To what extent is it accurate to argue that the 19th-century New Imperialism was more of a nationalistic movement than an economic phenomenon?
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
This is an interesting and complex question that has been widely debated by historians. There are valid arguments on both sides, and the extent to which New Imperialism was driven by nationalist or economic factors is a matter of interpretation.
Argument for New Imperialism as a Nationalist Phenomenon:
– The late 19th century saw the rise of aggressive nationalism, as newly unified nation-states like Germany and Italy sought to expand their power and influence on the global stage.
– Nationalist sentiments fueled the desire for colonial empires, as nations sought to acquire territories, resources, and prestige to bolster their status and compete with rival powers.
– Nationalist ideologies, such as social Darwinism and the belief in the superiority of certain races or cultures, justified and rationalized the subjugation of indigenous populations in the colonies.
– The scramble for Africa and the partition of the continent were driven as much by nationalist rivalries and the desire for geopolitical dominance as by economic motives.
– Nationalist rhetoric and the idea of the “white man’s burden” were used to legitimize colonial expansion and the civilizing mission of European powers.
Argument for New Imperialism as an Economic Phenomenon:
– The unprecedented industrialization and economic growth of the 19th century created a demand for raw materials, new markets, and investment opportunities, fueling the expansion of colonial empires.
– Capitalist interests, such as industrialists, financiers, and merchant classes, pushed for colonial expansion to secure access to resources, expand trade networks, and find new outlets for investment.
– The search for new sources of cheap labor and the desire to exploit colonial populations as a source of low-cost production were significant economic drivers of New Imperialism.
– The scramble for Africa was also motivated by the need to control strategic trade routes, such as the Suez Canal, and to secure sources of raw materials for industrial production.
– Technological advancements, such as the steamship and telegraph, facilitated the economic exploitation of colonial territories and the integration of colonial economies into the global capitalist system.
In reality, both nationalist and economic factors played a significant role in the rise of New Imperialism in the 19th century. The two were often intertwined, as nationalist ambitions were frequently coupled with a desire to expand economic power and influence. The relative importance of these factors may have varied across different colonial powers and specific colonial ventures. A nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between nationalism and economics is essential to fully appreciate the drivers and dynamics of 19th-century New Imperialism.
The New Imperialism refers to a period of competitive colonial expansion in Asia and Africa by European powers during the late 1875-1914. This is called New imperialism because this can be considered as the second wave of imperialism, as distinguished from the first wave that started from the 15th century and continued up to the early 19th century.
Characters Of New Imperialism
Economic Factors Of New Imperialism
Nationalistic Factors Of New Imperialism
New imperialism was influenced by economic factors and counties avoided wars even when they were at loggerheads with each other. The paper partition of Africa by European powers can be seen as the best example of this fact. But beyond this economic motive, it had underlying nationalistic imperatives of the imperial powers. Hence new imperialism was at once both an economic and nationalist phenomenon.