This is an interesting and complex question regarding the role of freebies in political campaigns and governance. Here is my perspective on it:

Reasons why political leaders focus on freebies:

• Freebies are often popular and eye-catching, promising immediate benefits to voters which can win votes.
• Providing tangible freebies is simpler to communicate and implement compared to complex policy reforms.
• There is a tendency for short-term populism over long-term, sustainable development.
• Political leaders may prioritize winning elections over prudent fiscal management.

Important sectors for free government services:

• Basic education and healthcare – Providing free access to quality education and healthcare can significantly improve human development.
• Essential utilities like water, electricity – Ensuring affordable access to these basic services is important for social welfare.
• Support for the underprivileged – Free rations, housing, skills training etc. can lift people out of poverty.

How freebies help people:

• They provide immediate financial relief and access to essential services for the poor and middle class.
• This can improve their standard of living, nutrition, education levels, and overall wellbeing.
• Freebies can also stimulate consumption and economic activity in the short-term.

Do freebies make us a superpower?

• Sustainable economic growth, technological innovation, strong institutions and governance are more important factors for becoming a superpower.
• Excessive freebies can distort market forces, discourage self-reliance, and burden government finances in the long run.
• A balanced approach combining targeted welfare with investment in human capital and productive economic sectors is needed.

Pros and cons of freebies:

Pros:

• Provide immediate relief to the underprivileged
• Can improve access to basic services
• May stimulate short-term economic activity

Cons:

• Can strain government finances and lead to fiscal deficits
• May discourage self-reliance and productivity
• Can be misused for political gains rather than genuine welfare
• Opportunity cost of funds not invested in long-term development

In conclusion, while freebies have their place in a welfare state, they should be part of a broader, balanced approach to governance and development. Overreliance on freebies without addressing structural reforms can be detrimental in the long run. A judicious mix of targeted welfare and investment in human capital & infrastructure is needed for sustainable progress.