Do you think there is no career/scope in manual testing. What is your opinion on Automation testing.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Manual testing still holds significant value in the software development lifecycle. It is essential for tasks requiring human judgment, exploratory testing, and usability assessments. Manual testers bring a unique perspective, understanding user behavior and identifying issues that automated scripts may overlook. For small projects or projects with frequent changes, manual testing is often more feasible and cost-effective.
However, the industry is progressively shifting towards automation testing due to its efficiency and scalability. Automation testing excels in repetitive tasks, regression testing, and performance testing, ensuring faster and more reliable results. It significantly reduces the testing time for large-scale applications, allowing for continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) practices.
Automation testing tools like Selenium, JUnit, and TestNG have become industry standards. The integration of AI and machine learning into automation testing is enhancing its capabilities, making it possible to predict potential failures and optimize test coverage.
In conclusion, while manual testing remains indispensable for certain scenarios, automation testing is increasingly becoming crucial in modern software development. A balanced approach, leveraging the strengths of both manual and automation testing, is the key to delivering high-quality software efficiently. Professionals skilled in both areas are in high demand, ensuring a robust career path in the testing domain.