Roadmap for Answer Writing
- Introduction
- Briefly introduce the NHRC and its role.
- Mention its establishment under the Protection of Human Rights Act (PHRA), 1993.
- Define the role of NHRC as a human rights watchdog in India.
- Challenges in Effectively Performing its Role
- Limited Powers
- NHRC can only make recommendations and lacks enforcement authority, which makes its recommendations ineffective without the government’s compliance.
- Example: Former Chief Justice of India referred to NHRC as a “toothless tiger”.
- Delays in Action
- NHRC has been criticized for delays in responding to major human rights violations.
- Example: The NHRC’s response to the 2023 Manipur riots came much later in July 2023.
- Resource Constraints
- NHRC faces significant resource limitations, both in terms of funding and staffing.
- Example: The NHRC saw a 1,455% rise in complaints from 1995 to 2015, while staffing decreased by 16.94%.
- Perceived Bias
- Allegations of NHRC’s bias due to its proximity to the government and the Home Ministry have hindered its impartiality.
- Example: The NHRC’s focus on human rights violations by police is often seen as biased, as it operates under the Home Ministry.
- Limited Powers
- Factors Hindering NHRC’s GANHRI Accreditation
- Non-Compliance with Paris Principles
- Police Officers in Investigations
- The involvement of police officers in investigating violations committed by fellow officers creates a conflict of interest.
- Police Officers in Investigations
- Issues with Composition
- NHRC’s leadership lacks gender balance and does not meet pluralism requirements, as key positions are vacant, including positions for human rights experts.
- Example: Three out of six key positions meant for human rights experts were vacant, and there is no woman in the NHRC leadership.
- Lack of Broad Consultation in Selection
- The selection committee for NHRC does not sufficiently involve civil society organizations in the appointment process, which undermines transparency and fairness.
- Non-Compliance with Paris Principles
- Conclusion
- Summarize the need for reforms in NHRC to address the above challenges.
- Highlight the importance of NHRC securing GANHRI accreditation for its credibility and effectiveness as a human rights body.
- Suggest measures to strengthen independence, enhance enforcement powers, and improve transparency and resource allocation.
Relevant Facts
- NHRC Powers and Limitations
- NHRC’s lack of enforcement authority makes it reliant on the government’s compliance.
- Delays in Action
- NHRC’s delayed response to the Manipur riots in 2023.
- Resource Constraints
- A 1,455% rise in complaints between 1995 and 2015, while NHRC staffing decreased by 16.94%.
- Perceived Bias and Influence
- Allegations of NHRC being biased due to its proximity to the Home Ministry.
- GANHRI’s Concerns
- NHRC’s failure to meet Paris Principles, including conflict of interest in police investigations and leadership composition issues.
Model Answer
Factors Hindering NHRC’s GANHRI Accreditation
NHRC has also faced difficulties in obtaining accreditation from the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) due to its non-compliance with the Paris Principles:
Conclusion
To enhance its effectiveness and secure GANHRI accreditation, NHRC must address these issues by strengthening its independence, enhancing enforcement powers, and ensuring greater transparency and resource allocation.