh the potential benefits. A more cautious, incremental approach of targeted amendments may be the more prudent path forward for updating the Constitution over time.