In this situation, the best course of action would be to choose option (c): “Approve the office note to show that you do not indulge in favoritism.”

Justification:

1. Adherence to Rules: The rules for house allotment were established for a reason: to ensure fairness and transparency in the process. Approving the office note reinforces the importance of these regulations and maintains the integrity of the system.
2. Avoiding Favoritism: By not granting special treatment to my personal secretary, I demonstrate that personal relationships do not influence professional decisions. This helps establish a culture of equity in the workplace, fostering trust among all employees.
3. Long-term Impact: While it may be tempting to prioritize a close associate in a personal matter, doing so could lead to resentment among other staff members. Upholding the rules today sets a precedent for future decisions, ensuring that all employees feel equally valued.
4. Respect for Process: The office secretariat has already examined the request and recommended following the established procedure. By aligning my actions with their recommendations, I show respect for the collective decision-making process of the office.
5. Compassionate Communication: I can still express empathy towards my personal secretary’s situation. After the decision, I can offer support or alternative solutions, such as discussing other housing options or suggesting assistance for his father’s illness.

In summary, approving the office note is the most ethical and responsible action that prioritizes fairness and maintains professional integrity.