Moral relativism and moral absolutism are two philosophical stances on ethics that discuss the nature of moral principles and how they should be applied.

The doctrine of moral relativism holds that moral judgments change based on an individual’s upbringing, society, or background. According to this perspective, morality is not a set of universal rules that apply to every person in every circumstance, but rather a social construct that is formed by environment, culture, and individual beliefs. Because of this, moral relativism allows different cultures or individuals to have different ethical standards without necessarily favoring one over the other.

On the other hand, moral absolutism holds that there are universally applicable, objective moral laws that hold true for all people, regardless of their cultural or background.

In conclusion, moral absolutism maintains the existence of universal and objective moral principles that transcend cultural and individual differences, while moral relativism stresses the diversity and subjectivity of moral opinions. These divergent points of view continue to influence discussions about the nature and premises of moral judgments in ethics and philosophy.