Roadmap for Answer Writing:

1. Introduction:
   • Define Conclusive Land Titling and highlight its benefits in reducing ambiguity, lowering litigation, easing business activities, facilitating infrastructure development, and curbing benami transactions.
2. Obstacles to Effective Implementation:
   • Discuss the challenges hindering the implementation of Conclusive Land Titling in India despite its advantages.
     • Records Maintenance Challenges:
       • Many title transfers are unrecorded and changes in land ownership often go undocumented.
     • Linguistic Fragmentation:
       • Existing land records are maintained in diverse scripts and languages across states, complicating land titling processes.
     • State Fiscal Capacity:
       • States may lack financial resources to support buyers in case of unclear land titles, affecting conclusive titling implementation.
     • Legal System Strain:
       • Overburdened courts face additional strain from disputes arising due to unclear land titles, potentially complicating compensation claims.
     • Lack of Accountability:
       • Involvement of non-state officials as Title Registration Officers may compromise accountability and increase vulnerability to external influences.
3. Conclusion:
   • Emphasize the critical need for enhancing land record management systems and implementing comprehensive reforms to overcome these obstacles and fully realize the benefits of Conclusive Land Titling for India’s economic growth and development.

Relevant Facts:

• Many title transfers in India are unrecorded, leading to undocumented changes in land ownership.
• Existing land records are maintained in various scripts and languages across states, complicating land titling processes.
• States may have limited financial resources to support buyers in case of unclear land titles, impacting conclusive titling implementation.
• Overburdened courts face additional challenges with disputes arising from unclear land titles, potentially complicating compensation claims.
• Involvement of non-state officials as Title Registration Officers may compromise accountability and increase vulnerability to external influences.