Arif is a public servant with experience across various state public service departments and holds a qualification as a chartered accountant. During his work, which primarily involves handling monetary and budgeting matters, Arif discovers that public funds are being improperly allocated. Although he is not directly responsible for managing this aspect of the budget, he raises concerns about the redirection of funds from one budget category to another with his superior. Upon investigation, Arif learns that his superior is not only aware of the practice but also supports it.Subsequently, Arif is called for a meeting with his superior and the Head of the Department to discuss the issue. For this meeting, Arif prepares a comprehensive report detailing his observations and understanding of the problem, which he presents to his seniors.In the meeting, Arif is informed that the funds have been reallocated from low-priority areas to high-priority areas. He is also told that, due to the politically sensitive nature of the issue, the matter does not fall within his responsibilities and that he should avoid pursuing it further.The explanation given to Arif is rooted in the concern that raising questions about the government’s budgeting practices could potentially lead to political ramifications, including a negative impact on electoral outcomes if the matter were made public.

In the light of the above case, suggest measures to address the problem of politicization of bureaucracy.  (200 words)

Roadmap for Answer Writing

To effectively address the question based on the scenario involving Arif, a public servant who uncovers the misallocation of public funds, a well-structured answer must include the following key components:

1. Introduction

• Briefly introduce Arif, his professional background, and the nature of the issue at hand.
• State the main ethical dilemma Arif faces: the improper allocation of public funds and the response from his superior.

Example Introduction:

Arif is a dedicated public servant with experience across various state departments and holds a qualification as a chartered accountant. During his tenure, Arif uncovers the improper redirection of public funds between budget categories, a situation that is condoned by his superior. This raises significant ethical concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and misuse of public funds.

2. Identify Ethical Issues

• Discuss the primary ethical issues involved in the case, including misappropriation of public funds, lack of accountability, and the potential abuse of authority by the senior officials involved.
• Mention the ethical responsibility of Arif as a public servant and a chartered accountant to act with integrity, even in the face of political pressures.

Relevant Facts for Ethical Issues:

• Misappropriation of public funds: Funds are being redirected from low-priority areas to high-priority ones, which can lead to financial mismanagement and misallocation of resources.
• Lack of accountability: Arif’s superior condoning the practice shows a failure to uphold transparency and accountability, which are central to public service ethics.
• Politicization of public service: Arif is advised to refrain from pursuing the issue due to the politically sensitive nature of the situation, suggesting that political interests may be prioritized over ethical governance.

3. Evaluate the Options Available to Arif

• Discuss the options Arif has in responding to the issue:
  • Report to higher authorities or regulatory bodies (e.g., anti-corruption agencies, auditors).
  • Resign in protest to signal his disapproval of unethical practices.
  • Follow the advice of his superior to avoid political backlash and protect his career.

Relevant Facts for Evaluating Options:

• Reporting to higher authorities: Reporting the issue could lead to an investigation into the matter, although Arif risks retaliation and professional repercussions. It also ensures accountability and protection of public funds.
• Resigning in protest: This option allows Arif to distance himself from corrupt practices but leaves the issue unresolved and may hinder his professional career.
• Following superior’s advice: This would avoid conflict and potential damage to Arif’s career but compromises his personal ethics and professional responsibility.

4. Recommend the Best Course of Action

• Based on the evaluation of options, recommend the most ethical and professional course of action for Arif.
• Emphasize the importance of upholding public trust, the moral duty to report financial misconduct, and the potential long-term benefits of promoting ethical behavior in the public sector.

Example Recommendation:

Arif should report the issue to the appropriate independent authorities, such as anti-corruption agencies or the comptroller general’s office. This action would align with his professional responsibilities, help ensure the proper use of public funds, and protect the integrity of the budgeting process. Despite the risks of retaliation, taking a stand against corruption is essential for maintaining trust in public institutions.

5. Conclusion

• Summarize the importance of ethics, accountability, and transparency in the public service sector.
• Reinforce the significance of public servants like Arif adhering to ethical standards and reporting wrongdoings, even when faced with significant challenges.

Example Conclusion:
In conclusion, Arif faces a difficult decision where personal career considerations must be balanced with his moral and professional obligations. By reporting the misuse of public funds, Arif can contribute to a more transparent, accountable, and ethical public service, which is crucial for upholding the public’s trust in government institutions.

Key Points to Remember for Writing the Answer:

• Focus on ethical dilemmas, such as misuse of public funds, accountability, and the potential conflict between personal and professional responsibilities.
• Evaluate the options based on ethical reasoning, professional duty, and potential long-term consequences.
• Recommend the course of action that prioritizes public trust, accountability, and adherence to ethical standards.
• Use the case facts effectively to support arguments and provide a reasoned conclusion.