S.N. Sen’s assertion that “the Mutiny was not inevitable in 1857 but it was inherent in the constitution of the empire” underscores the complex socio-political fabric of British India at that time. The 1857 uprising, often referred to as the Sepoy Mutiny, was a culmination of long-standing grievances rather than an inevitable event.

The British colonial policies created widespread discontent among various sections of society. The introduction of new military practices, particularly the use of cartridges rumored to be greased with cow and pig fat, deeply offended both Hindu and Muslim soldiers, leading to resentment within the army. This religious insensitivity exacerbated existing tensions and catalyzed the rebellion.

Moreover, British economic exploitation and land revenue policies created economic hardships for peasants and landlords alike. The Permanent Settlement and oppressive taxation fueled agrarian discontent, contributing to a broader sense of injustice.

Sen emphasizes that the Mutiny reflected the inherent contradictions and vulnerabilities within the British Empire’s structure. While the uprising was not predetermined, the seeds of dissent were sown by policies that alienated and marginalized various groups, including soldiers, peasants, and local rulers.

In this context, the 1857 Mutiny can be viewed as an expression of accumulated frustrations and aspirations for self-determination, rather than an isolated military insurrection. Thus, while the revolt may not have been inevitable, the systemic issues within the colonial framework made it a likely outcome of growing discontent.