Examine the Indian Constitution’s provisions about the defense of basic rights. Talk about the extent and constraints of these rights as well as the court’s role in interpreting and upholding them.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Fundamental Rights are enshrined in constitution and laws to protect the individual from arbitrary exercise of power by state and ensure their dignity ,liberty and equality.
-Functions of Fundamental Rights
°Limits power of State- These rights limits power of state.State cannot make laws which violates fundamental rights.
° Negative Obligation for State- State must respect the Fundamental Rights and must not infringe them.
° These rights are essential for individual to develop himself.
° Corner Stone for Democracy- These rights are one of the foundation stone of democracy.
– Limitation of Fundamental Rights
Fundamental Rights are not absolute because absolute rights can make chaos in society.
They have some reasonable restrictions on grounds of sovereignty, security and integrity.
SOMNATH LAHIRI-“These rights are framed from the point of view of police constable. For each give right ,you have given restrictions.”
-Protection of Fundamental Rights in constitution
° Under Article 32- “Right to Constitutional Remedies”,one can directly approach to supreme court ,if any of his fundamental right is violated. Supreme court is under constitutional obligation to ensure these rights
B.R. Ambedkar stated art 32 as “Heart and Soul of Constitution “.
°Under article 226- One can directly approach to High Court if his fundamental right is violated.
°Judicial Review- Under article 13,If legislature legislates the law which partially or fully violate fundamental rights then Judiciary will do Judicial review .
– JUDICIARY plays a very important role in exercise and protection of fundamental rights.
° Under article 13- Judicial review can be done by judiciary.
° Doctrine of Basic Structure- Supreme court under the landmark case of” Kerala State vs Swami keshwanand bharti ” 1973, coined the DOCTRINE OF BASIC STRUCTURE,under which some provisions of constitution comes under the ambit of Basic Structure.Legislature cannot violates/ ammend this basic structure.
° Judiciary expands the ambit of Fundamental Rights time to time
* Olga Tellis Case ,1985 – Right to livelihood is part of Right to live under article 21.
*Puttaswamy Case,2018- Right to privacy is part of Right to live under article 21.
*PUCL vs Union of India,2001- Right to Food
* Maneka Gandhi Case ,1978- Right to live with dignity.
Judiciary expands the ambit of Fundamental Rights to attain the individual his fullest spiritual, physical and intellectual development.
The Indian Constitution’s Part III (Articles 12-35) enshrines Fundamental Rights, inspired by the US Bill of Rights. These include the Right to Equality (Articles 14-18), Right to Freedom (Articles 19-22), Right against Exploitation (Articles 23-24), Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28), Cultural and Educational Rights (Articles 29-30), and the Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32).
These rights are, however, not without restrictions. Fundamental rights are subjected to reasonable restrictions which are crucial to maintain public order and security.
Article 32 is labeled as the heart and soul of the Indian constitution as it bestows upon the supreme court the power to enforce these rights when breached through the writs. Similarly, the high courts in India to enjoy this power under article 226 of the Indian constitution.
The judiciary, through its power of judicial review, safeguards that laws comply with the Constitution. Landmark judgments, like Kesavananda Bharati (1973), which established the Basic Structure Doctrine wherein it barred the parliament from amending the basic elements of the Indian constitution one of which are the fundamental rights. During national emergency, the fundamental rights can be suspended. They cannot be given away entirely; they are simply not in effect for a specified period.
The Indian Constitution’s provisions for the protection of fundamental rights are a crucial aspect of the country’s democratic framework. These rights, enshrined in Part III of the Constitution, serve as the bedrock of individual liberties and provide safeguards against the arbitrary exercise of state power.
Scope of Fundamental Rights:
The Indian Constitution guarantees a wide range of fundamental rights, including:
1.Right to Equality (Articles 14-18)
2. Right to Freedom (Articles 19-22)
3. Right against Exploitation (Articles 23-24)
4. Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28)
5. Cultural and Educational Rights (Articles 29-30)
6. Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32)
These rights cover a broad spectrum, ranging from civil and political rights to socio-economic and cultural rights. The scope of these rights has been expanded over time through judicial interpretations, with the Supreme Court adopting a progressive and expansive approach.
Limitations and Restrictions:
While fundamental rights are meant to be absolute, the Constitution also provides for reasonable restrictions to be imposed on them. These restrictions are primarily based on the grounds of public order, morality, security of the state, and the rights and freedoms of others.
For instance, the right to freedom of speech and expression (Article 19) can be subjected to reasonable restrictions on the grounds of defamation, incitement to violence, or national security. Similarly, the right to freedom of movement (Article 19) can be restricted in the interest of the general public.
Role of the Judiciary:
The Indian judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, has played a crucial role in interpreting and enforcing fundamental rights. The Supreme Court has, over the years, expanded the scope of fundamental rights through its landmark judgments.
Some key examples include:
Recognizing the right to privacy as a fundamental right (Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, 2017)
Decriminalizing homosexuality (Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, 2018)
Upholding the right to die with dignity (Common Cause v. Union of India, 2018)
Protecting the rights of transgenders (National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India, 2014)
The judiciary has also played a crucial role in enforcing fundamental rights through the writ jurisdiction under Article 32 and Article 226 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court and High Courts have the power to issue writs, such as habeas corpus, mandamus, quo warranto, prohibition, and certiorari, to provide effective remedies for the violation of fundamental rights.
In conclusion, the Indian Constitution’s provisions for the protection of fundamental rights, combined with the judiciary’s interpretive role, have been instrumental in safeguarding individual liberties and promoting social justice. However, the continued evolution and interpretation of these rights will be crucial in addressing contemporary challenges and ensuring the Constitution’s relevance in a rapidly changing society.